Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Welcome to Wikipedia. I am Addihockey10 a volunteer with the Account Creation Team and I received your account request. You are welcome to leave questions, comments on my talk page at anytime here. Here is some useful information to get you started. – Addihockey10 ( talk)
|
Hello, I'm Dougweller. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Christian mythology without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dougweller ( talk) 16:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Should I flee to Heysen? Timeshift ( talk) 20:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. I saw your edit that was reverted. I also saw your response and agreed with it, but since you did not open a Talk topic on this on the Talk page, I decided to comment here instead. I have enough battles of my own to fight as it is on the PR Talk page!
I was the one who originally introduced something like the phrase that you wanted to remove (although it fit a bit better the way I had it at the time). However, upon reading your explanation I totally agree with you. The source itself (which I agree has to be used somewhat cautiously for POV reasons) does not claim that the evidence proves that there are slightly fewer elections. What it says is that "stable, representative government can go hand in hand." That is all that can safely be said. Even assuming that the data set shows that there were slightly fewer elections in the sample reviewed, that difference may not be statistically significant and so one has to be cautious in using this indicator.
I would encourage you to not just give in on this point, as you are in the right, and there is altogether too much gratuitous reverting happening on this page. Don't let yourself be bullied. You should make your edit (either your original one or a slightly different one), but this time be sure to explain it in a bit more detail on the Talk page (you don't have to be as wordy as I tend to be! ;-). My suggestion would be to revert your deletion but to suggest that the issue of instability needs to be identified and discussed as a frequently-cited potential disadvantage of PR. Reallavergne ( talk) 12:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Australia history.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Australia history.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Codename Lisa ( talk) 13:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Ok current (today) usage in Tasmania might not use the word municipality - but it has been used fairly recently - the other thing is when you make claims like that, you need to back it up with
WP:RS where ever possible. Specially as the term has been used in Tasmania for local government - for instance - Munter, Ursula; Municipal Reform Group (Hobart, Tas.); Waratah (Tas. : Municipality). Council (1989),
Waratah : the effects of land (site) value rating, Municipality of Waratah (Tasmania), The Group, retrieved 27 September 2016, Ernst & Whinney Services; Howard, John; Australia. Office of Local Government (1989), Local government in an isolated community : a case study of the Municipality of Flinders, Tasmania, Australian Government Publishing Service,
ISBN
978-88-04-39791-5,
Clarence (Tas.). Council (1979), Municipality of Clarence : submission on the incorporation of the municipality as a city, Municipality of Clarence,
ISBN
978-0-9594281-0-0,Burnie. Municipality (Tasmania) (1976),
Burnie Civic Centre, [Burnie, Tas.] [Municipality of Burnie], retrieved 27 September 2016,Kingborough (Tas. : Municipality). Council (1994),
Strategic plan, Kingborough Council, retrieved 27 September 2016,Tolhurst, John; Moore, Colin, (joint author.) (1978), The Circular Head study : area characteristics and educational needs of the Circular Head Municipality, Tasmania, Education Department of Tasmania, Research Branch,
ISBN
978-0-7246-0947-5 {{
citation}}
: |author2=
has generic name (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link), and so on.
JarrahTree
09:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
On this - Raufutter verzehrende Großvieheinheit = cow - this is informative - interesting...
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raufutter_verzehrende_Gro%C3%9Fvieheinheit#Popul%C3%A4re_Rezeption
And it has a sources but I can't check them.
Is it worth putting back?
Best wishes ( Msrasnw ( talk) 14:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC))
Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Welcome to Wikipedia. I am Addihockey10 a volunteer with the Account Creation Team and I received your account request. You are welcome to leave questions, comments on my talk page at anytime here. Here is some useful information to get you started. – Addihockey10 ( talk)
|
Hello, I'm Dougweller. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Christian mythology without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dougweller ( talk) 16:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Should I flee to Heysen? Timeshift ( talk) 20:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. I saw your edit that was reverted. I also saw your response and agreed with it, but since you did not open a Talk topic on this on the Talk page, I decided to comment here instead. I have enough battles of my own to fight as it is on the PR Talk page!
I was the one who originally introduced something like the phrase that you wanted to remove (although it fit a bit better the way I had it at the time). However, upon reading your explanation I totally agree with you. The source itself (which I agree has to be used somewhat cautiously for POV reasons) does not claim that the evidence proves that there are slightly fewer elections. What it says is that "stable, representative government can go hand in hand." That is all that can safely be said. Even assuming that the data set shows that there were slightly fewer elections in the sample reviewed, that difference may not be statistically significant and so one has to be cautious in using this indicator.
I would encourage you to not just give in on this point, as you are in the right, and there is altogether too much gratuitous reverting happening on this page. Don't let yourself be bullied. You should make your edit (either your original one or a slightly different one), but this time be sure to explain it in a bit more detail on the Talk page (you don't have to be as wordy as I tend to be! ;-). My suggestion would be to revert your deletion but to suggest that the issue of instability needs to be identified and discussed as a frequently-cited potential disadvantage of PR. Reallavergne ( talk) 12:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Australia history.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Australia history.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Codename Lisa ( talk) 13:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Ok current (today) usage in Tasmania might not use the word municipality - but it has been used fairly recently - the other thing is when you make claims like that, you need to back it up with
WP:RS where ever possible. Specially as the term has been used in Tasmania for local government - for instance - Munter, Ursula; Municipal Reform Group (Hobart, Tas.); Waratah (Tas. : Municipality). Council (1989),
Waratah : the effects of land (site) value rating, Municipality of Waratah (Tasmania), The Group, retrieved 27 September 2016, Ernst & Whinney Services; Howard, John; Australia. Office of Local Government (1989), Local government in an isolated community : a case study of the Municipality of Flinders, Tasmania, Australian Government Publishing Service,
ISBN
978-88-04-39791-5,
Clarence (Tas.). Council (1979), Municipality of Clarence : submission on the incorporation of the municipality as a city, Municipality of Clarence,
ISBN
978-0-9594281-0-0,Burnie. Municipality (Tasmania) (1976),
Burnie Civic Centre, [Burnie, Tas.] [Municipality of Burnie], retrieved 27 September 2016,Kingborough (Tas. : Municipality). Council (1994),
Strategic plan, Kingborough Council, retrieved 27 September 2016,Tolhurst, John; Moore, Colin, (joint author.) (1978), The Circular Head study : area characteristics and educational needs of the Circular Head Municipality, Tasmania, Education Department of Tasmania, Research Branch,
ISBN
978-0-7246-0947-5 {{
citation}}
: |author2=
has generic name (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link), and so on.
JarrahTree
09:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Run to the hills, cos the end of the world is soon!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
On this - Raufutter verzehrende Großvieheinheit = cow - this is informative - interesting...
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raufutter_verzehrende_Gro%C3%9Fvieheinheit#Popul%C3%A4re_Rezeption
And it has a sources but I can't check them.
Is it worth putting back?
Best wishes ( Msrasnw ( talk) 14:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC))