Hello, Rayiran, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
Anupam
Talk
20:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Sikhism in Iran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Sid95Q (
talk)
00:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon ( talk) 16:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Sikhs, you may be
blocked from editing.
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Sikhism. --
dsprc
[talk]
08:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Religion in Iran. -
LouisAragon (
talk)
18:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Divinemomentever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I had asked to change my previous username Rayiran to be changed (to divinemomentever) and then I created a new one while waiting to have the username changed. I absolutely was not aware that I should not have created multiple accounts and I am deeply sorry. I had contributed positively to "religion in Iraq". Furthermore, I did not know about the warnings I had received on my page and I know that whenever I should check my page for any message or comment and act upon to resolve it. I have been only active for less than 2 weeks and I got blocked. I know the reason now, so I hope I get a new chance. Thanks Divinemomentever ( talk) 16:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I believe that you merit another chance. Good luck. Courtesy ping to RoySmith. 331dot ( talk) 18:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Indian diaspora, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
16:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Divinemomentever! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Punjab that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
RegentsPark (
comment)
14:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Divinemomentever, I noticed that you've been adding a lot of claims sourced to sikhiwiki.org. As explained at WP:UGC, most wikis are not reliable sources because they're entirely user generated. I checked the history of this article, for example, and it was written by some random person with the username "Zahratallah". A few wikis are considered reliable sources, but they're generally closed wikis (meaning that not everyone can edit them) and their authors/editors are reputable experts. This does not appear to be the case with sikhiwiki.org. Woodroar ( talk) 16:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Some of the content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. SikhWiki is not compatibly licensed. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Sikhism in Canada. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. No, an off the cuff comment by one person who happens to be a politician does not warrant mention, particularly in the lead, and that is certainly not a WP:MINOR edit Meters ( talk) 20:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
— DaxServer ( t · m · e · c) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Hinduism, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
17:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Hinduism. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 15:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buddhism in the Middle East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Rayiran, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
Anupam
Talk
20:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Sikhism in Iran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Sid95Q (
talk)
00:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon ( talk) 16:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Sikhs, you may be
blocked from editing.
Materialscientist (
talk)
21:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Sikhism. --
dsprc
[talk]
08:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Religion in Iran. -
LouisAragon (
talk)
18:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Divinemomentever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I had asked to change my previous username Rayiran to be changed (to divinemomentever) and then I created a new one while waiting to have the username changed. I absolutely was not aware that I should not have created multiple accounts and I am deeply sorry. I had contributed positively to "religion in Iraq". Furthermore, I did not know about the warnings I had received on my page and I know that whenever I should check my page for any message or comment and act upon to resolve it. I have been only active for less than 2 weeks and I got blocked. I know the reason now, so I hope I get a new chance. Thanks Divinemomentever ( talk) 16:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I believe that you merit another chance. Good luck. Courtesy ping to RoySmith. 331dot ( talk) 18:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Indian diaspora, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
16:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Divinemomentever! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Punjab that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
RegentsPark (
comment)
14:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Divinemomentever, I noticed that you've been adding a lot of claims sourced to sikhiwiki.org. As explained at WP:UGC, most wikis are not reliable sources because they're entirely user generated. I checked the history of this article, for example, and it was written by some random person with the username "Zahratallah". A few wikis are considered reliable sources, but they're generally closed wikis (meaning that not everyone can edit them) and their authors/editors are reputable experts. This does not appear to be the case with sikhiwiki.org. Woodroar ( talk) 16:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Some of the content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. SikhWiki is not compatibly licensed. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Sikhism in Canada. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. No, an off the cuff comment by one person who happens to be a politician does not warrant mention, particularly in the lead, and that is certainly not a WP:MINOR edit Meters ( talk) 20:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
— DaxServer ( t · m · e · c) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Hinduism, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
17:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Hinduism. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 15:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buddhism in the Middle East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)