|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smith Music Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smith Music Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bingobro (Chat) 09:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Smith Music Group. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a
bot about
this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
18:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello RedDirtRedBird, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Smith Music Group have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Smith Music Group Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Amelia Presley, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Melcous (
talk)
08:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
You did not verify the date of birth. That isn’t vandalism. You’ve shown no citations. It’s nothing personal. RedDirtRedBird ( talk) 18:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
How am I disruptively editing? I removed something that I saw no reference for. It wasn’t to make a point. You’ve pointed out the references, great. Thank you. But nothing I did was any more disruptive than any editor making any sort of edit. You cannot tell me that you’ve never removed information that had no references. I removed the information one time, you reverted it and called it vandalism. If it’s verified through a headstone that I missed, then so be it. RedDirtRedBird ( talk) 08:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smith Music Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smith Music Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bingobro (Chat) 09:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Smith Music Group. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a
bot about
this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
18:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello RedDirtRedBird, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Smith Music Group have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Smith Music Group Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Amelia Presley, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Melcous (
talk)
08:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
You did not verify the date of birth. That isn’t vandalism. You’ve shown no citations. It’s nothing personal. RedDirtRedBird ( talk) 18:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
How am I disruptively editing? I removed something that I saw no reference for. It wasn’t to make a point. You’ve pointed out the references, great. Thank you. But nothing I did was any more disruptive than any editor making any sort of edit. You cannot tell me that you’ve never removed information that had no references. I removed the information one time, you reverted it and called it vandalism. If it’s verified through a headstone that I missed, then so be it. RedDirtRedBird ( talk) 08:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)