You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Carolyn Farb. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. -
MBK
004
02:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Carolyn Farb. Thank you. -
MBK
004
06:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did to
Carolyn Farb. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
MBK
004
04:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sansabelt for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Postoak ( talk) 23:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent
vandalism, as you did to
Carolyn Farb, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being
blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Continuing to undo these edits without providing reliable sources is the reason. The next time you do so, this account will be indefinitely blocked. -
MBK
004
05:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Carolyn Farb. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. -
MBK
004
02:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Carolyn Farb. Thank you. -
MBK
004
06:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did to
Carolyn Farb. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
MBK
004
04:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sansabelt for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Postoak ( talk) 23:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent
vandalism, as you did to
Carolyn Farb, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being
blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Continuing to undo these edits without providing reliable sources is the reason. The next time you do so, this account will be indefinitely blocked. -
MBK
004
05:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)