http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Niemti_removes_all_edits_I_make_- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balzacdeverlain ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I've now done a full review and - sorry - have failed it. Feel free to just renominate, especially if you think it unfair, but really suggest addressing the points I covered. bridies ( talk) 09:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
That's OK, thanks. -- Niemti ( talk) 09:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Um, yeah merchandise is used to promote a character and/or game. It's not "Cultural impact". Cultural impact is when a virus gets named after Robotnik or Topeka changes its named to Topikachu. Not the fact they got an action figure a few pop-culture nods as weapons in games. Companies get paid to license a character for merchandise and in turn get advertising for their game or even the character itself. And yes that contest was essentially the same as a GameFAQs character battle. You notice we never cite those? The reason is they're unreliable as anyone could partake in them, so who she 'beat' in the brackets is meaningless. If something was actually said about the character in that case too it'd be unusable as well: the poll was not run by an independent party, but Konami themselves.
I've done this long enough and bounced off GA- and FA-nominations enough times to know what does and doesn't work for an article. You could try meeting me halfway there if you want it to stick around, because there's enough material to work with there...but not the way you're going about it.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 18:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
You recently reverted two category edits I made concerning fiction samurai and fictional ninja [1] [2] bringing them into the non-fictional categories.
As I understand Wikipedia:Categorization#Articles 'Articles on fictional subjects should not be categorized in a manner that confuses them with real subjects.', it would be better with the former categories. Could you give me your views on this? Thanks! jmcw ( talk) 12:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Fictional characters
Let me rephrase it and explain: all "Fictional something" articles are sub-section to "Something" articles. For example, "Fictional queens" is in "Queens" and "Fictional countries" is in "Countries". And these subjects often have nothing to do with "Japanese media", like for example Bushido (comics) for the samurai and Psylocke for the ninja. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm trying to assume good faith here...but it's really looking like you have a different standard when it comes to character articles if the subject is an attractive female. You agree in the other discussion that sources need to satisfy notability in one discussion and should actually discuss the character the article is about, yet when the matter comes up regarding putting it in practice on such an article, you argue against it if you have a vested interest on the subject. And I know you're an intelligent person so I'm not going to honestly believe you feel poor articles should exist just because others do...or does that go out the window if we're discussing something with t&a involved?-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 16:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Niemti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Wipsenade (
talk) 13:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I joined the ANI discussion and immediately discovered what you meant about Sjones23. I recommended that you apply for a mediation to resolve the conflict, my personal opinion would be a topic block for the other editor, but not being an administrator, I don't have the ability to enforce such a block. That's my recommendation, good luck. Go Phightins! ( talk) 02:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Just wondering if you're going to complete the Nuclear Strike GA review? If you meant to pass it, you need to replace the template on the talk page. bridies ( talk) 02:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
I was hoping I could get an outside opinion over at List of God of War characters. There's a current discussion (though nothing's been posted since August 28th) here that goes over some points. If you want to take a look at the points addressed and their differences, they're here (my proposed version) and here (Bluerim's proposed version). -- JDC808 ♫ 01:27, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Curse of Enchantia/GA1 is on hold. bridies ( talk) 10:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I know exactly what you're talking about as you can see
here. I had listed
God of War III (which is B-Class) for an A-Class assessment because of the page you linked. Then after listing it, I noticed that the assessment page states "To nominate an article for A-class, start a nomination thread on the article's talk page and notify the project here with a link to said thread. Please note that articles must be GA-class before nomination." I asked an editor who's done assessments on the assessment page and they said it should be GA-Class before A-Class nomination. It does make sense because A-Class is the step between GA and FA. This is a confusing matter becuase of the contradiction that the Quality Scale states. I believe we should start a discussion at the appropriate section to clear up this issue. I see that there is a discussion on this matter. Until it is resolved, I would suggest to wait to nominate them for A-Class that way there's not a bunch of reverts at the page over this issue.
On a related note, for the three articles that are GA class that you've nominated for A-Class, you'll need to add a new section on the Talk page for each article. All you have to do is title it "A-Class assessment" and state something simple like "Seeking assessment for A-Class." -- JDC808 ♫ 01:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey. I've been seeing your edits on the Requests page-- refusing to discuss a possible resolution by simply stating "well you're wrong!" and then reverting edits is teetering on the edge of disruptive editing. At this rate it's only a matter of time before one or the both of you are blocked for edit-warring. I think the two of you should calm down and try to strike a compromise on this issue. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 22:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
The discussion is going on elswhere and I didn't revert, I just did it properly (hid the requests for a time being, even as there's nothing wrong with them and never was). To be exact, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#A-class (and as I said there, it's unclear to me now what's even the very point of A-class, to begin with). -- Niemti ( talk) 22:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Salvidrim! 02:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
I undid some edits of yours where you redirected james bond characters to other articles because you never started a merge discussion. If you still believe they should be merged, you should add {{ Merge to}} and {{ Merge from}} to the relevant articles and start discussion. I undid your redirects of Plenty O'Toole, General Grubozaboyschikov, and Agent Strawberry Fields. If there's any I missed, it would be great if you could undo them so they can be properly discussed, or at least let me know which ones they are. Ryan Vesey 04:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Ryan Vesey 15:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
"One more revert, and I'll have this article deleted, not just redirected."
-- Welcome to the new Wikipedia, ladies & gents, where being a totally inflexible hardass is the newly updated definition of "civil". I mean, there's utterly no need for explanations in edit comments or Talk pages let alone (gosh!) reaching a consensus, or even droll references to 3RR once you've spent enough time learning the ropes and schmoozing your way to mod or mod's pet in order to then jam your-way-or-the-highway down everyone else's pie-hole like a complete bully. Buff those Barnstars, baby; I'm sure you've earned 'em. Before you know it, you'll have the full page collection with narcissist oak-leaf clusters. Yeehaw!-- 66.41.95.121 ( talk) 00:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
See the GA review, one piece about removing her seems a bit like original research or synthesis. I've heard the claim, but could not find verification myself, I've marked it with a CN for now because I think it was covered in the Ultimania books. Again, if its just a loose source that refers to the second sentence (as it seems natural) just tag it with the ref.
