![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Death's Apprentice, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, MrX
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Unfortunately my "edit" of the remington NMA article didn't really come across as intended. The system has greatly complicated uploading pictures and somehow, the caption didnt' make it to the article. Basically, the picture shows a 45 colt R&D conversion cylinder group at 12 0'clock and a ball/fffg group to the right both fired one-handed from 25 yards. User:Michael E. Cumpston (talk | contribs) at 09:08, February 4, 2014
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prostitution Research and Education (organization) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostitution Research and Education (organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 04:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Misty Dawn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Holmes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I recommend you bring those sources to the Reliable Sources noticeboard and ask if they are considered reliable for sourcing information about someone's comedy career. That will put this whole thing to rest. They're either good or they aren't. Kindzmarauli ( talk) 13:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (
talk)
20:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pornography#Belle_Knox.2C_revisited. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.
Spartaz
Humbug!
18:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebecca Bardoux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Thomas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, notifying all previous talk participants of an RfC: Talk:Rebecca_Bardoux#RfC: Should the article mention her comedy career? -- Green C 13:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michelle Thomas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A few days ago you removed a quote from WP:NPA. I unintentionally reverted it while reverting a block of edits by another user (and then get distracted by a dispute, so I never got round to checking whether your edit should be restored). Sorry about that, and please feel free to remove the quote again. Personally I fully agree that it doesn't belong (though I haven't yet read the full discussion so I might later change my mind, but in any case it's not something I feel strongly about). Unfortunately since I accidentally restored the quote another user has added in references, etc, so he may not be too happy about you removing them. I'm also going to leave a copy of this in the discussion on the NPA Talk page. Once again my apologies. Tlhslobus ( talk) 20:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Having thought about it more I decided that I did feel strongly about it after all, and that it should definitely go, so I've deleted it myself, giving reasons in Talk. Tlhslobus ( talk) 21:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
What happened to your self-imposed interaction ban? Removing the Eleanor Roosevelt quote [3] - which Drmies restored less than two months ago [4] - from the NPA article, which I'm in the middle of working on, is adding to the stalked feeling I have gotten from you before. Would you mind - please? Lightbreather ( talk) 19:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Folks, before things get out of hand (which is the tendency in matters related to LB and myself), until her posting here there was no interaction between LB and myself regarding the NPA page. The page is on my Watchlist and I noticed some changes. When I visited the page I saw the quote and it was my understanding that via Talk page discussion that it was better to not have any quote, Roosevelt attributed or not, on a Wikipedia Policy page. The closest thing that came to "interaction" was me clicking the "Thank you" link on one of LBs edits, so if THAT is the basis for her feeling uneasy about my presence, I promise to never do it again. My apology for what I consider a fairly minor attempt at being cordial. -- Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 15:36, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
I have asked at ANI to have an administrator evaluate your conduct: [5] -- Lightbreather ( talk) 22:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Please read the NYT article. 216.120.170.5 ( talk) 22:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dylan Ryder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if you saw but the Belle Knox article was relisted at DRV. Gaijin42 ( talk) 15:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Porn and BLP, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
User:TransporterMan (
talk)
16:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amia Miley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cheri and Evil Angel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Why did you just undo edits that removed inappropriate BLP material and fixed formatting issues?
Note that just because something is properly sourced, it doesn't mean it's correct to include it. In this context the article implied a correlation between a campaign donation and a piece of legislation, even though there's no evidence such a correlation exists. It used unencyclopedic language like "generous." Please stop reflexively reverting needed changes.
107.72.162.96 ( talk) 17:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 30, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, S Philbrick (Talk) 01:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC) -- S Philbrick (Talk) 01:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Please start your own section on the ARBCOM evidence page. You are not supposed to edit other users' sections in any way, even to reply to them. See the infobox at the top of the evidence page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 17:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for not accepting these edits. Such nonsense makes WP look bad. I'm glad I asked for Pending Revision protection.~ Technophant ( talk) 21:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
References
I just accepted the edit you resubmitted. It was caught up in a change of unsourced edits that the WP system bundled together. The best way to prevent this in the future is to register an account and login when making your edits. Thank you for your contributions. Regards, -- Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 21:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Game (Queen album). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
I didn't see too much before 13 October so I probably wouldn't have gone for much longer. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tori Welles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scrubs, Evil Angel and VCA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:39, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
This edit has been reverted as there cannot be two parent companies. Can you please be more careful when checking pendind edits.? Thanks.-- Jetstreamer Talk 12:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
It is part of the admin package and not a separate thing. Sorry. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Not sure why you reverted my copyediting changes. You yourself are a member of GOCE, you know that we want to move away from one-sentence paragraphs among other things.-- Aichik ( talk) 20:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the text removal, it was the result of an edit conflict and then there were further edits before I could restore it. Artw ( talk) 19:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Did you read the source? "There the plant was first cultivated, in Arusi and Ilta-Gallas home of the Galla warriors" Benjamin Storm ( talk)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Raymond Loewy may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
October 4 may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Turner's own words were "I lost my fortune, most of it. Got a million or two left.". [6] I will not deny I made some typos and edited them, but the truth about his fortune needs to known. The Forbes report is inaccurate. 184.97.194.191 ( talk) 23:38, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Have you read the source I cited? The words came from Turner himself during the Piers Morgan episode. The article you cited sources the Forbes article as well. It's no wonder why Wikipedia is dying off. [8] 184.97.194.191 ( talk) 23:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Person of Interest (TV series). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I am still keeping the sources, just condensing all of them into one general reference at the top of the air date column. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/FAQ#Verifiability for more information. They're unnecessary because if you want to know what happens in an episode, then . Dcbanners ( talk) 13:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive about
ownership of articles, which you showed at
Sonic Boom (TV series). The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Dcbanners (
talk)
17:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ''high water mark''. Since you had some involvement with the 'high water mark' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You reverted my edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Velupillai_Prabhakaran&oldid=635496918
I would like you to read :- http://idsa.in/idsacomments/AnappraisalofNorwaysRoleinSriLanka_hdayaratne_030211.html
Further , your full Wikipedia article is not full of references.Each para would then have had references ,although I do not refute the reference ideology of Wikipedia. Just because my reference included a blog ,you should not have trashed it.I am not reverting your edit.After all Wikipedia is an objective knowledge bank.If you discard an important piece of information ,it is the loss of Wikipedia and its readers.
A political person's life, religion, ideology , affects all latter developments of his area of functioning, and it is absolutely essential to tell the truth - maybe being strained out of 10 different sources.Also that his ideology which sought to protect!Who ? You protect Tamils.How ? Who finances and gives you weapons ? So the group has to bow to the ideology of its supporters.No matter what it might think of them.One should see the net result.It was protection of Tamils and guarding the coastline ! I included the blog because it had references.What is the security situation today after death of Prabhakaran ? Both in Sri Lanka and India ? http://www.srilankaguardian.org/2009/07/tamil-hindu-reflections-on-tamil.html http://www.dlib.pdn.ac.lk/archive/bitstream/123456789/2740/1/J.R.%20Rodd%20Vol.%20XXXI%20No.1%262%202005.pdf Mamta Jagdish Dhody ( talk) 18:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help, I feel it is important to include information such as the extremely common criticism or controversy of a figure if it's one of the main points about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thuaeg3 ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jess Greenberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Extreme and Poker Face. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for joining WP:BACON ! — Cirt ( talk) 20:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am sure that you as an American knows better than me on the subject of a British personality. I shall defer to your greater knowledge. -- 212.50.167.15 ( talk) 17:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello again! I see that you have special rights on the Tiffany Alvord article. A few moments ago I noticed what seems to be a good-faith edit to include the fact that she is a Mormon, but without a source. I checked briefly on Google, and the only source I found that might be acceptable is this tweet from her. I do think it qualifies per WP:SELFSOURCE, but I don't know how relevant that information is for her article. I have noticed the religious views of other musicians stated in their Wikipedia articles, but perhaps the context is different. Please let me know what you think (please ping me like before). Thanks in advance! Dontreader ( talk) 01:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hnancy ( talk) 05:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)I wonder why you delete my edit of black seo building strategy that I try to explain the conflicts.I am doing this for a class project and hope you can give my some advice.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jess Greenberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wonderwall and Wanted Dead or Alive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
RAF910 (
talk)
16:39, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
A comment or question about my edits would have been appreciated. I think this was a bit excessive. I apologize for not understanding your concerns at the time and undoing your edits. I just thought it was a misunderstanding that could be resolved with edit history messages. Anyway hope we can work this out. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 21:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
![]() Candidate nominations for Guild coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015, are currently underway. The nomination period will close at 23:59 on December 15 (UTC), after which voting will commence until 23:59 on December 31, 2014. Self-nominations are welcomed. Please consider getting involved; it's your Guild and it won't coordinate itself, so if you'd like to help coordinate Guild activities we'd love to hear from you. Cheers from your GOCE coordinators
Jonesey95,
Baffle gab1978, and
Miniapolis.
