This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi Ro.faridi ( talk) 22:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC) |
Where does it state that it's against copyright to show fixtures? The MoS for Project Football doesn't mention this. Samuel J Walker ( talk) 17:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Please, stop vandalism, and see here: https://www.premierleague.com/stats/top/players/goals. I made update ONLY AFTER game! What's wrong?-- Noel baran ( talk) 20:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like, I used 2 hours to make the Liverpool 2016/17 look good and have some information and you undo my great edits because I haven't given sources. Well, when you want, why not give them yourself?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.238.151.232 ( talk) 13:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
I usually do, this one must have slipped through the net. Thanks for the heads up. Samuel J Walker ( talk) 15:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
On Sandbox 1, because 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification will return. It's time to calculate the opportunities from the matches. -- 5.172.239.45 ( talk) 16:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: I will try and answer your questions one by one and since it may be a long discussion I hope it is okay to keep it here in one talkpage for simplicity. I will respond shortly. Qed237 (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Okay, now taking the questions one by one.
Qed237 (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: I hope this answers your questions? If not feel free to keep asking. Qed237 (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Qed237 for your answers, but I have a few more questions:
@ Qed237: p.1, 2, 3 - I'm asking about this, because I'm updating this table automatically, and having a lot of out-of-general-logic corner cases makes this job a way harder to do. That's why I'm searching for a good compromise about table's structure. Thank You 5-ht ( talk) 17:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: Okay, I can understand your point. I guess the readability depends on OS and browser and for me they are aligned when there is the same amount of characters (including blankspace) in front of them. However, this is only a very minor thing and a personal opinion so for the interest of your bot I am willing to ignore both that and the team name inside the comment. It does not matter for the table itself anyway. Also with the DIA and DIN I have no problem with you changing it, as long as it is the same on both places. Actually the results section should ideally be converted to using Module:Sports results like other leagues, which makes that change easier. About the team names, the article should be located at their most common english name. If you look at UEFA ( here) they basically have the same name we do, but I am not sure about common practice. I think FC Saxan is just mainly called Saxan in English speaking countries, while teams like FC Sheriff Tiraspol are known as Sheriff Tiraspol rather than just Sheriff. Perhaps you can ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football what they think. Qed237 (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Qed237: Looks like a compromise. Am I right? 5-ht ( talk) 18:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: That sounds great! Qed237 (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Qed237: Okay, thank you! 5-ht ( talk) 19:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Qed237: Pay your attention on this discussion, please 5-ht ( talk) 11:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: Thanks for the notification. I will be away now for a few hours, but I will try to look at it later tonight. Qed237 (talk) 12:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you really think you are the smartest person down here ??? Every team in the table have the name and the city together.why the situation with Saxan should be different ? Think about. About Petrocub. The club is based in the village Sarata Galbena and their official club name is Petrocub-Hincesti. Double name.exactly like other Moldovan club name dinamo-auto.you better change the page from Petrocub Hincesti to Petrocub-Hincesti. About the division A.why do you need to list 17-18 season if this page did not exist ?? This page will be added on time when will be created.check for English premier league for instance.is listed EFL Championship not 17-18 EFL championship.you always try to make mess.do you have girlfriend ??? Kolya77 ( talk) 16:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
If you really want to become usefull,add the goal scorers to the current season,improve Petrocub's page.it'so poor .why you always stop people from editing by reverting things ? Who you really think you are ??? Kolya77 ( talk) 16:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
You are still doing your way,which is completely wrong. 1.can you understand that the official name of the team is Petrocub-Hincesti (with dash) ????you can visit off website and see this.
