![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Why not hardblock 64.202.160.0/19? Spellcast ( talk) 22:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
For some reason, the 208.109.0.0/16 block doesn't seem to be working. See 208.109.19.19 ( talk · contribs). Spellcast ( talk) 12:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you block 129.250.211.0/10? I've warned them on each of their talk pages, and they continue to vandalise my talk page. Here are some diffs, [1], [2], [3]. Its getting pretty annoying and they've made no useful contributions whatsoever. He seems intent on vandalising my talk page because i deleted his comments on the Greys Annatomy talk page regarding a song question. I thought id come straight to an admin, but if there are other means of reporting people like this i'll take it through that. Thanks in advance! Metagraph comment 04:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, im not too familiar with rangeblocks. Thanks alot, now back to editing. Metagraph comment 05:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Brian Posehn Monster Under Your Bed ( talk) 05:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
You blocked this editor as a vandalism only account and they are requesting to be unblocked. Looking at the edits, you may have inadvertently blocked the wrong account. Take a look when you have a second. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 06:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor ( talk) 22:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RestoreTheEmpireSociety and Btzkillerv ( talk · contribs)? I think Btzkillerv's personal/racist attacks [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] quite resemble to RestoreTheEmpireSociety ( talk · contribs) indefinitely blocked by you for his racist attacks. Although RFCU would eventually take care of the case, but I think the user's behaviors need attentions by admins. Thanks.-- Caspian blue ( talk) 23:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ryulong. Okaaay - you just indef blocked the above editor for 'disruptive editing' [9] but they've only ever edited twice. You also immediately deleted their userpage. Can you possibly explain where they're being disruptive and what warranted an indef block? Thanks - Alison ❤ 05:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Quick one, I saw where you deleted an edit at ANI from an IP [10]. I certainly have no problem with that, I just wanted to know the reason he got removed so quickly. Are IPs not allowed to be a part of those discussions, or was it an IP sock issue? Just asking for future reference, thanks! Dayewalker ( talk) 05:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
You have commented in the past either for or against a video on the ejaculation article. There is currently a survey discussing this topic if you care to offer your opinion. Atom ( talk) 13:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
So you think I use a "welcomebot". Do tell me how you propose I am doing this? DougsTech ( talk) 09:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Enough of this. You were warned. You continued to perform edits that you were warned not to do. I deleted your huggle.css page, and protected it from creation for one month. You are no longer going to use an automated tool to welcome anyone: IP users with new edits, new users, old users, IP users with old edits, no one. There are several other administrators here and on your talk page who say that I was not wrong in what I did. Any more messages over this issue will be promptly removed from my talk page.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are listed as the protecting admin for Shuki Levy. The page has been semiprotected for longer than 2 months without an expiry date set. Because Wikipedia relies on contributers to make the encyclopedia, I'm asking you to review your decision and either
I hope that you will do one of the two in order to reduce the backlog of pages that have been semiprotected for very long period of time. Thank you. - Royalguard11( T) 19:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Why am I receiving this message?
You are receiving this message because you are listed as the protecting admin for VR Troopers. The page has been semiprotected for longer than 2 months without an expiry date set. Because Wikipedia relies on contributers to make the encyclopedia, I'm asking you to review your decision and either
I hope that you will do one of the two in order to reduce the backlog of pages that have been semiprotected for very long period of time. Thank you. - Royalguard11( T) 19:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Why am I receiving this message?
