|
As Wikipedia is a collaborative project, it is vital that editors show their willingness to communicate with other editors. This is done through talk pages of articles and editors and through edit summaries. You are obviously not communicating and I am the third editor whose comments here you've simply blanked. I'm now asking you to start using edit summaries and to respond to posts here and elsewhere (I note that you were asked to comment on an article talk page but didn't do so). I've no reason to think that you can't be a valuable editor except for this failure to communicate (eg it would have been reassuring if you'd read MOS:CAPS and said that you understood why I reverted your edits). But if you don't want to communicate then perhaps you don't belong here. I hope that's not the case. I'll probably block you if you carry on not communicating, and hopefully that won't happen. Dougweller ( talk) 05:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for that, I usually don't leave my talk page full, and I do want to be a good-standing member of the Wiki community. Thanks for putting my head on straight Doug! :) Senjuto ( talk) 10:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for that, I usually don't leave my talk page full, and I do want to be a good-standing member of the Wiki community. Thanks for putting my head on straight Doug! And I have come to agree with you on the Matter of MOS CAPS. Also, I am someone who likes correcting grammatical typos that pop up. :) Senjuto ( talk) 10:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Wanted to let anyone know that I made some edits of the inboxs of a few Byzantine Emperors to bring them in line with the rest. Someone changed the Palaiologos emperors from Andronikos II to Manuel II by changing them to the royalty infobox. The rest of the Byzantine emperors have the monarch infobox and its best to have them all uniform in appearance, if that is alright.
But if you want to have them reversed, I have no problem, as long as all of the Byzantine emperors from Arcadius to Constantine XI has the same infobox format. Senjuto 15:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
We don't change existing spelling in regards to American/British preferences, simply because that would lead to endless back-and-forth editing, per WP:RETAIN. Whatever the first person to write it used, we stick with that. It's not a big deal or anything, just letting you know. Cheers and happpy Wiki'ing, Herostratus ( talk) 18:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
... what you're attempting to do in this series of edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] and so on, if I had time to list them all.
It looks to me as if you're just retyping what's already there. All these articles are showing up on my watchlist that I then need to go check, since you're not leaving edit summaries. Please leave edit summaries that explain what you think you've been correcting. Cynwolfe ( talk) 17:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for not clarifying. I edited it to reduce the spaces between sentences. Senjuto 17:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Understood and duly noted Cynwolfe. Senjuto 17:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I am not trying to substitute someone's preference with my own. And I do not take credit for the content of the pages that I edit. It is not to irritate or annoy others. And I admit that only a few have grammatical errors in them that I correct. And I am saying this to you that you can undo what I did if you wish and I have mentioned it in some of my edit summaries. Senjuto 13:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for all your efforts to remove extra spaces between sentences, but it is unnecessary to do this. WP will automatically show only one space after a period (and in general, I believe), regardless of how many are entered. Try previewing a test edit with multiple spaces inserted and you will see. Hertz1888 ( talk) 15:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm entirely grateful that you've corrected some grammar on two of the Once Upon a Time articles; I'm usually editing from a NOOK so I don't see them. But I'd like to point out that in the series, Rumplestiltskin is actually the correct spelling as proven by in-episode text and what-not. You don't seem like you're going to edit the articles again, but I'd like to give you a heads up if you're ever going around correcting the spelling of Rumpelstiltskin again. Keep up the good work and thanks again! ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 21:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ernest A. Love Field may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Senjuto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Senjuto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Senjuto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Carlos Rodón, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Ok Senjuto ( talk) 02:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
As Wikipedia is a collaborative project, it is vital that editors show their willingness to communicate with other editors. This is done through talk pages of articles and editors and through edit summaries. You are obviously not communicating and I am the third editor whose comments here you've simply blanked. I'm now asking you to start using edit summaries and to respond to posts here and elsewhere (I note that you were asked to comment on an article talk page but didn't do so). I've no reason to think that you can't be a valuable editor except for this failure to communicate (eg it would have been reassuring if you'd read MOS:CAPS and said that you understood why I reverted your edits). But if you don't want to communicate then perhaps you don't belong here. I hope that's not the case. I'll probably block you if you carry on not communicating, and hopefully that won't happen. Dougweller ( talk) 05:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for that, I usually don't leave my talk page full, and I do want to be a good-standing member of the Wiki community. Thanks for putting my head on straight Doug! :) Senjuto ( talk) 10:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for that, I usually don't leave my talk page full, and I do want to be a good-standing member of the Wiki community. Thanks for putting my head on straight Doug! And I have come to agree with you on the Matter of MOS CAPS. Also, I am someone who likes correcting grammatical typos that pop up. :) Senjuto ( talk) 10:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Wanted to let anyone know that I made some edits of the inboxs of a few Byzantine Emperors to bring them in line with the rest. Someone changed the Palaiologos emperors from Andronikos II to Manuel II by changing them to the royalty infobox. The rest of the Byzantine emperors have the monarch infobox and its best to have them all uniform in appearance, if that is alright.
But if you want to have them reversed, I have no problem, as long as all of the Byzantine emperors from Arcadius to Constantine XI has the same infobox format. Senjuto 15:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
We don't change existing spelling in regards to American/British preferences, simply because that would lead to endless back-and-forth editing, per WP:RETAIN. Whatever the first person to write it used, we stick with that. It's not a big deal or anything, just letting you know. Cheers and happpy Wiki'ing, Herostratus ( talk) 18:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
... what you're attempting to do in this series of edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] and so on, if I had time to list them all.
It looks to me as if you're just retyping what's already there. All these articles are showing up on my watchlist that I then need to go check, since you're not leaving edit summaries. Please leave edit summaries that explain what you think you've been correcting. Cynwolfe ( talk) 17:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I apologize for not clarifying. I edited it to reduce the spaces between sentences. Senjuto 17:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Understood and duly noted Cynwolfe. Senjuto 17:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I am not trying to substitute someone's preference with my own. And I do not take credit for the content of the pages that I edit. It is not to irritate or annoy others. And I admit that only a few have grammatical errors in them that I correct. And I am saying this to you that you can undo what I did if you wish and I have mentioned it in some of my edit summaries. Senjuto 13:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for all your efforts to remove extra spaces between sentences, but it is unnecessary to do this. WP will automatically show only one space after a period (and in general, I believe), regardless of how many are entered. Try previewing a test edit with multiple spaces inserted and you will see. Hertz1888 ( talk) 15:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm entirely grateful that you've corrected some grammar on two of the Once Upon a Time articles; I'm usually editing from a NOOK so I don't see them. But I'd like to point out that in the series, Rumplestiltskin is actually the correct spelling as proven by in-episode text and what-not. You don't seem like you're going to edit the articles again, but I'd like to give you a heads up if you're ever going around correcting the spelling of Rumpelstiltskin again. Keep up the good work and thanks again! ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 21:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ernest A. Love Field may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Senjuto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Senjuto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Senjuto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Carlos Rodón, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
02:43, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Ok Senjuto ( talk) 02:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)