![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Reconsider the static, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged ( Nigel picart) under a criterion different from the one your provided, which was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific to protect the encyclopedia, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! So Why 07:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I am the original source & creator of the Byford Dolphin article, with the help of FP to edit content. You've just removed an important reference also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.T2009 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton | Talk 13:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I reverted your addition to Glenn Beck because it didn't add anything to the paragraph and it wasn't soured. In all seriousness: thanks for contributing, though. Cptnono ( talk) 11:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your help in patrolling the Joe Jett page, it has been subject to some bad hacking. I am trying to keep an eye on it but if more than one of us can it is helpful. Hammertime2005 ( talk) 18:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
— Farix ( t | c) 13:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Vivek Kundra. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. I know you are replacing the content but please refrain from further reverts, I've requested semi-protection
here
Smartse (
talk)
13:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Reluctantly, I've made a report at WP:AN3 in regards to the edit-warring you've done, including twice after Smartse warned you. I completely sympathize with your position (as you should see in the sockpuppet report against 7oceans) but I can't in good conscience let the edit war go unreported. We have a 3 revert rule and you've made 13 reverts in 24 hours. I'm hoping they go easy on you (less than 24 hour block, or even no block at all). But I felt the report was necessary, I hope you understand. Thank you. -- Atama 頭 17:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The investigation is not a conspircay theory, try using a bit of research & get your facts straight, before you start editing.. The investigation is descriped in detail, through the bok, Nordsjødykkerne by kristin Øye Gjerde og Helge Ryggvik ISBN 978-82-8140-082-5
== Nordsjødykkerne by kristin Øye Gjerde og Helge Ryggvik ISBN 978-82-8140-082-5 == Here is a reference
Hello, you have been accused of being a sockpuppet of SusanLesch. So have I, as it happens. Which means that we're apparently the same person, and by leaving this notice I'm actually talking to myself. But I thought I should let you know anyway. :) -- Atama 頭 18:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I think my edit was not vandalism. Thanks!-- 119.73.0.122 ( talk) 00:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
That new section was created few hours ago and doesn't belong there. It belongs at Hamid_Karzai#Early_years_and_personal_life. His wife ( Zeenat Quraishi) and his brother ( Ahmed Wali Karzai) have their own articles. Wife and children belong in personal life sections.-- 119.73.0.122 ( talk) 00:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
I see that the word "phrase" is redundant when the phrase itself was placed in quotes. Nice tiny tidy edits like this are often under-appreciated. Good job. User:Pedant ( talk) 06:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Modest Barnstar | |
No sarcasm was intended at all, but thanks for asking instead of assuming. I was so proud of my paragraph, thought it was perfect, but you made it better with your edit. I sincerely appreciate it and just wanted to say so. Good work, look forward to more collaboration in the future. User:Pedant ( talk) 06:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
Dear User,
The edit on page: Bokaro Steel City seems a POV action. The 3 changes made by you are unexplained and seems just a propaganda to discredit the city of what it deserves. The changes have been reverted for now. Discuss the change on talk page before making changes or I would be forced to report you for Vandalism.
Hope the changes you made were in good faith.
Thanks,
-- Indian ( talk) 02:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
While I agree that use of weasel words is not acceptable, removing vast pasts of fact also render the article almost useless.
I believe a neutral and standard language can fix the concerns without ripping the article.
Regards,
-- Indian ( talk) 05:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the concern to make page wiki-compliant. The page has been subject to many changes and shown active signs of acts that seem Vandalism. I have personally very recently started trying to slowly with common consent made some changes. I would appreciate if you could help the same process. Sudden changes attract unwanted IP attacks as you must have experienced over the time.
Expecting cooperation from a concerned member.