I was under the impression that it was too late /costly or omitted because the characters were 'secret' and not necessarily there for the scenes like the ending. This should be noted, it was my only issue with that. And the other was the personality being ran into the 'appearances' aspect, I think that should be pulled out, but that is not an obligation. So I passed it. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Plz, read (or re-read) Template:PD-textlogo and Wikipedia:Public_domain#Fonts and look on many others simple text logos (marked by Template:PD-textlogo or commons:Template:PD-textlogo) on En-wiki or Commons. Alex Spade ( talk) 20:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
I just noticed that in this edit you've repositioned an edit I made yesterday and I was wondering what the rationale was for this. My original reason for including the review where I did was because it looked to me like the review subsection covered different reviews in chronological order and so the 1995 Famitsu review came between the 1993 French award and the 1996 Computer Game World review. Is it because the Famitsu review covered a console version? Or is there some other order I'm not seeing? - Thibbs ( talk) 12:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
It was only a review. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I have just deleted, twice, the repeated reference to homosexual and child abuser. Just because two papers said almost the same thing doesn't mean it needs repeating. tThe section is about content, not about what the papers say. In fact, the notion of homosexuality, and the marriage of a young girl to an adult man is only offensive to some Muslims. What the west call paedophilia is not offensive to many African, Afghani or pakistani men. And in Saudi Arabia, chartered planes take loads of men to Manila, Philippines, to enjoy the "Lady Boys". The key issues are
The other issues concern Christians, and a the West. They are naturally the ones that the Daily Mirror seizes on.
But the other issues, cited by Reuters, are the real issues, which offend all Muslims, including homosexual, bisexual, philandering and paedophile Muslims, just as much as the "righteous" ones.
Amandajm ( talk) 12:58, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Okay, and? Are we going to incite riots be repeating mass media reports or something? -- Niemti ( talk) 13:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
It's typically considered courteous and good practice to review one GAN for each one that you nominate. Currently the GAN list shows that you've only reviewed 1-2 GANs, but have several nominated. Perhaps reviewing more will help get people interested on your GANs that aren't being reviewed. -- Teancum ( talk) 13:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
<<oo>>
I really do like your style. It makes me laugh and...that is rare.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 07:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your good faith contributions to Psylocke, however please take time to read the Wikipedia's comics project guidelines regarding superhero infobox images, which explicitly states that an image facing-the-camera is preferable over a profile picture.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 12:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.123.123.136 ( talk) 20:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Resident Evil characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NECA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
You need to stop harassing people about your hobby-horse. There is no rule that says categories need to be in alphabetical order. Do not leave messages on users' talkpages, do not write allcaps edit-summaries. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I'm curious as to why you removed Fallout: New Vegas soundtrack from {{ Fallout}}. It's undoubtedly related. Was your concern with that article's quality? -- BDD ( talk) 18:53, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced and trvial. Could be deleted or just redirected but I tagged it for a merge instead. Something like in Max Payne 3, for example. -- Niemti ( talk) 18:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you reverted some of my edits on Beat 'em up, not understanding what they were about. User:Jagged 85 has just been community banned for years of widespread, systemic abuse of sources. Basically, writing untrue stuff into articles, citing it to a source, and then when and if someone checks that source, it doesn't support the statement at all. He first did this from at least 2007 until he was caught in 2010. During this time he was editing history articles (history of Islamic science mainly). The clean-up from that is still ongoing 2 years later: we're talking tens of thousands of edits to thousands of articles. After that, he moved to editing video game articles, and did the same thing. As I said, he's been community banned, and all his edits are to be overturned (we're talking thousands of edits to VG articles alone). If anything is to kept, the onus is on whoever puts it back in to verify the material is really supported by the source, and that it wasn't plagiarised (this being another thing he's done on a large scale). If you're going to re-add anything, please do that and write on the talk page exactly what the source said. More info here Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Jagged 85. See also Jagged 85's page, and the ANI currently. Thanks, bridies ( talk) 15:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Uhhh... okay? Weird. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't think these KLOV and allgame references were actually even used as sources. More like just links for verification that the game really exists, when it has no Wikipedia page. Or something. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Or taht's what I would do. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:26, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
They forgot to notify you, so I am. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 17:25, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Ibuki (Street Fighter)/GA1 is on hold. bridies ( talk) 17:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
"Captions can consist of a few words of description, or several sentences. Writing good captions is difficult, and the examples below may be helpful. Along with the title, the lead, and section headings, captions are the most commonly read words in an article, so they should be succinct and informative." Okay? And I like it this way. -- Niemti ( talk) 18:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
It's not distracting in the least, it's the complete story as told by UDON, CAPCOM, and third party (IGN). As the above says, the captions are going to be read anyway. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:20, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello
At 14:05 on 20 September 2012 you edited the 14 September 2012 Camp Bastion attack article and placed a re-write template at the top. I have since cleaned up the article and i like to ask if it would be possible if you could pop over and check it is alright now and if it isn't some suggestions if possible? Thanks Gavbadger ( talk) 23:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Excellent recent edits, Niemti. I've noticed the quality in your work, so enjoy this cheeseburger! AnddoX ( talk) 20:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC) |
Ninja Gaiden series? -- Niemti ( talk) 18:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Thank you for your many creations and tireless edits to allow articles to become nominated as Good Article! Work on Nominator! GoShow (............................) |
Thanks for uploading File:Ibuki SSDIV alternate.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/TheDarkPyrano#Comments_by_other_users. Also, the barnstar directly above this post looks broken and I don't know how to fix it. Cheers, Reyk YO! 06:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi, please take this as a positive pointer for the future rather than criticism for its own sake. I'm surprised that as an experienced editor with FAC experience you chose to respond to Nikkimaria's comments in the way you did. She is widely respected for her thankless checking of references, and the use of words like "ridiculous" and "silly" is hardly likely to encourage other volunteer reviewers to comment. I don't normally review games articles anyway, but I had thought of doing so when I saw how limited the responses had been — until I saw why. I'll hope you'll see this in a positive light in case you should thing of resubmitting at a future date. Cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
By "silly" I meant all the "editors of" from the article (because who else). -- Niemti ( talk) 16:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti. No problem. Can you point out where it says this in the guidelines, though? -- GentlemanGhost ( talk) 18:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
You do realize we need something to *cite* for that other than just 'you emailed her and she responded', right? I'm not doubting you or I'd have reverted that, but yeah we kinda need something to cite in case it comes into question.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 21:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
jennifer@jenniferhale.com -- Niemti ( talk) 21:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
You know that only you ever had a "problem" about it, right? And no one else. -- Niemti ( talk) 05:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
And the source is her official website, endorsing the list by IMDb. -- Niemti ( talk) 06:08, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 5 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee for things which need to be addressed. Kürbis ( ✔) 19:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
If you are talking about my recent edits in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, a lot of character sections on the Wikipedia pages for different shows have the character names bolded. Rtkat3 ( talk) 7:39, September 30 2012 (UTC)
Which is all wrong. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
