![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A newspaper article [1] on Williams first game back also verifies baseballreference and baseball almanac that both say Williams didn't homer. If you aren't subscribed to newspapers.com, I can do screen captures for you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I'm a bl**dy idiot! Gah. And thanks for putting me straight. DBaK ( talk) 17:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
the template was moved. the old one is a redirect. see the Requested move at Template talk:Beauty and the Beast (Disney) -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 15:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
I revert your edit because my map is identical but more detailed. Kandi ( talk) 14:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Could you provide a link? Maybe reading that would help me understand. Endercase ( talk) 02:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
My source for Charlie's birthday is Charlie himself. I've been friends with him for years. Themeltingpat ( talk) 21:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Not to be rude but why did you revert it back to the previous one? Ted Turner didn't buy United Artists when he bought MGM/UA, he only bought MGM (although he did buy the a.a.p. library and Gilligan's Island and its animated spin-offs from United Artists). By removing information about Turner keeping the a.a.p. library and Gilligan's Island, it makes it sound like Turner only kept the pre-May 1986 MGM film and television library. Also, Time Warner was indeed founded in 1990, not 1989, on Time Warner's own Investors Relations Frequently Asked Questions page: "Time Inc. merged with Warner Communications Inc., on January 10, 1990, to form Time Warner Inc.". 71.95.63.155 ( talk) 22:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Personally, I don't care to use Facebook as a source, ever. In the convention market, you cannot depend on the official website to even be updated in a situation like this. Please consider reading into the AM2 convention situation a few years ago, when an active convention just ended operations while still selling tickets, and did not inform people for months. How long do you care we wait if the website isn't updated? Month, year, website disappears? Esw01407 ( talk) 16:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, about your reverts of my edit, why you can't accept the inclusion of Serbia alongside Kosovo on the table? The Republic of Kosovo is a partially-recognized state, as for example, the State of Palestine (Arab League member) or the Sahrawi Republic (African Union member), only some states recognize its sovereignity, while it's not member of any important international organization (UN, EU, OIC, OSCE...). If you want, we can add something like "Disputed territory". Regards.-- HC PUNXKID 15:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
The information about the Thomas Dixon collection does not warrant as much information as is on the page. It most certainly does not warrant a photograph and it is clear this has been added to cast the University in a negative light. Can you please tell me why you feel the need to keep putting it back up? Enh1905 ( talk) 18:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)enh1905
I am messaging to let you know that I have opened a discussion at Articles for Deletion (AfD) about the article Victorian America. As you revoked the original PROD, I thought you would wish to contribute to this discussion. MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk) 20:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Please could you explain your views on his nationality on the article talk page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 04:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Ah, actually they were "try to stop well-meaning future editors from restoring the previous mix-up" quotes. But okay, they didn't look great :) Equinox ◑ 21:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for this edit. If it happens again, you should know that it's plagiarized from copyrighted text posted here. You can request a revdel with a template or ask an admin directly to revdel. The way to tell that the WP text was copied from DeadMalls.com and not the other way around is that the text at DeadMalls was submitted in 2003 and the text in the WP article was added in 2006. 32.218.46.94 ( talk) 15:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
And how am I supposed to put a source if I don't even know how? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaimran ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Please see WP:AN3#User:ScrapIronIV reported by User:Qerinaceous (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:05, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Singing#Images for lead. —usernamekiran
(talk) 13:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Stefan Frei naturalized as a US Citizen earlier this year (see https://www.sounderatheart.com/2017/7/6/15930826/stefan-frei-national-anthem-new-us-citizen), so I believe his flag should be US now rather than Swiss in the Shutouts table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.81.81.80 ( talk) 02:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
OK! Benniejets ( talk) 21:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC) |
![]() |
Well done) Benniejets ( talk) 13:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC) |
I changed the reference to their (official) Facebook page because chipsyegypt.com is no longer online. They apparently closed the website and I'm thinking that their next most trusted source would be their *official* Facebook page. As you may well know, many businesses don't even have websites anymore and use their Facebook pages for announcements, ads, etc, instead. MatthewS. ( talk) 22:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello ScrapironIV, I'm Samuraipizzakat, the source of the information is from my 93 year old Grandmother who served with the No. 15 Operational Training Unit with the Vickers Wellington among others. Samuraipizzakat ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
The edit you reverted seems to have been copied from here, That page has a copyright notice which includes "Reproduce freely with attribution". While not an explicit cc license, I'm struggling to figure out why it would not qualify as acceptable. Any thoughts? S Philbrick (Talk) 13:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Heya,
I'm not wanting to get into an edit war on the UKIP-Police element of the Controversy section, so I've logged a note on the talk page with my reasoning. Can I get your input?
Thanks, Lkchild ( talk) 22:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
... for reverting my talk page. Typically the IP thinks that because I protected the page I am also the one that removed the material as well. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Read it first, then you will know. don't simply say that Im a Sockpuppet and not relible source. you a Insane !. Article = http://www.malaysiandefence.com/money-dont-grow-trees/ . Hawkeye Ridgesaw Summer ( talk) 15:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, User:ScrapIronIV greetings and salutations! I am the first and main editor of the page IRC(WASH), (see history) after my edits I realized there are a lot of misleading and unverified information of my edits (TOO MUCH). And it still needs time for me to make some repair over this. So I think it is better option to take that page down first before it is shown to the general audiences. If you agree with that, I will continue to put the delete template on. I am pretty confident a more reliable page will be there in a couple of days.
Faithfully, -- Dannyboi886 ( talk) 12:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear User:ScrapIronIV, how can I contact an admin and how could I make such requests? Wish you can help! Yours, -- Dannyboi886 ( talk) 13:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
User:ScrapIronIV, it seems like we are at a disagreement about parts of the history of Spartan race. You asked for references, I provided them. Then you said that those references were already disputed in the talk page, which is not the case. Obstacle Racing Media has been referenced several times in the page. If you wish to remove Obstacle Racing Media as a reputable source of citations, then we should remove all of them and any associated text.
What should we do to resolve this? I looked up this topic on several different websites to see what the public opinion was, even speaking with several Spartan Race employees, and they acknowledge that Joe Desena had cofounders. If you can come up with references that refute this information, I will gladly accept it. Jsslee ( talk) 20:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
That's her verified instagram account!! how is that not reliable? Bonaniiiia ( talk) 13:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Just a message to say thanks for the reverting of the rail image on Scotland - I had (stupidly) not realised it was a computer generated photograph. Goodreg3 ( talk) 15:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Could you explain why Brookline College is not provisionally accredited? Since it is seeking a new accreditor, it is not fully accredited.
