“ | The best things in life are free! | ” |
— Today's
Motto of the Day
|
Ask ActivExpression for help if needed! Please put the == == outside your talk title to me. Reply to me when I speak to you or you can make a note on my talk page so I know.
Write below this line
ActivExpression vs. World | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chessboard | Moves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
World to move... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's your turn, ActivExpression. Want to move or not? — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 19:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Well, my brother is socking again and I wasn't active for the last month. I got my IP block exemption removed from this account because I didn't answer the admin's question for over 5 days. If you want to see what administrator and I are saying, press this link to see more info. I need IP block exemption to keep editing on Wikipedia, but right now, I can't do anything right now. Thanks!
Decline reason:
I note you still have not answered that question, and your first edit since then is right after another sock appears. I'm sorry, I'm trying to assume good faith, but something is amiss here. Kuru (talk) 18:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block message:
Constant abuse - {{checkuserblock}}
Decline reason: No. Enough is enough. Now directly blocked. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 23:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please read what is above. Ask me more information if needed. ActivExpression Talk Guestbook 10:06 am, Today (UTC−7)
Decline reason:
I am not convinced by what I have read, and see no reason to unblock this account. The user of this accounts appears to be using multiple accounts, and so the block seems to be valid to me. -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 20:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Can I have an uninvolved administrator come and review this? Since we have a new router, we have a different IP address, so we can create accounts again. I heard from MC10 that MaddenNFL21 is creating more sockpuppets. I don't know what to do now, so I might as well wait until another uninvolved administrator come and review this.
Decline reason:
email arbcom BASC because you still have some explaining to do and without access to checkuser data ordinary admins will struggle to resolve this in your favour Spartaz Humbug! 19:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have answered Kuru's question and I'm willing to have another administrator review it once again. ActivExpression Talk Guestbook 03:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are simply lying. Please see my comments below, there is no doubt in my mind that you are abusing multiple accounts. Tiptoety talk 07:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Part of the difficulty is that user:ActivExpression, above here, says that he edits as user:MS10 in public places; and on the userpage of user:MC10 a userbox says that this is an alternative account of user:MS10. So you are in reality all the same person, and there is no justification for lifting the block. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 21:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Alright. I have tried my best to take a look at this situation from an outsiders point of view with a fresh set of eyes. There are just too many things that do not add up, and I simply do not buy the WP:FAMILY card being pulled. I re-ran some checks and have come to the following conclusion:
Ok I read Tiptoety's message, but again my question is this. Why would someone with MC's level of intelligence knowingly engage in such a stupid act of sockpuppetry, I don't know why he'd do that and what he'd gain. — Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • Cork? • Glass • 4:27pm • 06:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
I know there have been several incidents where trusted users (sometimes admins) abuse multiple accounts and I am aware that just because a user is a valued contributor does not mean that they aren't guilty of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry confirmed through a simple CU. Even if he did have good/bad hand accounts it's hard for a person to be who they aren't, it genuinely is sometimes people break and give it away, I mean look at Essjay's inconsistencies with his identity as noted in the Essjay controversy article, even though his case was a lot easier to spot (being a tenured professor at age 20 something is unlikely, near impossible). — Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 3:20pm • 05:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
I was the one who got you unbanned (by accident!). I even confessed to reverting this whole flaming mess here. Next time, help your "brother" report those Madden NFL 21 socks as they come before listing them in your family members profile! -- 92.23.7.73 ( talk) 21:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
What's the point of this page? It's completely useless and only serves to increase confusion. Its contents can just be copied to the main user page. — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 20:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Your submission at Admin Coaching has been removed from the request list, as requests where the submitter has not visited the page for at least 6 months (or been inactive for at least 4 months) are removed. You are welcome to re-submit a request should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request) to show your continued interest in the project. If you do re-submit, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited! As noted on the project page, there is an on-going backlog with the project, as so few admins are currently coaching. This means that you may have a long wait for a response (if you receive one at all). If you no longer require admin coaching, I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia! Regards, elektrik SHOOS 04:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC) |
Hey there ActivExpression, thank you for your contributions! I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:ActivExpression/Status Chart.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using ( This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 6teen All Characters. Since you had some involvement with the 6teen All Characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
“ | The best things in life are free! | ” |
— Today's
Motto of the Day
|
Ask ActivExpression for help if needed! Please put the == == outside your talk title to me. Reply to me when I speak to you or you can make a note on my talk page so I know.