I've reviewed your nomination of RE4 for GAC and have left my concerns in it's talk page. Congrats on the very well written article. -- Pedro J. the rookie 01:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Niemti,
I just created new page, Tagantsev conspiracy. Could you help with improving it? How do you think, would it qualify for DYK? Thanks, My very best wishes ( talk) 02:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Too many images, used in his own article. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Nikolay Gumilev. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lopota Gorge hostage crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divide and conquer ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I was thinking of reviewing Day Z, that you have nominated for GAN. It's a very well written and well researched but, since their is a full version of the game that is in production and has not been released yet, may I suggest you withdraw the nomination until the full game is released so that the article will have a more, may I say, complete structure. -- Pedro J. the rookie 18:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
It's about the mod, not the game. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I guess I should try reading the article before jumping to conclusions. I just assumed that it was original research because the articles Chris Redfield, Claire Redfield, and Rebecca Chambers were all in the category Fictional American people of English descent and there are no sources in the articles that say that they are of English descent. It was an honest mistake. For the record, I didn't delete any sourced material. -- John of Lancaster ( talk) 04:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MC Bourbonnais Yoko.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Claude Bourbonnais 2012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I am just curious as to why you removed an edit I made. I don't think I'd broken any 'rules' or done something incorrectly. It was valid and factual information so I don't know what prompted you to remove it. 24.141.100.74 ( talk) 22:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
A random Blogspot post is not a reliable source. -- Niemti ( talk) 22:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
It's not random, it's mine. I started the zombie walk. What I added was a fact. So, if a media outlet did not document the event is there another way to add it fairly? 24.141.100.74 ( talk) 22:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Also, [22] is a blog, and [45] is Facebook. 24.141.100.74 ( talk) 23:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis ( ✔) 17:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
The issue started here. I don't want to undo your work, but this is the first edit that caused the problem. -- Teancum ( talk) 16:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Alza08 has reinstated Tilly Masterton. You properly made it a redirect page on 19:56, 5 July 2012. I myself reversed Alza08. He again reinstated the article. He also reverted your redirects on several other Bond character pages. - Fanthrillers ( talk) 22:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I see. Thanks. -- Niemti ( talk) 22:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Shadowrun (Super Nintendo Entertainment System video game)/GA1 is on hold. bridies ( talk) 14:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I noticed you recently reverted one of my edits in Johnny Cage, yet did not provide a reason for doing so in the edit summary, so the content has again been removed. Calling a fictional character "the douchiest," regardless of the responsible source, is juvenile and non-encyclopedic, and adds nothing to the discussion, which is why it was removed. There is still plenty of material remaining in the section regarding the positive/negative reception of the character. Thanks. sixtynine • spill it • 21:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
left|thumbnail|256px|Very dark, not much color Hello. I have noticed your recent replacement of the old Ninja Gaiden 3 screenshot. Although I do like it, I do not believe that it is very appealing to the reader. The old revision had flashes of both red and dark blue, but this new one does not show much contrast in the color. I personally think that viewers visiting Wikipedia articles would like a nice overall layout to them, and that the previous screenshot would have fulfilled this attractiveness. However, the current version is very dark, with characters blending into the background.
I'll leave it up to you to decide, though. I do like the new screenshot, don't get me wrong, but contrast is far more appealing in a Wikipedia article. Please respond if you feel the same.
Cheers. -- Anddo ( talk) 21:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
I've been thinking of sprucing up this article one of these days with more references and some rewritten prose before sending it to GAN - it still seems a little bit crufty - but do you think it's likely to pass the way it is with no further work? If so, that would be a load off my back, and I'd leave it alone for now. -- LoK Wiki ( talk) 12:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Maybe? I don't know actually. -- Niemti ( talk) 12:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm the person that declined your initial Good Article nomination for XCOM: Enemy Unknown. I find it rather unsettling that you have renominated it with no attempt to improve the section that caused me to fail it, with no discussion about the first GAN, and without even supplying a useful edit summary. To be frank, that kind of behavior makes me question all of your good article nominations. If you aren't willing to address concerns in GANs, the process won't work. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Expansion tag was arbitrary (one user thought it's not enough, while I think it's enough, and I've seen no sources discuss it any further anyway, and I didn't play the game while all the others thousands users every day also didn't write one more word there) and is not listed among the quick-fail tags. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not assume ownership of articles such as XCOM: Enemy Unknown. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. In instructing another to 'stop fucking up [your] articles', your incivility is manifest, as is your presumption of ownership of the content, and these issues plainly contradict the collaborative premise of the encyclopedia. Thanks, Mephistophelian (contact) 17:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi.
Can you tell me why do you think this image is not a good illustration? I already see a worse further below in the article.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk) 12:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
W-what? It's an excellent image, absolutely representative of the character and quite iconic too, and seriously, no screenshots. Also - just as few non-free images as possible. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I "do know that the 1992 PoP has a different story than the 2008 PoP, right" (because I wrote most of this article, right). A screenshot shows a small, quite low-poly character, in a random pose, distracting a viewer with random background and the enemy. It's also not at all an iconic picture. What the article actually lacks, is something like that. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
It's not only just a concept art, it's also promotional and iconic image just as I already told AND showed you once. Iconic = well known and popular. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Haha, you look pretty bad. It's 4th, 12th, 17th, etc. Including on wallpapers and such. Now, stop talking to me about it. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
If your method of dealing with other editors and their concerns about articles is to insult them, I can only heartily recommend that you can equally go and get stuffed. Your reasoning, whether it is good or not, is immediately tarnished by such unnecessary hostility and rudeness. -- Sabre ( talk) 14:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ninja Gaiden 3 Razor's Edge logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth for things which need to be addressed. Tomcat ( 7) 10:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Niemti,
Just to let you know I've started the GA review for Kitana (Mortal Kombat) which can be found here - Cabe 6403 ( Talk• Sign) 10:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
In order to avoid an edit war, I started a discussion about whether robots and other AI programs are anthropomorphic at Talk:Anthropomorphism#Robots. Feel free to join the discussion, but please accept the outcome of it, as I will. JDDJS ( talk) 18:42, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
You filed a report at WP:ANI. As you already know - and as you were reminded there - you are required to advise the party being reported. It's been some time now ... when will you be notifying them? ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
It's vandalism only acocunt, not a "party" of any kind. -- Niemti ( talk) 12:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Another World (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Miller ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth for comments about the article. Well done! Tomcat ( 7) 18:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to this discussion on my recent plot change. You might want to have a look at this. I am not telling you whether or how you should respond, but I do think you should be aware of his one-sided version of events. Cheers! -- JTBX ( talk) 20:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
First off, how is "highly successful" subjective? God of War has sold a successful amount of copies, it has spawned lots of merchandise, and has become an award winning franchise and has set the bar for action games. In regards to it being "unsourced," this is one of those cases that it doesn't need to be. Most video game fans know that God of War is a highly successful game and franchise. Plus, the article of God of War itself goes into that. By the "unsourced" token, we should then remove all the games that he's in but aren't sourced.
The paragraph about costumes, to state "the costume Athena" is repetitive as costumes is already stated previously, and Athena is just an example of the costumes.
There's also no need to rename the "Merchandise" section to "Merchandise and promotion." -- JDC808 ♫ 21:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
This info is unsourced AND UNRELATED (because it's an article about a character) and thus out of place. "Athena" is a costume and not the character (as your version incrrectly indicates by not putting it in quotation marks - unlike the other costume - the female Athena is just confusing, like if the original Athena was not female or something). And it's "Merchandise and promotion" because it's precisely merchandise and promotion (and it was me who named it as just "Merchandise" it first place). -- Niemti ( talk) 22:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
It's just wild guessing - maybe it would actually MORE successful with another character, or some different version of Kratos, you don't know it. It's "silly argument" that it "doesn't need changed" - the word "merchandise" doesn't quite cover the games' promotional bonuses (also you don't own it too, so to speak). -- Niemti ( talk) 23:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ayane Dead or Alive.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Since this is part of procedure, I am letting you know that there is a WP:Requests for comment towards you. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Niemti. GamerPro64 02:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MK9 Mileena.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ryu Hayabusa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Canterbury Tail talk 18:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Ninja Gaiden 3 Razor's Edge gameplay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit 00:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I don't think we've interacted before, but I was just drawn to the ban discussion on AN. I've opposed the ban, but I think you should try harder to be civil to other users (not to say that I've been the best role model in that department though). Recently, another user appeared to be heading for a ban, but was able to turn community sentiment around by voluntarily agreeing to a set of editing restrictions (see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Youreallycan). Would you consider proposing a (different) set of restrictions in lieu of a ban? Just a suggestion though, you're under no obligation to do so. Good luck, Mark Arsten ( talk) 18:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
I would totally make an use of this forced wikibreak thing, for one. That's something that would be of use for me personally, as in: (much) more time for me for everything else, including some things that are just ridiculously overdue now. -- Niemti ( talk) 18:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social Justice (periodical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Doherty ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ayane Dead or Alive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Can you please use edit summaries when you are editing articles. Some of you edits can be easily mistaken for vandalism when made without summaries, especially those where you delete large portions of articles such as this one. Edit summaries also allow other users to understand why changes were made. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 16:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Since it appears no one else has clarified this to you, a good faith explanation: "Malleus" is User:Malleus Fatuorum. He's one of the top handful of content contributors left standing, in terms of successful FACs. He's also frequently and unrepentantly uncivil. Right now there's some kind of arbcom case regarding his incivility, and it seems to be the focal point of a broader debate about the enforcement of incivility: basically, if someone is both uncivil (and can't or won't change) but a really good contributor, do we ban them or not? So this is why people have been both defending and criticising you in comparison to him. Personally I (also?) find these comparisons really frustrating, partly because Malleus is both a much better writer and much more insulting than you, but also because the issues we brought up were about much broader things than straightforward incivility vs. contributions. But there you go. bridies ( talk) 13:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
...You've totally lost me at what you're getting at. You seem upset "stonewalling" and "doublestandards" and and "ignoring" and whatnot. I'm not following at all, but it seemed to be drifting off into something personal against me, so I figured we'd move it to talk pages. What exactly were you getting at? Sergecross73 msg me 21:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
"Stonewalling" was not about you (that's LB), "double standards" regarding how you think you (and everyone) can ignore me, but I can't ignore the others. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:27, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Tekken Tag Tournament 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 5 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Tekken Tag Tournament 2 for things which need to be addressed. Tomcat ( 7) 12:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
I went ahead and passed the article, though I do strongly recommend you go through and rework the prose a little tighter, just to ensure legibility and flow of information, and consider the strength of sources. Yeah this isn't the same scale as FAC, but it does make things easier for the person that picks up the work after you seeking to take it there. Heck if anything I wish you'd slow down on your volleys on GA nominations and put more care into the articles: GA should be used as a point for fixing small things up, not major repairs.
I'm honestly expecting a knee-jerk reaction where you defend yourself from what I just said, but I stand by my statement and hope you at least consider it.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
I've already asked on Fallout series for an additional copy edit (even as I don't really see any urgent need). -- Niemti ( talk) 15:47, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Do you have email and 10 mins of free time? -- JTBX ( talk) 23:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes? -- Niemti ( talk) 23:44, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Apologies, I must not have properly submitted my update. I'll get back to this tonight. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 12:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Glad to see the silly ban motion went nowhere. Keep up the great work you do here and thank you for your valuable contributions. BTW, "tldr" is absolutley the best way I have ever seen to respond to an RfC! Joefromrandb ( talk) 16:01, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
I think there is something to be learned here. You should really listen to people, learn and adapt. If people are coming in big numbers to AN and criticize you, they can not be all wrong. There is at least some your fault here. How to fix it? Just do exactly what they say, even if they do not act as your friends: stop telling anything they consider incivility or assertion of ownership, use edit summaries and ask other people to review your articles before nominating them at GAN. This should be easy.
Now, speaking about your responses, such as one on the RfC, this is something very much natural: you want to tell people how wrong they are and that you do not care. This helps to relieve your stress and feel better. Do not do it. Not only this makes others feel bad (to the degree they complain on AN), but you can be blocked or banned for doing this at any moment.
