Welcome!
Hello, Rick.nolan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -
CobaltBlueTony™
talk
13:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to
Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors
do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
CobaltBlueTony™
talk
14:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
The edits was not made by an anonymous editor, they were made by me, but the wikipedia system did not manage to associate my edits with my wikipedia user name. Now, leave the page as it is. It does not belong to you. Or do you imply that anybody can change anything here by saying "even by an anonymous editor". In that case, you are telling me, and all others that we are free to change your contribs.
Ckatz's edits up to now look good, and in keeping with conventional styling, formatting, and external linking used here. Please keep in mind that edit warring can get you blocked for a time. As I've said, the community decides, and if you truly feel Ckatz's edits thus far are out of place, we can find other users to offer input.
Consider this first article of yours a learning experience: as you go along, you'll learn more and more what the community expects for truly professional, concise, and encyclopedic articles, and your future contributions will stand on their own more and more. This is our hope for you, in fact. We need all kinds of help! Check out the tutorial and look for things that need to be done. I guarantee you'll always have something to do. Also, don't get too frustrated when more experienced users correct your work: learn from it and master the skills. And keeping a cool head about things will take you very far here. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
16:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Picsearch's notability has already been verified. If you look at the article and the user's contributions, there were constant concerns raised about the user's conflict of interest, and the advertising tone of the article. Users worked on them, and the article creator revised his views on his article and accepted the direction of the community. Similarly, there is no long description of the products produced by Picsearch; the list remains in the infobox.
Keep in mind that the article Munax is strictly about the company. If its product(s) themselves receive notability or coverage in independent sources sufficient to merit its/their own article(s), it should be self evident. Until then, the focus of the article is the company. With that in mind, the mention of the search engine without its own page is not really a good idea. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Rick, please stop your reverts at Munax. You have already had several explanations as to the issues with the article, issues which were addressed by the rewrite. You've also been told that another article's possible non-compliant state does not justify making the Munax article equally non-compliant. Finally, if you had looked at the Veveo article first, before your revert, you would have seen that I've already reworked it. In short, please stop edit warring and trying to "own" the Munax article. -- Ckatz chat spy 07:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the
external links you added in
this edit to
Munax do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is
not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Flewis
(talk)
09:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GP Bullhound is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GP Bullhound until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx ( talk) 11:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Samba Sensors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable company.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mccapra (
talk)
21:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Rick.nolan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -
CobaltBlueTony™
talk
13:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to
Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors
do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
CobaltBlueTony™
talk
14:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
The edits was not made by an anonymous editor, they were made by me, but the wikipedia system did not manage to associate my edits with my wikipedia user name. Now, leave the page as it is. It does not belong to you. Or do you imply that anybody can change anything here by saying "even by an anonymous editor". In that case, you are telling me, and all others that we are free to change your contribs.
Ckatz's edits up to now look good, and in keeping with conventional styling, formatting, and external linking used here. Please keep in mind that edit warring can get you blocked for a time. As I've said, the community decides, and if you truly feel Ckatz's edits thus far are out of place, we can find other users to offer input.
Consider this first article of yours a learning experience: as you go along, you'll learn more and more what the community expects for truly professional, concise, and encyclopedic articles, and your future contributions will stand on their own more and more. This is our hope for you, in fact. We need all kinds of help! Check out the tutorial and look for things that need to be done. I guarantee you'll always have something to do. Also, don't get too frustrated when more experienced users correct your work: learn from it and master the skills. And keeping a cool head about things will take you very far here. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
16:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Picsearch's notability has already been verified. If you look at the article and the user's contributions, there were constant concerns raised about the user's conflict of interest, and the advertising tone of the article. Users worked on them, and the article creator revised his views on his article and accepted the direction of the community. Similarly, there is no long description of the products produced by Picsearch; the list remains in the infobox.
Keep in mind that the article Munax is strictly about the company. If its product(s) themselves receive notability or coverage in independent sources sufficient to merit its/their own article(s), it should be self evident. Until then, the focus of the article is the company. With that in mind, the mention of the search engine without its own page is not really a good idea. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Rick, please stop your reverts at Munax. You have already had several explanations as to the issues with the article, issues which were addressed by the rewrite. You've also been told that another article's possible non-compliant state does not justify making the Munax article equally non-compliant. Finally, if you had looked at the Veveo article first, before your revert, you would have seen that I've already reworked it. In short, please stop edit warring and trying to "own" the Munax article. -- Ckatz chat spy 07:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the
external links you added in
this edit to
Munax do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is
not a collection of links; nor should it be used for
advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Flewis
(talk)
09:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GP Bullhound is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GP Bullhound until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx ( talk) 11:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Samba Sensors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable company.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mccapra (
talk)
21:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)