This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | → | Archive 35 |
I found your comments to be measured and reasonable.
Would you be open and willing to giving me some advice?
-- Bob drobbs ( talk) 05:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
"Is there an ongoing problem? Anyone (apart from those who have been topic banned) is free to suggest that someone should be topic banned. The only problem would be making a fuss (e.g. by repeating the claim excessively) as it is an issue for WP:AE. Johnuniq" [1]
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Daily Mail on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Radical Party (France) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Trickle-down economics on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
I don't have an external relationship with the subject of my submission ( Draft:Giovanni Morassutti). I have just read the preface he wrote about Method acting and found some good sources. Personally, I think it could be a good addition to Wikipedia.-- Submarine00 ( talk) 22:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Rosguill,
As for my edits on “Electoral fraud” and “Cloth face mask,” you failed to show me how I violated any policy in the edits I made. In fact, whoever preceded me in writing or editing the sections that I changed violated Wikipedia’s policy of neutrality, because they were very biased. I merely fixed their mistakes and made the articles more factual and neutral. Please do not threaten to suspend my editing privileges if you cannot clearly show how I have violated any policy that would warrant such suspension. If you are upset about article bias, please suspend whoever else wrote such biased and misleading information before me.
Thank you, Tippecanoe&TylerToo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tippecanoe&TylerToo ( talk • contribs) 05:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Tippecanoe&TylerToo, would you mind explaining this edit of yours, where you stated in the edit summary that you were making "minor grammatical corrections" when in fact you were systematically removing RS-backed claims that claims of electoral fraud were false? Or why you chose to replace paragraphs of seemingly fine content sourced to peer-reviewed studies at Cloth face mask with a paragraph cited to a far inferior news source, and proceeded to edit war when reverted? signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia readers should be allowed to read about a topic without receiving the leftist view of events. They get enough of that in the media. I did not claim that Trump’s claims were true or false, I left it neutral. The fact is nobody can actually prove that the claims of election fraud are indeed false. Wikipedia should stick to presenting information instead of propaganda. As for masks, they are not proven to be effective (states with more mandates have more COVID cases). And as for “inferior” sources, how can I trust that claim coming from a platform that has a banned sources list (for any source that is not liberal)? A person can cite MSNBC or CNN opinion articles as fact, but not Breitbart. Stuff like that only happens in Communist countries. I fail to see how a few liberal Wikipedia elite can monitor Wikipedia and censor out any opposing voices. Even the co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger said Wikipedia is too liberally biased, and it is becoming abundantly clear that he is correct. This is the last message I will post concerning this “issue.” I do not see why you have even made this an issue, please keep Wikipedia a truly free and neutral platform by not threatening to suspend editors you do not agree with. That is called censorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tippecanoe&TylerToo ( talk • contribs) 04:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Shut up 70.18.11.83 ( talk) 01:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I was doing cleanup on some random list somewhere and saw that you added an undisclosed paid tag at this diff. I was wondering why/how you came to that conclusion (genuine question)? How can one tell? Jdcooper ( talk) 01:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Hi Rosguill, Have an enjoyable holiday season! Cassiopeia talk 09:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship | from the Birthday Committee |
---|---|
Wishing Rosguill a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! -- Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 09:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Rosguill: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, JW 1961 Talk 11:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, John B123 ( talk) 15:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:2021 United States Capitol attack on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Cordially!
