Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Tom Suozzi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Thomas Suozzi. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Thomas Suozzi. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
Thomas Suozzi. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Thomas Suozzi. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. —
ξ
xplicit
06:28, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
the information posted by the previous editor is inaccurate and slanderous.
Please see [1] as it is a discussion about your recent edits. Frmatt ( talk) 06:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lemonyellowsun for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — ξ xplicit 06:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Tom Suozzi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Thomas Suozzi. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Thomas Suozzi. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
Thomas Suozzi. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
Frmatt (
talk)
06:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Thomas Suozzi. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. —
ξ
xplicit
06:28, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
the information posted by the previous editor is inaccurate and slanderous.
Please see [1] as it is a discussion about your recent edits. Frmatt ( talk) 06:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lemonyellowsun for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — ξ xplicit 06:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.