I would also suggest not be obsessed with editing any specific subject area. If there is a particularly nasty dispute somewhere, you can easily edit something else for a while, rather than risking development of a conflict. If anyone follows you around on a number different subjects, that will make them look bad. Since you like subjects like Ninjas, here is what art of war tells: "Anyone who excels in defeating his enemies triumphs before his enemy's threat become real". This is not to tell that there are "enemies" around, but rather to emphasize the importance of conflict-free editing. ( you are welcome to remove this my comment). My very best wishes ( talk) 17:04, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Legends Chun-Li.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Darkstalkers comic 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kung Lao comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Goro MK comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Scorpion Mortal Kombat comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mortal Kombat Battlewave 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Niemti_removes_all_edits_I_make_- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balzacdeverlain ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I've now done a full review and - sorry - have failed it. Feel free to just renominate, especially if you think it unfair, but really suggest addressing the points I covered. bridies ( talk) 09:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
That's OK, thanks. -- Niemti ( talk) 09:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Um, yeah merchandise is used to promote a character and/or game. It's not "Cultural impact". Cultural impact is when a virus gets named after Robotnik or Topeka changes its named to Topikachu. Not the fact they got an action figure a few pop-culture nods as weapons in games. Companies get paid to license a character for merchandise and in turn get advertising for their game or even the character itself. And yes that contest was essentially the same as a GameFAQs character battle. You notice we never cite those? The reason is they're unreliable as anyone could partake in them, so who she 'beat' in the brackets is meaningless. If something was actually said about the character in that case too it'd be unusable as well: the poll was not run by an independent party, but Konami themselves.
I've done this long enough and bounced off GA- and FA-nominations enough times to know what does and doesn't work for an article. You could try meeting me halfway there if you want it to stick around, because there's enough material to work with there...but not the way you're going about it.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 18:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
You recently reverted two category edits I made concerning fiction samurai and fictional ninja [1] [2] bringing them into the non-fictional categories.
As I understand Wikipedia:Categorization#Articles 'Articles on fictional subjects should not be categorized in a manner that confuses them with real subjects.', it would be better with the former categories. Could you give me your views on this? Thanks! jmcw ( talk) 12:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Fictional characters
Let me rephrase it and explain: all "Fictional something" articles are sub-section to "Something" articles. For example, "Fictional queens" is in "Queens" and "Fictional countries" is in "Countries". And these subjects often have nothing to do with "Japanese media", like for example Bushido (comics) for the samurai and Psylocke for the ninja. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm trying to assume good faith here...but it's really looking like you have a different standard when it comes to character articles if the subject is an attractive female. You agree in the other discussion that sources need to satisfy notability in one discussion and should actually discuss the character the article is about, yet when the matter comes up regarding putting it in practice on such an article, you argue against it if you have a vested interest on the subject. And I know you're an intelligent person so I'm not going to honestly believe you feel poor articles should exist just because others do...or does that go out the window if we're discussing something with t&a involved?-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 16:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Niemti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Wipsenade (
talk) 13:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I joined the ANI discussion and immediately discovered what you meant about Sjones23. I recommended that you apply for a mediation to resolve the conflict, my personal opinion would be a topic block for the other editor, but not being an administrator, I don't have the ability to enforce such a block. That's my recommendation, good luck. Go Phightins! ( talk) 02:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Just wondering if you're going to complete the Nuclear Strike GA review? If you meant to pass it, you need to replace the template on the talk page. bridies ( talk) 02:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
I was hoping I could get an outside opinion over at List of God of War characters. There's a current discussion (though nothing's been posted since August 28th) here that goes over some points. If you want to take a look at the points addressed and their differences, they're here (my proposed version) and here (Bluerim's proposed version). -- JDC808 ♫ 01:27, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Curse of Enchantia/GA1 is on hold. bridies ( talk) 10:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I know exactly what you're talking about as you can see
here. I had listed
God of War III (which is B-Class) for an A-Class assessment because of the page you linked. Then after listing it, I noticed that the assessment page states "To nominate an article for A-class, start a nomination thread on the article's talk page and notify the project here with a link to said thread. Please note that articles must be GA-class before nomination." I asked an editor who's done assessments on the assessment page and they said it should be GA-Class before A-Class nomination. It does make sense because A-Class is the step between GA and FA. This is a confusing matter becuase of the contradiction that the Quality Scale states. I believe we should start a discussion at the appropriate section to clear up this issue. I see that there is a discussion on this matter. Until it is resolved, I would suggest to wait to nominate them for A-Class that way there's not a bunch of reverts at the page over this issue.
On a related note, for the three articles that are GA class that you've nominated for A-Class, you'll need to add a new section on the Talk page for each article. All you have to do is title it "A-Class assessment" and state something simple like "Seeking assessment for A-Class." -- JDC808 ♫ 01:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey. I've been seeing your edits on the Requests page-- refusing to discuss a possible resolution by simply stating "well you're wrong!" and then reverting edits is teetering on the edge of disruptive editing. At this rate it's only a matter of time before one or the both of you are blocked for edit-warring. I think the two of you should calm down and try to strike a compromise on this issue. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 22:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
The discussion is going on elswhere and I didn't revert, I just did it properly (hid the requests for a time being, even as there's nothing wrong with them and never was). To be exact, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#A-class (and as I said there, it's unclear to me now what's even the very point of A-class, to begin with). -- Niemti ( talk) 22:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Salvidrim! 02:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
I undid some edits of yours where you redirected james bond characters to other articles because you never started a merge discussion. If you still believe they should be merged, you should add {{ Merge to}} and {{ Merge from}} to the relevant articles and start discussion. I undid your redirects of Plenty O'Toole, General Grubozaboyschikov, and Agent Strawberry Fields. If there's any I missed, it would be great if you could undo them so they can be properly discussed, or at least let me know which ones they are. Ryan Vesey 04:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Ryan Vesey 15:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
"One more revert, and I'll have this article deleted, not just redirected."
-- Welcome to the new Wikipedia, ladies & gents, where being a totally inflexible hardass is the newly updated definition of "civil". I mean, there's utterly no need for explanations in edit comments or Talk pages let alone (gosh!) reaching a consensus, or even droll references to 3RR once you've spent enough time learning the ropes and schmoozing your way to mod or mod's pet in order to then jam your-way-or-the-highway down everyone else's pie-hole like a complete bully. Buff those Barnstars, baby; I'm sure you've earned 'em. Before you know it, you'll have the full page collection with narcissist oak-leaf clusters. Yeehaw!-- 66.41.95.121 ( talk) 00:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
See the GA review, one piece about removing her seems a bit like original research or synthesis. I've heard the claim, but could not find verification myself, I've marked it with a CN for now because I think it was covered in the Ultimania books. Again, if its just a loose source that refers to the second sentence (as it seems natural) just tag it with the ref.