Sci-Fi is not Wikipedia and does not have to adhere to WP:UE or similar guidelines. I repeat, get NARUTO or BLEACH moved, and I'll agree; until then, I won't agree.-- 十 八 05:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, TV Nihon provided half of the name origin: As Pacha Kamaq's name is pun on both the deity of the same name and the ruins of Pachacamac (named after the god because of its religous importance). Fractyl ( talk) 03:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
I now believe that you are harassing me. Before you even took any action regarding Huggle, you deleted my monobook.js. The reason you gave was "cleanup". You have NO RIGHT to be there. Luckily, I predicted this move, and have a local copy of what was there. I was able to restore most of what was there, then I looked at yours. You brought it upon yourself. What is an "abuse of .js". I am considering reporting this action to seek a de-admin. DougsTech ( talk) 20:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
It looks like you also have a history of harassing other users, and abusing your adminship. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Videmus+Omnia DougsTech ( talk) 21:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Looking at the talk page of Jungle Fury, you seem to be in the know about most Power Ranger stuff. My son's started to watch the show religiously and I end up watching it with him. From what I understand, the scenes with the Zords are taken from the Japanese equivalent, right? What about the scenes with the Power Rangers when they're in full costumes wearing their helmets? Theo is really short and RJ is really tall, but when they're standing next to each other in their ranger suits they look almost the same height. This leads me to think that these scenes are from Japan too, but then the surrounding buildings (especially in that "square" where they do a lot of fighting (there's a food court, a games store and a few others) look the same. And I've seen English signs on walls too. Also the scenes with Dai Shi, the bouncy people, Jellica and the other people in rubber costumes - Are they Japanese scenes too? Thanks in advance, Matthew Edwards ( talk • contribs • email) 08:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
FYI, I'm performing undeletion requests for User:SLJCOAAATR 1 and User:Unknown the Hedgehog based entirely off my subjective opinions on what is and isn't constructive content in userspace. I'm just letting you know to head off potential issues with this, and so you don't take it the wrong way. Cheers. lifebaka ++ 20:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, Ryu, well, during the whole big fiasco, all of my stuff was deleted. Lifebaka was kind enough to hep me get most things back. I was hoping that you could help with the rest? It's just a bunch of userboxes that I've made over the times. Thank you, and regards! Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. Soul 22:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
(OD)Is this really the way to show wikipedia editors that you're serious about making contributions to the encyclopedia, since you guys just came off blocks for being too obsessed with your userpages and boxes? Dayewalker ( talk) 00:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Just checking to make sure you saw this, but another admin is offering the userboxes back. [11] Dayewalker ( talk) 02:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Another TyrusThomas4lyf sock is active: 99.141.23.146 ( talk · contribs · logs). Would it be possible to semi-protect the following pages to discourage his reappearance?
Thanks! — Myasuda ( talk) 01:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
He's another sock of indefinitely blocked and multiple-socker User:TyrusThomas4lyf, who returns, makes the same changes he's been trying to make for months without ever justifying anything on talk pages, and whipping sock accusations and edit wars around him as he goes. He's currently at 99.145.217.208 ( talk · contribs · logs), edit warring again. Any help would be greatly apprecated. Thanks! Dayewalker ( talk) 02:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
-- mboverload @ 03:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Ryudecay -- mboverload @ 04:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual
New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please
sign up and be sure to
bring something! Please be sure to come!
You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the
invite list.
BrownBot (
talk)
20:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Phelps even gets compared to him in an article. It's an interesting bit of conversation right now (agreed, once Phelps wins two more championships, it's acadameic), but I think it's a good item for the article. SirFozzie ( talk) 07:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Almost no one has opposed merger, if we read beyond the !votes, and everybody suggested different ways of merging these articles. Lack of participation can delay consensus, but as long the argument remains valid, there is no reason to assume that consensus wouldn't be reached. The intention should be constructing an encyclopedia that is not confusing or ethnocentric, not even in pieces, rather than constructing an encyclopedia that values the bureaucracy of appropriate tagging system over that of content. I am not implying that you had such an intention, rather I am clarifying my position here. You are right in one way - the tags are not helping much. May be this concern has to be addressed in different way, but it needs to be cleaned up, no matter how much of laziness it meets. May be WP:BRD is the only way to get people discussing and reaching consensus. I'll take a look at the possibilities. If necessary I am perfectly willing to put myself into the line of fire, while others can go about quoting policies and guidelines without trying to resolve anything. Thanks for showing me what was not working. Aditya( talk • contribs) 11:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