MrSamContributor (
talk)
05:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Shane McMahon on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
Hi Rosguill, Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Thank you for your support and great work on Wikipedia. Happy Holidays. DMySon ( talk) 15:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
Rosguill,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
12:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
A token of thanks
Hi Rosguill! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:1998 Sokcho submarine incident on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
I am a fairly new Wikipedian, and I've been looking to solve an issue I've had that appears to be in your skillset on Wikipedia. You see, searching for "Bayou Pierre" brings up a river in Mississippi. This is in spite of the fact that it is also the name of a river in Louisiana (the page for which I wrote.) I don't know how to make Bayou Pierre into a disambiguation page. Should I copy the source text of a similar one into the redirect page and edit the content? I don't know what to do! Thanks in advance, Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 22:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
I was in the process of closing the dispute with a similar comment, and you closed it first. Okay. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
you will be banned without further warning if you promote any cryptocurrency related subject. That is the price for editing in such a spam-prone topic with serious ramifications for the public, which is a) a warning, not a threat and b) the correct thing to do, as it is important to let people know when they are engaging in behavior that can lead to being banned. If you still think you have a a valid complaint to make, you can take it to WP:ANI, ARBCOM would be premature and the WMF doesn't intervene into disputes like this. But again, it is my relatively-expert and uninvolved opinion that you're barking up the wrong tree here and would recommend that you either focus on improving the article directly (as I see you were already doing this morning) or let the matter drop. signed, Rosguill talk 16:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Can you adopt me?-- 14Jenna7Caesura ( talk) 21:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you protect the above article from repeated vandalism? Thanks Denisarona ( talk) 18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing all of those pages. Cheers! Surge_Elec ( talk) 20:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC) |
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your hard work in reviewing NCNR UK, InteliDey and HPC4+ articles. IMLone wolf ( talk) 21:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC) |
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Main Page on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Please, review this page. Thanks. - Owais Talk 13:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This redirect was just changed to an article. You reverted a similar change in 2020, so I thought you might want to take a look. I also note that when you reverted, you overrode a 2017 RFD - I'm not sure if that was intentional. This may be a candidate for broader discussion. I removed the redirect hatnote at the old target, and added one to this article; if this new article stands as is, please review this hatnote. MB 19:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Could you give your opinion for this AfD which seems to be stuck: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Family of Churches (2nd nomination)? Thanks. Veverve ( talk) 23:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill, this is Derivator2017 here, I think you know me. I am really thankful to you for reviewing my articles. It's always a pleasure to have your articles reviewed by an experienced editor. However, it apparently looks like not everyone loves seeing me on this platform. I have recently created an article, Yara International School and it was placed on AfD for the third time by the same editor under the pretext of notability, despite me providing around 70 references this time and out of which 3 to 4 sources clearly make the article eligible for existence. Since you've already reviewed dozens of my articles, I perhaps assume you see me as someone with AFG. Kindly review my article and place your opinion in the deletion discussion page, and if you think this article meets the GNG criteria, please vote to keep it. Warm regards. Derivator2017 ( talk) 12:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I am new to Wikipedia and had a question.
A page I created recently got reviewed/patrolled and is located here: [1]
However, it still shows as unreviewed at the following link: [2]
When are the noindex tags removed for patrolled pages?
Thanks Wickedwiki2 ( talk) 06:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
References
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
oversight
will be renamed suppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for
technical reasons. You can comment
in Phabricator if you have objections.[2] [3]. This is not the first time. Look at their history, this person blatantly revert edits without a single piece of explanation on several articles.-- 2409:4073:2E9B:8C13:DEB:1400:D425:AAF7 ( talk) 08:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the
Researcher user group and
Checkusers who are not administrators can now access
Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (
T301928)Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Warner Bros. Discovery on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
I've been closing more RfDs lately and have been kinda surprised that it's empirically the most thankless task I regularly do (colloquially and Special:Log/thanks-ly). And I've noticed that I almost never see anyone thanking admins or frequent non-admin closers on any user talkpages I watch, and when I do see it, it's usually "Thanks for saying I'm right".
So, I wanted to take a moment to thank you for this close. It went against how I'd !voted, but I agree with it, and it was the exact kind of succinct but nuanced close to a complex discussion that any closer aspires to. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 21:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
This was some time ago, but please note that in this case, you should have used the {{
R to anchor}} tag. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
12:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Billion on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that you closed a few RfDs at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#List of Resident Evil 1 creatures and below. There are a few subpages that should be G8 speedy-deleted: Talk:List of creatures in the Resident Evil series/Archive 1, Talk:List of creatures in the Resident Evil series/Impact, and Talk:List of creatures in the Resident Evil series/to do ( search). I found nothing when searching for each of the other redirects, but double-checking wouldn't hurt if there's a tool. Thanks! Flatscan ( talk) 05:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, can I get a WP:REFUND of David Wood (Christian apologist). I remember seeing this article previously, and looking at the two previous AfD pages, I am keen to rescue this article if I can. It seems that the most recent AfD had very little participation, and I have doubts that it was thorough enough. Could you please recreate it as a draft for me? Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere( or here)( or here)( or here) 08:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello I made a request to be a New Page reviewer over a week ago but had no response, I kindly ask you if you have time to review my request. Thanks Trains2050 ( talk) 10:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | → | Archive 35 |
I found your comments to be measured and reasonable.