I was under the impression that it was too late /costly or omitted because the characters were 'secret' and not necessarily there for the scenes like the ending. This should be noted, it was my only issue with that. And the other was the personality being ran into the 'appearances' aspect, I think that should be pulled out, but that is not an obligation. So I passed it. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Plz, read (or re-read) Template:PD-textlogo and Wikipedia:Public_domain#Fonts and look on many others simple text logos (marked by Template:PD-textlogo or commons:Template:PD-textlogo) on En-wiki or Commons. Alex Spade ( talk) 20:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
I just noticed that in this edit you've repositioned an edit I made yesterday and I was wondering what the rationale was for this. My original reason for including the review where I did was because it looked to me like the review subsection covered different reviews in chronological order and so the 1995 Famitsu review came between the 1993 French award and the 1996 Computer Game World review. Is it because the Famitsu review covered a console version? Or is there some other order I'm not seeing? - Thibbs ( talk) 12:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
It was only a review. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I have just deleted, twice, the repeated reference to homosexual and child abuser. Just because two papers said almost the same thing doesn't mean it needs repeating. tThe section is about content, not about what the papers say. In fact, the notion of homosexuality, and the marriage of a young girl to an adult man is only offensive to some Muslims. What the west call paedophilia is not offensive to many African, Afghani or pakistani men. And in Saudi Arabia, chartered planes take loads of men to Manila, Philippines, to enjoy the "Lady Boys". The key issues are
The other issues concern Christians, and a the West. They are naturally the ones that the Daily Mirror seizes on.
But the other issues, cited by Reuters, are the real issues, which offend all Muslims, including homosexual, bisexual, philandering and paedophile Muslims, just as much as the "righteous" ones.
Amandajm ( talk) 12:58, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Okay, and? Are we going to incite riots be repeating mass media reports or something? -- Niemti ( talk) 13:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
It's typically considered courteous and good practice to review one GAN for each one that you nominate. Currently the GAN list shows that you've only reviewed 1-2 GANs, but have several nominated. Perhaps reviewing more will help get people interested on your GANs that aren't being reviewed. -- Teancum ( talk) 13:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
<<oo>>
I really do like your style. It makes me laugh and...that is rare.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 07:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your good faith contributions to Psylocke, however please take time to read the Wikipedia's comics project guidelines regarding superhero infobox images, which explicitly states that an image facing-the-camera is preferable over a profile picture.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 12:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.123.123.136 ( talk) 20:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Resident Evil characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NECA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
You need to stop harassing people about your hobby-horse. There is no rule that says categories need to be in alphabetical order. Do not leave messages on users' talkpages, do not write allcaps edit-summaries. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I'm curious as to why you removed Fallout: New Vegas soundtrack from {{ Fallout}}. It's undoubtedly related. Was your concern with that article's quality? -- BDD ( talk) 18:53, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced and trvial. Could be deleted or just redirected but I tagged it for a merge instead. Something like in Max Payne 3, for example. -- Niemti ( talk) 18:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you reverted some of my edits on Beat 'em up, not understanding what they were about. User:Jagged 85 has just been community banned for years of widespread, systemic abuse of sources. Basically, writing untrue stuff into articles, citing it to a source, and then when and if someone checks that source, it doesn't support the statement at all. He first did this from at least 2007 until he was caught in 2010. During this time he was editing history articles (history of Islamic science mainly). The clean-up from that is still ongoing 2 years later: we're talking tens of thousands of edits to thousands of articles. After that, he moved to editing video game articles, and did the same thing. As I said, he's been community banned, and all his edits are to be overturned (we're talking thousands of edits to VG articles alone). If anything is to kept, the onus is on whoever puts it back in to verify the material is really supported by the source, and that it wasn't plagiarised (this being another thing he's done on a large scale). If you're going to re-add anything, please do that and write on the talk page exactly what the source said. More info here Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Jagged 85. See also Jagged 85's page, and the ANI currently. Thanks, bridies ( talk) 15:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Uhhh... okay? Weird. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't think these KLOV and allgame references were actually even used as sources. More like just links for verification that the game really exists, when it has no Wikipedia page. Or something. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Or taht's what I would do. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:26, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
They forgot to notify you, so I am. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 17:25, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Ibuki (Street Fighter)/GA1 is on hold. bridies ( talk) 17:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
"Captions can consist of a few words of description, or several sentences. Writing good captions is difficult, and the examples below may be helpful. Along with the title, the lead, and section headings, captions are the most commonly read words in an article, so they should be succinct and informative." Okay? And I like it this way. -- Niemti ( talk) 18:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
It's not distracting in the least, it's the complete story as told by UDON, CAPCOM, and third party (IGN). As the above says, the captions are going to be read anyway. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:20, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello
At 14:05 on 20 September 2012 you edited the 14 September 2012 Camp Bastion attack article and placed a re-write template at the top. I have since cleaned up the article and i like to ask if it would be possible if you could pop over and check it is alright now and if it isn't some suggestions if possible? Thanks Gavbadger ( talk) 23:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Excellent recent edits, Niemti. I've noticed the quality in your work, so enjoy this cheeseburger! AnddoX ( talk) 20:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC) |
Ninja Gaiden series? -- Niemti ( talk) 18:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | |
Thank you for your many creations and tireless edits to allow articles to become nominated as Good Article! Work on Nominator! GoShow (............................) |
Thanks for uploading File:Ibuki SSDIV alternate.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/TheDarkPyrano#Comments_by_other_users. Also, the barnstar directly above this post looks broken and I don't know how to fix it. Cheers, Reyk YO! 06:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi, please take this as a positive pointer for the future rather than criticism for its own sake. I'm surprised that as an experienced editor with FAC experience you chose to respond to Nikkimaria's comments in the way you did. She is widely respected for her thankless checking of references, and the use of words like "ridiculous" and "silly" is hardly likely to encourage other volunteer reviewers to comment. I don't normally review games articles anyway, but I had thought of doing so when I saw how limited the responses had been — until I saw why. I'll hope you'll see this in a positive light in case you should thing of resubmitting at a future date. Cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
By "silly" I meant all the "editors of" from the article (because who else). -- Niemti ( talk) 16:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti. No problem. Can you point out where it says this in the guidelines, though? -- GentlemanGhost ( talk) 18:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
You do realize we need something to *cite* for that other than just 'you emailed her and she responded', right? I'm not doubting you or I'd have reverted that, but yeah we kinda need something to cite in case it comes into question.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 21:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
jennifer@jenniferhale.com -- Niemti ( talk) 21:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
You know that only you ever had a "problem" about it, right? And no one else. -- Niemti ( talk) 05:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
And the source is her official website, endorsing the list by IMDb. -- Niemti ( talk) 06:08, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 5 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee for things which need to be addressed. Kürbis ( ✔) 19:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
If you are talking about my recent edits in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, a lot of character sections on the Wikipedia pages for different shows have the character names bolded. Rtkat3 ( talk) 7:39, September 30 2012 (UTC)
Which is all wrong. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
