![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Hi Rayis! I expanded this article some more. I would like to invite you to see the article again. I would like to invite you to see the parts on Iranian culture in particular. Thanks and all the best. Sina Kardar 15:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, I have retried the links you reinserted, but get a blank page. Can you please check it? Jona Lendering 23:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis – Here is a copy a template for Iranian Languages Group – according to your wonderful idea. Regards Surena 07:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis - please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khorasani Turkish language. Surena 20:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
See User_talk:Patchouli#My_viewpoint.-- Patchouli 18:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry Rayis - I tried to roll back a large rollback by "Mardavich", but instead killed your improvements. I'm trying to correct it. Sorry. Jona Lendering 14:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jona, about this article I would like to point out a few things:
1- You are conducting your original research and putting it on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:No original research. -Do it elsewhere.
2- You are claiming your point of view Please see WP:NPOV -Accept other points of view.
3- You are claiming ownership of the article Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles -Let others edit.
I see you have rolled back to the pre-Schaudig info, but now I will not remove it; I can live with your remark that the pre-Schaudig info is contested (as it should be). Let's first see what the others do. Jona Lendering 17:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
You may be an expert, but your point of view is one, in over 6 billion humans, and this is Wikipedia "not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information not heretofore published."
Dear Rayis: that's not the issue, I'd say. If 6 billion opinions are all based on Schaudig, you'd be right. But that's not the case. It is simply incorrect to base an article on outdated information. We must use the latest readings, based on Fragments A and B, based on Schaudig.
As to pre-Shah-claims that the CC is a human rights charter: you are right that the Shah did not create this out of the blue. Therefore, I left the Frye quote standing, and even accentuated it. But HIM is responsible for propagating this reading, see the UN document I quote. Jona Lendering 17:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, just received your last remark. Let's agree to disagree - if Cyrus (or his exegetes) could be tolerant, so can we. Just improve the site as you see fit, but please note which info goes back to pre- and post-Schaudig's editions. Maybe we should leave the "contested information" tag until the others have given their opinion. Jona Lendering 18:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Daste shoma dard nakoneh. dastkari shahnameh ro ham didam. joz afsoos khordan che mishavad kard. be omide rooz haie behtar. Sina Kardar 20:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Rayis. Yes, I was going to work on Persians next. I am finishing up with Pashtuns and then will get started with Persians as I am kind of on a theme of eastern Middle Eastern peoples lately. Well, probably I'll work Persians by using some of what is already there, but adding a lot more and removing anything that can't be proven etc. In the past, the articles I've worked on (with lots of help from my usual friends) such as Iranian peoples, Azerbaijani people and Pashtuns all have a similar look in terms of having a lot of references and some common questions regarding origins etc. The Persians I may treat a bit differently as the terminology seems to vary from a view similar to that of 'Arabs' (meaning anyone who speaks Persian) to groups that link themselves to the ancients (which is hard given the amount of time that separates modern people from ancient ones). At any rate, nothing will be put in that isn't referenced and verifiable. Probably the opening will be fixed and expanded a bit. The collage picture will have to go because it violates copyright laws (as we've found with Pashtuns now (trying to get that article back to FA status). We'll probably go with sections like history, origins, modern society, culture, institutions and women so some sections in the article should stay and others will change a bit. It'll be a lot of work and probably take weeks to complete. If you have any suggestions, then please let me know and any help you can give will be appreciated. Cheers. Tombseye 02:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the user appears to be pushing his own original research, not to mention using Wikipedia as a platform to promote his website. I don't have time to handle it myself, but I recommend that you post something about this at WP:AN/I. Regards, Khoi khoi 07:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The "Azerembassy source" you mention is just a host for a book by a highly respected Azerbaijani scholar of Talysh origin, academician Igrar Aliyev. Him being a major academician and director of the History Institute and all, and editor of that book that's hosted on that site – Igrar Aliyev (ed.), “History of Azerbaijan”, Part IV “Azerbaijan in modern times”, Chapter XXIII, “Founding of Azerbaijan Democratic Republic”, sub-title: “Azerbaijan on international arena. Paris Peace Conference”, Baku: Elm Publishing House of the Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, 1995 (in Russian) – makes the source valid and acceptable. If not, I can take those pages and host them on my site, that would not change anything. Likewise, we can scan the original page as well in due time, if necessary. This source is not written by "Azerembassy", it is simply hosted there like many other articles. It is written by academician Igrar Aliyev, and cites archival documents, obviously some of them available only in Azerbaijan and in Azerbaijani. Likewise, we are discussing Azerbaijan here, hence, we cannot avoid Azerbaijani sources, and in light of using for example Iranian scholars, Armenian scholars, Russian scholars, we thus definitely cannot ignore Azerbaijani scholars that write about their own nation. -- AdilBaguirov 18:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Remind me what I did. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Orthologist ( talk • contribs) 21:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC).