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC) |
Hi
Can I please ask why you accepted this edit to Tanya Branning? The whole reason that the page is on pending changes protection is because IPs keep adding that she is returning, however no source is provided and Google does not support that she is returning. If you look in the page history, you will see that the same IP made a similar edit yesterday which was correctly reverted and the IP's talk page and contributions suggest that they have a history of making these types of unsubstantiated edits.
Please be more careful in the future and if you're unsure, leave the pending revision for another editor to look over-- 5 albert square ( talk) 17:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Concerning this RfC. Prcc27 ( talk) 11:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. In response to your edit I started a thread on the project talk page. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Firearms#Importance_rankings. Your input would be helpful. Rezin ( talk) 22:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
I saw some recent edits to William Shockley under your user name, apparently part of a GOCE cleanup. What I have found when I have done GOCE cleanups is that if an article has a lot of messy language, but relies heavily on specific sources, it's nearly impossible to clean up the language without looking at the sources. Do you have the cited sources at hand now? (I do.) I reverted the edits per WP:BRD and invited discussion on the article talk page. See you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 13:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2014 Newsletter
![]() Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in November's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 43 people who signed up for this drive, 26 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: The November Drive removed 26 requests from the Requests page and 509 articles from the {{ copy edit}} backlog. We copy edited 83 articles tagged in the target months; July, August, and September 2013. Together with tag removals from articles unsuitable for copy editing, we eliminated July 2013 from the backlog and reduced August and September's tags to 61 and 70 respectively. As of 01:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC), the backlog stood at 1,974 articles, dipping below 2,000 for the first time in the Guild's history (see graph at right). Well done everyone! Blitz: The December Blitz will run from December 14–20 and will focus on articles related to Religion, in recognition of this month's religious holidays in much of the English-speaking world. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. Sign up here! Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from 1 January to 30 June 2015 is now underway. Candidates can nominate themselves or others from December 01, 00:01 (UTC), until December 15, 23:59. The voting period will run from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. You can read about coordinators' duties here. Please consider getting involved and remember to cast you vote—it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself! Thank you all once again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve anything without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Scalhotrod,
I can't help but notice that you've reverted Vehicle registration plates of Pennsylvania to the "last stable version before WP:EDITWAR and content disputes".
That is, the version as of 01:44 on May 31 - some five months before Meldar667's edits, and six before mine.
So... what happens next?
Regards, Bluebird207 ( talk) 13:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Can I please request that you comment on the talk page why you feel that mentioning how many books the author has published and how many are on the New York Times Best Sellers list is UNDUE... while cherry-picked criticisms of just a few specific ideas which the author has put out is not UNDUE? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.173.194.250 ( talk) 00:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
In light of your edit summary regarding these 'See also' links, I looked through the talk page archives for postings regarding including/not-including Bath School disaster but didn't find any clear consensus. Would welcome further discussion about it here. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 01:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
That whole discussion was such a mess, its easy to miss. So many threads and intersections of comments and issues. It was in the Lead for quite some time, but I think that it was removed simply because it happened so long ago and the comparison became contrived. Quick frankly, some of the "body count" discussions that have taken place in various Talk pages just outright disgust me, but I guess guidelines need to be established somehow. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove my content in a simple talk page. As for your descent, you are the one who started it. Who needed to know that?!?! 212.178.230.159 ( talk) 20:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
I cited the relevant section of Policy WP:TALK for why I did it. I was trying to help settle a content dispute that you are involved in and as I stated, disclosed my background in relation to the subject matter. You then chose to make a comment about it, "No one cares about your descent but thank you for revealing it anyways, we will take that into consideration too." Granted, you were expressing your opinion, but it could have just as easily been left out. Making personal comments about other editors is generally seen as a offensive gesture and does little to gain you support for any stance you have. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 20:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hedwig of Holstein. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Why do you keep posting March as the premiere of season 8, when it's supposed to be February?
