We're almost there, but we've been asked to trim the lead (now that it's merged) and remove unnecessary information. Would you mind doing the honours? I'm too fussy when it comes to that and can never know what should stay and what should go. -- linca linca 04:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply
When's the RfA coming? WHEN? WHEN? Dihydrogen Monoxide ( H2O) 08:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the comments. Would you be willing to assist me in the development? Regards, Rudget Contributions 17:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC) reply
See my last edit to the talk page. Handy trick to know. :) Orderinchaos 01:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC) reply
I've deleted other Chaser-cruft of late ( The Chaser Eulogy Song being one) and this one caught my eye as being more of the same. Perhaps the AfD was premature. I understand what you're doing now, however I won't withdraw the AfD just yet to see if anyone has any issues with the article being split up as such. -- Longhair\ talk 21:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Hello again,
Thank you very much for taking the time to revert the vandalism to my user page; why anyone would blank the page is beyond me. Cheers, -- Aarktica 22:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply
I've put up Transfusion (EP) for GA. Hope you don't mind, but I'm certain it's ready for it. There's just not THAT much more information that can be gleaned for it. -- linca linca 04:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply
I added the DYK box you suggested some time ago after ferreting about in the archives, although I didn't get round to noting it in the peer review page until now. Any other suggestions would be more than welcome. Cheers, -- Chris B • talk 11:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi. You nominated Australia Day for Australian Collaboration. It has been selected, please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks. -- Scott Davis Talk 13:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Hmm...I could look, but I'm not sure if there would be anything. You can always just try URL smashing - see Wikipedia:WikiProject Powderfinger/Fanclub for what the URL should look like. Otherwise I'll google a bit more, that's all I tried before (to no avail). Best to ask Linca, I'm quite sure he wrote it. And thanks for the DYK kudos :) Dihydrogen Monoxide ( H2O) 07:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Thank you very much. It is much appreciated. Cheers, Mattinbgn\ talk 21:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC) reply
They'd be typos then - the band calls him DiDia in all their productions. — H 2O — 02:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I was thinking that the FLC for that page should be reopened, because Circeus had just opposed the page hours ago and generally we shouldn't close pages until the nominators have had a chance to address the opposition. -- Scorpion 0422 06:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC) reply
You either voted on the original list of the day proposal or the revised version. A more modest experimental proposal is now at issue at WP:LOTDP. Feel free to voice your opinion.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC) reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mugunth_Kumar#Stop_vandalism User:Himhifi is accusing me of vandalism as I've reported him here Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism Mugunth 09:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi there,
if you would like to, please can you comment on my response to concerns about my survey attempt here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Message_from_Zhan_Li_regarding_Survey
I am contacting you as you were part of the original discussion.
thank you very much Zhan Li Zhanliusc 21:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Regarding this. Not going to revert, of course. I would however appreciate something a bit more specific. I'm fairly sure there's a good deal to criticise about my contribs and behaviour, so if you'd like to address something specific, you're absolutely welcome to do so at any time, whether in the criticism section or at my talk. — Dorftrot tel 12:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi!, I know this might seem unusual, but could you please review the article in question as the nomination ends on the 12th of november and am worried it might not get enough nominations before the deadline.
Many thanks. Marcus Bowen 13:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply
We're almost there, but we've been asked to trim the lead (now that it's merged) and remove unnecessary information. Would you mind doing the honours? I'm too fussy when it comes to that and can never know what should stay and what should go. -- linca linca 04:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply
When's the RfA coming? WHEN? WHEN? Dihydrogen Monoxide ( H2O) 08:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the comments. Would you be willing to assist me in the development? Regards, Rudget Contributions 17:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC) reply
See my last edit to the talk page. Handy trick to know. :) Orderinchaos 01:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC) reply
I've deleted other Chaser-cruft of late ( The Chaser Eulogy Song being one) and this one caught my eye as being more of the same. Perhaps the AfD was premature. I understand what you're doing now, however I won't withdraw the AfD just yet to see if anyone has any issues with the article being split up as such. -- Longhair\ talk 21:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Hello again,
Thank you very much for taking the time to revert the vandalism to my user page; why anyone would blank the page is beyond me. Cheers, -- Aarktica 22:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply
I've put up Transfusion (EP) for GA. Hope you don't mind, but I'm certain it's ready for it. There's just not THAT much more information that can be gleaned for it. -- linca linca 04:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply
I added the DYK box you suggested some time ago after ferreting about in the archives, although I didn't get round to noting it in the peer review page until now. Any other suggestions would be more than welcome. Cheers, -- Chris B • talk 11:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi. You nominated Australia Day for Australian Collaboration. It has been selected, please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks. -- Scott Davis Talk 13:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Hmm...I could look, but I'm not sure if there would be anything. You can always just try URL smashing - see Wikipedia:WikiProject Powderfinger/Fanclub for what the URL should look like. Otherwise I'll google a bit more, that's all I tried before (to no avail). Best to ask Linca, I'm quite sure he wrote it. And thanks for the DYK kudos :) Dihydrogen Monoxide ( H2O) 07:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Thank you very much. It is much appreciated. Cheers, Mattinbgn\ talk 21:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC) reply
They'd be typos then - the band calls him DiDia in all their productions. — H 2O — 02:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I was thinking that the FLC for that page should be reopened, because Circeus had just opposed the page hours ago and generally we shouldn't close pages until the nominators have had a chance to address the opposition. -- Scorpion 0422 06:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC) reply
You either voted on the original list of the day proposal or the revised version. A more modest experimental proposal is now at issue at WP:LOTDP. Feel free to voice your opinion.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC) reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Mugunth_Kumar#Stop_vandalism User:Himhifi is accusing me of vandalism as I've reported him here Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism Mugunth 09:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi there,
if you would like to, please can you comment on my response to concerns about my survey attempt here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Message_from_Zhan_Li_regarding_Survey
I am contacting you as you were part of the original discussion.
thank you very much Zhan Li Zhanliusc 21:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Regarding this. Not going to revert, of course. I would however appreciate something a bit more specific. I'm fairly sure there's a good deal to criticise about my contribs and behaviour, so if you'd like to address something specific, you're absolutely welcome to do so at any time, whether in the criticism section or at my talk. — Dorftrot tel 12:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi!, I know this might seem unusual, but could you please review the article in question as the nomination ends on the 12th of november and am worried it might not get enough nominations before the deadline.
Many thanks. Marcus Bowen 13:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply