If you think this constitutes outing, the appropriate thing to do is to go to WP:OS, not perpetuate an edit war. A.Prock ( talk) 19:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 13:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
A couple of arbs have indicated that the involved parties list can be trimmed further, and I agree - though I think you can help with this issue. Have a look at what I said on my talk about the issue and consider whether Arthur Rubin and Beyond My Ken are involved parties - if not, perhaps you'd be ready to remove them? This might mean you need to quickly skim through previous ANIs, WQAs, BLPNs and of course relevant article talk/history. At the same time, you could remove the notification diff with respect to me (and these editors, should you find that they ought to be removed too)? Cheers, Ncmvocalist ( talk) 08:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Say, I saw your mention of possible media claims by Gottman and/or his institute. That'd be a great thing to add to the article; the criticisms in Slate were as much about the media image as the studies themselves. William Pietri ( talk) 17:07, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 12:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mathsci ( talk) 08:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
A nice demonstration of good faith . . . David.Kane ( talk) 14:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
As the "first woman to lead a FORTUNE 20 company", as CEO, per Fortune Magazine, I'd say that a little more than "fluff". While I'm no fan of the woman, removing a significant point about a notable female CEO (banned editor or not) is just not right - Alison ❤ 19:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I've answered your question here, as well as I'm able to. I'm not sure how much of an answer this really is, though, since it looks like Coren (the drafting arbitrator) isn't posting a proposed decision by either of the two times when he’d predicted he would.
I'm kind of impatient about this also, but I've already asked him about it once recently, and I don't want to keep badgering him. If you want to try and get a better idea of how long he'll be with this, you should probably ask him yourself. -- Captain Occam ( talk) 03:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
NW ( Talk) 23:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
The ArbCom case on Race and intelligence is mentioned in a letter to The Economist. [1] -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 01:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Rvcx. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hello, Rvcx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
If you think this constitutes outing, the appropriate thing to do is to go to WP:OS, not perpetuate an edit war. A.Prock ( talk) 19:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 13:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
A couple of arbs have indicated that the involved parties list can be trimmed further, and I agree - though I think you can help with this issue. Have a look at what I said on my talk about the issue and consider whether Arthur Rubin and Beyond My Ken are involved parties - if not, perhaps you'd be ready to remove them? This might mean you need to quickly skim through previous ANIs, WQAs, BLPNs and of course relevant article talk/history. At the same time, you could remove the notification diff with respect to me (and these editors, should you find that they ought to be removed too)? Cheers, Ncmvocalist ( talk) 08:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Say, I saw your mention of possible media claims by Gottman and/or his institute. That'd be a great thing to add to the article; the criticisms in Slate were as much about the media image as the studies themselves. William Pietri ( talk) 17:07, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 12:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mathsci ( talk) 08:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
A nice demonstration of good faith . . . David.Kane ( talk) 14:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
As the "first woman to lead a FORTUNE 20 company", as CEO, per Fortune Magazine, I'd say that a little more than "fluff". While I'm no fan of the woman, removing a significant point about a notable female CEO (banned editor or not) is just not right - Alison ❤ 19:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I've answered your question here, as well as I'm able to. I'm not sure how much of an answer this really is, though, since it looks like Coren (the drafting arbitrator) isn't posting a proposed decision by either of the two times when he’d predicted he would.
I'm kind of impatient about this also, but I've already asked him about it once recently, and I don't want to keep badgering him. If you want to try and get a better idea of how long he'll be with this, you should probably ask him yourself. -- Captain Occam ( talk) 03:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
NW ( Talk) 23:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
The ArbCom case on Race and intelligence is mentioned in a letter to The Economist. [1] -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 01:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Rvcx. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hello, Rvcx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)