Bcf1291 ( talk) 17:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
The last post is retained in history - it was removed as a wall of text copied from an article talk page. This issue is now resolved, and the other editor's edits were correct. Scr★pIron IV 18:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that a lot of the changes that were made to the Brookline College Wikipedia page were removed under your username. I am admittedly new to all of the formatting requirements with Wikipedia so I just want to make sure I understand what I am doing wrong there. The information that was posted is accurate, I am guessing I was incorrect in how I referenced the materials. I am not sure if this is your role, but any guidance on what I could do to make sure I am posting information in good standing would be greatly appreciated. Brookline College has programmatic accreditation that is very important to the school, in particular their nursing program, that was removed as well.
Jdon31 ( talk) 00:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Why were my edits to Jaws: The Revenge reverted? The plot, as written, is inaccurate to the movie. My edits and contribution corrected this. Vampus ( talk) 18:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
@ ScrapIronIV: Having made my edits straight after watching the film, and going back to the film as reference to confirm plot points and event ordering, I can assure you that there are inaccuracies in the plot as written that my edits corrected. For example, they don't start zapping the shark until the device is swallowed and Jake is taken at the same time (or a second later). Additionally, the device isn't a bomb, but a strobe light they rigged with a receiver that they slave to another strobe light to have it activate. Also, having re-read my version vs the original version, I would argue my edits make it clearer, in part as it removes superfluous information. Vampus ( talk) 12:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with the post. I am not sure what happened, there was much more that I had typed up and was trying to post but for some reason only part of it showed up. I am the Current Mall Manager for this location and am only trying to provide the public with the update to date information!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:301D:1F00:7100:E030:7439:4676:7856 ( talk • contribs)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Tornado chaser (
talk) 17:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey! I just wanted to take a second to thank you for your mea culpa over on 2017. I totally understand the feeling of frustration and the temptation to make a point-y edit. I certainly can't say I've never done that. And I feel like far too often, Wikipedia becomes a battleground, and that makes admitting any mistakes so hard. That's a part of the culture here that really bothers me, and that, unfortunately, I participate in far too often. Seeing someone take themselves out of that is so refreshing. And I really appreciate it. Seeing that helps me keep things in perspective, and I think it goes a long way in terms of creating a more congenial editing environment. So, again, thank you. And happy editing! Cheers, -- irn ( talk) 20:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Enjoy! Thanks for all your work thus far. Cassianto Talk 17:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I thought I added sufficient references to this page. May I ask what you need to be sourced as I am confused. Thank you. Also, what seems to be the issue in the first place? What am I taking to the talk page? Hooplamoneu89 ( talk) 17:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
It is no copyright problem, and not a POV(no influence on the neutrality). So the lyrics should not be deleted by WP:LYRICS and WP:DUE. If you insist that the lyrics is an pov, you ought to create an article, and name it as Lyrics of Menin' Qazaqstanym or some other else. Please not begin the Wikipedia:Edit warring. Thanks.
About your undo edit to the VICE column on the Zeena Schreck article - I didn't know there was mention of the column earlier in the article. (Correction: I just found where that was. Maybe it should be moved over to the bibliography section to make more sense.) Thanks! :) Got2Bthere ( talk) 23:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIronIV,
I am writing to inform you that I am eligible person to make changes in Yerevan State Medical University page as I am working in the development department. Please, do not make any changes.
Best regards,
Diana2198 — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Diana2198 (
talk •
contribs) 14:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I'd been wondering how anyone knew a pound dog's exact DOB. Anmccaff ( talk) 20:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIronIV,
Can I know the reason of deleting my edits to this page?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Anaid34 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaid34 ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIronIV,
So, if I saw that the information on the page is not full, I should discuss it in the talk page of YSMU wiki page?
Can I send some additional information to some not interested person, so that they can make changes?
Best Anaid34 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaid34 ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, ScrapIronIV. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIron,
Wishing to resolve this league of gentlemen dispute - the source for the edit restoration which keeps reverting is outdated, and not useful - it claims that in April 2017 Gatiss confirmed an anniversary special, yet the referenced article (
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2017-02-13/the-league-of-gentlemen-eyeing-20th-anniversary-reunion/) is from February 2017.
I think perhaps some confusion has arisen because of this dubious sourcing - Gatiss did state in early 2017 that they were meeting for a 20th anniversary special - although the 20th anniverary of the tv show would be in 2019, this 20th anniversary is to celebrate the show on the BBC (on radio in 1997), hence the 2017 specials ARE the 20th anniversary specials. Similarly this article only suggests they'll try and make something happen, and is lacking in specificity; as sourced content goes, it is a weak secondary source, I would say.
There is no commissioned content for 2019, 2020; these remarks in Feb/April merely announces intent to reform, and came before the BBC commissioned three specials in August 2017 ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41024660), and reece shearsmith has since announced on twitter ( https://twitter.com/ReeceShearsmith/status/935181066314375169?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitalspy.com%2Ftv%2Fnews%2Fa844054%2Fthe-league-of-gentlemen-specials-airdate-confirmed-by-reece-shearsmith%2F) the air dates of these three specials as December 2017. Unless you can find more evidence for specials in 2019 and 2020, sourced after August 2017 (I can't find any such article), I'd like to revert to my edit.
(and apologies for the bloody hell comment - that was probably partly responsible for this edit war, should've just started the talk page then instead - don't edit wiki that often, so protocol for discussing went slightly over my head, just in this case I wanted to edit it, as the information is outdated and slightly misleading, and a topic I know a lot about)
Best,
Ratto
I guess I'm bringing the veracity of that source - I guess you can sum up the point I'm trying to make in 4 main points;
1) The written wiki content says "April 2017", yet the source was written on Monday, 13th February 2017; so what is currently written in the article is incorrectly sourced.
2) The written wiki content says "Gatiss confirmed", yet the source seems to have quotes from 3/4 of the members of the league of gentlemen. Similarly, Gatiss doesn't confirm anything more than "We’re hoping to [do it again].", since this was before they had been commissioned.
3) No expected air date is really touted in the source - 2019 is mentioned as a year, but 2020 is nowhere in that RT article, so phrasing in the wiki "expected to air in 2019 or 2020" corresponds with nothing in the source.
4) This radio times source is a weak second hand source; it features a number of selective quotes, but it doesn't really give much idea of the context of conversation. Similarly all the comments are vague and non-committal, since they don't have a commission in february - and I think the point stands that as much as they say they might like to do something in 2019, that this would take the form of an annual special is pure speculation, as they do not have a commission from the BBC to do so.