2.why you only cut the city name from Saxan and not from other 10 clubs ? 3.why you listed 17-18 season if the page is not created. ?if you dont know nothing about moldovan football ,why you vandalising ? By the way,Next divizia seson will be 2017 only,cause they change the system. Kolya77 ( talk) 19:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)i
What makes you think you the only person right and others are not ? Stop vandalising and deleting everything you dont like.you are not the owner of article to do this.stop acting this way.you dont need to warn me,warn yourself for vandalism. Kolya77 ( talk) 21:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you think 17 players, as we currently have, are a little bit too many? Actually it should be 18, somehow we missed Yu Dabao who also has scored 7 goals. I prefer to reduce the list to 10 players by removing "7 goals" group. Centaur271188 ( talk) 18:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Séamus Coleman and a number of pages, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. If you keep on doing this, you will get longer blocks
Efc1878
(talk)
07:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, that's because Romanians don't really edit Wikipedia and majority of them are Steaua fans. They don't really accept the name change. I don't like it either, because it's the most famous club in the country, but it has to be done. 8Dodo8 ( talk · contribs) 11:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Qed237. I am hoping that you can lend some assistance. Me and user Giant Snowman need assistance in resolving an edit dispute concerning the kit section that was in the Nigerian national football team article. He removed it citing WP:NOTGALLERY. I disagree with his interpretation and I have shared my reasons on the talk page at WikiProject Football. We request the input of members of this project in order to resolve this issue. Your assistance would be appreciated if you have the time. Thanks! unak 1978 16:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
I've recently seen quite a few pages related to the play-offs of the Championship, League One, and League Two, which are either not up-to-date or do not have good content (such as 2017 English Football League play-offs, which has lots of tables and barely any prose). Mill. did qualify for the Championship less than an hour ago, but there's still some discrepancies between articles. For example, for previous years the title such as [year] Football League play-offs was used. This year, 2017 English Football League play-offs was used. Anyways, do you know a list of pages that should be edited now that different teams are in different leagues? Dat Guy Talk Contribs 17:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Domestic average home attendances of football clubs is a list that clearly does not meet WP:CSD#A11, which is for WP:NFT type material. Looking at attendance numbers is not something the author of this articles and their mates made up one day at the pub. If you would like to see this page deleted, please use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead. Happy editing, — Kusma ( t· c) 12:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, about your last edit on that template, I do not understand why you deleted a sentence mentioning Athletic Bilbao in Real Sociedad's note. I think there was nothing wrong with it. The case seems too obvious, so I decide to undo your change without waiting for your answer. Hopefully you do not mind, otherwise I am sorry :) Centaur271188 ( talk) 19:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Sceptre: @ Qed237: As it is right now, the notes are very ambiguous, informal, and, on top of that, contain grammatical mistakes.
Maybe, we should agree on a compromise - if you really seem to hate convoluted texts? OlJa 22:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2018-19 UEFA Champions League, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:C30:3680:19E:28D8:822C:24D6 ( talk) 12:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
You say the phrase "competition proper" is 'proper standard English". It is not. At best it is slang, and at worst it doesn't even make sense when you think about it. I've tried to edit the page to apply consistent logic (renaming the qualifying phase) in line with what logic was already applied, and then correcting the rest of the page when you objected that my regional change was not was these phases were called but your own logic seems hard to follow. so I really won;t get what you are trying to do with the page. KP-TheSpectre ( talk) 10:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Why are you as a Wikipedia moderator ignoring the site's rules? The rules clearly state that all the statements must be based on sources..... Saksapoiss ( talk) 20:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
How could he have recieved a medal when they don't award any in Supercopa. Saksapoiss ( talk) 20:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
These are some of the very reliable source that credit him with 30 trophies. You can't deny these sources according to Wikipedia's rules. Wikipedia isn't a place for biased opinions.
And this is a biased opinion because there are no criterias by RFEF that player must appear in Super Cup final to be part of the winning team, like there is for example in FA Community Shield. Saksapoiss ( talk) 21:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Got it - I'll make sure to edit only the date information in the info box. Thanks a lot for the heads up! Raider1918 ( talk) 16:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey Qed237. How come you reverted the edit I made on Ozil article? I think it's notable information useful to the reader. Hashim-afc ( talk) 17:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
What do you mean when you say " WP:STATUSQUO seems popular"? Is it not more useful to have the player's club displayed? Does it not make more sense to use the space more efficiently? I fail to see what negative impact my changes have had. – Pee Jay 21:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I saw you were part of the discussion at Talk:UEFA Euro 2016 squads involving what to list players' clubs as. I had a quick question for 2017 FIFA Confederations Cup squads, Robbie Kruse last played a competitive match for Liaoning Whowin prior to the tournament, but he terminated his contract with the club in May due to unpaid wages. Should his club be listed as Liaoning Whowin, or unattached? S.A. Julio ( talk) 06:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