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Death's Apprentice, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, MrX
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Unfortunately my "edit" of the remington NMA article didn't really come across as intended. The system has greatly complicated uploading pictures and somehow, the caption didnt' make it to the article. Basically, the picture shows a 45 colt R&D conversion cylinder group at 12 0'clock and a ball/fffg group to the right both fired one-handed from 25 yards. User:Michael E. Cumpston (talk | contribs) at 09:08, February 4, 2014
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prostitution Research and Education (organization) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostitution Research and Education (organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 04:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Misty Dawn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Holmes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I recommend you bring those sources to the Reliable Sources noticeboard and ask if they are considered reliable for sourcing information about someone's comedy career. That will put this whole thing to rest. They're either good or they aren't. Kindzmarauli ( talk) 13:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (
talk)
20:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pornography#Belle_Knox.2C_revisited. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.
Spartaz
Humbug!
18:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebecca Bardoux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Thomas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, notifying all previous talk participants of an RfC: Talk:Rebecca_Bardoux#RfC: Should the article mention her comedy career? -- Green C 13:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michelle Thomas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A few days ago you removed a quote from WP:NPA. I unintentionally reverted it while reverting a block of edits by another user (and then get distracted by a dispute, so I never got round to checking whether your edit should be restored). Sorry about that, and please feel free to remove the quote again. Personally I fully agree that it doesn't belong (though I haven't yet read the full discussion so I might later change my mind, but in any case it's not something I feel strongly about). Unfortunately since I accidentally restored the quote another user has added in references, etc, so he may not be too happy about you removing them. I'm also going to leave a copy of this in the discussion on the NPA Talk page. Once again my apologies. Tlhslobus ( talk) 20:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Having thought about it more I decided that I did feel strongly about it after all, and that it should definitely go, so I've deleted it myself, giving reasons in Talk. Tlhslobus ( talk) 21:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
What happened to your self-imposed interaction ban? Removing the Eleanor Roosevelt quote [3] - which Drmies restored less than two months ago [4] - from the NPA article, which I'm in the middle of working on, is adding to the stalked feeling I have gotten from you before. Would you mind - please? Lightbreather ( talk) 19:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Folks, before things get out of hand (which is the tendency in matters related to LB and myself), until her posting here there was no interaction between LB and myself regarding the NPA page. The page is on my Watchlist and I noticed some changes. When I visited the page I saw the quote and it was my understanding that via Talk page discussion that it was better to not have any quote, Roosevelt attributed or not, on a Wikipedia Policy page. The closest thing that came to "interaction" was me clicking the "Thank you" link on one of LBs edits, so if THAT is the basis for her feeling uneasy about my presence, I promise to never do it again. My apology for what I consider a fairly minor attempt at being cordial. -- Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 15:36, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
I have asked at ANI to have an administrator evaluate your conduct: [5] -- Lightbreather ( talk) 22:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Please read the NYT article. 216.120.170.5 ( talk) 22:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dylan Ryder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if you saw but the Belle Knox article was relisted at DRV. Gaijin42 ( talk) 15:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning Porn and BLP, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
User:TransporterMan (
talk)
16:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amia Miley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cheri and Evil Angel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Why did you just undo edits that removed inappropriate BLP material and fixed formatting issues?
Note that just because something is properly sourced, it doesn't mean it's correct to include it. In this context the article implied a correlation between a campaign donation and a piece of legislation, even though there's no evidence such a correlation exists. It used unencyclopedic language like "generous." Please stop reflexively reverting needed changes.