Regards, -- Indian ( talk) 05:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw that you marked this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapsch to be cleaned up. I would like to do that, so could you please tell me what exactly I should? best regards -- Florian.schleicher ( talk) 11:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Reconsider the static. Yes, there is indeed a set of automated messages you can use. See WP:WARN for a full list. But tell you what, I'll let you use my vandalism-template cheatsheet. You can also use automated tools such as Huggle or Twinkle to revert vandalism as well. Hope that helps to answer your question. Kind regards, FASTILY (TALK) 03:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you reverted someone's edit on the P-8 Poseidon page about what UAS might become the BAMS system. Although the wiki page for BAMS ( Broad Area Maritime Surveillance) is rather lacking, the Global Hawk is the system that is being developed, so the edits you reverted back to are out of date. I think it would be fine to go back to what the earlier edit was. - SidewinderX ( talk) 04:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit on the Lusatians. A redirect to Sorbs is wrong. I am a Lusatian but no Sorb. What is your problem with this? 195.243.51.34 ( talk) 10:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. But why should I contact the Person who created the redirect page? I am from Lusatia, was born in Lusatia and live in Lusatia. Well I should know that 90% of the people here consider themselve Germans - and 90% is a very low estimate. Historically it was different of course, but allready around 1400 the Germans formed the majority in the cities. The Lusatian=Sorbs case is often found, so it has to be mentioned on the disambugation page, but it is nevertheless incorrect. This incorrectnes is also found in many articles about Lusatia in the English wiki, where is always much talking about the Sorbs, but forgotten that the regions was two-national for nearly 1000 years. By the way I am proud of the "two nation"-context, but nevertheless it is important to me that Lusatians is not Sorbs. 195.243.51.34 ( talk) 10:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Static. I overrode your db-content tag, which you applied while I was looking for some content. Look again at the article; it might be a notable subject. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 05:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
You tagged the article I created on magnet programs in PGCPS citing it came across as an "advertisement". I'm not sure what it would be advertising. The article was created because ANOTHER person on wiki suggested that an article SPECIFICALLY for PGCPS magnet programs be created to reduce redundant content on other wiki pages directly related to Prince George's County Public Schools. The article on PGPCS magnet programs DIRECTLY LINKS to the main article for the Prince George's County Public Schools system, which is a highly detailed page which lists the magnet programs that each school offers. Maryland Pride ( talk) 04:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes hi, why did you delete the AFJROTC portion at first at this page? I had to go back to retype it all and was not completed with it. The Rapid Man ( talk) 10:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
How do I archive talk pages then? The Rapid Man ( talk) 10:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I will figure it out, will be cautious next time before deleting anything. Thanks again. The Rapid Man ( talk) 11:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
There must be more, Google Groups isn't a Usenet Provider. Why do you want delete Open-News-Network_e.V.-- OnnoS ( talk) 11:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
ARUNKUMAR P.R has given you a
LOL
ipop! This horrible pun and delicious candy promotes
WikiLove and tells the world how low you will stoop for the sake of humor. Spread WikiLove by giving someone else a lollipop, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the unrelenting joy of lollipops by adding {{ subst:Lollipop}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Take a break, Have a Lollipop!!! arun talk 04:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Lettter Bomb (Song). The reason I declined it is because the artist of the song in question is Circle Jerks. Please note that articles about songs are only speedy deletable if their artist have no article on Wikipedia. For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
While I'm sure everyone does appreciate your great zeal in vigorously patrolling wikipedia for possible junk articles, call me eccentric but I personally feel it shows more courtesy not to mention common sense to wait until someone actually finishes up entering the initial data on a new article before slapping a plethora boxes on it and/or trying to have it speedily deleted. Especially when this means you have just blown away all the editing work the OP has just done . . . . sigh. Thanks ever so CyntWorkStuff ( talk) 02:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I saw a welcome template you put on someone's talk page... it ended with "Happy editing! Reconsider". It was kind of funny. fetch comms ☛ 03:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
The Grim Reaper 11:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Got your message at my talk. Actually, you are partly incorrect. Please look at the recent edit history of the talk page for the article: you will see that the user is the same person as the IP who made multiple blankings before logging in. (Made comment as IP, then logged in and signed.) In other words, he is continuing to blank after you warned him. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 02:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. You may want to look at the comments I left at the SPI. Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 10:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
There is a discussion section open, and talk on the talk page about the sentence. Your comments are welcome. I restored the sentence for now. Thanks. - Pecoc ( talk) 02:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Regarding your nomination then 'un-nomination' of Paper Plus Group, I have no problem with you nominating it if you feel like it is not notable enough for wikipedia. Do you feel that way? I always try and produce quality work for wikipedia and love to hear feedback, Thanks! Kiwiteen123 ( talk) 08:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
That was a fast edit! Thanks though, it looks like it is common practice to not include a header for categories, and I removed it from the other places (3 others) that I also added it to when I was adding the web hosting category to them. Out of curiosity though, is there a page that actually specifies this as a best practice? I'm not contesting your change in any way (shown by the subsequent changes I made) I am simply curious to read more about it if it's documented somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by T007mav ( talk • contribs) 09:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() | 'tis the season to be jolly! Have a Merry Christmas, a high-spirited Hanukkah, a Happy New Year, a killer Kwanzaa, a hearty Hogmanay, a smashing Silvester, or even a spiffy Saturnalia as the case may be! And don't forget to spread the holiday cheer by pasting {{subst:User:Happenstance/Dec}} to the talk pages of all your little friends, and even one or two of your enemies too, in the spirit of the holiday, no? Season's greetings, from — what a crazy random happenstance 10:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
An article that you have been involved in editing, Langley Flying School, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langley Flying School. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ahunt ( talk) 02:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Reconsider the static, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged ( Nigel picart) under a criterion different from the one your provided, which was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific to protect the encyclopedia, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! So Why 07:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I am the original source & creator of the Byford Dolphin article, with the help of FP to edit content. You've just removed an important reference also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.T2009 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton | Talk 13:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I reverted your addition to Glenn Beck because it didn't add anything to the paragraph and it wasn't soured. In all seriousness: thanks for contributing, though. Cptnono ( talk) 11:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your help in patrolling the Joe Jett page, it has been subject to some bad hacking. I am trying to keep an eye on it but if more than one of us can it is helpful. Hammertime2005 ( talk) 18:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
— Farix ( t | c) 13:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Vivek Kundra. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. I know you are replacing the content but please refrain from further reverts, I've requested semi-protection
here
Smartse (
talk)
13:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Reluctantly, I've made a report at WP:AN3 in regards to the edit-warring you've done, including twice after Smartse warned you. I completely sympathize with your position (as you should see in the sockpuppet report against 7oceans) but I can't in good conscience let the edit war go unreported. We have a 3 revert rule and you've made 13 reverts in 24 hours. I'm hoping they go easy on you (less than 24 hour block, or even no block at all). But I felt the report was necessary, I hope you understand. Thank you. -- Atama 頭 17:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The investigation is not a conspircay theory, try using a bit of research & get your facts straight, before you start editing.. The investigation is descriped in detail, through the bok, Nordsjødykkerne by kristin Øye Gjerde og Helge Ryggvik ISBN 978-82-8140-082-5
== Nordsjødykkerne by kristin Øye Gjerde og Helge Ryggvik ISBN 978-82-8140-082-5 == Here is a reference
Hello, you have been accused of being a sockpuppet of SusanLesch. So have I, as it happens. Which means that we're apparently the same person, and by leaving this notice I'm actually talking to myself. But I thought I should let you know anyway. :) -- Atama 頭 18:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I think my edit was not vandalism. Thanks!-- 119.73.0.122 ( talk) 00:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
That new section was created few hours ago and doesn't belong there. It belongs at Hamid_Karzai#Early_years_and_personal_life. His wife ( Zeenat Quraishi) and his brother ( Ahmed Wali Karzai) have their own articles. Wife and children belong in personal life sections.-- 119.73.0.122 ( talk) 00:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
I see that the word "phrase" is redundant when the phrase itself was placed in quotes. Nice tiny tidy edits like this are often under-appreciated. Good job. User:Pedant ( talk) 06:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Modest Barnstar | |
No sarcasm was intended at all, but thanks for asking instead of assuming. I was so proud of my paragraph, thought it was perfect, but you made it better with your edit. I sincerely appreciate it and just wanted to say so. Good work, look forward to more collaboration in the future. User:Pedant ( talk) 06:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC) |
Dear User,
The edit on page: Bokaro Steel City seems a POV action. The 3 changes made by you are unexplained and seems just a propaganda to discredit the city of what it deserves. The changes have been reverted for now. Discuss the change on talk page before making changes or I would be forced to report you for Vandalism.
Hope the changes you made were in good faith.
Thanks,
-- Indian ( talk) 02:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
While I agree that use of weasel words is not acceptable, removing vast pasts of fact also render the article almost useless.
I believe a neutral and standard language can fix the concerns without ripping the article.
Regards,
-- Indian ( talk) 05:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the concern to make page wiki-compliant. The page has been subject to many changes and shown active signs of acts that seem Vandalism. I have personally very recently started trying to slowly with common consent made some changes. I would appreciate if you could help the same process. Sudden changes attract unwanted IP attacks as you must have experienced over the time.
Expecting cooperation from a concerned member.