Write below this line
ActivExpression vs. World | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chessboard | Moves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
World to move... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's your turn, ActivExpression. Want to move or not? — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 19:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Well, my brother is socking again and I wasn't active for the last month. I got my IP block exemption removed from this account because I didn't answer the admin's question for over 5 days. If you want to see what administrator and I are saying, press this link to see more info. I need IP block exemption to keep editing on Wikipedia, but right now, I can't do anything right now. Thanks!
Decline reason:
I note you still have not answered that question, and your first edit since then is right after another sock appears. I'm sorry, I'm trying to assume good faith, but something is amiss here. Kuru (talk) 18:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block message:
Constant abuse - {{checkuserblock}}
Decline reason: No. Enough is enough. Now directly blocked. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 23:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please read what is above. Ask me more information if needed. ActivExpression Talk Guestbook 10:06 am, Today (UTC−7)
Decline reason:
I am not convinced by what I have read, and see no reason to unblock this account. The user of this accounts appears to be using multiple accounts, and so the block seems to be valid to me. -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 20:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Can I have an uninvolved administrator come and review this? Since we have a new router, we have a different IP address, so we can create accounts again. I heard from MC10 that MaddenNFL21 is creating more sockpuppets. I don't know what to do now, so I might as well wait until another uninvolved administrator come and review this.
Decline reason:
email arbcom BASC because you still have some explaining to do and without access to checkuser data ordinary admins will struggle to resolve this in your favour Spartaz Humbug! 19:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ActivExpression ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have answered Kuru's question and I'm willing to have another administrator review it once again. ActivExpression Talk Guestbook 03:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are simply lying. Please see my comments below, there is no doubt in my mind that you are abusing multiple accounts. Tiptoety talk 07:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Part of the difficulty is that user:ActivExpression, above here, says that he edits as user:MS10 in public places; and on the userpage of user:MC10 a userbox says that this is an alternative account of user:MS10. So you are in reality all the same person, and there is no justification for lifting the block. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 21:40, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Alright. I have tried my best to take a look at this situation from an outsiders point of view with a fresh set of eyes. There are just too many things that do not add up, and I simply do not buy the WP:FAMILY card being pulled. I re-ran some checks and have come to the following conclusion:
Ok I read Tiptoety's message, but again my question is this. Why would someone with MC's level of intelligence knowingly engage in such a stupid act of sockpuppetry, I don't know why he'd do that and what he'd gain. — Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • Cork? • Glass • 4:27pm • 06:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
I know there have been several incidents where trusted users (sometimes admins) abuse multiple accounts and I am aware that just because a user is a valued contributor does not mean that they aren't guilty of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry confirmed through a simple CU. Even if he did have good/bad hand accounts it's hard for a person to be who they aren't, it genuinely is sometimes people break and give it away, I mean look at Essjay's inconsistencies with his identity as noted in the Essjay controversy article, even though his case was a lot easier to spot (being a tenured professor at age 20 something is unlikely, near impossible). — Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 3:20pm • 05:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
I was the one who got you unbanned (by accident!). I even confessed to reverting this whole flaming mess here. Next time, help your "brother" report those Madden NFL 21 socks as they come before listing them in your family members profile! -- 92.23.7.73 ( talk) 21:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
What's the point of this page? It's completely useless and only serves to increase confusion. Its contents can just be copied to the main user page. — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 20:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Your submission at Admin Coaching has been removed from the request list, as requests where the submitter has not visited the page for at least 6 months (or been inactive for at least 4 months) are removed. You are welcome to re-submit a request should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request) to show your continued interest in the project. If you do re-submit, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited! As noted on the project page, there is an on-going backlog with the project, as so few admins are currently coaching. This means that you may have a long wait for a response (if you receive one at all). If you no longer require admin coaching, I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia! Regards, elektrik SHOOS 04:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC) |
Hey there ActivExpression, thank you for your contributions! I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:ActivExpression/Status Chart.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using ( This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 6teen All Characters. Since you had some involvement with the 6teen All Characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!