Hello, Saccyind, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jason Quinn (
talk •
contribs)
23:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Please stop futzing with the nationalities and genres of film/actor articles. Some of these (like calling King Kong an "epic" film) are POV changes, others are problematic. There have been several discussions about the Terminator films, for example, with the consensus being that since they were multi-national productions and their "nationality" is not an intrinsic feature, we should leave nationality out of the lead. You would also do well to read WP:OVERLINK: We do not link generic terms like "epic" or "American". If you find your edits repeatedly reverted, please discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page rather than just making the same changes over and over again. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 03:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Terminator 2: Judgment Day, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 07:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Hopkins. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
The Dark Knight Rises. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr ( talk) 20:33, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to try and start a vote to get american added to the intro paragraph. To not allow this is wikipedia anti americanism. Wikipedia is trying to censure the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavisJune ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
You are editing against consensus without discussing your changes on article talk pages. This cannot continue. Please take your concerns to the article talk pages to avoid a block on your account. Tide rolls 23:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I've replied to your message on my user talk. Tide rolls 10:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Why are your edits so confrontational? Have you checked into the MOS guidelines regarding nationalities of article subjects? You make a bold statement here, but what has the article subject said on the matter? Is there clear sourcing for the edits you are making, because I see no sources being cited in your edits. Indeed, I see sources being deleted. Wikipedia is not a venue for crusades nor a field of battle. Please take a moment to reassess your choices and compare your stance to accepted convention and policies. Tide rolls 01:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tide rolls 15:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Batman Begins, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 10:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at M. Night Shyamalan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tide rolls 20:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Saccyind ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
EVERY PERSON BORN IS INDIA IS AUTOMATICALLY AN INDIAN CITIZEN SO IS M NIGHT SHYAMALAN OK HE IS AN INDIAN-AMERICAN Saccyind ( talk) 03:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not an unblock request, and in any event I'm highly disinclined to review anything where you're shouting. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 03:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your block has expired & you've immediately gone back to the exact same behavior that led to your block in the first place. Take my advice and stop fiddling with the nationalities of film articles. You should consider that when every single person you interact with disagrees with you, it may not be everyone else who is wrong: It may be you (hint: it is). -- IllaZilla ( talk) 05:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Aliens (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Clarification: Even though the rule is called 3RR, there is no "right" or "guarantee" that allows you to revert 3 times. Those who have been blocked for edit-warring in the past and those who continue their behavior despite multiple warnings may as well be blocked right away. Since you are aware of the rule, this is your only warning, and it applies to all pages you decide to edit, not just the one mentioned above. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 20:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 02:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
section header McDonagh - English or Irish? Tide rolls 21:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Tide rolls 21:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
section header - Very important information - Indian citizenship Tide rolls 21:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tide rolls ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
I left those talkback templates here so that you would be able to find the discussions. Instead, you choose to continue editing against consensus. If you do not cease your disruption I will block this account indefinitely. Engage on the article talk pages, make an effort to understand consensus. This way you can avoid a block and continue editing here. Tide rolls 03:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Are you going to stop?
Any answer other than "yes" will be interpreted as "no". What's your pleasure? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
03:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Saccyind ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
In michael fassbender page although he is COMPLETE irish but as he is born in Germany So It is stated Irish-German SO like that M NIGHT SHYAMALAN IS INDIAN BORN His Both Parents Are Indian And By Indian Constitution Any NON RESIDENT INDIAN bORN iN iNDIA is indian so he is INDIAN-AMERICAN i gave link also THEN WHY CAN'T I EDIT ,WHY THIS BLOCK Saccyind ( talk) 19:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I can see that it has been explained to you multiple times on this page alone what the problem is, and you just don't seem to get it, so clearly unblocking you is not in the best interest of the project Jac16888 Talk 19:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In michael fassbender page although he is COMPLETE irish but as he is born in Germany So It is stated Irish-German SO like that M NIGHT SHYAMALAN IS INDIAN BORN His Both Parents Are Indian And By Indian Constitution Any NON RESIDENT INDIAN bORN iN iNDIA is indian so he is INDIAN-AMERICAN i gave link also THEN WHY CAN'T I EDIT ,WHY THIS BLOCK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saccyind ( talk • contribs)
if you still believe you did nothing wrong, then there's nothing anyone can do for you anymore; as the blocking admin indicated above, patience is running out; in fact, you have been given an exhaustive amount of explanations and have been met with a degree of patience rarely seen here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 13:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
I have removed your talk page access for continued disruptive editing here. You have proved over and over again that you don't understand our most basic policies for editing. If you still believe you should be unblocked, go to WP:UTRS and follow the instructions there. Qwyrxian ( talk) 23:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Saccyind has made an unblock appeal to the Arbitration Committee. After review of the appeal, the Committee have declined the appeal.