[2]. Chanheigeorge ( talk) 11:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Done Giant Snowman 06:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Dear Qed237, why do you want to block me? Because I've added a 'Bogus' article?? The Linafoot is the top-flight football league of DR Congo, the biggest sport in the country with almost 100 million inhabitants, with a club named TP Mazembe who made it to the prestigious FIFA Club World Cup final. The 2016-17 season, and with a reference to the league standings table. Can you PLEASE explain what's so bogus about that? Some Linafoot matches attracted crowds around 80,000... Really a bogus league... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houndground ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Okay, now I understand the problem. You could have told me to add that information instead of deleting the article immediately and asking to block me, while all I wanted to do is making Wikipedia more complete. I would have added the information that was missing if you asked me, no problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houndground ( talk • contribs)
Okay, but you have to understand... I did a lot of editing and I tried to do it as good as possible. But I didn't know that a page like Linafoot had to be made that way, I couldn't find it anywhere and no one told me until you now. But I'm done editing for Wikipedia, everything I add isn't good enough. In the reactions, a lot of people did appreciate the attendance figures for example, but it can't be made with 100% reliable sources, so the information simply can't be added. I did add relative reliable sources, and I found a lot of information on Wikipedia without sources where no one seems to complain about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houndground ( talk • contribs)
Thank you. Is it okay if I'll try to add the Linafoot 2016-17 page again, without the errors you mentioned? I want to learn to make the pages the right way, as good as possible. Can you please let me know if things are not right, and how I could do it better the next time? Thanks for the help. Houndground ( talk) 15:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Is it okay if I'll try to add the Linafoot 2016-17 page again, without the errors you mentioned? I want to learn to make the pages the right way, as good as possible. Can you please let me know if things are not right, and how I could do it better the next time? Thanks for the help. Houndground ( talk) 15:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
I am writing to you because you controversially reverted most of IP 86.185.127.247's good faith edits. Furthermore, we DO write scores with home score first AND George Boyd's ref 156 got a worse display by displaying RED text. PLUS, you have re-inserted the "ghost caption" of Steve Simonsen which shouldn't be in the source code as the photo was deleted two years ago.
Thank you and happy 1st July. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.147.73 ( talk) 05:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Dude, why did you revert my edits in this article??? Ipsumesse ( talk) 21:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
You are the one vandalizing Wikipedia here! I am doing nothing wrong! I have no idea what you are talking about. Stop doing this please. MValera ( talk) 20:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I did not vandalize KS Torun. Their official sponsored name is now KS Get Well Torun. Sponsor name "Apator" is not in their name anymore. If you don't believe me, please check (the ranking table on) their official site: http://speedway.torun.pl/. Houndground ( talk) 05:40, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry for making Wikipedia more up to date... There's already a link to the official page with the club's new official name, but okay, next time I'll add a reference.
hey, I went into the site again to make sure I didn't make a mistake, but it indeed shows me 19:45 as the k.o. time. Perhaps it's by the local time-zone of access (I'm actually in Israel, UTC+3)? -- SuperJew ( talk) 10:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Any chance you could have a look at the recent changes to Park Ji-sung. An anonymous editor is changing the article to have his stint with Myongji University as part of his "youth" career instead of the "college" career where it belongs. – Pee Jay 13:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Do you plan to put the {{ in use}} tag on 2017–18 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round the next day of games? I think I have a problem with this approach, which it seems is how you handled 29 June and 6 July. I appreciate that it is frustrating to edit when there are edit conflicts, but I don't see how we can say one editor essentially calls "dibs" on updating the article. Is this common practice by other football editors on other pages? Was there a discussion somewhere on using this? I was going to get other opinions at a noticeboard somewhere (I haven't decided which board is best, and I am absolutely not planning on seeking some kind of sanction, just going to ask on clarification for the future), but first I thought I'd ask if you plan to do it again, because there's no point in discussing it at a noticeboard if you don't plan to do it. Or if there's already been a clear consensus established somewhere that this is OK. If I do raise the issue somewhere, I will certainly let you know when and where I do it. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Can you please respond to the points raised on the Talk page? Also, i have noticed that the quote from Mourinho has been readded. Can this be removed as it is an outdated opinion and does not back up the claim as intended. (In 2016 Mourinho named Maradona, Pele and Messi as the three greatest footballers of all time http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/690890/Manchester-United-News-Gossip-Rumours-Jose-Mourinho-Top-Three-Players-Messi-Not-Ronaldo ) I would make the change myself but with your recent threat of a block I thought it would be wise to ask you to do it instead. Thanks in advance. O'Flannery ( talk) 17:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Removed Manchester United 2017 link as this is not confirmed by either clubs. Please stop re-adding this or it will be reported. User- Craigw87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigw87 ( talk • contribs) 15:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