Overall, I think to make the strong claim "Gatiss confirmed that the show would return for an anniversary special which was expected to air between 2019 and 2020" is not a fair representation of that source states, both given the context of its timing, and the quality of the source. Some weak claim along the lines of "Gatiss suggested that the group might do something in 2019 to celebrate 20 years since the series" would be better, but is too weak a claim for wikipedia, I'd expect.
So although it is true the new specials aren't mutually exclusive with a 2019 special, my point is that the source isn't strong enough to make the claim that there will be annual specials; and then asking about cancellation brings us into a rather Kafkaesque realm of whether you can cancel something which hasn't been commissioned? I think the further specials claim therefore either needs resourcing with a more credible source which states there will be annual specials hereafter, or else that claim be removed.
(as for the hellfire and bloody damnation comment, it made me chuckle, and was a damn sight wittier than my bloody hell! but yeah [holy] water under the bridge!) Best, Ratto
Hello there. I know YouTube isn't a reliable source, but how about when the person the article is about says it themselves? I can't get the link to work, but the title is The Last Jedi's John Boyega Goes Undercover on Reddit, Twitter & Wikipedia | Actually Me | GQ. It should show up as first search result on YouTube. Best regards, DisgustingFish ( talk) 20:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC) :)
Sorry We're not satisfied by your edits, as you're making wikipedia unauthentic by yourself that could result you to got temporarily blocked from editing for short period or could be long. let the edits remain as you're saying that it's not entertaining thing. yes it is entertaining thing and informative that you made it nonsense by making your slum edits that could result in vandalisms. Thank You
You may be temporarily blocked or i can report against you for your edits you made for Bigg Boss 11. so please let them as it is as it's currently mode as I done and stop making these articles inaccurate. CK ( talk) 15:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
If you think that wikipedia is not that please so simply visit various other wikipedia articles that relates to these shows like bigg boss 11, big brother and other reality shows related pages, and do the same as you did at Bigg Boss 11, without any harrasements apology for previous behaviour that could cause to got block from editing article for short time, so please leave the topic and if you think that the edits are wrong or accurate then it's your own intention, as there are several wikipedia pages relating shows of nominations, eliminations and votings(repeating again), where the votings, nominations and elimination summaries are still as it is as previous season of Bigg Boss 10 and furtherly have still as it is. so leave it alone. Thank You and Calm Down and once again Apology for vandalizing. CHEERS!. CK ( talk) 17:03, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thing you're trying to remove is not making any fan site as this is not only the encyclopedia, you people make encyclopedia unauthentic by removing and declaring it nonsense which is not, please let those things re added as you're trying to do on Bigg Boss 11, then do with all articles relating to Bigg Boss 10 Bigg boss 9 and so on.
Things you're trying to remove is not making it fan site as you're trying to explain. 'What wikipedia is not' is not explaining such thing you're trying to do and explain. So please let the things remain as it is and step back from this article, It's not Broken Nutshell as I know the user I've ignored Broken nutshell but I cite the things and I better know what wikipedia is, and the things you're trying to remove has to be re added as it is not making any sought of fan page. Oasis Gravel ( talk) 19:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, as a habit enforced by dyslexia, I referred to you as "Scorpion" in an edit summary in regards to the above article mentioned. I'm sure you don't care, but since I can't find a way to edit edit summaries (and I'm too neurotic to just leave it wrong) I wanted to say sorry for any confusion. Valeince ( talk) 00:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Coffee //
have a ☕️ //
beans // 05:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)ScrapIronIV ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Mea culpa; mea maxima culpa This block is absolutely correct in its application. Generally, I know better. There is no good excuse; I miscounted, and broke the bright line of WP:3RR. I should not have been editing tired, in the middle of the night, and in a bad mood. I ask for leniency, despite my two previous blocks, which were both in my first six months of editing. I apologize. I know better, and I will - as I have in the past 3 years - try not to let this happen again. Scr★pIronIV 13:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Accept reason:
@ Coffee: Coffee, as blocking administrator, I'd like to ask your opinion on lifting this block. Had I placed the block, this unblock request contains everything I'd want to see in order to lift it. If that's not convincing, perhaps an agreement to abide by 1RR for the remaining duration of the block? Anyway, you are the blocking admin and I defer to your better judgment. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I am a rower at rowamerica rye and she is one of our assistant coaches. To find a source for that will be hard because she is part time. The disqualifications were sourced by another user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metro north ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about that and thank you for giving me the outline via my talk page. I am sorry if i wasted your time. Thank you. Metro north ( talk) 21:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
A suggestion: Don't revert people who have done extensive work on an article over many months with Not an improvement. Especially when they are restoring the page to a version closer to what it had been before you put in your version. - Gothicfilm ( talk) 21:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Could you please re-insert the changes I made in order to bring my page up to date. I provided the references you asked for. Thank you Edit0695 ( talk) 23:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain to me why the alumni section is considered "soapboxing" on the Williams College page but not on the Dartmouth College, Princeton University, Brown University, Harvard University, etc. pages? Every major university / college page has a section where they summarize alumni achievements. Why shouldn't Williams have one of these? All of the information is verifiable on the List of Williams College people page. I am very confused why we can't include one for Williams. GreylockFoW ( talk) 18:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
You just reverted my recent edits to Principality of Sealand on account of notability. I recognize you have been editing much longer than I have, and thus I defer to your judgement here. However, I don't quite understand how that action was necessitated by WP:NNC and WP:UNDUE, if you wanted to drop me a line of additional explanation, that'd be appreciated, but no pressue. So you know, I had reverted your edit because you said the bit about the coin was not referenced, and I found a reference; I didn't realize notability was also an issue. Anyway, thank you for cleaning up Wikipedia, and helping junior editors such as myself. Mr.1032 ( talk) 02:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
So, apparently WP:BRD does not apply to you and you may edit war whenever you like? If you are at all familiar with those policies, then you know you should self-revert until a discussion on the matter takes place. You have only cited WP:AVIMOS, a guideline that while does state images shouldn't be included in lists, there are exceptions and they should be reviewed and discussed. You have done neither. I'm sure you're aware that alot of work went into finding and and adding those images, which only serve to greatly enhance that list. Yet, without so much as a simple attempt at a discussion on that talk page, or the Project Aviation talk, you would gleefully wipe out all that hard work. Your actions do nothing to improve this project, but at the very least, your actions should follow the policies here. You can begin by self-reverting (unless you think those images being there even a short while longer is causing some kind of significant harm?), then go and start the discussion you should have in the first place. - theWOLFchild 19:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Coffee, Yamla, sorry I'm late to the party on this, but I believe ScrapIron's edit warring was justified as an enforcement of BLP? They were removing unsourced BLP content, even if they didn't invoke the policy. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 18:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop undoing my edits there. What I put in there IS true. I even provided a link to a source that reaffirms everything.