For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Saccyind, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jason Quinn (
talk •
contribs)
23:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Please stop futzing with the nationalities and genres of film/actor articles. Some of these (like calling King Kong an "epic" film) are POV changes, others are problematic. There have been several discussions about the Terminator films, for example, with the consensus being that since they were multi-national productions and their "nationality" is not an intrinsic feature, we should leave nationality out of the lead. You would also do well to read WP:OVERLINK: We do not link generic terms like "epic" or "American". If you find your edits repeatedly reverted, please discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page rather than just making the same changes over and over again. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 03:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Terminator 2: Judgment Day, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 07:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Hopkins. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
The Dark Knight Rises. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr ( talk) 20:33, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to try and start a vote to get american added to the intro paragraph. To not allow this is wikipedia anti americanism. Wikipedia is trying to censure the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavisJune ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
You are editing against consensus without discussing your changes on article talk pages. This cannot continue. Please take your concerns to the article talk pages to avoid a block on your account. Tide rolls 23:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I've replied to your message on my user talk. Tide rolls 10:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Why are your edits so confrontational? Have you checked into the MOS guidelines regarding nationalities of article subjects? You make a bold statement here, but what has the article subject said on the matter? Is there clear sourcing for the edits you are making, because I see no sources being cited in your edits. Indeed, I see sources being deleted. Wikipedia is not a venue for crusades nor a field of battle. Please take a moment to reassess your choices and compare your stance to accepted convention and policies. Tide rolls 01:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tide rolls 15:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Batman Begins, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 10:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at M. Night Shyamalan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tide rolls 20:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Saccyind ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
EVERY PERSON BORN IS INDIA IS AUTOMATICALLY AN INDIAN CITIZEN SO IS M NIGHT SHYAMALAN OK HE IS AN INDIAN-AMERICAN Saccyind ( talk) 03:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not an unblock request, and in any event I'm highly disinclined to review anything where you're shouting. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 03:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your block has expired & you've immediately gone back to the exact same behavior that led to your block in the first place. Take my advice and stop fiddling with the nationalities of film articles. You should consider that when every single person you interact with disagrees with you, it may not be everyone else who is wrong: It may be you (hint: it is). -- IllaZilla ( talk) 05:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Aliens (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Clarification: Even though the rule is called 3RR, there is no "right" or "guarantee" that allows you to revert 3 times. Those who have been blocked for edit-warring in the past and those who continue their behavior despite multiple warnings may as well be blocked right away. Since you are aware of the rule, this is your only warning, and it applies to all pages you decide to edit, not just the one mentioned above. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 20:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- IllaZilla ( talk) 02:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
section header McDonagh - English or Irish? Tide rolls 21:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Tide rolls 21:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
section header - Very important information - Indian citizenship Tide rolls 21:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tide rolls ( talk • contribs) 12:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
I left those talkback templates here so that you would be able to find the discussions. Instead, you choose to continue editing against consensus. If you do not cease your disruption I will block this account indefinitely. Engage on the article talk pages, make an effort to understand consensus. This way you can avoid a block and continue editing here. Tide rolls 03:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Are you going to stop?
Any answer other than "yes" will be interpreted as "no". What's your pleasure? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
03:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Saccyind ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
In michael fassbender page although he is COMPLETE irish but as he is born in Germany So It is stated Irish-German SO like that M NIGHT SHYAMALAN IS INDIAN BORN His Both Parents Are Indian And By Indian Constitution Any NON RESIDENT INDIAN bORN iN iNDIA is indian so he is INDIAN-AMERICAN i gave link also THEN WHY CAN'T I EDIT ,WHY THIS BLOCK Saccyind ( talk) 19:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I can see that it has been explained to you multiple times on this page alone what the problem is, and you just don't seem to get it, so clearly unblocking you is not in the best interest of the project Jac16888 Talk 19:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In michael fassbender page although he is COMPLETE irish but as he is born in Germany So It is stated Irish-German SO like that M NIGHT SHYAMALAN IS INDIAN BORN His Both Parents Are Indian And By Indian Constitution Any NON RESIDENT INDIAN bORN iN iNDIA is indian so he is INDIAN-AMERICAN i gave link also THEN WHY CAN'T I EDIT ,WHY THIS BLOCK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saccyind ( talk • contribs)
if you still believe you did nothing wrong, then there's nothing anyone can do for you anymore; as the blocking admin indicated above, patience is running out; in fact, you have been given an exhaustive amount of explanations and have been met with a degree of patience rarely seen here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 13:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
I have removed your talk page access for continued disruptive editing here. You have proved over and over again that you don't understand our most basic policies for editing. If you still believe you should be unblocked, go to WP:UTRS and follow the instructions there. Qwyrxian ( talk) 23:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Saccyind has made an unblock appeal to the Arbitration Committee. After review of the appeal, the Committee have declined the appeal.
For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)