I am unable to see any article that was referenced. Craigw87
Those attendance figures might not be interesting for you, but for a lot of people it is interesting. Wikipedia is not only about what's interesting for you. Most Wikipedia club and league pages already had the attendance figures included, they're very common as said by other people in the reactions before. I've only added the missing figures of major sports leagues and I only have to add around 4 or 5 more leagues and then I'm done. Houndground ( talk) 02:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
hey i would like to ask why you marked Amos Nondi for speedy deletion yet Amos Nondi played in an league allstars match against Hull City Fc and was also named among the top players in kenya, he also earned a call up for the national team which qualifies him as a top player — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennwes32 ( talk • contribs) 11:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sir
{{Some Months Back we where registered our article Called Basically its a Temple Article Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir and for 2 to 3 attempts the page was on to deletion and we worked with Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Temple but this went on cool because of one change of village name, the person changed village name to the new name on formula the page was on to deletion for 2 days and got deleted, same way they attempted Mandyada Shri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir H Highlighted Shri we pre requested what's really wrong going on out , it was nothing . but no response , it was on delete}}. and more over the use name was blocked Pranerao EMail Prane_98@yahoo.init was 2 months back}}.
Sir As am the temple Chairman looking to Get back this articles work again , with our details and more.}} Bhaskaraomsai 12:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Looking to get a feed back from you Thanks. Bhaskar Rao M Sai}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhaskaraomsai ( talk • contribs) 12:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help at Marko Arnautović Kind regards MJ ☕ 14:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC) |
What happened to our discussion regarding Ronaldo on here? O'Flannery ( talk) 10:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. If I may, on what basis do you calculate the possible seedings of teams for the group stages? As things stand now, the Europa League article puts Fastav and Lugano into seeding pots 2, 3 or 4, but I don't see how these two can theoretically make it into pot 2. Consider: For a team to be in pot 2 in Europa League, there has to be at least 24 teams lower-ranked teams in a position to qualify for the group stage. However, there are only 20 teams ranked lower than Lugano. And even if there are exactly 24 teams ranked lower than Fastav, they cannot possibly all qualify for the group stage, as at least two of them will be eliminated (Ostersund/Fola and Shkendija/Trakai). Or am I missing something? Cheers. Ivan Volodin ( talk) 10:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Just posting here for a quicker response, but how do I horizontally align the sports table module? By that, I mean for this article, I'd like to move Group B to be aligned to the right of Group A, just to save some space and be easier to read. If this is something simple to do, then I haven't figured it out. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 22:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello there. Im a old "friends" of you and please I ask youti intervene at Freddie Veseli because Im going unfortunely through an edit wat with another user. Thank you. -- Eni.Sukthi.Durres ( talk) 15:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
2018 FIFA World Cup is close to finish. It's time for the simulation, which national team will qualify for 2018 FIFA World Cup. Of course, if you have a lot of time. -- 5.172.234.239 ( talk) 14:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello there is a discussion about the volleyball players layout being held in the WikiProject Volleyball talk page. Please visit us and help us with your contributions. -- Osplace 17:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I request you to change their size to smaller and merge column, like this. I would like to bring this module to use the FIVB tournaments in 2018. Can you discus for the module in WikiProject_Volleyball. -- BTechTV ( talk) 05:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Rank | Team | Matches | Pts | Sets | Points | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W | L | W | L | Ratio | W | L | Ratio | |||
1 | China | 5 | 0 | 14 | 15 | 4 | 3.750 | 454 | 343 | 1.324 |
2 | Brazil | 3 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 1.857 | 438 | 405 | 1.081 |
3 | United States | 3 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 1.000 | 431 | 434 | 0.993 |
4 | Russia | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 0.900 | 411 | 427 | 0.963 |
5 | Japan | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 11 | 0.909 | 462 | 471 | 0.981 |
6 | South Korea | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0.000 | 260 | 376 | 0.691 |
Hello, Qed237. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Qed237,
I think you made a number of good points in your speedy deletion nomination.
In light of these issues, ! have redirected "2017 Faroe Islands Premier League" to Faroe Islands Premier League.
Please do nominate the redirect page for deletion at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion if you think I got it wrong.
Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi Ro.faridi ( talk) 22:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC) |
Where does it state that it's against copyright to show fixtures? The MoS for Project Football doesn't mention this. Samuel J Walker ( talk) 17:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Please, stop vandalism, and see here: https://www.premierleague.com/stats/top/players/goals. I made update ONLY AFTER game! What's wrong?-- Noel baran ( talk) 20:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like, I used 2 hours to make the Liverpool 2016/17 look good and have some information and you undo my great edits because I haven't given sources. Well, when you want, why not give them yourself?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.238.151.232 ( talk) 13:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
I usually do, this one must have slipped through the net. Thanks for the heads up. Samuel J Walker ( talk) 15:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
On Sandbox 1, because 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification will return. It's time to calculate the opportunities from the matches. -- 5.172.239.45 ( talk) 16:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: I will try and answer your questions one by one and since it may be a long discussion I hope it is okay to keep it here in one talkpage for simplicity. I will respond shortly. Qed237 (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Okay, now taking the questions one by one.
Qed237 (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: I hope this answers your questions? If not feel free to keep asking. Qed237 (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Qed237 for your answers, but I have a few more questions:
@ Qed237: p.1, 2, 3 - I'm asking about this, because I'm updating this table automatically, and having a lot of out-of-general-logic corner cases makes this job a way harder to do. That's why I'm searching for a good compromise about table's structure. Thank You 5-ht ( talk) 17:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: Okay, I can understand your point. I guess the readability depends on OS and browser and for me they are aligned when there is the same amount of characters (including blankspace) in front of them. However, this is only a very minor thing and a personal opinion so for the interest of your bot I am willing to ignore both that and the team name inside the comment. It does not matter for the table itself anyway. Also with the DIA and DIN I have no problem with you changing it, as long as it is the same on both places. Actually the results section should ideally be converted to using Module:Sports results like other leagues, which makes that change easier. About the team names, the article should be located at their most common english name. If you look at UEFA ( here) they basically have the same name we do, but I am not sure about common practice. I think FC Saxan is just mainly called Saxan in English speaking countries, while teams like FC Sheriff Tiraspol are known as Sheriff Tiraspol rather than just Sheriff. Perhaps you can ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football what they think. Qed237 (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Qed237: Looks like a compromise. Am I right? 5-ht ( talk) 18:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: That sounds great! Qed237 (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Qed237: Okay, thank you! 5-ht ( talk) 19:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@ Qed237: Pay your attention on this discussion, please 5-ht ( talk) 11:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
@ 5-hydroxytryptamine: Thanks for the notification. I will be away now for a few hours, but I will try to look at it later tonight. Qed237 (talk) 12:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you really think you are the smartest person down here ??? Every team in the table have the name and the city together.why the situation with Saxan should be different ? Think about. About Petrocub. The club is based in the village Sarata Galbena and their official club name is Petrocub-Hincesti. Double name.exactly like other Moldovan club name dinamo-auto.you better change the page from Petrocub Hincesti to Petrocub-Hincesti. About the division A.why do you need to list 17-18 season if this page did not exist ?? This page will be added on time when will be created.check for English premier league for instance.is listed EFL Championship not 17-18 EFL championship.you always try to make mess.do you have girlfriend ??? Kolya77 ( talk) 16:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
If you really want to become usefull,add the goal scorers to the current season,improve Petrocub's page.it'so poor .why you always stop people from editing by reverting things ? Who you really think you are ??? Kolya77 ( talk) 16:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
You are still doing your way,which is completely wrong. 1.can you understand that the official name of the team is Petrocub-Hincesti (with dash) ????you can visit off website and see this.