I just reverted it to the latest version, as it had been blanked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orthologist ( talk • contribs)
Alright, excuse me, I pressed the Refresh button a lot of times and thought it had been blanked for good; i didn't know it was you.-- Orthologist 21:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC) It's alright now, I reverted it.-- Orthologist 21:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Rayis! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule petitiononline\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
After working on History or religious fundamentalism in Iran etc, I am back to science and art again! Would you please see my new works on Abbas Kiarostami? Any ideas or comments on the structure of article? Any mistakes or shortcommings? Thanks for your time and take care. Sangak 21:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps as a compromise, we can change the numbers to only include the number of Kurds in Iranian Kurdistan, and then give numbers of Kurds living in other parts of Iran? What do you think? Khoi khoi 03:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Please don't move my comments up and down, add yours in the correct place to show how the discussion progresses. Try to avoid editing another editor's comments unless absolutely necessary Wikipedia:Etiquette --Rayis 13:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Rayis; Sorry, it was accidental not intentional. Kiumars Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kiumars"
Your revert of my copy-editing, wikification, and bringing of the lead into line with the manual of style, was not acceptable. Your edit summary was also unrelated to your edit. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 13:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Salam
It would be very helpful if you could comment on Abbas Kiarostami. Then I can improve the article further. Ba sepaas. Sangak 22:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Salam!
Please see [1]. We need to change the WP:MoS for Persian transliteration. MoS forces us to use Arabic transliteration for Persian words. It makes no sense. Please see the problem I have now on transliteration of Kiarostami. [2]
Sangak 13:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see the good amount of work you have been doing with articles about Mazandaran & its people. What do you suggest for Lurs? If you go to Lorestan#People and culture, there is some information, but the main article is listed as Lurs. Yet at Lurs, the main article is listed at Lorestan#People and culture, and there is less information. Perhaps a merge is appropriate for this situation as well. Tell me what you think. The Behnam 01:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I am a bit concerned about this article and I saw that you nominated it to be deleted. I think much of the data is a copy of the Norouz article, and the main part of the article is basically the problems in Turkey which I don't think justifies existence of it. This came to my attention after another user created yet another Norouz article about how they celebrate it in Mazandaran and said well, if Kurds have their own page, why can't we?! I would love to know your thoughts -- Rayis 14:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion! I'll creat that category too, though there might not be a clear definition who we should call a nationalist. Siba 03:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Doroud & Done! Shervink 15:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)shervink
Yes, I accidentally used the npa1 template, which has a welcome in it. I should have used npa2, and this has now been corrected. Anyway, try not to violate civility by such inflammatory characterizations of other editors as you did at the page, thanks. The Behnam 23:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Regardless of whatever unspecified edits of mine were trolling, the reason I made the initial edit was to remove your trolling without further incident. I had seen that done with other trolling situations and felt it entirely appropriate for that instance. For some reason you reinstated it; don't you realize that just your last part was enough? The part I removed was just an uncivil characterization of me that could only be inflammatory; the removal was definitely justified. Perhaps you should re-remove it? I thought you would see that it was rather trollish upon me removing it. Thanks. The Behnam 23:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for all the effort you put to maintain and improve Iran-Related articles. Arad 02:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
Done. Khoi khoi 03:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Do have any reliable information about this guy? I recently encountered the article, which of course was rubbish. I cleared it up, but he seems to have had a much wider 'musician' role in the past. I just couldn't find that many reliable sources, especially on his death. It isn't clear how they tracked it to IRI agents; from what I see right now it appears to just be suspicion. As usual, most of the information talking about his death are from unreliable fringe opposition blogs that have no chance of reporting anything objectively or with proper fact-checking. However, I suspect you may know more about these, so if you don't mind please give it a look and add some real information to it if possible. Thanks. The Behnam 19:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I know what you mean. It is very hard to find reliable information about opposition figures and related things. I'm currently digging through HRW's website to find their opinion on the 1988 incident. What is particularly frustrating is that there aren't even many reliable books on these matters. Too many special interests I guess. In any case, thanks for whatever help you can give these articles. The Behnam 20:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
these fishes are found in the ARABIAN side of the ARABIAN gulf "in oman and UAE". you cannot find these fishes in northern ARABIAN gulf. so, dont be racest and do NOT change the ARABIAN GULF word in the article!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.150.120.84 ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 13 March 2007