I've reviewed your nomination of RE4 for GAC and have left my concerns in it's talk page. Congrats on the very well written article. -- Pedro J. the rookie 01:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Niemti,
I just created new page, Tagantsev conspiracy. Could you help with improving it? How do you think, would it qualify for DYK? Thanks, My very best wishes ( talk) 02:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Too many images, used in his own article. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Nikolay Gumilev. -- Niemti ( talk) 20:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lopota Gorge hostage crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divide and conquer ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I was thinking of reviewing Day Z, that you have nominated for GAN. It's a very well written and well researched but, since their is a full version of the game that is in production and has not been released yet, may I suggest you withdraw the nomination until the full game is released so that the article will have a more, may I say, complete structure. -- Pedro J. the rookie 18:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
It's about the mod, not the game. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I guess I should try reading the article before jumping to conclusions. I just assumed that it was original research because the articles Chris Redfield, Claire Redfield, and Rebecca Chambers were all in the category Fictional American people of English descent and there are no sources in the articles that say that they are of English descent. It was an honest mistake. For the record, I didn't delete any sourced material. -- John of Lancaster ( talk) 04:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MC Bourbonnais Yoko.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Claude Bourbonnais 2012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I am just curious as to why you removed an edit I made. I don't think I'd broken any 'rules' or done something incorrectly. It was valid and factual information so I don't know what prompted you to remove it. 24.141.100.74 ( talk) 22:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
A random Blogspot post is not a reliable source. -- Niemti ( talk) 22:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
It's not random, it's mine. I started the zombie walk. What I added was a fact. So, if a media outlet did not document the event is there another way to add it fairly? 24.141.100.74 ( talk) 22:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Also, [22] is a blog, and [45] is Facebook. 24.141.100.74 ( talk) 23:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis ( ✔) 17:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
The issue started here. I don't want to undo your work, but this is the first edit that caused the problem. -- Teancum ( talk) 16:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Alza08 has reinstated Tilly Masterton. You properly made it a redirect page on 19:56, 5 July 2012. I myself reversed Alza08. He again reinstated the article. He also reverted your redirects on several other Bond character pages. - Fanthrillers ( talk) 22:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I see. Thanks. -- Niemti ( talk) 22:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Shadowrun (Super Nintendo Entertainment System video game)/GA1 is on hold. bridies ( talk) 14:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I noticed you recently reverted one of my edits in Johnny Cage, yet did not provide a reason for doing so in the edit summary, so the content has again been removed. Calling a fictional character "the douchiest," regardless of the responsible source, is juvenile and non-encyclopedic, and adds nothing to the discussion, which is why it was removed. There is still plenty of material remaining in the section regarding the positive/negative reception of the character. Thanks. sixtynine • spill it • 21:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
left|thumbnail|256px|Very dark, not much color Hello. I have noticed your recent replacement of the old Ninja Gaiden 3 screenshot. Although I do like it, I do not believe that it is very appealing to the reader. The old revision had flashes of both red and dark blue, but this new one does not show much contrast in the color. I personally think that viewers visiting Wikipedia articles would like a nice overall layout to them, and that the previous screenshot would have fulfilled this attractiveness. However, the current version is very dark, with characters blending into the background.
I'll leave it up to you to decide, though. I do like the new screenshot, don't get me wrong, but contrast is far more appealing in a Wikipedia article. Please respond if you feel the same.
Cheers. -- Anddo ( talk) 21:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
I've been thinking of sprucing up this article one of these days with more references and some rewritten prose before sending it to GAN - it still seems a little bit crufty - but do you think it's likely to pass the way it is with no further work? If so, that would be a load off my back, and I'd leave it alone for now. -- LoK Wiki ( talk) 12:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Maybe? I don't know actually. -- Niemti ( talk) 12:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm the person that declined your initial Good Article nomination for XCOM: Enemy Unknown. I find it rather unsettling that you have renominated it with no attempt to improve the section that caused me to fail it, with no discussion about the first GAN, and without even supplying a useful edit summary. To be frank, that kind of behavior makes me question all of your good article nominations. If you aren't willing to address concerns in GANs, the process won't work. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Expansion tag was arbitrary (one user thought it's not enough, while I think it's enough, and I've seen no sources discuss it any further anyway, and I didn't play the game while all the others thousands users every day also didn't write one more word there) and is not listed among the quick-fail tags. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not assume ownership of articles such as XCOM: Enemy Unknown. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. In instructing another to 'stop fucking up [your] articles', your incivility is manifest, as is your presumption of ownership of the content, and these issues plainly contradict the collaborative premise of the encyclopedia. Thanks, Mephistophelian (contact) 17:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi.
Can you tell me why do you think this image is not a good illustration? I already see a worse further below in the article.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk) 12:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
W-what? It's an excellent image, absolutely representative of the character and quite iconic too, and seriously, no screenshots. Also - just as few non-free images as possible. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I "do know that the 1992 PoP has a different story than the 2008 PoP, right" (because I wrote most of this article, right). A screenshot shows a small, quite low-poly character, in a random pose, distracting a viewer with random background and the enemy. It's also not at all an iconic picture. What the article actually lacks, is something like that. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
It's not only just a concept art, it's also promotional and iconic image just as I already told AND showed you once. Iconic = well known and popular. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Haha, you look pretty bad. It's 4th, 12th, 17th, etc. Including on wallpapers and such. Now, stop talking to me about it. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
If your method of dealing with other editors and their concerns about articles is to insult them, I can only heartily recommend that you can equally go and get stuffed. Your reasoning, whether it is good or not, is immediately tarnished by such unnecessary hostility and rudeness. -- Sabre ( talk) 14:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ninja Gaiden 3 Razor's Edge logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth for things which need to be addressed. Tomcat ( 7) 10:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Niemti,
Just to let you know I've started the GA review for Kitana (Mortal Kombat) which can be found here - Cabe 6403 ( Talk• Sign) 10:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
In order to avoid an edit war, I started a discussion about whether robots and other AI programs are anthropomorphic at Talk:Anthropomorphism#Robots. Feel free to join the discussion, but please accept the outcome of it, as I will. JDDJS ( talk) 18:42, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
You filed a report at WP:ANI. As you already know - and as you were reminded there - you are required to advise the party being reported. It's been some time now ... when will you be notifying them? ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
It's vandalism only acocunt, not a "party" of any kind. -- Niemti ( talk) 12:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Another World (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Miller ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth for comments about the article. Well done! Tomcat ( 7) 18:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to this discussion on my recent plot change. You might want to have a look at this. I am not telling you whether or how you should respond, but I do think you should be aware of his one-sided version of events. Cheers! -- JTBX ( talk) 20:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
First off, how is "highly successful" subjective? God of War has sold a successful amount of copies, it has spawned lots of merchandise, and has become an award winning franchise and has set the bar for action games. In regards to it being "unsourced," this is one of those cases that it doesn't need to be. Most video game fans know that God of War is a highly successful game and franchise. Plus, the article of God of War itself goes into that. By the "unsourced" token, we should then remove all the games that he's in but aren't sourced.