2.why you only cut the city name from Saxan and not from other 10 clubs ? 3.why you listed 17-18 season if the page is not created. ?if you dont know nothing about moldovan football ,why you vandalising ? By the way,Next divizia seson will be 2017 only,cause they change the system. Kolya77 ( talk) 19:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)i
What makes you think you the only person right and others are not ? Stop vandalising and deleting everything you dont like.you are not the owner of article to do this.stop acting this way.you dont need to warn me,warn yourself for vandalism. Kolya77 ( talk) 21:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you think 17 players, as we currently have, are a little bit too many? Actually it should be 18, somehow we missed Yu Dabao who also has scored 7 goals. I prefer to reduce the list to 10 players by removing "7 goals" group. Centaur271188 ( talk) 18:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Séamus Coleman and a number of pages, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. If you keep on doing this, you will get longer blocks
Efc1878
(talk)
07:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, that's because Romanians don't really edit Wikipedia and majority of them are Steaua fans. They don't really accept the name change. I don't like it either, because it's the most famous club in the country, but it has to be done. 8Dodo8 ( talk · contribs) 11:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Qed237. I am hoping that you can lend some assistance. Me and user Giant Snowman need assistance in resolving an edit dispute concerning the kit section that was in the Nigerian national football team article. He removed it citing WP:NOTGALLERY. I disagree with his interpretation and I have shared my reasons on the talk page at WikiProject Football. We request the input of members of this project in order to resolve this issue. Your assistance would be appreciated if you have the time. Thanks! unak 1978 16:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
I've recently seen quite a few pages related to the play-offs of the Championship, League One, and League Two, which are either not up-to-date or do not have good content (such as 2017 English Football League play-offs, which has lots of tables and barely any prose). Mill. did qualify for the Championship less than an hour ago, but there's still some discrepancies between articles. For example, for previous years the title such as [year] Football League play-offs was used. This year, 2017 English Football League play-offs was used. Anyways, do you know a list of pages that should be edited now that different teams are in different leagues? Dat Guy Talk Contribs 17:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Domestic average home attendances of football clubs is a list that clearly does not meet WP:CSD#A11, which is for WP:NFT type material. Looking at attendance numbers is not something the author of this articles and their mates made up one day at the pub. If you would like to see this page deleted, please use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead. Happy editing, — Kusma ( t· c) 12:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, about your last edit on that template, I do not understand why you deleted a sentence mentioning Athletic Bilbao in Real Sociedad's note. I think there was nothing wrong with it. The case seems too obvious, so I decide to undo your change without waiting for your answer. Hopefully you do not mind, otherwise I am sorry :) Centaur271188 ( talk) 19:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Sceptre: @ Qed237: As it is right now, the notes are very ambiguous, informal, and, on top of that, contain grammatical mistakes.
Maybe, we should agree on a compromise - if you really seem to hate convoluted texts? OlJa 22:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2018-19 UEFA Champions League, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:C30:3680:19E:28D8:822C:24D6 ( talk) 12:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
You say the phrase "competition proper" is 'proper standard English". It is not. At best it is slang, and at worst it doesn't even make sense when you think about it. I've tried to edit the page to apply consistent logic (renaming the qualifying phase) in line with what logic was already applied, and then correcting the rest of the page when you objected that my regional change was not was these phases were called but your own logic seems hard to follow. so I really won;t get what you are trying to do with the page. KP-TheSpectre ( talk) 10:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Why are you as a Wikipedia moderator ignoring the site's rules? The rules clearly state that all the statements must be based on sources..... Saksapoiss ( talk) 20:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
How could he have recieved a medal when they don't award any in Supercopa. Saksapoiss ( talk) 20:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
These are some of the very reliable source that credit him with 30 trophies. You can't deny these sources according to Wikipedia's rules. Wikipedia isn't a place for biased opinions.
And this is a biased opinion because there are no criterias by RFEF that player must appear in Super Cup final to be part of the winning team, like there is for example in FA Community Shield. Saksapoiss ( talk) 21:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Got it - I'll make sure to edit only the date information in the info box. Thanks a lot for the heads up! Raider1918 ( talk) 16:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey Qed237. How come you reverted the edit I made on Ozil article? I think it's notable information useful to the reader. Hashim-afc ( talk) 17:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
What do you mean when you say " WP:STATUSQUO seems popular"? Is it not more useful to have the player's club displayed? Does it not make more sense to use the space more efficiently? I fail to see what negative impact my changes have had. – Pee Jay 21:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I saw you were part of the discussion at Talk:UEFA Euro 2016 squads involving what to list players' clubs as. I had a quick question for 2017 FIFA Confederations Cup squads, Robbie Kruse last played a competitive match for Liaoning Whowin prior to the tournament, but he terminated his contract with the club in May due to unpaid wages. Should his club be listed as Liaoning Whowin, or unattached? S.A. Julio ( talk) 06:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