Hey Rayis, I'm not sure what you think about the merge issue. I think, especially now, that the kurdish page is fully referenced, and is (in my mind) NPOV that there is no point merging because it would add too much info to the general Norouz page. Regards, – Jeff3000 04:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Doroud & Thanks for your quick response to the vadalism on the Reza Shah Pahlavi article by "Artaxerxes", "Faranbazu" and other sockpuppets. You were correct that I had clearly entered a discussion piece prior to removing damages done by the vandal, contrary to accusations from the vandal/sockpuppet. Mehrshad123 18:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Please take a look at History of fundamentalist Islam in Iran. I am happy that the article attracted a few critical editors. The more people take part the less chance will be for POV. I hope people with different background edit this article. Thanks and take care. Sina Kardar 14:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, I have noticed that you, Mehrshad and Shervink have filled evidence for sock puppet against me. This is o.k., and I wish you success. However, may I ask you respectfully to provide reference and citations for your contributions. I also want to edit some of lopesided text about his modernization programs. Of course, all based on well cited evidence. I am also concerned about lack of any references to his human right abuses, and his corruption. I do not want to go through long edit wars. So I thought I'll discuss this with you beforehand and seek your advice to see what would be agreeable to you. cheers Faranbazu 18:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah, great. I'm glad you started up a page for that, it's actually been locked locked from editing longer than Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Well, right now, The Behnam is proposing it for speedy deletion, but I'm trying to reason with him to keep it up. It's really the best version to start with, as from it, we can slowly add in all of the other information needs to be there. ♠ SG →Talk 15:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Indeed. Right or wrong, that is an Islamic POV and probably is not necessary to the timeline. The Behnam 10:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Rayis, Thank you for donating your time [ [5]] in helping us expose the troll User:Faranbazu and having him and his sockpuppets and meatpuppets banned! I am hoping the Reza Shah article will be unlocked soon so that the months of vandalism can be removed promptly. Mehrshad123 20:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
It's not important what BBC says when it's not officially police force. As defined in Police article, Police are agents or agencies empowered to use force and other forms of coercion and legal means to effect public and social order. The term is most commonly associated with police departments of a state that are authorized to exercise the police power of that state within a defined legal or territorial area of responsibility. Please go there and change the definition. Bebin har vaqt tunesti unha ra qane koni ke gruh haye feshar ejtemaee va niruhaye shebhe dolati ra ham mishe police khand man kolle harfhayam ra pas migiram. Boro beheshun bego chon BBC ya x va y be in gruhha migan police behtare ke tarife police shamel niruhaye qeyrdoliti ke tamin nazm ejtemaee ra bar ohde darand beshavad. Agar unha paziroftand man ham mipaziram. -- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 03:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Please be careful when using 'rvv' in the edit summary. Some of the edits you undid here [6] shouldn't have been called vandalism. Thanks. The Behnam 18:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 14 | 2 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Kianush Sanjari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. . I may well be wrong on this, but I can't see why this is notable at the moment. Surely a lot of people are arrested and released bu why is that notable? Pedro | Talk 13:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I responded on that page, but to summarize, I need to see some diffs here if you are asserting that the individual you reported is continuing the same behavior they were blocked for.-- Isotope23 14:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
I am curious; what brought you to the 300 article today? I ask because you haven't contributed before. Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
It was not my intent to insult you in any way. I was gave voice to a concern that appears to have been unwarranted in your case. Please accept my apologies. Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Arabic mathematics a term used by historians of mathematics and has nothing to do with the ethnicity of Omar Khayyám. — Ruud 22:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I proposed the move 5 days ago and only Jeff had objection and after my last comment (4 days ago), he didn't have any objection anymore. If you have any objection, participate in the discussion (in its talk page). Jahangard 01:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for offering feedback through the Request for Comment on Racism by Country. WilyD 17:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you know anything about this? It needs sources. The Behnam 21:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I have a class to go to in a minute and will be back in about 1 hour and 30 minutes, at which point I will be able to look into this situation. Natalie 22:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I guess you can read Persian. Just take a look to these sources. [12]-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 13:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Salam. Do you agree on making a wikiproject or at least a task force (like this)about Contemporary history of Iran which includes issues science 1900. Please write your idea in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Iran#Contemporary_history_of_Iran-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 06:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
King of Kings is still King. If it were Emperor amongst Kings, or what-have-you, that would be different. The article should only refer to the title that is implicitly stated, not the one that is implied. María ( habla con migo) 15:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Do you intend to apologise for your behaviour or should we move this to the Administrators' noticeboard? Miskin 16:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you had restored the Iranian reformist page then moved it to a new title, and then copied things from the other page to it. So I got confused about this which could have been done directly by moving 2nd of K to a new title! So I wasn't sure what your question meant. In any case, I think the title should be in lower case as it is not a proper noun see: WP:TITLE-- Gerash 77 13:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, Please do not accuse me of Sock puppetry. Thanks Yima 17:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
ببین مجبورم کردی فارسی برایت توضیح بدهم.
آقا روزشمار یعنی نوشته ای که به بیان وقایع بر اساس روند تاریخی آنها می پردازد. [13]
در یک روزشمار فقط حوادث و زمان وقوع آنها به طور روشن و دقیق ذکر می شود. علت ها و آثار وقایع در روزشمار نمی آید. این نه به نفع من است و نه شما. در اون روزشمار هم کلی اتفاق دیگر هست نظیر ترور مطهری، پیشینه سازمان مجاهدین خلق و غیره که من دوست دارم روشن شود. اما چون متوجه هستم که آن متن یک روز شمار است و یک مقاله فرعی از مقاله انقلاب ایران به شمار می رود لزومی برای افزودن هیچ توضیح اضافه به آن حوادث نمی بینم. فرض بر این است که هر خواننده ای مه بر سراغ یک روزشمار آمد می داند که روزشمار چیست. به علاوه در بالای آن مقاله به روشنی و صراحت بیان شده که برای مشاهده حوادث قبلی و بعدی و توضیحات بیشتر به کدام مقالات باید رجوع شود. همین طور در نظر داشته باش که ویکی پدیا یک هایپرتکست است و خوانندگان اگر توضیح اضافه نیاز داشتند می توانند با یک کلیک به مقاله های دیگر بروند.