By undoing my edits, you are only further perpetuating lies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.97.210.48 ( talk) 03:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
crime family vandal 96.19.148.120 is doing exactly the same edits as previously performed by now blocked user 96.19.159.1 Hmains ( talk) 18:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I know for a fact I was right, he is a McCarthy, on highly reliable websites, and i share the same last name and i am related to him, I hope you change it back to the truth
-T7TEEN03
Hi there,
I've started a dedicated section in the talk page. — Jerome Potts ( talk) 23:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Freddie Prinze Jr. original surname is spelled Pruetzel which is spelled in Prützel! Germans have vowels called umlaut. "ue" is spelled "ü". Please search some essentials in 101 German spelling before editing. Chem-is-try7 ( talk) 21:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (
talk) 22:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
OK, so it's not too much to get excited about, but the sub-pages certainly help to clear my shiny new user page of all the clutter. Have a great new year! Cassianto Talk 23:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award |
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 06:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours!
FWiW Bzuk (
talk) 13:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Seasons Greetings |
Christmas!
Christmas, everywhere, |
Merry Christmas ScrapIronIV
--
samtar
whisper 21:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Sir I am affiliated with Muse India and ask kindly why you continue to remove our award winner notice for Priya Sarukkai Chanri and Ravi Shankar for translation of Andal? She is respected as goddess in our country and just because book was published in India means not it is noteworthy. This is widely covered in our country sir.
http://cms.newindianexpress.com/cities/hyderabad/2018/jan/10/three-new-attractions-at-hlf-2018-1749288.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.234.194 ( talk) 13:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Did you intend for the article to have "her then-husband" in the 2018 investigation of her death, when her husband is mentioned many times?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello!
Back a year ago at this time, I made some edits to the Heartland Baptist Bible College page that were ill-advised (due to being new to editing on Wikipedia). You reverted those and talked me through why they were wrong. I appreciated the guidance! This time, I simply removed some information that was out-of-date and tied to a dead link and replaced it with information that can be easily found on the college's website. However, my edits were still reverted...
Could you please help me? I'm not trying to do anything wrong. I'm just trying to update information.
R495364r ( talk) 23:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
By the way, at first I "un-reverted" my edits that you reverted. But I didn't realize it was you. I'm not trying to be argumentative. R495364r ( talk) 23:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
One more thing... I saw that some others are making edits on the page due to "reputation." That is not the purpose of the edits I have done. I am just trying to update information. R495364r ( talk) 23:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Tilikum_(orca)&diff=824691754&oldid=824691638 This edit summary would suggest a most extraordinary misunderstanding of the core policies that we present verifiable facts neutrally. I trust that you do not genuinely believe that describing something as "notorious" is a verifiable fact, and that this was some kind of mistake. Mermaid99 ( talk) 08:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Ok The Silver Chair film was on Wikipedia but then there was an isheu with will poulter's age but his age was not Joe's only reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.71.152 ( talk) 20:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hiya, the fact that South Kesteven did not exist in his lifetime does not matter as per Wikipedia_talk:Categorization_of_people/Archive_10#Categorization_of_people_by_place... GrahamHardy ( talk) 19:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Do not leave me warnings about refactoring other people's talk page comments, when they had just deleted my talk page comment. You restored their deletion of my comment. Why? Mermaid99 ( talk) 20:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
The resolution making Goodluck Jonathan Acting President was passed by both Chambers of The National Assembly of Nigeria and not only The Senate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samson at AcademicJournals ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
In case I've reverted you somewhere - ParisClementine was a sock of DonkeyGoatFace so I've reverted some stuff to the status quo before both of them started in... I think. It kind of gets confusing when the sock and the master are arguing different sides of the edits. Cabayi ( talk) 23:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've recently spotted your edits to the articles National anthem of Mongolia and Meniń Qazaqstanym. You seem to insist removing the lyrics sections in these articles with the claim that these articles somehow violate the guidelines as presented on WP:LYRICS. I've read this through several times, and I am unable to find any condition that the given articles would violate:
Could you please clarify your stance and explain, how you see the lyrics sections of the given articles violate the contents of WP:LYRICS? SURJECTION · talk· contr· log· 18:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello ScrapIronIV. Thanks for the message. I took your comments on board and re-added the edit in a different version incl. a citation, which i had missed before. I hope this is Ok now. I am not sure what you meant by highly editorialised. The original edit was not expressing an opinion, our at least I didn't mean it to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saintandrewz ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, there is a fine line between explanation and promotion. On the citation, I thought quoting the ISBN would do it. Anyway, I'll find something else to back it up. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saintandrewz ( talk • contribs) 21:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
done. hope that works. thanks, SZaintandrewz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saintandrewz ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Nitin23000#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft%3ANitin_Rai
If your saying that the content which i use is copied from other website for this article, so i wanna make this clear that nitinrai.com is website of Nitin Rai a photographer for which i written this article and he is a professional photographer of our fashion and media industry. Please kindly approve this article or if you want to write about Nitin Rai on wikipedia you can write, Please its a humble request for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitin23000 ( talk • contribs) 05:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
I do not know how to support my changes to the article with a citation to a reliable source, even though I shared something from a reliable source.
I hope we can somehow work together to make the edit correctly because I do not like it when inaccuracies get spread. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duke Remington ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Could you please provide a little more context with regard to the reverting of my addition of business uses of artificial intelligence? All your comments states is "promotional". I am not sure what you feel was promotional about it. Thanks. OrdinaryArtery ( talk) 21:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey Scrap. Saw your revert on the Shmuly Yanklowitz page (I'm sure you took a peek at the talk page discussion too). Would like to hear more of your thoughts here, and your reasoning for the revert. Thank you! Dtj16 ( talk) 18:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Scrap. Can you please respond to my inquiry? Thanks. Dtj16 ( talk) 21:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
hi , recently you have undid my change of pic of a person. i have uploaded the pic of jasmin walia coz she dont want that current pic appear to the result so she has given me authority to change the pic on her behalf (she is an celebrity) thats why i am trying to change the pic but everytime you people give different different reason, earlier with other pic they said it cant be used coz it has been used before on other website, and now when i uploade fresh pic which has never been used then you saying its conflicting, i want this new pic in infobox please understand and do the changes, coz is affecting the person. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpeshpandey09 ( talk • contribs) 16:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
omg keep it stands — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btreadaway23 ( talk • contribs) 22:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
It Looks Good Today Don't Reverse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btreadaway23 ( talk • contribs) 00:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A newspaper article [1] on Williams first game back also verifies baseballreference and baseball almanac that both say Williams didn't homer. If you aren't subscribed to newspapers.com, I can do screen captures for you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I'm a bl**dy idiot! Gah. And thanks for putting me straight. DBaK ( talk) 17:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
the template was moved. the old one is a redirect. see the Requested move at Template talk:Beauty and the Beast (Disney) -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 15:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
I revert your edit because my map is identical but more detailed. Kandi ( talk) 14:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Could you provide a link? Maybe reading that would help me understand. Endercase ( talk) 02:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
My source for Charlie's birthday is Charlie himself. I've been friends with him for years. Themeltingpat ( talk) 21:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Not to be rude but why did you revert it back to the previous one? Ted Turner didn't buy United Artists when he bought MGM/UA, he only bought MGM (although he did buy the a.a.p. library and Gilligan's Island and its animated spin-offs from United Artists). By removing information about Turner keeping the a.a.p. library and Gilligan's Island, it makes it sound like Turner only kept the pre-May 1986 MGM film and television library. Also, Time Warner was indeed founded in 1990, not 1989, on Time Warner's own Investors Relations Frequently Asked Questions page: "Time Inc. merged with Warner Communications Inc., on January 10, 1990, to form Time Warner Inc.". 71.95.63.155 ( talk) 22:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Personally, I don't care to use Facebook as a source, ever. In the convention market, you cannot depend on the official website to even be updated in a situation like this. Please consider reading into the AM2 convention situation a few years ago, when an active convention just ended operations while still selling tickets, and did not inform people for months. How long do you care we wait if the website isn't updated? Month, year, website disappears? Esw01407 ( talk) 16:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, about your reverts of my edit, why you can't accept the inclusion of Serbia alongside Kosovo on the table? The Republic of Kosovo is a partially-recognized state, as for example, the State of Palestine (Arab League member) or the Sahrawi Republic (African Union member), only some states recognize its sovereignity, while it's not member of any important international organization (UN, EU, OIC, OSCE...). If you want, we can add something like "Disputed territory". Regards.-- HC PUNXKID 15:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
The information about the Thomas Dixon collection does not warrant as much information as is on the page. It most certainly does not warrant a photograph and it is clear this has been added to cast the University in a negative light. Can you please tell me why you feel the need to keep putting it back up? Enh1905 ( talk) 18:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)enh1905
I am messaging to let you know that I have opened a discussion at Articles for Deletion (AfD) about the article Victorian America. As you revoked the original PROD, I thought you would wish to contribute to this discussion. MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk) 20:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Please could you explain your views on his nationality on the article talk page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 04:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Ah, actually they were "try to stop well-meaning future editors from restoring the previous mix-up" quotes. But okay, they didn't look great :) Equinox ◑ 21:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for this edit. If it happens again, you should know that it's plagiarized from copyrighted text posted here. You can request a revdel with a template or ask an admin directly to revdel. The way to tell that the WP text was copied from DeadMalls.com and not the other way around is that the text at DeadMalls was submitted in 2003 and the text in the WP article was added in 2006. 32.218.46.94 ( talk) 15:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
And how am I supposed to put a source if I don't even know how? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaimran ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Please see WP:AN3#User:ScrapIronIV reported by User:Qerinaceous (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:05, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Singing#Images for lead. —usernamekiran
(talk) 13:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Stefan Frei naturalized as a US Citizen earlier this year (see https://www.sounderatheart.com/2017/7/6/15930826/stefan-frei-national-anthem-new-us-citizen), so I believe his flag should be US now rather than Swiss in the Shutouts table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.81.81.80 ( talk) 02:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
OK! Benniejets ( talk) 21:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC) |
![]() |
Well done) Benniejets ( talk) 13:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC) |
I changed the reference to their (official) Facebook page because chipsyegypt.com is no longer online. They apparently closed the website and I'm thinking that their next most trusted source would be their *official* Facebook page. As you may well know, many businesses don't even have websites anymore and use their Facebook pages for announcements, ads, etc, instead. MatthewS. ( talk) 22:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello ScrapironIV, I'm Samuraipizzakat, the source of the information is from my 93 year old Grandmother who served with the No. 15 Operational Training Unit with the Vickers Wellington among others. Samuraipizzakat ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
The edit you reverted seems to have been copied from here, That page has a copyright notice which includes "Reproduce freely with attribution". While not an explicit cc license, I'm struggling to figure out why it would not qualify as acceptable. Any thoughts? S Philbrick (Talk) 13:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Heya,
I'm not wanting to get into an edit war on the UKIP-Police element of the Controversy section, so I've logged a note on the talk page with my reasoning. Can I get your input?
Thanks, Lkchild ( talk) 22:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
... for reverting my talk page. Typically the IP thinks that because I protected the page I am also the one that removed the material as well. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Read it first, then you will know. don't simply say that Im a Sockpuppet and not relible source. you a Insane !. Article = http://www.malaysiandefence.com/money-dont-grow-trees/ . Hawkeye Ridgesaw Summer ( talk) 15:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, User:ScrapIronIV greetings and salutations! I am the first and main editor of the page IRC(WASH), (see history) after my edits I realized there are a lot of misleading and unverified information of my edits (TOO MUCH). And it still needs time for me to make some repair over this. So I think it is better option to take that page down first before it is shown to the general audiences. If you agree with that, I will continue to put the delete template on. I am pretty confident a more reliable page will be there in a couple of days.
Faithfully, -- Dannyboi886 ( talk) 12:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear User:ScrapIronIV, how can I contact an admin and how could I make such requests? Wish you can help! Yours, -- Dannyboi886 ( talk) 13:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
User:ScrapIronIV, it seems like we are at a disagreement about parts of the history of Spartan race. You asked for references, I provided them. Then you said that those references were already disputed in the talk page, which is not the case. Obstacle Racing Media has been referenced several times in the page. If you wish to remove Obstacle Racing Media as a reputable source of citations, then we should remove all of them and any associated text.
What should we do to resolve this? I looked up this topic on several different websites to see what the public opinion was, even speaking with several Spartan Race employees, and they acknowledge that Joe Desena had cofounders. If you can come up with references that refute this information, I will gladly accept it. Jsslee ( talk) 20:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
That's her verified instagram account!! how is that not reliable? Bonaniiiia ( talk) 13:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Just a message to say thanks for the reverting of the rail image on Scotland - I had (stupidly) not realised it was a computer generated photograph. Goodreg3 ( talk) 15:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Could you explain why Brookline College is not provisionally accredited? Since it is seeking a new accreditor, it is not fully accredited.