[2]. Chanheigeorge ( talk) 11:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Done Giant Snowman 06:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Dear Qed237, why do you want to block me? Because I've added a 'Bogus' article?? The Linafoot is the top-flight football league of DR Congo, the biggest sport in the country with almost 100 million inhabitants, with a club named TP Mazembe who made it to the prestigious FIFA Club World Cup final. The 2016-17 season, and with a reference to the league standings table. Can you PLEASE explain what's so bogus about that? Some Linafoot matches attracted crowds around 80,000... Really a bogus league... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houndground ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Okay, now I understand the problem. You could have told me to add that information instead of deleting the article immediately and asking to block me, while all I wanted to do is making Wikipedia more complete. I would have added the information that was missing if you asked me, no problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houndground ( talk • contribs)
Okay, but you have to understand... I did a lot of editing and I tried to do it as good as possible. But I didn't know that a page like Linafoot had to be made that way, I couldn't find it anywhere and no one told me until you now. But I'm done editing for Wikipedia, everything I add isn't good enough. In the reactions, a lot of people did appreciate the attendance figures for example, but it can't be made with 100% reliable sources, so the information simply can't be added. I did add relative reliable sources, and I found a lot of information on Wikipedia without sources where no one seems to complain about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houndground ( talk • contribs)
Thank you. Is it okay if I'll try to add the Linafoot 2016-17 page again, without the errors you mentioned? I want to learn to make the pages the right way, as good as possible. Can you please let me know if things are not right, and how I could do it better the next time? Thanks for the help. Houndground ( talk) 15:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Is it okay if I'll try to add the Linafoot 2016-17 page again, without the errors you mentioned? I want to learn to make the pages the right way, as good as possible. Can you please let me know if things are not right, and how I could do it better the next time? Thanks for the help. Houndground ( talk) 15:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
I am writing to you because you controversially reverted most of IP 86.185.127.247's good faith edits. Furthermore, we DO write scores with home score first AND George Boyd's ref 156 got a worse display by displaying RED text. PLUS, you have re-inserted the "ghost caption" of Steve Simonsen which shouldn't be in the source code as the photo was deleted two years ago.
Thank you and happy 1st July. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.147.73 ( talk) 05:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Dude, why did you revert my edits in this article??? Ipsumesse ( talk) 21:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
You are the one vandalizing Wikipedia here! I am doing nothing wrong! I have no idea what you are talking about. Stop doing this please. MValera ( talk) 20:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I did not vandalize KS Torun. Their official sponsored name is now KS Get Well Torun. Sponsor name "Apator" is not in their name anymore. If you don't believe me, please check (the ranking table on) their official site: http://speedway.torun.pl/. Houndground ( talk) 05:40, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry for making Wikipedia more up to date... There's already a link to the official page with the club's new official name, but okay, next time I'll add a reference.
hey, I went into the site again to make sure I didn't make a mistake, but it indeed shows me 19:45 as the k.o. time. Perhaps it's by the local time-zone of access (I'm actually in Israel, UTC+3)? -- SuperJew ( talk) 10:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Any chance you could have a look at the recent changes to Park Ji-sung. An anonymous editor is changing the article to have his stint with Myongji University as part of his "youth" career instead of the "college" career where it belongs. – Pee Jay 13:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Do you plan to put the {{ in use}} tag on 2017–18 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round the next day of games? I think I have a problem with this approach, which it seems is how you handled 29 June and 6 July. I appreciate that it is frustrating to edit when there are edit conflicts, but I don't see how we can say one editor essentially calls "dibs" on updating the article. Is this common practice by other football editors on other pages? Was there a discussion somewhere on using this? I was going to get other opinions at a noticeboard somewhere (I haven't decided which board is best, and I am absolutely not planning on seeking some kind of sanction, just going to ask on clarification for the future), but first I thought I'd ask if you plan to do it again, because there's no point in discussing it at a noticeboard if you don't plan to do it. Or if there's already been a clear consensus established somewhere that this is OK. If I do raise the issue somewhere, I will certainly let you know when and where I do it. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Can you please respond to the points raised on the Talk page? Also, i have noticed that the quote from Mourinho has been readded. Can this be removed as it is an outdated opinion and does not back up the claim as intended. (In 2016 Mourinho named Maradona, Pele and Messi as the three greatest footballers of all time http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/690890/Manchester-United-News-Gossip-Rumours-Jose-Mourinho-Top-Three-Players-Messi-Not-Ronaldo ) I would make the change myself but with your recent threat of a block I thought it would be wise to ask you to do it instead. Thanks in advance. O'Flannery ( talk) 17:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Removed Manchester United 2017 link as this is not confirmed by either clubs. Please stop re-adding this or it will be reported. User- Craigw87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigw87 ( talk • contribs) 15:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
