Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs secondary sources that discuss Kennedy in detail, not just sample writings of his work in magazines and news articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Kennedy (chemistry spokesperson) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:James Kennedy (chemistry spokesperson), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haileybury International School Tianjin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Haileybury International School Tianjin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt ( talk) 04:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Tianjinren88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt ( talk) 04:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The article James Kennedy (chemistry spokesperson) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual. No coverage in independent reliable sources beyond mere mentions, generally in connection with an art project he did listing the chemicals in "natural" foods. Doesn't meet, WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, is arguably a case of WP:BLP1E based on provided coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply

	元祖星章
	很不错！I like what you have done so far with Gaocun, Wuqing & Taitou, Gaocun. Keep up the good work, and please add other towns or villages & participate in next month's Wikipedia:Wikipedia Asian Month! Geographyinitiative ( talk) 06:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Kennedy (chemistry spokesperson) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Kennedy (chemistry spokesperson) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sincerely, Chemicals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sincerely, Chemicals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC) reply

I see that after an IP user made some questionable and unsourced edits to Haileybury International School, you added several paragraphs of fairly serious accusations against the school, also without providing sources. Making such accusations without sources can be considered libell, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. I would suggest that you avoid making edits to this article in the future. Rest assured that other editors who are unaffiliated with the school will make sure that no one adds baseless claims to the article. I have requested that the page be protected from editing except by users with extended confirmed permissions, which an admin may or may not satisfy at their discretion. Be advised that if you add similarly contentious unsourced content to articles in the future, you may lose editing privileges. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 08:01, 5 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Agreed and understood. Tianjinren88 ( talk) 04:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC) reply