Do any of you know the tale of how cornmeal came to be? Neither did the miller when he left his house that morning.
Umm... I had something in mind to talk to you about, but after reading what you have on your talk page... the confusion has actually knocked the thought out of my head. Wait... Okay, now I remember.
I took a look at some stirrup images, and found that the cut of the stirrups I had created was a bit drastic. I made changes to a much more reasonable and realistic stirrup. I did not include any sanitary seen behind the stirrup because there's a fine balance that must be struck here. Basically what's being displayed is a person who has their feet pointed a bit outwards. Basically, showing the back of the sock makes it look like the foot is turned drastically. If this is so, then the piping down the sides of the pants wouldn't be shown. If I show the other side of the stirrup from the front view, then the show looks turned too much, and it took a lot just to draw that shoe. I can't so a front view. I tried. The way it is, which is more of a 3/4 turn, shows the most information possible without looking disjointed.
However, the inclusion of stirrups seems to have caused a bit of a stir. Could you please join the discussion here on how to display the uniform socks? Thank you very much. -- The Silent Wind of Doom ( talk) 05:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Darn--you beat me to it. But by the way, I see that that change, like most of your edits, doesn't have an edit summary. Please help your fellow editors by including them. Ma t c hups 21:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
Carl Duff has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
23:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Redsox00002. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Redsox00002. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Do any of you know the tale of how cornmeal came to be? Neither did the miller when he left his house that morning.
Umm... I had something in mind to talk to you about, but after reading what you have on your talk page... the confusion has actually knocked the thought out of my head. Wait... Okay, now I remember.
I took a look at some stirrup images, and found that the cut of the stirrups I had created was a bit drastic. I made changes to a much more reasonable and realistic stirrup. I did not include any sanitary seen behind the stirrup because there's a fine balance that must be struck here. Basically what's being displayed is a person who has their feet pointed a bit outwards. Basically, showing the back of the sock makes it look like the foot is turned drastically. If this is so, then the piping down the sides of the pants wouldn't be shown. If I show the other side of the stirrup from the front view, then the show looks turned too much, and it took a lot just to draw that shoe. I can't so a front view. I tried. The way it is, which is more of a 3/4 turn, shows the most information possible without looking disjointed.
However, the inclusion of stirrups seems to have caused a bit of a stir. Could you please join the discussion here on how to display the uniform socks? Thank you very much. -- The Silent Wind of Doom ( talk) 05:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Darn--you beat me to it. But by the way, I see that that change, like most of your edits, doesn't have an edit summary. Please help your fellow editors by including them. Ma t c hups 21:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
Carl Duff has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
23:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Redsox00002. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Redsox00002. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)