I am unable to see any article that was referenced. Craigw87
Those attendance figures might not be interesting for you, but for a lot of people it is interesting. Wikipedia is not only about what's interesting for you. Most Wikipedia club and league pages already had the attendance figures included, they're very common as said by other people in the reactions before. I've only added the missing figures of major sports leagues and I only have to add around 4 or 5 more leagues and then I'm done. Houndground ( talk) 02:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
hey i would like to ask why you marked Amos Nondi for speedy deletion yet Amos Nondi played in an league allstars match against Hull City Fc and was also named among the top players in kenya, he also earned a call up for the national team which qualifies him as a top player — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennwes32 ( talk • contribs) 11:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sir
{{Some Months Back we where registered our article Called Basically its a Temple Article Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir and for 2 to 3 attempts the page was on to deletion and we worked with Mandyada Sri Shiradi Sai Baba Temple but this went on cool because of one change of village name, the person changed village name to the new name on formula the page was on to deletion for 2 days and got deleted, same way they attempted Mandyada Shri Shiradi Sai Baba Mandir H Highlighted Shri we pre requested what's really wrong going on out , it was nothing . but no response , it was on delete}}. and more over the use name was blocked Pranerao EMail Prane_98@yahoo.init was 2 months back}}.
Sir As am the temple Chairman looking to Get back this articles work again , with our details and more.}} Bhaskaraomsai 12:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Looking to get a feed back from you Thanks. Bhaskar Rao M Sai}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhaskaraomsai ( talk • contribs) 12:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help at Marko Arnautović Kind regards MJ ☕ 14:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC) |
What happened to our discussion regarding Ronaldo on here? O'Flannery ( talk) 10:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. If I may, on what basis do you calculate the possible seedings of teams for the group stages? As things stand now, the Europa League article puts Fastav and Lugano into seeding pots 2, 3 or 4, but I don't see how these two can theoretically make it into pot 2. Consider: For a team to be in pot 2 in Europa League, there has to be at least 24 teams lower-ranked teams in a position to qualify for the group stage. However, there are only 20 teams ranked lower than Lugano. And even if there are exactly 24 teams ranked lower than Fastav, they cannot possibly all qualify for the group stage, as at least two of them will be eliminated (Ostersund/Fola and Shkendija/Trakai). Or am I missing something? Cheers. Ivan Volodin ( talk) 10:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Just posting here for a quicker response, but how do I horizontally align the sports table module? By that, I mean for this article, I'd like to move Group B to be aligned to the right of Group A, just to save some space and be easier to read. If this is something simple to do, then I haven't figured it out. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 22:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello there. Im a old "friends" of you and please I ask youti intervene at Freddie Veseli because Im going unfortunely through an edit wat with another user. Thank you. -- Eni.Sukthi.Durres ( talk) 15:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
2018 FIFA World Cup is close to finish. It's time for the simulation, which national team will qualify for 2018 FIFA World Cup. Of course, if you have a lot of time. -- 5.172.234.239 ( talk) 14:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello there is a discussion about the volleyball players layout being held in the WikiProject Volleyball talk page. Please visit us and help us with your contributions. -- Osplace 17:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I request you to change their size to smaller and merge column, like this. I would like to bring this module to use the FIVB tournaments in 2018. Can you discus for the module in WikiProject_Volleyball. -- BTechTV ( talk) 05:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Rank | Team | Matches | Pts | Sets | Points | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W | L | W | L | Ratio | W | L | Ratio | |||
1 | China | 5 | 0 | 14 | 15 | 4 | 3.750 | 454 | 343 | 1.324 |
2 | Brazil | 3 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 1.857 | 438 | 405 | 1.081 |
3 | United States | 3 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 1.000 | 431 | 434 | 0.993 |
4 | Russia | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 0.900 | 411 | 427 | 0.963 |
5 | Japan | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 11 | 0.909 | 462 | 471 | 0.981 |
6 | South Korea | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0.000 | 260 | 376 | 0.691 |
Hello, Qed237. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Qed237,
I think you made a number of good points in your speedy deletion nomination.
In light of these issues, ! have redirected "2017 Faroe Islands Premier League" to Faroe Islands Premier League.
Please do nominate the redirect page for deletion at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion if you think I got it wrong.
Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)