متأسفانه پیشنهاد شما فقط مربوط به آن یک بند نمی شود. یعنی یا ما نباید هیچ جایی دلایل را بنویسیم یا باید همه جا دلایل را بنویسیم. آن وقت روزشمار تبدیل به مقاله انقلاب ایران می شود و همه به ما می خندند.
درخصوص شروع مقاله از آن تاریخ هم ظاهرا توافق بین تاریخ نویسان وجود دارد که انقلاب با این اتفاق شروع می شود. حالا اگر شما دوست داری از تاریخ دیگری بحث را شروع کنیم می توانی در صفحه بحث مقاله مزبور پیشنهاد بدهی تا دیگر ویکی نویسان در موردش نظر دهند.
نکته آخر اگر به خاطر فقدان بیان دلایل هزار بار روی مقاله برچسب بزنی من هم هزار بار آن را بر میدارم. مطمئن باش از شما هم سمج تر هستم. بهترین راهی که می توانم پیشنهاد کنم این است که به مقاله انقلاب ایران بروی و دیدگاه مورد نظرت را با ادله روشن بیان کنی. مطمئن باش هر کس که به روزشمار سربزند قطعا به مقاله اصلی هم سر خواهد زد.
-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 04:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it's best if you don't accuse this editor of being a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. Per WP:AGF, you should assume that other users are making a good-faith edit to improve the encyclopedia. However, you're right that it is also inappropriate for him/her to label other editors as "bloggers" and "Iranchamber", per WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Best if everyone cools down here, and holds off on editing the Reza Shah article for a while. I've already suggested that a request for comment on the article might be a good idea, if this dispute escalates. I will leave a message for Yima asking him/her not to describe other editors as "bloggers". Please contact me if you need any further advice. Wal ton Vivat Regina! 17:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I am not blocking you for 3RR at this time, but I strongly caution you not to take this as support for your actions. The article has been temporarily locked to prevent edit warring, and I will be monitoring the situation. Participate in discussion on the talk page and seek mediation if necessary (perhaps by requesting a third opinion, because any further edit warring after the block is lifted (whether or not it breaks 3RR) will result in a block without warning. Kafziel Talk 13:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 16 | 16 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words, and they are very much reciprocated. Regards, – Jeff3000 17:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Please read the section in the talk area for information before reverting. All possible care was taken with preserving the votes and the voting record prior to archiving. Anyone can see the voting record in the archiove, and can see who voted. There is nopt reason to further clutter up the Talk Page with votes that are weeks old. The same vote choices have been left ont he talk page, and instructions on voting anew. Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I will give you the opportunity to tell me exaclyt how i am pushing "my" POV. Aside for neutrality and a low tolerance for nonsense, I don't think i have one. However, if you feel I have one, please, point it out. Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I notice Makalp is on a vandalism binge, hope we can stop this. Hetoum 17:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
You are one edit away from breaking 3RR on Tehcir Law. The other editor's changes are not vandalism, and calling them that will not give you free reign to revert his changes. Please stop. Kafziel Talk 20:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Amir jan don't let this featured article be ruined because some people don't like it, cheers. -- Rayis 09:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
وضع مقالات برگزیده و خوب مربوط به ایران خیلی بدتر از اینه که بشه گفت. اگر می خواستم راحت می تونستنم کاری بکنم که الان هیچ کدومشون حتی مقاله خوب هم محسوب نشوند. اما وقتی میام برای امیر پیغام می گذارم که بیا مقاله را درست کنیم حتما حسن نیت داشتم. سعی کن درست برخورد کنی. -- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 10:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I made a few edits at the section, and ended up removing it. After I removed 'tied in' things that weren't about 'apartheid', I realized that this was just undue weight on a minority view, so I had to eliminate the section. Bring up any further concerns on the talk page. Thanks for notifying me of the situation. The Behnam 16:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Yo. I've started the section again, this time on the right foot by sticking to notable allegations in real sources. It obviously needs expansion. I'm also going to ask Sa.vakilian and Gerash to get opposing views to add balance. Feel free to expand on any more Ganji details without bounds of weight and NPOV. Cheers. The Behnam 17:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for taking the time to comment on my my RfA, which was successful. I learned a lot from the comments, I appreciate everything that was said, and I'll do my best to deserve the community's trust. Thanks again! And thanks for your kind words and support. -- Shirahadasha 04:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 17 | 23 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed a red link for your name on my talk page, and checked your userpage out. I hope you're not leaving Wikipedia; we need neutral editors like yourself here. Regards, – Jeff3000 04:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete your userpage? Khorshid 03:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, a request for mediation has been filed given the deadlock at racism by country. You previously offered comment on it, but were not involved in any edit warring. As such, I'm inviting you to add yourself to the RFM if you feel that you're part of the dispute. You can do so here. If you feel you're not involved in the dispute, please disregard this message and thanks for your earlier opinion. WilyD 21:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 21 | 21 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:30+not+300.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 11:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Hi Rayis! I expanded this article some more. I would like to invite you to see the article again. I would like to invite you to see the parts on Iranian culture in particular. Thanks and all the best. Sina Kardar 15:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, I have retried the links you reinserted, but get a blank page. Can you please check it? Jona Lendering 23:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis – Here is a copy a template for Iranian Languages Group – according to your wonderful idea. Regards Surena 07:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis - please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khorasani Turkish language. Surena 20:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
See User_talk:Patchouli#My_viewpoint.-- Patchouli 18:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry Rayis - I tried to roll back a large rollback by "Mardavich", but instead killed your improvements. I'm trying to correct it. Sorry. Jona Lendering 14:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jona, about this article I would like to point out a few things:
1- You are conducting your original research and putting it on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:No original research. -Do it elsewhere.
