I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to
stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the
Five pillars of Wikipedia and
simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the
naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the
manual of style. If you need help look at
Wikipedia:Help and the
FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the
Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the
Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the
Tutorial and
Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the
Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on
my user talk page or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
Happy Wiki-ing. — Kf4bdy talk contribs
Hi, I notice your recent creations of the article Blaked does not cite the WP:NO of its subject, and I listed it for speedy deletion. If you can explain this acronym to me please reply here or on my talk page. Thanks. -- Nscheffey( T/ C) 06:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Please read the following:
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Wikipedia:No original research
Please note that Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting your own theories - we base article content on current scientific consensus. The only reason I haven't reverted your recent edits to the article is that I'm not entirely sure which is the last policy-compliant version. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 23:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I've reverted the large section you appended to the top of the article. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policy here: Wikipedia:No original research and refrain from appending 10,000 characters of, well:
This isn't encyclopedic. You put a lot of effort into that, but a lot of it is scientifically unsound. If you would like to re-add anything that you wrote I suggest you bring it up on the talk page. Warrenmck ( talk) 23:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to
stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the
Five pillars of Wikipedia and
simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the
naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the
manual of style. If you need help look at
Wikipedia:Help and the
FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the
Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the
Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the
Tutorial and
Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the
Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on
my user talk page or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
Happy Wiki-ing. — Kf4bdy talk contribs
Hi, I notice your recent creations of the article Blaked does not cite the WP:NO of its subject, and I listed it for speedy deletion. If you can explain this acronym to me please reply here or on my talk page. Thanks. -- Nscheffey( T/ C) 06:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Please read the following:
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Wikipedia:No original research
Please note that Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting your own theories - we base article content on current scientific consensus. The only reason I haven't reverted your recent edits to the article is that I'm not entirely sure which is the last policy-compliant version. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 23:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I've reverted the large section you appended to the top of the article. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policy here: Wikipedia:No original research and refrain from appending 10,000 characters of, well:
This isn't encyclopedic. You put a lot of effort into that, but a lot of it is scientifically unsound. If you would like to re-add anything that you wrote I suggest you bring it up on the talk page. Warrenmck ( talk) 23:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)