Another editor has added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Resistance: 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{ prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot ( talk) 20:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome...
Hello, Raidcrisis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
青い(Aoi) (
talk)
22:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page
Rosa Parks on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -
Banyan
Tree
22:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- When another user is making a mistake, it's normally far more productive to point it out to them, rather than revert warring. The dates in parenthesis are mandated by Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates of birth and death, so I have reintroduced them. I didn't scroll down to see your second productive change in my initial review, for which I apologize. A note on my talk, your talk page here, the article talk page or an explanation in your edit summary would have reduced the risk of raising the level of drama. Happy editing, Banyan Tree 07:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
D-Generation X, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That Headline states how DX feels/thinks about RAW going HD. They, nor does WWE, state that DX is returning next week to RAW.
TrUcO9311
TaLk /
SiGn
00:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. DX on HD? That does not mean they have returned and that is a small segment not notable to the article stop adding before you violate the
3RR rule
TrUcO9311
TaLk /
SiGn
01:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Umm, you are violating the 3RR rule by reverting constructive edits. I have refrained from reverting your edits, other users are reverting your edits. One more revert and you might be blocked from Wikipedia. TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 01:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Raidcrisis, do you just ignore others when editing? The source you provided for ECW getting new sets is a messageboard (messageboards are usually considered unreliable sources). On top of that, it's just a reposting of WWE's press release, the same press release that only mentions RAW and SmackDown getting new sets (it does NOT mention ECW getting a new set). TJ Spyke 01:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the WP:3RR rule. You reverted for the 5th time after Truco's two warnings. If you violate this rule in the future, it will result in a longer block. Thanks. Nikki 311 01:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Shawn Michaels. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
ThinkBlue
(Hit
BLUE)
20:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Don't add nonsense to the Shawn Michaels article, if you do, then I will report you and have you blocked once more. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Resistance: 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{ prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot ( talk) 20:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome...
Hello, Raidcrisis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
青い(Aoi) (
talk)
22:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page
Rosa Parks on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -
Banyan
Tree
22:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- When another user is making a mistake, it's normally far more productive to point it out to them, rather than revert warring. The dates in parenthesis are mandated by Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates of birth and death, so I have reintroduced them. I didn't scroll down to see your second productive change in my initial review, for which I apologize. A note on my talk, your talk page here, the article talk page or an explanation in your edit summary would have reduced the risk of raising the level of drama. Happy editing, Banyan Tree 07:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
D-Generation X, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That Headline states how DX feels/thinks about RAW going HD. They, nor does WWE, state that DX is returning next week to RAW.
TrUcO9311
TaLk /
SiGn
00:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. DX on HD? That does not mean they have returned and that is a small segment not notable to the article stop adding before you violate the
3RR rule
TrUcO9311
TaLk /
SiGn
01:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Umm, you are violating the 3RR rule by reverting constructive edits. I have refrained from reverting your edits, other users are reverting your edits. One more revert and you might be blocked from Wikipedia. TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 01:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Raidcrisis, do you just ignore others when editing? The source you provided for ECW getting new sets is a messageboard (messageboards are usually considered unreliable sources). On top of that, it's just a reposting of WWE's press release, the same press release that only mentions RAW and SmackDown getting new sets (it does NOT mention ECW getting a new set). TJ Spyke 01:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the WP:3RR rule. You reverted for the 5th time after Truco's two warnings. If you violate this rule in the future, it will result in a longer block. Thanks. Nikki 311 01:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Shawn Michaels. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
ThinkBlue
(Hit
BLUE)
20:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Don't add nonsense to the Shawn Michaels article, if you do, then I will report you and have you blocked once more. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)