107.72.162.96 ( talk) 17:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 30, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, S Philbrick (Talk) 01:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC) -- S Philbrick (Talk) 01:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Please start your own section on the ARBCOM evidence page. You are not supposed to edit other users' sections in any way, even to reply to them. See the infobox at the top of the evidence page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 17:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for not accepting these edits. Such nonsense makes WP look bad. I'm glad I asked for Pending Revision protection.~ Technophant ( talk) 21:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
References
I just accepted the edit you resubmitted. It was caught up in a change of unsourced edits that the WP system bundled together. The best way to prevent this in the future is to register an account and login when making your edits. Thank you for your contributions. Regards, -- Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 21:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Game (Queen album). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
I didn't see too much before 13 October so I probably wouldn't have gone for much longer. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tori Welles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scrubs, Evil Angel and VCA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:39, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
This edit has been reverted as there cannot be two parent companies. Can you please be more careful when checking pendind edits.? Thanks.-- Jetstreamer Talk 12:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
It is part of the admin package and not a separate thing. Sorry. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Not sure why you reverted my copyediting changes. You yourself are a member of GOCE, you know that we want to move away from one-sentence paragraphs among other things.-- Aichik ( talk) 20:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the text removal, it was the result of an edit conflict and then there were further edits before I could restore it. Artw ( talk) 19:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Did you read the source? "There the plant was first cultivated, in Arusi and Ilta-Gallas home of the Galla warriors" Benjamin Storm ( talk)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Raymond Loewy may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
October 4 may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Turner's own words were "I lost my fortune, most of it. Got a million or two left.". [6] I will not deny I made some typos and edited them, but the truth about his fortune needs to known. The Forbes report is inaccurate. 184.97.194.191 ( talk) 23:38, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Have you read the source I cited? The words came from Turner himself during the Piers Morgan episode. The article you cited sources the Forbes article as well. It's no wonder why Wikipedia is dying off. [8] 184.97.194.191 ( talk) 23:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Person of Interest (TV series). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I am still keeping the sources, just condensing all of them into one general reference at the top of the air date column. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/FAQ#Verifiability for more information. They're unnecessary because if you want to know what happens in an episode, then . Dcbanners ( talk) 13:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive about
ownership of articles, which you showed at
Sonic Boom (TV series). The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Dcbanners (
talk)
17:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ''high water mark''. Since you had some involvement with the 'high water mark' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You reverted my edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Velupillai_Prabhakaran&oldid=635496918
I would like you to read :- http://idsa.in/idsacomments/AnappraisalofNorwaysRoleinSriLanka_hdayaratne_030211.html
Further , your full Wikipedia article is not full of references.Each para would then have had references ,although I do not refute the reference ideology of Wikipedia. Just because my reference included a blog ,you should not have trashed it.I am not reverting your edit.After all Wikipedia is an objective knowledge bank.If you discard an important piece of information ,it is the loss of Wikipedia and its readers.
A political person's life, religion, ideology , affects all latter developments of his area of functioning, and it is absolutely essential to tell the truth - maybe being strained out of 10 different sources.Also that his ideology which sought to protect!Who ? You protect Tamils.How ? Who finances and gives you weapons ? So the group has to bow to the ideology of its supporters.No matter what it might think of them.One should see the net result.It was protection of Tamils and guarding the coastline ! I included the blog because it had references.What is the security situation today after death of Prabhakaran ? Both in Sri Lanka and India ? http://www.srilankaguardian.org/2009/07/tamil-hindu-reflections-on-tamil.html http://www.dlib.pdn.ac.lk/archive/bitstream/123456789/2740/1/J.R.%20Rodd%20Vol.%20XXXI%20No.1%262%202005.pdf Mamta Jagdish Dhody ( talk) 18:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help, I feel it is important to include information such as the extremely common criticism or controversy of a figure if it's one of the main points about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thuaeg3 ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jess Greenberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Extreme and Poker Face. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for joining WP:BACON ! — Cirt ( talk) 20:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am sure that you as an American knows better than me on the subject of a British personality. I shall defer to your greater knowledge. -- 212.50.167.15 ( talk) 17:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello again! I see that you have special rights on the Tiffany Alvord article. A few moments ago I noticed what seems to be a good-faith edit to include the fact that she is a Mormon, but without a source. I checked briefly on Google, and the only source I found that might be acceptable is this tweet from her. I do think it qualifies per WP:SELFSOURCE, but I don't know how relevant that information is for her article. I have noticed the religious views of other musicians stated in their Wikipedia articles, but perhaps the context is different. Please let me know what you think (please ping me like before). Thanks in advance! Dontreader ( talk) 01:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hnancy ( talk) 05:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)I wonder why you delete my edit of black seo building strategy that I try to explain the conflicts.I am doing this for a class project and hope you can give my some advice.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jess Greenberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wonderwall and Wanted Dead or Alive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
RAF910 (
talk)
16:39, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
A comment or question about my edits would have been appreciated. I think this was a bit excessive. I apologize for not understanding your concerns at the time and undoing your edits. I just thought it was a misunderstanding that could be resolved with edit history messages. Anyway hope we can work this out. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 21:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
![]() Candidate nominations for Guild coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015, are currently underway. The nomination period will close at 23:59 on December 15 (UTC), after which voting will commence until 23:59 on December 31, 2014. Self-nominations are welcomed. Please consider getting involved; it's your Guild and it won't coordinate itself, so if you'd like to help coordinate Guild activities we'd love to hear from you. Cheers from your GOCE coordinators
Jonesey95,
Baffle gab1978, and
Miniapolis.
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC) |
Hi
Can I please ask why you accepted this edit to Tanya Branning? The whole reason that the page is on pending changes protection is because IPs keep adding that she is returning, however no source is provided and Google does not support that she is returning. If you look in the page history, you will see that the same IP made a similar edit yesterday which was correctly reverted and the IP's talk page and contributions suggest that they have a history of making these types of unsubstantiated edits.
Please be more careful in the future and if you're unsure, leave the pending revision for another editor to look over-- 5 albert square ( talk) 17:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Concerning this RfC. Prcc27 ( talk) 11:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. In response to your edit I started a thread on the project talk page. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Firearms#Importance_rankings. Your input would be helpful. Rezin ( talk) 22:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
I saw some recent edits to William Shockley under your user name, apparently part of a GOCE cleanup. What I have found when I have done GOCE cleanups is that if an article has a lot of messy language, but relies heavily on specific sources, it's nearly impossible to clean up the language without looking at the sources. Do you have the cited sources at hand now? (I do.) I reverted the edits per WP:BRD and invited discussion on the article talk page. See you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 13:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2014 Newsletter
![]() Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in November's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 43 people who signed up for this drive, 26 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: The November Drive removed 26 requests from the Requests page and 509 articles from the {{ copy edit}} backlog. We copy edited 83 articles tagged in the target months; July, August, and September 2013. Together with tag removals from articles unsuitable for copy editing, we eliminated July 2013 from the backlog and reduced August and September's tags to 61 and 70 respectively. As of 01:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC), the backlog stood at 1,974 articles, dipping below 2,000 for the first time in the Guild's history (see graph at right). Well done everyone! Blitz: The December Blitz will run from December 14–20 and will focus on articles related to Religion, in recognition of this month's religious holidays in much of the English-speaking world. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. Sign up here! Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from 1 January to 30 June 2015 is now underway. Candidates can nominate themselves or others from December 01, 00:01 (UTC), until December 15, 23:59. The voting period will run from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. You can read about coordinators' duties here. Please consider getting involved and remember to cast you vote—it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself! Thank you all once again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve anything without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Scalhotrod,
I can't help but notice that you've reverted Vehicle registration plates of Pennsylvania to the "last stable version before WP:EDITWAR and content disputes".
That is, the version as of 01:44 on May 31 - some five months before Meldar667's edits, and six before mine.
So... what happens next?
Regards, Bluebird207 ( talk) 13:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Can I please request that you comment on the talk page why you feel that mentioning how many books the author has published and how many are on the New York Times Best Sellers list is UNDUE... while cherry-picked criticisms of just a few specific ideas which the author has put out is not UNDUE? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.173.194.250 ( talk) 00:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
In light of your edit summary regarding these 'See also' links, I looked through the talk page archives for postings regarding including/not-including Bath School disaster but didn't find any clear consensus. Would welcome further discussion about it here. Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 01:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
That whole discussion was such a mess, its easy to miss. So many threads and intersections of comments and issues. It was in the Lead for quite some time, but I think that it was removed simply because it happened so long ago and the comparison became contrived. Quick frankly, some of the "body count" discussions that have taken place in various Talk pages just outright disgust me, but I guess guidelines need to be established somehow. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove my content in a simple talk page. As for your descent, you are the one who started it. Who needed to know that?!?! 212.178.230.159 ( talk) 20:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
I cited the relevant section of Policy WP:TALK for why I did it. I was trying to help settle a content dispute that you are involved in and as I stated, disclosed my background in relation to the subject matter. You then chose to make a comment about it, "No one cares about your descent but thank you for revealing it anyways, we will take that into consideration too." Granted, you were expressing your opinion, but it could have just as easily been left out. Making personal comments about other editors is generally seen as a offensive gesture and does little to gain you support for any stance you have. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 20:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hedwig of Holstein. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot ( talk) 00:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Why do you keep posting March as the premiere of season 8, when it's supposed to be February?