2- You are claiming your point of view Please see WP:NPOV -Accept other points of view.
3- You are claiming ownership of the article Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles -Let others edit.
I see you have rolled back to the pre-Schaudig info, but now I will not remove it; I can live with your remark that the pre-Schaudig info is contested (as it should be). Let's first see what the others do. Jona Lendering 17:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
You may be an expert, but your point of view is one, in over 6 billion humans, and this is Wikipedia "not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information not heretofore published."
Dear Rayis: that's not the issue, I'd say. If 6 billion opinions are all based on Schaudig, you'd be right. But that's not the case. It is simply incorrect to base an article on outdated information. We must use the latest readings, based on Fragments A and B, based on Schaudig.
As to pre-Shah-claims that the CC is a human rights charter: you are right that the Shah did not create this out of the blue. Therefore, I left the Frye quote standing, and even accentuated it. But HIM is responsible for propagating this reading, see the UN document I quote. Jona Lendering 17:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, just received your last remark. Let's agree to disagree - if Cyrus (or his exegetes) could be tolerant, so can we. Just improve the site as you see fit, but please note which info goes back to pre- and post-Schaudig's editions. Maybe we should leave the "contested information" tag until the others have given their opinion. Jona Lendering 18:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Daste shoma dard nakoneh. dastkari shahnameh ro ham didam. joz afsoos khordan che mishavad kard. be omide rooz haie behtar. Sina Kardar 20:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Rayis. Yes, I was going to work on Persians next. I am finishing up with Pashtuns and then will get started with Persians as I am kind of on a theme of eastern Middle Eastern peoples lately. Well, probably I'll work Persians by using some of what is already there, but adding a lot more and removing anything that can't be proven etc. In the past, the articles I've worked on (with lots of help from my usual friends) such as Iranian peoples, Azerbaijani people and Pashtuns all have a similar look in terms of having a lot of references and some common questions regarding origins etc. The Persians I may treat a bit differently as the terminology seems to vary from a view similar to that of 'Arabs' (meaning anyone who speaks Persian) to groups that link themselves to the ancients (which is hard given the amount of time that separates modern people from ancient ones). At any rate, nothing will be put in that isn't referenced and verifiable. Probably the opening will be fixed and expanded a bit. The collage picture will have to go because it violates copyright laws (as we've found with Pashtuns now (trying to get that article back to FA status). We'll probably go with sections like history, origins, modern society, culture, institutions and women so some sections in the article should stay and others will change a bit. It'll be a lot of work and probably take weeks to complete. If you have any suggestions, then please let me know and any help you can give will be appreciated. Cheers. Tombseye 02:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the user appears to be pushing his own original research, not to mention using Wikipedia as a platform to promote his website. I don't have time to handle it myself, but I recommend that you post something about this at WP:AN/I. Regards, Khoi khoi 07:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
The "Azerembassy source" you mention is just a host for a book by a highly respected Azerbaijani scholar of Talysh origin, academician Igrar Aliyev. Him being a major academician and director of the History Institute and all, and editor of that book that's hosted on that site – Igrar Aliyev (ed.), “History of Azerbaijan”, Part IV “Azerbaijan in modern times”, Chapter XXIII, “Founding of Azerbaijan Democratic Republic”, sub-title: “Azerbaijan on international arena. Paris Peace Conference”, Baku: Elm Publishing House of the Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, 1995 (in Russian) – makes the source valid and acceptable. If not, I can take those pages and host them on my site, that would not change anything. Likewise, we can scan the original page as well in due time, if necessary. This source is not written by "Azerembassy", it is simply hosted there like many other articles. It is written by academician Igrar Aliyev, and cites archival documents, obviously some of them available only in Azerbaijan and in Azerbaijani. Likewise, we are discussing Azerbaijan here, hence, we cannot avoid Azerbaijani sources, and in light of using for example Iranian scholars, Armenian scholars, Russian scholars, we thus definitely cannot ignore Azerbaijani scholars that write about their own nation. -- AdilBaguirov 18:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Remind me what I did. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Orthologist ( talk • contribs) 21:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC).