The paragraph about costumes, to state "the costume Athena" is repetitive as costumes is already stated previously, and Athena is just an example of the costumes.
There's also no need to rename the "Merchandise" section to "Merchandise and promotion." -- JDC808 ♫ 21:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
This info is unsourced AND UNRELATED (because it's an article about a character) and thus out of place. "Athena" is a costume and not the character (as your version incrrectly indicates by not putting it in quotation marks - unlike the other costume - the female Athena is just confusing, like if the original Athena was not female or something). And it's "Merchandise and promotion" because it's precisely merchandise and promotion (and it was me who named it as just "Merchandise" it first place). -- Niemti ( talk) 22:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
It's just wild guessing - maybe it would actually MORE successful with another character, or some different version of Kratos, you don't know it. It's "silly argument" that it "doesn't need changed" - the word "merchandise" doesn't quite cover the games' promotional bonuses (also you don't own it too, so to speak). -- Niemti ( talk) 23:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ayane Dead or Alive.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Since this is part of procedure, I am letting you know that there is a WP:Requests for comment towards you. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Niemti. GamerPro64 02:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MK9 Mileena.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ryu Hayabusa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Canterbury Tail talk 18:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Ninja Gaiden 3 Razor's Edge gameplay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit 00:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I don't think we've interacted before, but I was just drawn to the ban discussion on AN. I've opposed the ban, but I think you should try harder to be civil to other users (not to say that I've been the best role model in that department though). Recently, another user appeared to be heading for a ban, but was able to turn community sentiment around by voluntarily agreeing to a set of editing restrictions (see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Youreallycan). Would you consider proposing a (different) set of restrictions in lieu of a ban? Just a suggestion though, you're under no obligation to do so. Good luck, Mark Arsten ( talk) 18:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
I would totally make an use of this forced wikibreak thing, for one. That's something that would be of use for me personally, as in: (much) more time for me for everything else, including some things that are just ridiculously overdue now. -- Niemti ( talk) 18:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social Justice (periodical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Doherty ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ayane Dead or Alive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Can you please use edit summaries when you are editing articles. Some of you edits can be easily mistaken for vandalism when made without summaries, especially those where you delete large portions of articles such as this one. Edit summaries also allow other users to understand why changes were made. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 16:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Since it appears no one else has clarified this to you, a good faith explanation: "Malleus" is User:Malleus Fatuorum. He's one of the top handful of content contributors left standing, in terms of successful FACs. He's also frequently and unrepentantly uncivil. Right now there's some kind of arbcom case regarding his incivility, and it seems to be the focal point of a broader debate about the enforcement of incivility: basically, if someone is both uncivil (and can't or won't change) but a really good contributor, do we ban them or not? So this is why people have been both defending and criticising you in comparison to him. Personally I (also?) find these comparisons really frustrating, partly because Malleus is both a much better writer and much more insulting than you, but also because the issues we brought up were about much broader things than straightforward incivility vs. contributions. But there you go. bridies ( talk) 13:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
...You've totally lost me at what you're getting at. You seem upset "stonewalling" and "doublestandards" and and "ignoring" and whatnot. I'm not following at all, but it seemed to be drifting off into something personal against me, so I figured we'd move it to talk pages. What exactly were you getting at? Sergecross73 msg me 21:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
"Stonewalling" was not about you (that's LB), "double standards" regarding how you think you (and everyone) can ignore me, but I can't ignore the others. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:27, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Tekken Tag Tournament 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 5 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Tekken Tag Tournament 2 for things which need to be addressed. Tomcat ( 7) 12:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
I went ahead and passed the article, though I do strongly recommend you go through and rework the prose a little tighter, just to ensure legibility and flow of information, and consider the strength of sources. Yeah this isn't the same scale as FAC, but it does make things easier for the person that picks up the work after you seeking to take it there. Heck if anything I wish you'd slow down on your volleys on GA nominations and put more care into the articles: GA should be used as a point for fixing small things up, not major repairs.
I'm honestly expecting a knee-jerk reaction where you defend yourself from what I just said, but I stand by my statement and hope you at least consider it.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
I've already asked on Fallout series for an additional copy edit (even as I don't really see any urgent need). -- Niemti ( talk) 15:47, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Do you have email and 10 mins of free time? -- JTBX ( talk) 23:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes? -- Niemti ( talk) 23:44, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Apologies, I must not have properly submitted my update. I'll get back to this tonight. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 12:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Glad to see the silly ban motion went nowhere. Keep up the great work you do here and thank you for your valuable contributions. BTW, "tldr" is absolutley the best way I have ever seen to respond to an RfC! Joefromrandb ( talk) 16:01, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
I think there is something to be learned here. You should really listen to people, learn and adapt. If people are coming in big numbers to AN and criticize you, they can not be all wrong. There is at least some your fault here. How to fix it? Just do exactly what they say, even if they do not act as your friends: stop telling anything they consider incivility or assertion of ownership, use edit summaries and ask other people to review your articles before nominating them at GAN. This should be easy.
Now, speaking about your responses, such as one on the RfC, this is something very much natural: you want to tell people how wrong they are and that you do not care. This helps to relieve your stress and feel better. Do not do it. Not only this makes others feel bad (to the degree they complain on AN), but you can be blocked or banned for doing this at any moment.
I would also suggest not be obsessed with editing any specific subject area. If there is a particularly nasty dispute somewhere, you can easily edit something else for a while, rather than risking development of a conflict. If anyone follows you around on a number different subjects, that will make them look bad. Since you like subjects like Ninjas, here is what art of war tells: "Anyone who excels in defeating his enemies triumphs before his enemy's threat become real". This is not to tell that there are "enemies" around, but rather to emphasize the importance of conflict-free editing. ( you are welcome to remove this my comment). My very best wishes ( talk) 17:04, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Legends Chun-Li.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Darkstalkers comic 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kung Lao comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Goro MK comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Scorpion Mortal Kombat comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mortal Kombat Battlewave 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)