From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2023

Information icon Hello, Rusty Soto, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Rajashree.Arunashmi ( talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ( talk) 16:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

ok sir Rusty Soto ( talk) 12:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Rusty Soto. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ( talk) 16:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Nnaemeka Clinton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nnaemeka Clinton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnaemeka Clinton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti ( talk) 06:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

CS1 error on Ross Lazaroo-Hood

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ross Lazaroo-Hood, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A " generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 07:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Information icon

Hello Rusty Soto. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ross Lazaroo-Hood, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rusty Soto. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rusty Soto|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD ( talk) 09:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello,
I have zero interest in receiving payments. I know the policies of Wikipedia and I know it is free encyclopedia. If the person is notable so he/she may have a page. And, Ross Lazaroo-Hood is a notable person and businessman.
Regards Rusty Soto ( talk) 09:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Ross Lazaroo-Hood for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ross Lazaroo-Hood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Lazaroo-Hood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep ( talk) 12:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Zubin Dowlaty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zubin Dowlaty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zubin Dowlaty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep ( talk) 12:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello,
I do not understand why you have put this tag. The candidate is enough notable to be on Wikipedia and its inclusion would be helpful for others. Please pay heed for his achievements. Rusty Soto ( talk) 14:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Abbasshaikh124 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasshaikh124. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Spicy ( talk) 23:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2023

Information icon Hello, Rusty Soto, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Rajashree.Arunashmi ( talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ( talk) 16:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

ok sir Rusty Soto ( talk) 12:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Rusty Soto. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ( talk) 16:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Nnaemeka Clinton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nnaemeka Clinton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnaemeka Clinton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti ( talk) 06:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

CS1 error on Ross Lazaroo-Hood

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ross Lazaroo-Hood, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A " generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 07:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Information icon

Hello Rusty Soto. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ross Lazaroo-Hood, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rusty Soto. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rusty Soto|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD ( talk) 09:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello,
I have zero interest in receiving payments. I know the policies of Wikipedia and I know it is free encyclopedia. If the person is notable so he/she may have a page. And, Ross Lazaroo-Hood is a notable person and businessman.
Regards Rusty Soto ( talk) 09:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Ross Lazaroo-Hood for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ross Lazaroo-Hood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Lazaroo-Hood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep ( talk) 12:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Zubin Dowlaty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zubin Dowlaty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zubin Dowlaty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep ( talk) 12:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello,
I do not understand why you have put this tag. The candidate is enough notable to be on Wikipedia and its inclusion would be helpful for others. Please pay heed for his achievements. Rusty Soto ( talk) 14:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Abbasshaikh124 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasshaikh124. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Spicy ( talk) 23:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook