Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Julia Montes, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
‡ MAHEWA ‡ •
talk
04:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
This is your last warning. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Kiray, you will be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Kiray was
changed by
Rundome
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.962752 on 2011-07-12T12:32:52+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk)
12:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. 12:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You have repeatedly been told about adding unsourced content, but you continue to do so, as in your recent edits at
Maja Salvador,
Rhian Ramos and
Kiray. In addition, your recent edit to
Hopia Legaspi looked like vandalism. If it wasn't, then in future please explain your edits in edit summaries to avoid giving the impression of vandalism.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rhian Ramos, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC) This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent
vandalism, as you did to
Julia Montes, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being
blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. -
WayKurat (
talk)
14:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Julia Montes, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found
here. Thank you.
‡ MAHEWA ‡ •
talk
04:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
This is your last warning. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Kiray, you will be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Kiray was
changed by
Rundome
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.962752 on 2011-07-12T12:32:52+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk)
12:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. 12:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You have repeatedly been told about adding unsourced content, but you continue to do so, as in your recent edits at
Maja Salvador,
Rhian Ramos and
Kiray. In addition, your recent edit to
Hopia Legaspi looked like vandalism. If it wasn't, then in future please explain your edits in edit summaries to avoid giving the impression of vandalism.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rhian Ramos, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC) This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent
vandalism, as you did to
Julia Montes, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being
blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. -
WayKurat (
talk)
14:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)