Bcf1291 ( talk) 17:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
The last post is retained in history - it was removed as a wall of text copied from an article talk page. This issue is now resolved, and the other editor's edits were correct. Scr★pIron IV 18:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that a lot of the changes that were made to the Brookline College Wikipedia page were removed under your username. I am admittedly new to all of the formatting requirements with Wikipedia so I just want to make sure I understand what I am doing wrong there. The information that was posted is accurate, I am guessing I was incorrect in how I referenced the materials. I am not sure if this is your role, but any guidance on what I could do to make sure I am posting information in good standing would be greatly appreciated. Brookline College has programmatic accreditation that is very important to the school, in particular their nursing program, that was removed as well.
Jdon31 ( talk) 00:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Why were my edits to Jaws: The Revenge reverted? The plot, as written, is inaccurate to the movie. My edits and contribution corrected this. Vampus ( talk) 18:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
@ ScrapIronIV: Having made my edits straight after watching the film, and going back to the film as reference to confirm plot points and event ordering, I can assure you that there are inaccuracies in the plot as written that my edits corrected. For example, they don't start zapping the shark until the device is swallowed and Jake is taken at the same time (or a second later). Additionally, the device isn't a bomb, but a strobe light they rigged with a receiver that they slave to another strobe light to have it activate. Also, having re-read my version vs the original version, I would argue my edits make it clearer, in part as it removes superfluous information. Vampus ( talk) 12:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with the post. I am not sure what happened, there was much more that I had typed up and was trying to post but for some reason only part of it showed up. I am the Current Mall Manager for this location and am only trying to provide the public with the update to date information!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:301D:1F00:7100:E030:7439:4676:7856 ( talk • contribs)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Tornado chaser (
talk) 17:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey! I just wanted to take a second to thank you for your mea culpa over on 2017. I totally understand the feeling of frustration and the temptation to make a point-y edit. I certainly can't say I've never done that. And I feel like far too often, Wikipedia becomes a battleground, and that makes admitting any mistakes so hard. That's a part of the culture here that really bothers me, and that, unfortunately, I participate in far too often. Seeing someone take themselves out of that is so refreshing. And I really appreciate it. Seeing that helps me keep things in perspective, and I think it goes a long way in terms of creating a more congenial editing environment. So, again, thank you. And happy editing! Cheers, -- irn ( talk) 20:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Enjoy! Thanks for all your work thus far. Cassianto Talk 17:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I thought I added sufficient references to this page. May I ask what you need to be sourced as I am confused. Thank you. Also, what seems to be the issue in the first place? What am I taking to the talk page? Hooplamoneu89 ( talk) 17:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
It is no copyright problem, and not a POV(no influence on the neutrality). So the lyrics should not be deleted by WP:LYRICS and WP:DUE. If you insist that the lyrics is an pov, you ought to create an article, and name it as Lyrics of Menin' Qazaqstanym or some other else. Please not begin the Wikipedia:Edit warring. Thanks.
About your undo edit to the VICE column on the Zeena Schreck article - I didn't know there was mention of the column earlier in the article. (Correction: I just found where that was. Maybe it should be moved over to the bibliography section to make more sense.) Thanks! :) Got2Bthere ( talk) 23:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIronIV,
I am writing to inform you that I am eligible person to make changes in Yerevan State Medical University page as I am working in the development department. Please, do not make any changes.
Best regards,
Diana2198 — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Diana2198 (
talk •
contribs) 14:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I'd been wondering how anyone knew a pound dog's exact DOB. Anmccaff ( talk) 20:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIronIV,
Can I know the reason of deleting my edits to this page?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Anaid34 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaid34 ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIronIV,
So, if I saw that the information on the page is not full, I should discuss it in the talk page of YSMU wiki page?
Can I send some additional information to some not interested person, so that they can make changes?
Best Anaid34 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaid34 ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, ScrapIronIV. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Dear ScrapIron,
Wishing to resolve this league of gentlemen dispute - the source for the edit restoration which keeps reverting is outdated, and not useful - it claims that in April 2017 Gatiss confirmed an anniversary special, yet the referenced article (
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2017-02-13/the-league-of-gentlemen-eyeing-20th-anniversary-reunion/) is from February 2017.
I think perhaps some confusion has arisen because of this dubious sourcing - Gatiss did state in early 2017 that they were meeting for a 20th anniversary special - although the 20th anniverary of the tv show would be in 2019, this 20th anniversary is to celebrate the show on the BBC (on radio in 1997), hence the 2017 specials ARE the 20th anniversary specials. Similarly this article only suggests they'll try and make something happen, and is lacking in specificity; as sourced content goes, it is a weak secondary source, I would say.
There is no commissioned content for 2019, 2020; these remarks in Feb/April merely announces intent to reform, and came before the BBC commissioned three specials in August 2017 ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41024660), and reece shearsmith has since announced on twitter ( https://twitter.com/ReeceShearsmith/status/935181066314375169?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitalspy.com%2Ftv%2Fnews%2Fa844054%2Fthe-league-of-gentlemen-specials-airdate-confirmed-by-reece-shearsmith%2F) the air dates of these three specials as December 2017. Unless you can find more evidence for specials in 2019 and 2020, sourced after August 2017 (I can't find any such article), I'd like to revert to my edit.
(and apologies for the bloody hell comment - that was probably partly responsible for this edit war, should've just started the talk page then instead - don't edit wiki that often, so protocol for discussing went slightly over my head, just in this case I wanted to edit it, as the information is outdated and slightly misleading, and a topic I know a lot about)
Best,
Ratto
I guess I'm bringing the veracity of that source - I guess you can sum up the point I'm trying to make in 4 main points;
1) The written wiki content says "April 2017", yet the source was written on Monday, 13th February 2017; so what is currently written in the article is incorrectly sourced.
2) The written wiki content says "Gatiss confirmed", yet the source seems to have quotes from 3/4 of the members of the league of gentlemen. Similarly, Gatiss doesn't confirm anything more than "We’re hoping to [do it again].", since this was before they had been commissioned.
3) No expected air date is really touted in the source - 2019 is mentioned as a year, but 2020 is nowhere in that RT article, so phrasing in the wiki "expected to air in 2019 or 2020" corresponds with nothing in the source.
4) This radio times source is a weak second hand source; it features a number of selective quotes, but it doesn't really give much idea of the context of conversation. Similarly all the comments are vague and non-committal, since they don't have a commission in february - and I think the point stands that as much as they say they might like to do something in 2019, that this would take the form of an annual special is pure speculation, as they do not have a commission from the BBC to do so.