I just reverted it to the latest version, as it had been blanked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orthologist ( talk • contribs)
Alright, excuse me, I pressed the Refresh button a lot of times and thought it had been blanked for good; i didn't know it was you.-- Orthologist 21:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC) It's alright now, I reverted it.-- Orthologist 21:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Rayis! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule petitiononline\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
After working on History or religious fundamentalism in Iran etc, I am back to science and art again! Would you please see my new works on Abbas Kiarostami? Any ideas or comments on the structure of article? Any mistakes or shortcommings? Thanks for your time and take care. Sangak 21:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps as a compromise, we can change the numbers to only include the number of Kurds in Iranian Kurdistan, and then give numbers of Kurds living in other parts of Iran? What do you think? Khoi khoi 03:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Please don't move my comments up and down, add yours in the correct place to show how the discussion progresses. Try to avoid editing another editor's comments unless absolutely necessary Wikipedia:Etiquette --Rayis 13:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Rayis; Sorry, it was accidental not intentional. Kiumars Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kiumars"
Your revert of my copy-editing, wikification, and bringing of the lead into line with the manual of style, was not acceptable. Your edit summary was also unrelated to your edit. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 13:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Salam
It would be very helpful if you could comment on Abbas Kiarostami. Then I can improve the article further. Ba sepaas. Sangak 22:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Salam!
Please see [1]. We need to change the WP:MoS for Persian transliteration. MoS forces us to use Arabic transliteration for Persian words. It makes no sense. Please see the problem I have now on transliteration of Kiarostami. [2]
Sangak 13:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I see the good amount of work you have been doing with articles about Mazandaran & its people. What do you suggest for Lurs? If you go to Lorestan#People and culture, there is some information, but the main article is listed as Lurs. Yet at Lurs, the main article is listed at Lorestan#People and culture, and there is less information. Perhaps a merge is appropriate for this situation as well. Tell me what you think. The Behnam 01:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I am a bit concerned about this article and I saw that you nominated it to be deleted. I think much of the data is a copy of the Norouz article, and the main part of the article is basically the problems in Turkey which I don't think justifies existence of it. This came to my attention after another user created yet another Norouz article about how they celebrate it in Mazandaran and said well, if Kurds have their own page, why can't we?! I would love to know your thoughts -- Rayis 14:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion! I'll creat that category too, though there might not be a clear definition who we should call a nationalist. Siba 03:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Doroud & Done! Shervink 15:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)shervink
Yes, I accidentally used the npa1 template, which has a welcome in it. I should have used npa2, and this has now been corrected. Anyway, try not to violate civility by such inflammatory characterizations of other editors as you did at the page, thanks. The Behnam 23:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Regardless of whatever unspecified edits of mine were trolling, the reason I made the initial edit was to remove your trolling without further incident. I had seen that done with other trolling situations and felt it entirely appropriate for that instance. For some reason you reinstated it; don't you realize that just your last part was enough? The part I removed was just an uncivil characterization of me that could only be inflammatory; the removal was definitely justified. Perhaps you should re-remove it? I thought you would see that it was rather trollish upon me removing it. Thanks. The Behnam 23:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for all the effort you put to maintain and improve Iran-Related articles. Arad 02:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
Done. Khoi khoi 03:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Do have any reliable information about this guy? I recently encountered the article, which of course was rubbish. I cleared it up, but he seems to have had a much wider 'musician' role in the past. I just couldn't find that many reliable sources, especially on his death. It isn't clear how they tracked it to IRI agents; from what I see right now it appears to just be suspicion. As usual, most of the information talking about his death are from unreliable fringe opposition blogs that have no chance of reporting anything objectively or with proper fact-checking. However, I suspect you may know more about these, so if you don't mind please give it a look and add some real information to it if possible. Thanks. The Behnam 19:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I know what you mean. It is very hard to find reliable information about opposition figures and related things. I'm currently digging through HRW's website to find their opinion on the 1988 incident. What is particularly frustrating is that there aren't even many reliable books on these matters. Too many special interests I guess. In any case, thanks for whatever help you can give these articles. The Behnam 20:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
these fishes are found in the ARABIAN side of the ARABIAN gulf "in oman and UAE". you cannot find these fishes in northern ARABIAN gulf. so, dont be racest and do NOT change the ARABIAN GULF word in the article!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.150.120.84 ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 13 March 2007