Regards, -- Indian ( talk) 05:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw that you marked this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapsch to be cleaned up. I would like to do that, so could you please tell me what exactly I should? best regards -- Florian.schleicher ( talk) 11:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Reconsider the static. Yes, there is indeed a set of automated messages you can use. See WP:WARN for a full list. But tell you what, I'll let you use my vandalism-template cheatsheet. You can also use automated tools such as Huggle or Twinkle to revert vandalism as well. Hope that helps to answer your question. Kind regards, FASTILY (TALK) 03:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you reverted someone's edit on the P-8 Poseidon page about what UAS might become the BAMS system. Although the wiki page for BAMS ( Broad Area Maritime Surveillance) is rather lacking, the Global Hawk is the system that is being developed, so the edits you reverted back to are out of date. I think it would be fine to go back to what the earlier edit was. - SidewinderX ( talk) 04:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit on the Lusatians. A redirect to Sorbs is wrong. I am a Lusatian but no Sorb. What is your problem with this? 195.243.51.34 ( talk) 10:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. But why should I contact the Person who created the redirect page? I am from Lusatia, was born in Lusatia and live in Lusatia. Well I should know that 90% of the people here consider themselve Germans - and 90% is a very low estimate. Historically it was different of course, but allready around 1400 the Germans formed the majority in the cities. The Lusatian=Sorbs case is often found, so it has to be mentioned on the disambugation page, but it is nevertheless incorrect. This incorrectnes is also found in many articles about Lusatia in the English wiki, where is always much talking about the Sorbs, but forgotten that the regions was two-national for nearly 1000 years. By the way I am proud of the "two nation"-context, but nevertheless it is important to me that Lusatians is not Sorbs. 195.243.51.34 ( talk) 10:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Static. I overrode your db-content tag, which you applied while I was looking for some content. Look again at the article; it might be a notable subject. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 05:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
You tagged the article I created on magnet programs in PGCPS citing it came across as an "advertisement". I'm not sure what it would be advertising. The article was created because ANOTHER person on wiki suggested that an article SPECIFICALLY for PGCPS magnet programs be created to reduce redundant content on other wiki pages directly related to Prince George's County Public Schools. The article on PGPCS magnet programs DIRECTLY LINKS to the main article for the Prince George's County Public Schools system, which is a highly detailed page which lists the magnet programs that each school offers. Maryland Pride ( talk) 04:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes hi, why did you delete the AFJROTC portion at first at this page? I had to go back to retype it all and was not completed with it. The Rapid Man ( talk) 10:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
How do I archive talk pages then? The Rapid Man ( talk) 10:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I will figure it out, will be cautious next time before deleting anything. Thanks again. The Rapid Man ( talk) 11:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
There must be more, Google Groups isn't a Usenet Provider. Why do you want delete Open-News-Network_e.V.-- OnnoS ( talk) 11:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
ARUNKUMAR P.R has given you a
LOL
ipop! This horrible pun and delicious candy promotes
WikiLove and tells the world how low you will stoop for the sake of humor. Spread WikiLove by giving someone else a lollipop, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the unrelenting joy of lollipops by adding {{ subst:Lollipop}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Take a break, Have a Lollipop!!! arun talk 04:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Lettter Bomb (Song). The reason I declined it is because the artist of the song in question is Circle Jerks. Please note that articles about songs are only speedy deletable if their artist have no article on Wikipedia. For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
While I'm sure everyone does appreciate your great zeal in vigorously patrolling wikipedia for possible junk articles, call me eccentric but I personally feel it shows more courtesy not to mention common sense to wait until someone actually finishes up entering the initial data on a new article before slapping a plethora boxes on it and/or trying to have it speedily deleted. Especially when this means you have just blown away all the editing work the OP has just done . . . . sigh. Thanks ever so CyntWorkStuff ( talk) 02:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I saw a welcome template you put on someone's talk page... it ended with "Happy editing! Reconsider". It was kind of funny. fetch comms ☛ 03:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
The Grim Reaper 11:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Got your message at my talk. Actually, you are partly incorrect. Please look at the recent edit history of the talk page for the article: you will see that the user is the same person as the IP who made multiple blankings before logging in. (Made comment as IP, then logged in and signed.) In other words, he is continuing to blank after you warned him. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 02:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. You may want to look at the comments I left at the SPI. Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 10:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
There is a discussion section open, and talk on the talk page about the sentence. Your comments are welcome. I restored the sentence for now. Thanks. - Pecoc ( talk) 02:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Regarding your nomination then 'un-nomination' of Paper Plus Group, I have no problem with you nominating it if you feel like it is not notable enough for wikipedia. Do you feel that way? I always try and produce quality work for wikipedia and love to hear feedback, Thanks! Kiwiteen123 ( talk) 08:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
That was a fast edit! Thanks though, it looks like it is common practice to not include a header for categories, and I removed it from the other places (3 others) that I also added it to when I was adding the web hosting category to them. Out of curiosity though, is there a page that actually specifies this as a best practice? I'm not contesting your change in any way (shown by the subsequent changes I made) I am simply curious to read more about it if it's documented somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by T007mav ( talk • contribs) 09:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() | 'tis the season to be jolly! Have a Merry Christmas, a high-spirited Hanukkah, a Happy New Year, a killer Kwanzaa, a hearty Hogmanay, a smashing Silvester, or even a spiffy Saturnalia as the case may be! And don't forget to spread the holiday cheer by pasting {{subst:User:Happenstance/Dec}} to the talk pages of all your little friends, and even one or two of your enemies too, in the spirit of the holiday, no? Season's greetings, from — what a crazy random happenstance 10:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
An article that you have been involved in editing, Langley Flying School, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langley Flying School. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ahunt ( talk) 02:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)