Would you be open and willing to giving me some advice?
-- Bob drobbs ( talk) 05:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
"Is there an ongoing problem? Anyone (apart from those who have been topic banned) is free to suggest that someone should be topic banned. The only problem would be making a fuss (e.g. by repeating the claim excessively) as it is an issue for WP:AE. Johnuniq" [1]
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Daily Mail on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Radical Party (France) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Trickle-down economics on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
I don't have an external relationship with the subject of my submission ( Draft:Giovanni Morassutti). I have just read the preface he wrote about Method acting and found some good sources. Personally, I think it could be a good addition to Wikipedia.-- Submarine00 ( talk) 22:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Rosguill,
As for my edits on “Electoral fraud” and “Cloth face mask,” you failed to show me how I violated any policy in the edits I made. In fact, whoever preceded me in writing or editing the sections that I changed violated Wikipedia’s policy of neutrality, because they were very biased. I merely fixed their mistakes and made the articles more factual and neutral. Please do not threaten to suspend my editing privileges if you cannot clearly show how I have violated any policy that would warrant such suspension. If you are upset about article bias, please suspend whoever else wrote such biased and misleading information before me.
Thank you, Tippecanoe&TylerToo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tippecanoe&TylerToo ( talk • contribs) 05:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Tippecanoe&TylerToo, would you mind explaining this edit of yours, where you stated in the edit summary that you were making "minor grammatical corrections" when in fact you were systematically removing RS-backed claims that claims of electoral fraud were false? Or why you chose to replace paragraphs of seemingly fine content sourced to peer-reviewed studies at Cloth face mask with a paragraph cited to a far inferior news source, and proceeded to edit war when reverted? signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia readers should be allowed to read about a topic without receiving the leftist view of events. They get enough of that in the media. I did not claim that Trump’s claims were true or false, I left it neutral. The fact is nobody can actually prove that the claims of election fraud are indeed false. Wikipedia should stick to presenting information instead of propaganda. As for masks, they are not proven to be effective (states with more mandates have more COVID cases). And as for “inferior” sources, how can I trust that claim coming from a platform that has a banned sources list (for any source that is not liberal)? A person can cite MSNBC or CNN opinion articles as fact, but not Breitbart. Stuff like that only happens in Communist countries. I fail to see how a few liberal Wikipedia elite can monitor Wikipedia and censor out any opposing voices. Even the co-founder of Wikipedia Larry Sanger said Wikipedia is too liberally biased, and it is becoming abundantly clear that he is correct. This is the last message I will post concerning this “issue.” I do not see why you have even made this an issue, please keep Wikipedia a truly free and neutral platform by not threatening to suspend editors you do not agree with. That is called censorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tippecanoe&TylerToo ( talk • contribs) 04:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Shut up 70.18.11.83 ( talk) 01:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I was doing cleanup on some random list somewhere and saw that you added an undisclosed paid tag at this diff. I was wondering why/how you came to that conclusion (genuine question)? How can one tell? Jdcooper ( talk) 01:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Hi Rosguill, Have an enjoyable holiday season! Cassiopeia talk 09:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship | from the Birthday Committee |
---|---|
Wishing Rosguill a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! -- Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 09:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Rosguill: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, JW 1961 Talk 11:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, John B123 ( talk) 15:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:2021 United States Capitol attack on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Cordially!
MrSamContributor (
talk)
05:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Shane McMahon on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
Hi Rosguill, Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Thank you for your support and great work on Wikipedia. Happy Holidays. DMySon ( talk) 15:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
Rosguill,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
12:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
A token of thanks
Hi Rosguill! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:1998 Sokcho submarine incident on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
I am a fairly new Wikipedian, and I've been looking to solve an issue I've had that appears to be in your skillset on Wikipedia. You see, searching for "Bayou Pierre" brings up a river in Mississippi. This is in spite of the fact that it is also the name of a river in Louisiana (the page for which I wrote.) I don't know how to make Bayou Pierre into a disambiguation page. Should I copy the source text of a similar one into the redirect page and edit the content? I don't know what to do! Thanks in advance, Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 22:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
I was in the process of closing the dispute with a similar comment, and you closed it first. Okay. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
you will be banned without further warning if you promote any cryptocurrency related subject. That is the price for editing in such a spam-prone topic with serious ramifications for the public, which is a) a warning, not a threat and b) the correct thing to do, as it is important to let people know when they are engaging in behavior that can lead to being banned. If you still think you have a a valid complaint to make, you can take it to WP:ANI, ARBCOM would be premature and the WMF doesn't intervene into disputes like this. But again, it is my relatively-expert and uninvolved opinion that you're barking up the wrong tree here and would recommend that you either focus on improving the article directly (as I see you were already doing this morning) or let the matter drop. signed, Rosguill talk 16:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Can you adopt me?-- 14Jenna7Caesura ( talk) 21:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you protect the above article from repeated vandalism? Thanks Denisarona ( talk) 18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing all of those pages. Cheers! Surge_Elec ( talk) 20:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC) |
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your hard work in reviewing NCNR UK, InteliDey and HPC4+ articles. IMLone wolf ( talk) 21:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC) |
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Main Page on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Please, review this page. Thanks. - Owais Talk 13:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This redirect was just changed to an article. You reverted a similar change in 2020, so I thought you might want to take a look. I also note that when you reverted, you overrode a 2017 RFD - I'm not sure if that was intentional. This may be a candidate for broader discussion. I removed the redirect hatnote at the old target, and added one to this article; if this new article stands as is, please review this hatnote. MB 19:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Could you give your opinion for this AfD which seems to be stuck: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Family of Churches (2nd nomination)? Thanks. Veverve ( talk) 23:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill, this is Derivator2017 here, I think you know me. I am really thankful to you for reviewing my articles. It's always a pleasure to have your articles reviewed by an experienced editor. However, it apparently looks like not everyone loves seeing me on this platform. I have recently created an article, Yara International School and it was placed on AfD for the third time by the same editor under the pretext of notability, despite me providing around 70 references this time and out of which 3 to 4 sources clearly make the article eligible for existence. Since you've already reviewed dozens of my articles, I perhaps assume you see me as someone with AFG. Kindly review my article and place your opinion in the deletion discussion page, and if you think this article meets the GNG criteria, please vote to keep it. Warm regards. Derivator2017 ( talk) 12:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I am new to Wikipedia and had a question.
A page I created recently got reviewed/patrolled and is located here: [1]
However, it still shows as unreviewed at the following link: [2]
When are the noindex tags removed for patrolled pages?
Thanks Wickedwiki2 ( talk) 06:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
References
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
oversight
will be renamed suppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for
technical reasons. You can comment
in Phabricator if you have objections.[2] [3]. This is not the first time. Look at their history, this person blatantly revert edits without a single piece of explanation on several articles.-- 2409:4073:2E9B:8C13:DEB:1400:D425:AAF7 ( talk) 08:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the
Researcher user group and
Checkusers who are not administrators can now access
Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (
T301928)Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Warner Bros. Discovery on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
I've been closing more RfDs lately and have been kinda surprised that it's empirically the most thankless task I regularly do (colloquially and Special:Log/thanks-ly). And I've noticed that I almost never see anyone thanking admins or frequent non-admin closers on any user talkpages I watch, and when I do see it, it's usually "Thanks for saying I'm right".
So, I wanted to take a moment to thank you for this close. It went against how I'd !voted, but I agree with it, and it was the exact kind of succinct but nuanced close to a complex discussion that any closer aspires to. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 21:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
This was some time ago, but please note that in this case, you should have used the {{
R to anchor}} tag. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
12:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Billion on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that you closed a few RfDs at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#List of Resident Evil 1 creatures and below. There are a few subpages that should be G8 speedy-deleted: Talk:List of creatures in the Resident Evil series/Archive 1, Talk:List of creatures in the Resident Evil series/Impact, and Talk:List of creatures in the Resident Evil series/to do ( search). I found nothing when searching for each of the other redirects, but double-checking wouldn't hurt if there's a tool. Thanks! Flatscan ( talk) 05:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, can I get a WP:REFUND of David Wood (Christian apologist). I remember seeing this article previously, and looking at the two previous AfD pages, I am keen to rescue this article if I can. It seems that the most recent AfD had very little participation, and I have doubts that it was thorough enough. Could you please recreate it as a draft for me? Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere( or here)( or here)( or here) 08:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello I made a request to be a New Page reviewer over a week ago but had no response, I kindly ask you if you have time to review my request. Thanks Trains2050 ( talk) 10:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)