Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with
Leaf fat. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{
hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
Wombatcat
21:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Copyright status of Leaf fat
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
Leaf fat. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (
http://www.leaf-fat.com/english/index.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Darkspots 21:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Copyright status of Leaf fat
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
Leaf fat. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (
http://www.leaf-fat.com/english/index.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iknowyourider ( t c) 22:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as
Leaf fat, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. We don't accept copyrighted content, and you've repeatedly reposted copyrighted materal.
Darkspots
22:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
If you wish to contest the speedy deletion, read and follow the instructions given within. Thanks. -- Iknowyourider ( t c) 22:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- This is the second time you've been warned about this. That really shouldn't be necessary. -- Iknowyourider ( t c) 22:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a
speedy deletion notice from an article you created, as you did with
Leaf fat, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Darkspots
22:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Redirect of Leaf-fat
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Leaf-fat, by
Darkspots (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Leaf-fat is a redirect to a non-existent page (
CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Leaf-fat, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Leaf-fat itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
22:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as
Leaf fat, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. This article is still a copyright violation and you have been warned several times before.
Iknowyourider (
t
c)
20:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to
User talk: Reorgart. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Cheers,
JetLover (
Talk) (
Sandbox)
21:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Reorgart, I'd be happy to help you write your article. I'm very busy in real life until after the weekend, but for now I created a subpage off your user page, User:Reorgart/Leaf fat. Your article needs to be rewritten so that it doesn't violate WP:COPYRIGHT, and it needs to show the WP:NOTABILITY of Leaf fat. So, to get started, repost your article to the user subpage. Please keep the {{userpage}} template on the page. You can work on the article, and I'll try to help you rewrite the text so that you pass WP:COPYRIGHT. If we get the article to something that should pass Wikipedia's standards, we can move it back to article space, at Leaf fat. Let's keep the discussion about the page here on your talk page for now, if that works for you. Darkspots 12:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with
The Locos. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{
hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
Also, the links that you placed on the names of the band members link to incorrect places in Wikipedia. Please do not replace them. EliminatorJR Talk 15:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Please be civil to other editors. Edits like this aren't helpful. Darkspots 19:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
List of ska punk bands, by
Salaskan (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
List of ska punk bands fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
List of ska punk bands, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate
List of ska punk bands itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
16:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Balkan Pop has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Rror (
talk)
21:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to the page
Balkan Pop constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
21:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--
John (
talk)
18:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
Depeche Mode, without providing a
source and without establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
This has been going on for quite some time and is quite useless until you provide solid reliable sources to support your suggestion. Until that, it will always be reverted. Please stop adding to the workload of other editors. -- Sk4170 ( talk) 09:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Electronic rock is 100 % correct genre for Depeche Mode. I m fucking don´t understand why you don´t recognize that. Justice and truth for DM genre. -- Reorgart ( talk) 11:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Reorgart. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Reorgart~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
18:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with
Leaf fat. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{
hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
Wombatcat
21:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Copyright status of Leaf fat
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
Leaf fat. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (
http://www.leaf-fat.com/english/index.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Darkspots 21:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Copyright status of Leaf fat
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to
Leaf fat. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (
http://www.leaf-fat.com/english/index.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Leaf fat saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iknowyourider ( t c) 22:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as
Leaf fat, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. We don't accept copyrighted content, and you've repeatedly reposted copyrighted materal.
Darkspots
22:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
If you wish to contest the speedy deletion, read and follow the instructions given within. Thanks. -- Iknowyourider ( t c) 22:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- This is the second time you've been warned about this. That really shouldn't be necessary. -- Iknowyourider ( t c) 22:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a
speedy deletion notice from an article you created, as you did with
Leaf fat, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Darkspots
22:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Redirect of Leaf-fat
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Leaf-fat, by
Darkspots (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Leaf-fat is a redirect to a non-existent page (
CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Leaf-fat, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Leaf-fat itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
22:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as
Leaf fat, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. This article is still a copyright violation and you have been warned several times before.
Iknowyourider (
t
c)
20:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to
User talk: Reorgart. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Cheers,
JetLover (
Talk) (
Sandbox)
21:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Reorgart, I'd be happy to help you write your article. I'm very busy in real life until after the weekend, but for now I created a subpage off your user page, User:Reorgart/Leaf fat. Your article needs to be rewritten so that it doesn't violate WP:COPYRIGHT, and it needs to show the WP:NOTABILITY of Leaf fat. So, to get started, repost your article to the user subpage. Please keep the {{userpage}} template on the page. You can work on the article, and I'll try to help you rewrite the text so that you pass WP:COPYRIGHT. If we get the article to something that should pass Wikipedia's standards, we can move it back to article space, at Leaf fat. Let's keep the discussion about the page here on your talk page for now, if that works for you. Darkspots 12:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with
The Locos. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{
hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's
talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
Also, the links that you placed on the names of the band members link to incorrect places in Wikipedia. Please do not replace them. EliminatorJR Talk 15:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Please be civil to other editors. Edits like this aren't helpful. Darkspots 19:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
List of ska punk bands, by
Salaskan (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
List of ska punk bands fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
List of ska punk bands, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate
List of ska punk bands itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
16:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Balkan Pop has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Rror (
talk)
21:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to the page
Balkan Pop constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
21:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--
John (
talk)
18:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
Depeche Mode, without providing a
source and without establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
This has been going on for quite some time and is quite useless until you provide solid reliable sources to support your suggestion. Until that, it will always be reverted. Please stop adding to the workload of other editors. -- Sk4170 ( talk) 09:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Electronic rock is 100 % correct genre for Depeche Mode. I m fucking don´t understand why you don´t recognize that. Justice and truth for DM genre. -- Reorgart ( talk) 11:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Reorgart. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Reorgart~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
18:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)