Hey Rayis, I'm not sure what you think about the merge issue. I think, especially now, that the kurdish page is fully referenced, and is (in my mind) NPOV that there is no point merging because it would add too much info to the general Norouz page. Regards, – Jeff3000 04:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Doroud & Thanks for your quick response to the vadalism on the Reza Shah Pahlavi article by "Artaxerxes", "Faranbazu" and other sockpuppets. You were correct that I had clearly entered a discussion piece prior to removing damages done by the vandal, contrary to accusations from the vandal/sockpuppet. Mehrshad123 18:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Please take a look at History of fundamentalist Islam in Iran. I am happy that the article attracted a few critical editors. The more people take part the less chance will be for POV. I hope people with different background edit this article. Thanks and take care. Sina Kardar 14:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, I have noticed that you, Mehrshad and Shervink have filled evidence for sock puppet against me. This is o.k., and I wish you success. However, may I ask you respectfully to provide reference and citations for your contributions. I also want to edit some of lopesided text about his modernization programs. Of course, all based on well cited evidence. I am also concerned about lack of any references to his human right abuses, and his corruption. I do not want to go through long edit wars. So I thought I'll discuss this with you beforehand and seek your advice to see what would be agreeable to you. cheers Faranbazu 18:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah, great. I'm glad you started up a page for that, it's actually been locked locked from editing longer than Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Well, right now, The Behnam is proposing it for speedy deletion, but I'm trying to reason with him to keep it up. It's really the best version to start with, as from it, we can slowly add in all of the other information needs to be there. ♠ SG →Talk 15:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Indeed. Right or wrong, that is an Islamic POV and probably is not necessary to the timeline. The Behnam 10:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Rayis, Thank you for donating your time [ [5]] in helping us expose the troll User:Faranbazu and having him and his sockpuppets and meatpuppets banned! I am hoping the Reza Shah article will be unlocked soon so that the months of vandalism can be removed promptly. Mehrshad123 20:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
It's not important what BBC says when it's not officially police force. As defined in Police article, Police are agents or agencies empowered to use force and other forms of coercion and legal means to effect public and social order. The term is most commonly associated with police departments of a state that are authorized to exercise the police power of that state within a defined legal or territorial area of responsibility. Please go there and change the definition. Bebin har vaqt tunesti unha ra qane koni ke gruh haye feshar ejtemaee va niruhaye shebhe dolati ra ham mishe police khand man kolle harfhayam ra pas migiram. Boro beheshun bego chon BBC ya x va y be in gruhha migan police behtare ke tarife police shamel niruhaye qeyrdoliti ke tamin nazm ejtemaee ra bar ohde darand beshavad. Agar unha paziroftand man ham mipaziram. -- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 03:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Please be careful when using 'rvv' in the edit summary. Some of the edits you undid here [6] shouldn't have been called vandalism. Thanks. The Behnam 18:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 14 | 2 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Kianush Sanjari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. . I may well be wrong on this, but I can't see why this is notable at the moment. Surely a lot of people are arrested and released bu why is that notable? Pedro | Talk 13:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I responded on that page, but to summarize, I need to see some diffs here if you are asserting that the individual you reported is continuing the same behavior they were blocked for.-- Isotope23 14:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
I am curious; what brought you to the 300 article today? I ask because you haven't contributed before. Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
It was not my intent to insult you in any way. I was gave voice to a concern that appears to have been unwarranted in your case. Please accept my apologies. Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Arabic mathematics a term used by historians of mathematics and has nothing to do with the ethnicity of Omar Khayyám. — Ruud 22:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I proposed the move 5 days ago and only Jeff had objection and after my last comment (4 days ago), he didn't have any objection anymore. If you have any objection, participate in the discussion (in its talk page). Jahangard 01:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for offering feedback through the Request for Comment on Racism by Country. WilyD 17:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you know anything about this? It needs sources. The Behnam 21:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I have a class to go to in a minute and will be back in about 1 hour and 30 minutes, at which point I will be able to look into this situation. Natalie 22:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I guess you can read Persian. Just take a look to these sources. [12]-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 13:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Salam. Do you agree on making a wikiproject or at least a task force (like this)about Contemporary history of Iran which includes issues science 1900. Please write your idea in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Iran#Contemporary_history_of_Iran-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 06:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
King of Kings is still King. If it were Emperor amongst Kings, or what-have-you, that would be different. The article should only refer to the title that is implicitly stated, not the one that is implied. María ( habla con migo) 15:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Do you intend to apologise for your behaviour or should we move this to the Administrators' noticeboard? Miskin 16:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you had restored the Iranian reformist page then moved it to a new title, and then copied things from the other page to it. So I got confused about this which could have been done directly by moving 2nd of K to a new title! So I wasn't sure what your question meant. In any case, I think the title should be in lower case as it is not a proper noun see: WP:TITLE-- Gerash 77 13:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis, Please do not accuse me of Sock puppetry. Thanks Yima 17:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
ببین مجبورم کردی فارسی برایت توضیح بدهم.
آقا روزشمار یعنی نوشته ای که به بیان وقایع بر اساس روند تاریخی آنها می پردازد. [13]
در یک روزشمار فقط حوادث و زمان وقوع آنها به طور روشن و دقیق ذکر می شود. علت ها و آثار وقایع در روزشمار نمی آید. این نه به نفع من است و نه شما. در اون روزشمار هم کلی اتفاق دیگر هست نظیر ترور مطهری، پیشینه سازمان مجاهدین خلق و غیره که من دوست دارم روشن شود. اما چون متوجه هستم که آن متن یک روز شمار است و یک مقاله فرعی از مقاله انقلاب ایران به شمار می رود لزومی برای افزودن هیچ توضیح اضافه به آن حوادث نمی بینم. فرض بر این است که هر خواننده ای مه بر سراغ یک روزشمار آمد می داند که روزشمار چیست. به علاوه در بالای آن مقاله به روشنی و صراحت بیان شده که برای مشاهده حوادث قبلی و بعدی و توضیحات بیشتر به کدام مقالات باید رجوع شود. همین طور در نظر داشته باش که ویکی پدیا یک هایپرتکست است و خوانندگان اگر توضیح اضافه نیاز داشتند می توانند با یک کلیک به مقاله های دیگر بروند.
متأسفانه پیشنهاد شما فقط مربوط به آن یک بند نمی شود. یعنی یا ما نباید هیچ جایی دلایل را بنویسیم یا باید همه جا دلایل را بنویسیم. آن وقت روزشمار تبدیل به مقاله انقلاب ایران می شود و همه به ما می خندند.
درخصوص شروع مقاله از آن تاریخ هم ظاهرا توافق بین تاریخ نویسان وجود دارد که انقلاب با این اتفاق شروع می شود. حالا اگر شما دوست داری از تاریخ دیگری بحث را شروع کنیم می توانی در صفحه بحث مقاله مزبور پیشنهاد بدهی تا دیگر ویکی نویسان در موردش نظر دهند.
نکته آخر اگر به خاطر فقدان بیان دلایل هزار بار روی مقاله برچسب بزنی من هم هزار بار آن را بر میدارم. مطمئن باش از شما هم سمج تر هستم. بهترین راهی که می توانم پیشنهاد کنم این است که به مقاله انقلاب ایران بروی و دیدگاه مورد نظرت را با ادله روشن بیان کنی. مطمئن باش هر کس که به روزشمار سربزند قطعا به مقاله اصلی هم سر خواهد زد.
-- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 04:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it's best if you don't accuse this editor of being a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. Per WP:AGF, you should assume that other users are making a good-faith edit to improve the encyclopedia. However, you're right that it is also inappropriate for him/her to label other editors as "bloggers" and "Iranchamber", per WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Best if everyone cools down here, and holds off on editing the Reza Shah article for a while. I've already suggested that a request for comment on the article might be a good idea, if this dispute escalates. I will leave a message for Yima asking him/her not to describe other editors as "bloggers". Please contact me if you need any further advice. Wal ton Vivat Regina! 17:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I am not blocking you for 3RR at this time, but I strongly caution you not to take this as support for your actions. The article has been temporarily locked to prevent edit warring, and I will be monitoring the situation. Participate in discussion on the talk page and seek mediation if necessary (perhaps by requesting a third opinion, because any further edit warring after the block is lifted (whether or not it breaks 3RR) will result in a block without warning. Kafziel Talk 13:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 16 | 16 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words, and they are very much reciprocated. Regards, – Jeff3000 17:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Please read the section in the talk area for information before reverting. All possible care was taken with preserving the votes and the voting record prior to archiving. Anyone can see the voting record in the archiove, and can see who voted. There is nopt reason to further clutter up the Talk Page with votes that are weeks old. The same vote choices have been left ont he talk page, and instructions on voting anew. Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I will give you the opportunity to tell me exaclyt how i am pushing "my" POV. Aside for neutrality and a low tolerance for nonsense, I don't think i have one. However, if you feel I have one, please, point it out. Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I notice Makalp is on a vandalism binge, hope we can stop this. Hetoum 17:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
You are one edit away from breaking 3RR on Tehcir Law. The other editor's changes are not vandalism, and calling them that will not give you free reign to revert his changes. Please stop. Kafziel Talk 20:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Amir jan don't let this featured article be ruined because some people don't like it, cheers. -- Rayis 09:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
وضع مقالات برگزیده و خوب مربوط به ایران خیلی بدتر از اینه که بشه گفت. اگر می خواستم راحت می تونستنم کاری بکنم که الان هیچ کدومشون حتی مقاله خوب هم محسوب نشوند. اما وقتی میام برای امیر پیغام می گذارم که بیا مقاله را درست کنیم حتما حسن نیت داشتم. سعی کن درست برخورد کنی. -- Sa.vakilian( t- c) 10:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I made a few edits at the section, and ended up removing it. After I removed 'tied in' things that weren't about 'apartheid', I realized that this was just undue weight on a minority view, so I had to eliminate the section. Bring up any further concerns on the talk page. Thanks for notifying me of the situation. The Behnam 16:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Yo. I've started the section again, this time on the right foot by sticking to notable allegations in real sources. It obviously needs expansion. I'm also going to ask Sa.vakilian and Gerash to get opposing views to add balance. Feel free to expand on any more Ganji details without bounds of weight and NPOV. Cheers. The Behnam 17:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for taking the time to comment on my my RfA, which was successful. I learned a lot from the comments, I appreciate everything that was said, and I'll do my best to deserve the community's trust. Thanks again! And thanks for your kind words and support. -- Shirahadasha 04:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 17 | 23 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed a red link for your name on my talk page, and checked your userpage out. I hope you're not leaving Wikipedia; we need neutral editors like yourself here. Regards, – Jeff3000 04:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete your userpage? Khorshid 03:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, a request for mediation has been filed given the deadlock at racism by country. You previously offered comment on it, but were not involved in any edit warring. As such, I'm inviting you to add yourself to the RFM if you feel that you're part of the dispute. You can do so here. If you feel you're not involved in the dispute, please disregard this message and thanks for your earlier opinion. WilyD 21:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 21 | 21 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:30+not+300.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 11:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)