You reverted my revert here [12]. Didn't you know that User:Avinesh is another user and User:Avineshjose just redirected the former's user page without going through the process? Uzhuthiran ( talk) 13:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ryulong, what's up with the block of Nano-Tyranno ( talk · contribs)? I'm not seeing anything particularly evil jumping out at me from a quick first glance. east718 // talk // email // 02:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
How did you determine that this address was operating an open proxy? Can you determine whether it still is? My limited tests seem to indicate that it is not. -- Chris (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Heh, I forgot to check 3128 (I think I scanned 1-1024,8080-8082). While it does seem to be an open proxy, if you go to whatismyip.com using it, it reports 68.72.39.170. So blocking this IP is doing exactly zero good for Wikipedia, since the requests seem to be routed to come from somewhere else. I have tried some Tor .onion addresses which all seem to fail, so it's not a Tor in-proxy. But it's forwarding the requests somewhere else for sure. -- Chris (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, the article's starting to surface. New-Den-O
Plus, the movie site is now opened. [13]
Fractyl ( talk) 16:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I wondered why there was an olive padlock on the Conservapedia article, and saw that you'd move-protected it in April following some drive-by vandalism ( logs). Since there was no expiry on the protection just letting you know, since it seems unnecessary to keep it protected permanently. • Anakin (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Why not hardblock 64.202.160.0/19? Spellcast ( talk) 22:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
For some reason, the 208.109.0.0/16 block doesn't seem to be working. See 208.109.19.19 ( talk · contribs). Spellcast ( talk) 12:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you block 129.250.211.0/10? I've warned them on each of their talk pages, and they continue to vandalise my talk page. Here are some diffs, [1], [2], [3]. Its getting pretty annoying and they've made no useful contributions whatsoever. He seems intent on vandalising my talk page because i deleted his comments on the Greys Annatomy talk page regarding a song question. I thought id come straight to an admin, but if there are other means of reporting people like this i'll take it through that. Thanks in advance! Metagraph comment 04:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, im not too familiar with rangeblocks. Thanks alot, now back to editing. Metagraph comment 05:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Brian Posehn Monster Under Your Bed ( talk) 05:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
You blocked this editor as a vandalism only account and they are requesting to be unblocked. Looking at the edits, you may have inadvertently blocked the wrong account. Take a look when you have a second. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 06:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor ( talk) 22:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RestoreTheEmpireSociety and Btzkillerv ( talk · contribs)? I think Btzkillerv's personal/racist attacks [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] quite resemble to RestoreTheEmpireSociety ( talk · contribs) indefinitely blocked by you for his racist attacks. Although RFCU would eventually take care of the case, but I think the user's behaviors need attentions by admins. Thanks.-- Caspian blue ( talk) 23:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ryulong. Okaaay - you just indef blocked the above editor for 'disruptive editing' [9] but they've only ever edited twice. You also immediately deleted their userpage. Can you possibly explain where they're being disruptive and what warranted an indef block? Thanks - Alison ❤ 05:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Quick one, I saw where you deleted an edit at ANI from an IP [10]. I certainly have no problem with that, I just wanted to know the reason he got removed so quickly. Are IPs not allowed to be a part of those discussions, or was it an IP sock issue? Just asking for future reference, thanks! Dayewalker ( talk) 05:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
You have commented in the past either for or against a video on the ejaculation article. There is currently a survey discussing this topic if you care to offer your opinion. Atom ( talk) 13:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
So you think I use a "welcomebot". Do tell me how you propose I am doing this? DougsTech ( talk) 09:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Enough of this. You were warned. You continued to perform edits that you were warned not to do. I deleted your huggle.css page, and protected it from creation for one month. You are no longer going to use an automated tool to welcome anyone: IP users with new edits, new users, old users, IP users with old edits, no one. There are several other administrators here and on your talk page who say that I was not wrong in what I did. Any more messages over this issue will be promptly removed from my talk page.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are listed as the protecting admin for Shuki Levy. The page has been semiprotected for longer than 2 months without an expiry date set. Because Wikipedia relies on contributers to make the encyclopedia, I'm asking you to review your decision and either
I hope that you will do one of the two in order to reduce the backlog of pages that have been semiprotected for very long period of time. Thank you. - Royalguard11( T) 19:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Why am I receiving this message?
You are receiving this message because you are listed as the protecting admin for VR Troopers. The page has been semiprotected for longer than 2 months without an expiry date set. Because Wikipedia relies on contributers to make the encyclopedia, I'm asking you to review your decision and either
I hope that you will do one of the two in order to reduce the backlog of pages that have been semiprotected for very long period of time. Thank you. - Royalguard11( T) 19:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Why am I receiving this message?
Sci-Fi is not Wikipedia and does not have to adhere to WP:UE or similar guidelines. I repeat, get NARUTO or BLEACH moved, and I'll agree; until then, I won't agree.-- 十 八 05:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, TV Nihon provided half of the name origin: As Pacha Kamaq's name is pun on both the deity of the same name and the ruins of Pachacamac (named after the god because of its religous importance). Fractyl ( talk) 03:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
I now believe that you are harassing me. Before you even took any action regarding Huggle, you deleted my monobook.js. The reason you gave was "cleanup". You have NO RIGHT to be there. Luckily, I predicted this move, and have a local copy of what was there. I was able to restore most of what was there, then I looked at yours. You brought it upon yourself. What is an "abuse of .js". I am considering reporting this action to seek a de-admin. DougsTech ( talk) 20:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
It looks like you also have a history of harassing other users, and abusing your adminship. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Videmus+Omnia DougsTech ( talk) 21:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Looking at the talk page of Jungle Fury, you seem to be in the know about most Power Ranger stuff. My son's started to watch the show religiously and I end up watching it with him. From what I understand, the scenes with the Zords are taken from the Japanese equivalent, right? What about the scenes with the Power Rangers when they're in full costumes wearing their helmets? Theo is really short and RJ is really tall, but when they're standing next to each other in their ranger suits they look almost the same height. This leads me to think that these scenes are from Japan too, but then the surrounding buildings (especially in that "square" where they do a lot of fighting (there's a food court, a games store and a few others) look the same. And I've seen English signs on walls too. Also the scenes with Dai Shi, the bouncy people, Jellica and the other people in rubber costumes - Are they Japanese scenes too? Thanks in advance, Matthew Edwards ( talk • contribs • email) 08:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
FYI, I'm performing undeletion requests for User:SLJCOAAATR 1 and User:Unknown the Hedgehog based entirely off my subjective opinions on what is and isn't constructive content in userspace. I'm just letting you know to head off potential issues with this, and so you don't take it the wrong way. Cheers. lifebaka ++ 20:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, Ryu, well, during the whole big fiasco, all of my stuff was deleted. Lifebaka was kind enough to hep me get most things back. I was hoping that you could help with the rest? It's just a bunch of userboxes that I've made over the times. Thank you, and regards! Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. Soul 22:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
(OD)Is this really the way to show wikipedia editors that you're serious about making contributions to the encyclopedia, since you guys just came off blocks for being too obsessed with your userpages and boxes? Dayewalker ( talk) 00:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Just checking to make sure you saw this, but another admin is offering the userboxes back. [11] Dayewalker ( talk) 02:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Another TyrusThomas4lyf sock is active: 99.141.23.146 ( talk · contribs · logs). Would it be possible to semi-protect the following pages to discourage his reappearance?
Thanks! — Myasuda ( talk) 01:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
He's another sock of indefinitely blocked and multiple-socker User:TyrusThomas4lyf, who returns, makes the same changes he's been trying to make for months without ever justifying anything on talk pages, and whipping sock accusations and edit wars around him as he goes. He's currently at 99.145.217.208 ( talk · contribs · logs), edit warring again. Any help would be greatly apprecated. Thanks! Dayewalker ( talk) 02:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
-- mboverload @ 03:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Ryudecay -- mboverload @ 04:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual
New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please
sign up and be sure to
bring something! Please be sure to come!
You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the
invite list.
BrownBot (
talk)
20:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Phelps even gets compared to him in an article. It's an interesting bit of conversation right now (agreed, once Phelps wins two more championships, it's acadameic), but I think it's a good item for the article. SirFozzie ( talk) 07:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Almost no one has opposed merger, if we read beyond the !votes, and everybody suggested different ways of merging these articles. Lack of participation can delay consensus, but as long the argument remains valid, there is no reason to assume that consensus wouldn't be reached. The intention should be constructing an encyclopedia that is not confusing or ethnocentric, not even in pieces, rather than constructing an encyclopedia that values the bureaucracy of appropriate tagging system over that of content. I am not implying that you had such an intention, rather I am clarifying my position here. You are right in one way - the tags are not helping much. May be this concern has to be addressed in different way, but it needs to be cleaned up, no matter how much of laziness it meets. May be WP:BRD is the only way to get people discussing and reaching consensus. I'll take a look at the possibilities. If necessary I am perfectly willing to put myself into the line of fire, while others can go about quoting policies and guidelines without trying to resolve anything. Thanks for showing me what was not working. Aditya( talk • contribs) 11:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
You reverted my revert here [12]. Didn't you know that User:Avinesh is another user and User:Avineshjose just redirected the former's user page without going through the process? Uzhuthiran ( talk) 13:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Ryulong, what's up with the block of Nano-Tyranno ( talk · contribs)? I'm not seeing anything particularly evil jumping out at me from a quick first glance. east718 // talk // email // 02:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
How did you determine that this address was operating an open proxy? Can you determine whether it still is? My limited tests seem to indicate that it is not. -- Chris (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Heh, I forgot to check 3128 (I think I scanned 1-1024,8080-8082). While it does seem to be an open proxy, if you go to whatismyip.com using it, it reports 68.72.39.170. So blocking this IP is doing exactly zero good for Wikipedia, since the requests seem to be routed to come from somewhere else. I have tried some Tor .onion addresses which all seem to fail, so it's not a Tor in-proxy. But it's forwarding the requests somewhere else for sure. -- Chris (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, the article's starting to surface. New-Den-O
Plus, the movie site is now opened. [13]
Fractyl ( talk) 16:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I wondered why there was an olive padlock on the Conservapedia article, and saw that you'd move-protected it in April following some drive-by vandalism ( logs). Since there was no expiry on the protection just letting you know, since it seems unnecessary to keep it protected permanently. • Anakin (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)