Overall, I think to make the strong claim "Gatiss confirmed that the show would return for an anniversary special which was expected to air between 2019 and 2020" is not a fair representation of that source states, both given the context of its timing, and the quality of the source. Some weak claim along the lines of "Gatiss suggested that the group might do something in 2019 to celebrate 20 years since the series" would be better, but is too weak a claim for wikipedia, I'd expect.
So although it is true the new specials aren't mutually exclusive with a 2019 special, my point is that the source isn't strong enough to make the claim that there will be annual specials; and then asking about cancellation brings us into a rather Kafkaesque realm of whether you can cancel something which hasn't been commissioned? I think the further specials claim therefore either needs resourcing with a more credible source which states there will be annual specials hereafter, or else that claim be removed.
(as for the hellfire and bloody damnation comment, it made me chuckle, and was a damn sight wittier than my bloody hell! but yeah [holy] water under the bridge!) Best, Ratto
Hello there. I know YouTube isn't a reliable source, but how about when the person the article is about says it themselves? I can't get the link to work, but the title is The Last Jedi's John Boyega Goes Undercover on Reddit, Twitter & Wikipedia | Actually Me | GQ. It should show up as first search result on YouTube. Best regards, DisgustingFish ( talk) 20:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC) :)
Sorry We're not satisfied by your edits, as you're making wikipedia unauthentic by yourself that could result you to got temporarily blocked from editing for short period or could be long. let the edits remain as you're saying that it's not entertaining thing. yes it is entertaining thing and informative that you made it nonsense by making your slum edits that could result in vandalisms. Thank You
You may be temporarily blocked or i can report against you for your edits you made for Bigg Boss 11. so please let them as it is as it's currently mode as I done and stop making these articles inaccurate. CK ( talk) 15:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
If you think that wikipedia is not that please so simply visit various other wikipedia articles that relates to these shows like bigg boss 11, big brother and other reality shows related pages, and do the same as you did at Bigg Boss 11, without any harrasements apology for previous behaviour that could cause to got block from editing article for short time, so please leave the topic and if you think that the edits are wrong or accurate then it's your own intention, as there are several wikipedia pages relating shows of nominations, eliminations and votings(repeating again), where the votings, nominations and elimination summaries are still as it is as previous season of Bigg Boss 10 and furtherly have still as it is. so leave it alone. Thank You and Calm Down and once again Apology for vandalizing. CHEERS!. CK ( talk) 17:03, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thing you're trying to remove is not making any fan site as this is not only the encyclopedia, you people make encyclopedia unauthentic by removing and declaring it nonsense which is not, please let those things re added as you're trying to do on Bigg Boss 11, then do with all articles relating to Bigg Boss 10 Bigg boss 9 and so on.
Things you're trying to remove is not making it fan site as you're trying to explain. 'What wikipedia is not' is not explaining such thing you're trying to do and explain. So please let the things remain as it is and step back from this article, It's not Broken Nutshell as I know the user I've ignored Broken nutshell but I cite the things and I better know what wikipedia is, and the things you're trying to remove has to be re added as it is not making any sought of fan page. Oasis Gravel ( talk) 19:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, as a habit enforced by dyslexia, I referred to you as "Scorpion" in an edit summary in regards to the above article mentioned. I'm sure you don't care, but since I can't find a way to edit edit summaries (and I'm too neurotic to just leave it wrong) I wanted to say sorry for any confusion. Valeince ( talk) 00:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Coffee //
have a ☕️ //
beans // 05:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)ScrapIronIV ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Mea culpa; mea maxima culpa This block is absolutely correct in its application. Generally, I know better. There is no good excuse; I miscounted, and broke the bright line of WP:3RR. I should not have been editing tired, in the middle of the night, and in a bad mood. I ask for leniency, despite my two previous blocks, which were both in my first six months of editing. I apologize. I know better, and I will - as I have in the past 3 years - try not to let this happen again. Scr★pIronIV 13:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Accept reason:
@ Coffee: Coffee, as blocking administrator, I'd like to ask your opinion on lifting this block. Had I placed the block, this unblock request contains everything I'd want to see in order to lift it. If that's not convincing, perhaps an agreement to abide by 1RR for the remaining duration of the block? Anyway, you are the blocking admin and I defer to your better judgment. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I am a rower at rowamerica rye and she is one of our assistant coaches. To find a source for that will be hard because she is part time. The disqualifications were sourced by another user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metro north ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about that and thank you for giving me the outline via my talk page. I am sorry if i wasted your time. Thank you. Metro north ( talk) 21:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
A suggestion: Don't revert people who have done extensive work on an article over many months with Not an improvement. Especially when they are restoring the page to a version closer to what it had been before you put in your version. - Gothicfilm ( talk) 21:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Could you please re-insert the changes I made in order to bring my page up to date. I provided the references you asked for. Thank you Edit0695 ( talk) 23:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Can you explain to me why the alumni section is considered "soapboxing" on the Williams College page but not on the Dartmouth College, Princeton University, Brown University, Harvard University, etc. pages? Every major university / college page has a section where they summarize alumni achievements. Why shouldn't Williams have one of these? All of the information is verifiable on the List of Williams College people page. I am very confused why we can't include one for Williams. GreylockFoW ( talk) 18:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
You just reverted my recent edits to Principality of Sealand on account of notability. I recognize you have been editing much longer than I have, and thus I defer to your judgement here. However, I don't quite understand how that action was necessitated by WP:NNC and WP:UNDUE, if you wanted to drop me a line of additional explanation, that'd be appreciated, but no pressue. So you know, I had reverted your edit because you said the bit about the coin was not referenced, and I found a reference; I didn't realize notability was also an issue. Anyway, thank you for cleaning up Wikipedia, and helping junior editors such as myself. Mr.1032 ( talk) 02:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
So, apparently WP:BRD does not apply to you and you may edit war whenever you like? If you are at all familiar with those policies, then you know you should self-revert until a discussion on the matter takes place. You have only cited WP:AVIMOS, a guideline that while does state images shouldn't be included in lists, there are exceptions and they should be reviewed and discussed. You have done neither. I'm sure you're aware that alot of work went into finding and and adding those images, which only serve to greatly enhance that list. Yet, without so much as a simple attempt at a discussion on that talk page, or the Project Aviation talk, you would gleefully wipe out all that hard work. Your actions do nothing to improve this project, but at the very least, your actions should follow the policies here. You can begin by self-reverting (unless you think those images being there even a short while longer is causing some kind of significant harm?), then go and start the discussion you should have in the first place. - theWOLFchild 19:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Coffee, Yamla, sorry I'm late to the party on this, but I believe ScrapIron's edit warring was justified as an enforcement of BLP? They were removing unsourced BLP content, even if they didn't invoke the policy. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 18:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop undoing my edits there. What I put in there IS true. I even provided a link to a source that reaffirms everything.
