This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

Sadifan ( block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser ( log))

---

Block ID: #24971694 ( BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: Star Mississippi ( talk • blocks)
Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sadifan". The reason given for Sadifan's block is: "User lacks the English-language competence to edit here".

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Sadifan}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Star Mississippi | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sadifan". The reason given for Sadifan's block is: "User lacks the English-language competence to edit here".</nowiki> | 3=127.0.0.1 | 4=24971694 | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sadifan". The reason given for Sadifan's block is: "User lacks the English-language competence to edit here".</nowiki> | 3=Star Mississippi | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sadifan". The reason given for Sadifan's block is: "User lacks the English-language competence to edit here".</nowiki> | 3=Star Mississippi | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sadifan ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

I know English, I just made small mistakes and for this you thought that I don’t know English Sadifan ( talk) 09:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I know English, I just made small mistakes and for this you thought that I don’t know English [[User:Sadifan|Sadifan]] ([[User talk:Sadifan#top|talk]]) 09:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know English, I just made small mistakes and for this you thought that I don’t know English [[User:Sadifan|Sadifan]] ([[User talk:Sadifan#top|talk]]) 09:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I know English, I just made small mistakes and for this you thought that I don’t know English [[User:Sadifan|Sadifan]] ([[User talk:Sadifan#top|talk]]) 09:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Demetrios1993 ( talk) 14:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 14:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Sadifan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel ( talk) 17:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Temryuk's campaign in Ingushetia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Kudenet Kambulatovich. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 21:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Mamstryuk Temryukovich. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 21:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Crimean–Circassian War (1720-1721). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 05:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Crimean-Circassian War (1616-1640). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 05:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Kudenet Kambulatovich. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin ( talk) 07:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Mamstryuk Temryukovich. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin ( talk) 07:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Ottoman-Circassian War (1583-1589). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin ( talk) 07:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Military cooperation between Cossacks and Circassians during First World War. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin ( talk) 07:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Genoese-Circassian War. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin ( talk) 07:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mamstryuk Temryukovich. Thanks! Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Temryuk's campaign in Ingushetia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 14:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Russo-Circassian War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your unexplained edit here, which continues an edit war in an article that had to be protected because of this kind of stuff, is severely disruptive--and you made it right after protection ran out, without even seeking the talk page. Drmies ( talk) 15:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I see, at the top of this page, that you have received a number of alerts, including one for not leaving an edit summary--you didn't leave one in this disruptive edit either. Pinging El_C and Daniel Case. Drmies ( talk) 15:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I also object to this, where you moved a draft by a now-blocked sock account to main space, a draft with a ton of problems. Drmies ( talk) 17:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dependence of Karachais and Balkars on Circassians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabardian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Conquests of Inal the Great. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it has no inline citations. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ltb d l ( talk) 01:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

As an example, for your latest creation, Draft:Battle of Maikop:

• The prose and grammar are extremely poor. Is it a translation from another wiki? Tenses are all over the place, some sentences which should be in quotes are not (the article should obviously not end with "We present to your attention.").
• The sources are vastly out of date. Primary sources written in the 19th century do not confer notability, and should not be the sole basis of Wikipedia articles.
• Per WP:RSUEC, I request that whenever you cite a non-English source, you include a citation to the original text, to make sure of verifiability, a central Wikipedia policy.
• A central part of Wikipedia is collaboration. Many of your articles have been moved to draftspace, but you have moved them back without addressing the problems, or discussing the issues raised. If this continues I will not hesitate to open a section at ANI.

I hope that you take this message seriously. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 02:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Maikop. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 02:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 18:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Your articles are not in good enough English to stay on Wikipedia. Are they from Russian wikipedia? Secretlondon ( talk) 19:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

No, they are not from Russian Wikipedia Sadifan ( talk) 18:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kariokskoe of battle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kariokskoe of battle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 23:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Star Mississippi 01:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Unblock please Sadifan ( talk) 09:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadifan ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Sadifan ( talk) 09:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot ( talk) 09:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This and this are unhelpful. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Dependence of Karachais and Balkars on Circassians. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 09:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Conquest of Eastern Circassia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 10:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Mamia's invasion of Jiketi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 10:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Circassian raids on Crimean Tatars and Nogais. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 10:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Maikop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Maikop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 12:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Note this user evaded their block as 5.138.85.198. -- Yamla ( talk) 22:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadifan ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Sadifan ( talk) 19:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You apparently don't understand English sufficiently to determine how to write an unblock request (see WP:GAB). Nor do you address your block evasion. Yamla ( talk) 20:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I speak English well!

UTRS appeal #90653 is declined. User still doesn't seem to be able to follow the directions in WP:GAB. -- Yamla ( talk) 18:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Sadifan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Genocide Cossacks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply