Hello, Saintpako, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We require detailed information about the source and licensing status of all images uploaded to Wikipedia. Some of the images you have recently uploaded do not contain this information and will be deleted in a few days unless that information is provided. I am posting the notices below to your talk page in accordance with established procedure, to notify you of this situation. Please let me know if you have questions or need any help. — Bkell ( talk) 04:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:I543337.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Bkell ( talk) 05:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
The whole article is written like an ad. It isn't written in an encyclopedic manner. In fact, from my first look at it, I figured that the article was probably copied from the Accutone website, it's so ad-speak like. Look around at a few more articles for products and see how they're written. Corvus cornix talk 03:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Rundblad.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skellefteaaik.se/plugins/spelartruppen/images/7_big.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Rundblad.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.
Hello, Saintpako, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We require detailed information about the source and licensing status of all images uploaded to Wikipedia. Some of the images you have recently uploaded do not contain this information and will be deleted in a few days unless that information is provided. I am posting the notices below to your talk page in accordance with established procedure, to notify you of this situation. Please let me know if you have questions or need any help. — Bkell ( talk) 04:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:I543337.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Bkell ( talk) 05:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
The whole article is written like an ad. It isn't written in an encyclopedic manner. In fact, from my first look at it, I figured that the article was probably copied from the Accutone website, it's so ad-speak like. Look around at a few more articles for products and see how they're written. Corvus cornix talk 03:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Rundblad.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skellefteaaik.se/plugins/spelartruppen/images/7_big.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Rundblad.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.