By undoing my edits, you are only further perpetuating lies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.97.210.48 ( talk) 03:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
crime family vandal 96.19.148.120 is doing exactly the same edits as previously performed by now blocked user 96.19.159.1 Hmains ( talk) 18:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I know for a fact I was right, he is a McCarthy, on highly reliable websites, and i share the same last name and i am related to him, I hope you change it back to the truth
-T7TEEN03
Hi there,
I've started a dedicated section in the talk page. — Jerome Potts ( talk) 23:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Freddie Prinze Jr. original surname is spelled Pruetzel which is spelled in Prützel! Germans have vowels called umlaut. "ue" is spelled "ü". Please search some essentials in 101 German spelling before editing. Chem-is-try7 ( talk) 21:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (
talk) 22:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
OK, so it's not too much to get excited about, but the sub-pages certainly help to clear my shiny new user page of all the clutter. Have a great new year! Cassianto Talk 23:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award |
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 06:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours!
FWiW Bzuk (
talk) 13:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Seasons Greetings |
Christmas!
Christmas, everywhere, |
Merry Christmas ScrapIronIV
--
samtar
whisper 21:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Sir I am affiliated with Muse India and ask kindly why you continue to remove our award winner notice for Priya Sarukkai Chanri and Ravi Shankar for translation of Andal? She is respected as goddess in our country and just because book was published in India means not it is noteworthy. This is widely covered in our country sir.
http://cms.newindianexpress.com/cities/hyderabad/2018/jan/10/three-new-attractions-at-hlf-2018-1749288.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.234.194 ( talk) 13:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Did you intend for the article to have "her then-husband" in the 2018 investigation of her death, when her husband is mentioned many times?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello!
Back a year ago at this time, I made some edits to the Heartland Baptist Bible College page that were ill-advised (due to being new to editing on Wikipedia). You reverted those and talked me through why they were wrong. I appreciated the guidance! This time, I simply removed some information that was out-of-date and tied to a dead link and replaced it with information that can be easily found on the college's website. However, my edits were still reverted...
Could you please help me? I'm not trying to do anything wrong. I'm just trying to update information.
R495364r ( talk) 23:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
By the way, at first I "un-reverted" my edits that you reverted. But I didn't realize it was you. I'm not trying to be argumentative. R495364r ( talk) 23:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
One more thing... I saw that some others are making edits on the page due to "reputation." That is not the purpose of the edits I have done. I am just trying to update information. R495364r ( talk) 23:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Tilikum_(orca)&diff=824691754&oldid=824691638 This edit summary would suggest a most extraordinary misunderstanding of the core policies that we present verifiable facts neutrally. I trust that you do not genuinely believe that describing something as "notorious" is a verifiable fact, and that this was some kind of mistake. Mermaid99 ( talk) 08:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Ok The Silver Chair film was on Wikipedia but then there was an isheu with will poulter's age but his age was not Joe's only reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.71.152 ( talk) 20:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Hiya, the fact that South Kesteven did not exist in his lifetime does not matter as per Wikipedia_talk:Categorization_of_people/Archive_10#Categorization_of_people_by_place... GrahamHardy ( talk) 19:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Do not leave me warnings about refactoring other people's talk page comments, when they had just deleted my talk page comment. You restored their deletion of my comment. Why? Mermaid99 ( talk) 20:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
The resolution making Goodluck Jonathan Acting President was passed by both Chambers of The National Assembly of Nigeria and not only The Senate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samson at AcademicJournals ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
In case I've reverted you somewhere - ParisClementine was a sock of DonkeyGoatFace so I've reverted some stuff to the status quo before both of them started in... I think. It kind of gets confusing when the sock and the master are arguing different sides of the edits. Cabayi ( talk) 23:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've recently spotted your edits to the articles National anthem of Mongolia and Meniń Qazaqstanym. You seem to insist removing the lyrics sections in these articles with the claim that these articles somehow violate the guidelines as presented on WP:LYRICS. I've read this through several times, and I am unable to find any condition that the given articles would violate:
Could you please clarify your stance and explain, how you see the lyrics sections of the given articles violate the contents of WP:LYRICS? SURJECTION · talk· contr· log· 18:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello ScrapIronIV. Thanks for the message. I took your comments on board and re-added the edit in a different version incl. a citation, which i had missed before. I hope this is Ok now. I am not sure what you meant by highly editorialised. The original edit was not expressing an opinion, our at least I didn't mean it to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saintandrewz ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, there is a fine line between explanation and promotion. On the citation, I thought quoting the ISBN would do it. Anyway, I'll find something else to back it up. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saintandrewz ( talk • contribs) 21:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
done. hope that works. thanks, SZaintandrewz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saintandrewz ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Nitin23000#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft%3ANitin_Rai
If your saying that the content which i use is copied from other website for this article, so i wanna make this clear that nitinrai.com is website of Nitin Rai a photographer for which i written this article and he is a professional photographer of our fashion and media industry. Please kindly approve this article or if you want to write about Nitin Rai on wikipedia you can write, Please its a humble request for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitin23000 ( talk • contribs) 05:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
I do not know how to support my changes to the article with a citation to a reliable source, even though I shared something from a reliable source.
I hope we can somehow work together to make the edit correctly because I do not like it when inaccuracies get spread. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duke Remington ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Could you please provide a little more context with regard to the reverting of my addition of business uses of artificial intelligence? All your comments states is "promotional". I am not sure what you feel was promotional about it. Thanks. OrdinaryArtery ( talk) 21:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey Scrap. Saw your revert on the Shmuly Yanklowitz page (I'm sure you took a peek at the talk page discussion too). Would like to hear more of your thoughts here, and your reasoning for the revert. Thank you! Dtj16 ( talk) 18:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Scrap. Can you please respond to my inquiry? Thanks. Dtj16 ( talk) 21:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
hi , recently you have undid my change of pic of a person. i have uploaded the pic of jasmin walia coz she dont want that current pic appear to the result so she has given me authority to change the pic on her behalf (she is an celebrity) thats why i am trying to change the pic but everytime you people give different different reason, earlier with other pic they said it cant be used coz it has been used before on other website, and now when i uploade fresh pic which has never been used then you saying its conflicting, i want this new pic in infobox please understand and do the changes, coz is affecting the person. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpeshpandey09 ( talk • contribs) 16:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
omg keep it stands — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btreadaway23 ( talk • contribs) 22:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
It Looks Good Today Don't Reverse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btreadaway23 ( talk • contribs) 00:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)