![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | |
my story today |
My story today is about the Alchymic Quartet, - I went away from DYK but it's the last one from last year. - The songs are about vacation, continued. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry for first upsetting your non-editable archive page before seeing I need to post here. In connection with the last item on that page, I thought I should let you know that as there have been lots of related problems, I've been in touch with Village pump where they explained that these were due to an editing error which has now been corrected. All remaining incorrectly unassessed-listed talk pages should disappear over the next few days, including most of those under Women writers articles. They result from a problem with redirects but this has also been solved and all those marked NA should disappear soon.-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, Rosie. I see you assessed Catherine Corless in August 2020 but it is now listed as unassessed. There are similar problems with, Fall on Your Knees, Larissa Kelly, Eswyn Lyster, Charlotte Roche and Vijayarajamallika, all of which you also rated. Maybe you know someone who could sort this out.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much for adding categories to the new article on David T. Hanson TimidGuy ( talk) 14:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much for reviewing many of my last pages, and giving me helpful tips about editing, i will make sure to create valuable pages. DanishGirIInheaven ( talk) 15:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosiestep, thank you for your rating ("C" no less!) of and improvements to the recently added article about Maria Cristina Didero (which is still very much a work in progress). I'm leaving this note here rather than on the Talk page of the article itself because my query is of a more general nature. I hope I've got the protocol correct. I have two questions that I hope you might help answer:
|ref=none/
parameter in the citations? I read a little about HarvErrors, but this is a tad above my level of technical knowledge. (I'm still getting up to speed with the proper formatting of these templates, so really, I suppose I'm also asking: is this something I should use systematically or is it a special case?){{Expand section|date=April 2023}}
template. I had placed this in the hope that someone might come along and add a bit more depth to the summary information that I was able to locate.Thanks again for your edits, and I do hope it's ok to ask for your help here. Cheers, Cl3phact0 ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
|ref=none
: I have a script installed that shows Harv warning in bold markup next to books and journals that use the cite template but aren't cited in the article. Commonly, this is noticed in "Publications" sections. By adding |ref=none
, you don't get the Harv warning. (Maybe a pagestalker can provide a link to the script.)Hi, I see you have reviewed the article I translated from the French Wikipedia, so is the article good enough for A-class? I think it is, what do you think? Dancing Dollar ( let's talk) 20:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
New page reviewing is mainly about deciding whether a new article will be marked as approved and accepting it into Wikipedia, or initiating one of several deletion procedures.So, yup, I didn't WP:PROD it. ;) As for how I would rate it, IMO, it's WP:BCLASS, not WP:ACLASS. One relatively easy improvement, just by way of example, would be to convert the article's green links to blue. Good luck! And thanks for what you do around here. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. R. Morlan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. R. Morlan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I didn't realize until now...) seems on point. What really catches my attention, though, is that the article has had 631 pageviews in the last 90 days. I know we don't use pageviews as a measure of WP:N, but IMO, the article has some amount of relevancy in today's society, so I'm glad I made the effort to translate it from DE-WP, no matter what the outcome of the AfD might be. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
The whole time I was writing about Mary Zirin she made me think of you and uncovering unknown women writers. While I was searching for sources about her with the wikilibrary, I noticed they have added a collection on the Women Writers Project at Northeastern University. Did you know about it? SusunW ( talk) 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Dear Rosiestep, i thought i followed the cite-book-rules and now i find this ref=none you had to add to avoid some "conflict"? I didn't see any formatting in the template of cite books... could you please explain, what i did wrong and what the ref=none does? Kind regards, Naomi Hennig ( talk) 00:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
<ref></ref>
. To disable the error message, you simply add |ref=none
into that citation. More info here (‹The
template
Category link is being
considered for merging.›
Category:Harv and Sfn template errors) and here ({{
Citation}}). P.S. I recommend installing one of the scripts mentioned in these info links so that you can readily see "Harv errors". Cheers and happy editing. --
Rosiestep (
talk)
00:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
I had a good story on coronation day: the Te Deum we sang that day (mentioned before). And the following day we sang it for the composer ;) - And today we remember a composer who created music especially for us! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
I like today's Main page, and here's why ;) - (DYK that we got filmed when performing the piece mentioned?) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Last weekend was nice, class reunion a funny number of years after completing school, and the lovely park where I spent many Sundays as a child. Today's story is about a quite dramatic woman, there's a yt trailer to the hook. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
It appears you have re-added the reference to 'alchetron' to the Rosita Rodrigo article. Please note that this site copies older versions of Wikipedia pages (in this case, the 2017 version of the Vedette (cabaret) article). They give attribution at the bottom of the page. If the reasons why this is not acceptable as a source are unclear, please let me know. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:BBC 100 Women has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing Elif Çomoğlu Ülgen, I would want to seek your opinion or review on Mustafa Gültepe especially as regards notability. I’m seeking a second opinion after a editor who I deem a superior to me here added the tag. I will appreciate your input + or -. Kind regards. TEB001 ( talk) 07:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | |
my story today |
My story today is about the Alchymic Quartet, - I went away from DYK but it's the last one from last year. - The songs are about vacation, continued. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry for first upsetting your non-editable archive page before seeing I need to post here. In connection with the last item on that page, I thought I should let you know that as there have been lots of related problems, I've been in touch with Village pump where they explained that these were due to an editing error which has now been corrected. All remaining incorrectly unassessed-listed talk pages should disappear over the next few days, including most of those under Women writers articles. They result from a problem with redirects but this has also been solved and all those marked NA should disappear soon.-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, Rosie. I see you assessed Catherine Corless in August 2020 but it is now listed as unassessed. There are similar problems with, Fall on Your Knees, Larissa Kelly, Eswyn Lyster, Charlotte Roche and Vijayarajamallika, all of which you also rated. Maybe you know someone who could sort this out.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much for adding categories to the new article on David T. Hanson TimidGuy ( talk) 14:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much for reviewing many of my last pages, and giving me helpful tips about editing, i will make sure to create valuable pages. DanishGirIInheaven ( talk) 15:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosiestep, thank you for your rating ("C" no less!) of and improvements to the recently added article about Maria Cristina Didero (which is still very much a work in progress). I'm leaving this note here rather than on the Talk page of the article itself because my query is of a more general nature. I hope I've got the protocol correct. I have two questions that I hope you might help answer:
|ref=none/
parameter in the citations? I read a little about HarvErrors, but this is a tad above my level of technical knowledge. (I'm still getting up to speed with the proper formatting of these templates, so really, I suppose I'm also asking: is this something I should use systematically or is it a special case?){{Expand section|date=April 2023}}
template. I had placed this in the hope that someone might come along and add a bit more depth to the summary information that I was able to locate.Thanks again for your edits, and I do hope it's ok to ask for your help here. Cheers, Cl3phact0 ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
|ref=none
: I have a script installed that shows Harv warning in bold markup next to books and journals that use the cite template but aren't cited in the article. Commonly, this is noticed in "Publications" sections. By adding |ref=none
, you don't get the Harv warning. (Maybe a pagestalker can provide a link to the script.)Hi, I see you have reviewed the article I translated from the French Wikipedia, so is the article good enough for A-class? I think it is, what do you think? Dancing Dollar ( let's talk) 20:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
New page reviewing is mainly about deciding whether a new article will be marked as approved and accepting it into Wikipedia, or initiating one of several deletion procedures.So, yup, I didn't WP:PROD it. ;) As for how I would rate it, IMO, it's WP:BCLASS, not WP:ACLASS. One relatively easy improvement, just by way of example, would be to convert the article's green links to blue. Good luck! And thanks for what you do around here. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. R. Morlan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. R. Morlan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I didn't realize until now...) seems on point. What really catches my attention, though, is that the article has had 631 pageviews in the last 90 days. I know we don't use pageviews as a measure of WP:N, but IMO, the article has some amount of relevancy in today's society, so I'm glad I made the effort to translate it from DE-WP, no matter what the outcome of the AfD might be. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
The whole time I was writing about Mary Zirin she made me think of you and uncovering unknown women writers. While I was searching for sources about her with the wikilibrary, I noticed they have added a collection on the Women Writers Project at Northeastern University. Did you know about it? SusunW ( talk) 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Dear Rosiestep, i thought i followed the cite-book-rules and now i find this ref=none you had to add to avoid some "conflict"? I didn't see any formatting in the template of cite books... could you please explain, what i did wrong and what the ref=none does? Kind regards, Naomi Hennig ( talk) 00:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
<ref></ref>
. To disable the error message, you simply add |ref=none
into that citation. More info here (‹The
template
Category link is being
considered for merging.›
Category:Harv and Sfn template errors) and here ({{
Citation}}). P.S. I recommend installing one of the scripts mentioned in these info links so that you can readily see "Harv errors". Cheers and happy editing. --
Rosiestep (
talk)
00:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
I had a good story on coronation day: the Te Deum we sang that day (mentioned before). And the following day we sang it for the composer ;) - And today we remember a composer who created music especially for us! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
I like today's Main page, and here's why ;) - (DYK that we got filmed when performing the piece mentioned?) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Last weekend was nice, class reunion a funny number of years after completing school, and the lovely park where I spent many Sundays as a child. Today's story is about a quite dramatic woman, there's a yt trailer to the hook. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
It appears you have re-added the reference to 'alchetron' to the Rosita Rodrigo article. Please note that this site copies older versions of Wikipedia pages (in this case, the 2017 version of the Vedette (cabaret) article). They give attribution at the bottom of the page. If the reasons why this is not acceptable as a source are unclear, please let me know. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:BBC 100 Women has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing Elif Çomoğlu Ülgen, I would want to seek your opinion or review on Mustafa Gültepe especially as regards notability. I’m seeking a second opinion after a editor who I deem a superior to me here added the tag. I will appreciate your input + or -. Kind regards. TEB001 ( talk) 07:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)