![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Q28. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Accept reason:
Granted for one year. SQL Query me! 16:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. SQL Query me! 16:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I just came across your successful request for rename and just wanted to share the joy. That would be really really easier and faster to refer in many languages, I bet. Best wishes. Alfa80 ( talk) 17:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Genuinely curious, but why create over 150 sandboxes for templates that probably don't even need them (for example, {{ 25}}, which has not been edited since 2015)? Seems like pointless busywork. Primefac ( talk) 13:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Please stop mass create the template's sandbox. These edits are not constructive contribution and violate Gaming the system guideline. If you still still doing this behavior, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. (警告內容與中維的警告相近) -- SCP -20 00 16:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
User:IN/twinkleoptions.js, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:IN/twinkleoptions.js and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:IN/twinkleoptions.js during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Security
XP
🔒
13:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My IPBE is about to expire, request renewal.
Accept reason:
Extended for 12 months from now. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 11:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
You don't need to add tags like {{ unreferenced}} to articles such as List of listed buildings in the Scottish Borders as these are simply disambiguation pages that do not contain information. Nthep ( talk) 14:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
It seems that the other party has not responded to me for more than a month, so I can assume that this topic has ended, so after I leave this message, I can archive it at any time.-- Alcremie ( talk) 07:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi!
I saw your comment about the Monkbot's edit:
and I got curious about the edits numbering. They really appear to grow in time, so the natural guess is the oldid=1
would give the first revision of the first page ever. Alas, that turned out to be false:
is an edit made to the revision 294750:
As a result, the Monkbot's edit id=999999999
is not necessarily the 999,999,999th one.
Anyway, well spotted!
Keep safe! And happy editing! :) -- CiaPan ( talk) 10:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification message, no reply.--Did you know? Alcremie's 1000th edit was made very close to the 20th anniversary day of Wikipedia. 05:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, IN!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Sulfurboy (
talk)
15:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi, I noticed your signature on
Wikipedia talk:Twinkle and it's really difficult to tell that it's a signature: By the way, did you know?
Alcremie's 1000th edit was made very close to the
20th anniversary day of Wikipedia.
It reads as a continuation of whatever comment you're making, but doesn't make sense as part of that comment. Perhaps you might add that information about your 1000th edit to your user page, and return to a recognizable signature for talk pages? Happy editing!
Schazjmd
(talk)
17:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
据 Special:Diff/1004567715得知。 现在应该可以了。-- AnYiLin Talk 07:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure there was a consensus there. Please could you just close it rather than relist? Thanks, Number 5 7 12:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
It's time for the discussion to come to an end. The template has been deleted, so after I left this message, I can archive it on any time. -- Alcremie ( talk) 11:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:X9 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
I suggest that you don't relist at RfD as you don't understand the rules. Relisting a discussion you have taken part in is a violation of WP:INVOLVED. So until you get more experienced at RfD, don't relist or close those discussions. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this was just a mistake, an attempt at a joke, or something else – it's no big deal if you just did it this once, but please don't use odd random capital letters, or replace letters with digits (in some kind of Leet spelling), in discussions on Wikipedia. Please also stop using nonsensical edit summaries like the one you used in that edit, or here, or here, and in several other places. Edit summaries are used to give your fellow editors some idea of what you did in your edit, and meaningless combinations of letters don't do that. Thanks. -- bonadea contributions talk 20:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi IN, see WP:IAN#Missing nowiki tags in user scripts lead to strange template creations and protection requests, thanks ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi IN,
if I understand the situation correctly, you are currently blocked on the Chinese Wikipedia, and at least part of the reason is that you have created unnecessary redirects.
Now you have created unnecessary redirects on the English Wikipedia, too, and your recent contributions seem to show an interest in continuing to create redirects.
Please do not continue to create redirects for now.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
17:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
The other party has not responded to the topic for more than a month, so I think this discussion is over, This discussion will be archive on evey time without further notice.-- Alcremie ( talk) 10:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, IN!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Fiddle
Faddle
13:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Hi IN! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, The archival was done by
Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Hi, please don't change other people's comments as you did here. I have undone the addition of that URL. Also, I'm not sure what an edit summary of "Hrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?" is supposed to denote; edit summaries should be concise summaries of the changes that you're making. Thanks. DanCherek ( talk) 18:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
How is editing a sandbox so bad that you needed to place an only warning? Sure, the category is supposed to be for adding to pages, not for editing but this is a sandbox... I'm not sure if even a level 1 warning was needed, let alone a level 4im. Please can you be more careful with your warning? -- Belwine ( talk) 20:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Fiddle
Faddle
10:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I see you have been in trouble before for disruption concerning redirects. Now what is this all about? It makes no sense at all. The redirect does not go to that article and never has done. Nor does the target article discuss or use that abbreviation for anything. Spinning Spark 13:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Spinning
Spark
17:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have understood that change link to en.wikipedia.org is not allowed and I promise that I must not modify the link to en.wikpedia.org again.-- q28 ( talk) 04:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address the reason you were blocked. Yamla ( talk) 10:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Spinningspark: What do I have to do to unblock me? I'll do as you say.-- q28 ( talk) 15:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:P.S. has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Primefac (
talk)
21:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:666. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 22#Wikipedia:666 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Primefac (
talk)
21:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
The page Minecraft (game) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 03:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:GQ. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:GQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:KI. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:KI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:MZ. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:MZ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:Q28. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:Q28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:FH. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:FH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Q28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
User:Q28/draft, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 08:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
I've noticed an uptick of your nominations within the past few days. If you're interested you can add yourself as a member of the Unused Templates Task Force that I created. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Q28! Following up from here, your current signature is quite confusing, and it took me a minute at TfD to figure out what was happening. For the convenience of others, I'd suggest changing it to something that doesn't begin with plain unlinked text and/or adding some formatting to set it apart. Regards, {{u| Sdkb}} talk 19:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Just so you know if you find something that's useless and more or less single authored often the easiest way to get it deleted is just requesting a WP:G7 on the creator's page assuming they're currently active. It doesn't always work, but when it does it can save community time in xfds. Anyway, it's an option to consider if the circumstances allow. Due to the app I'm using my IP is currently hopping all over the place every couple of hours, eventually I hope get back on a static IP; in the meantime if I don't follow up on any replies it's not because I don't like you. Regards, 79.126.122.14 ( talk) 03:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Basically, it doesn't have much to do with me.--Did Q28 make a mess today? 07:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Since all of your Hebrew template nominations (at TfD) are with the same logic, could you please group them up? Gonnym ( talk) 15:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
At TfD, please give actual deletion rationales in plain English, not round-about or meaningless phrasing. The entries Unfortunately, that's out of date
, Okay, I still don't understand what this template is for
, I don't know if I need to delete it
at
TfD/2021-11-22 are utterly meaningless so others have to guess at your intent. I know that Pppery has also
raised this with you. There are extensive notes on what makes a good or bad rationale at
WP:AADD.
User:GKFX
talk
19:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Q28,
Any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), you have to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator. It is part of the deletion process. I see you are using Twinkle, which is great, so please check your Twinkle Preferences, make sure that "Notify page creator" is checked and that every criteria of speedy deletion is also checked. I think the default is that only a few of the more popular options are selected but they all need to be. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Q28 - just a note that your signature is confusing at the moment. I saw it at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 22 and other similar entries, and thought at first that it was a comment by some other user, asking if you'd "made a mess". Per WP:SIG, although you can customise your signature up to a point, it still needs to be recognisable as a signature, not look like part of a comment, and it looks like other editors have said the same thing at User_talk:Q28/0#Signature_legibility and User_talk:Q28/0#Your_signature. This may seem like a minor issue, but it's a distraction for other editors so I'd request you to please amend it. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 12:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Now that I'm using my default signature, there should be no problem.-- Q28 ( talk) 01:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Bonadea,
Primefac: I changed my signature.--
Q28 (
talk)
03:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
When you tag a TemplateStyles page for TFD, please ensure that you use the expanded form. Review the last instruction in item I: Tag the Template in the TFD instructions. Thanks! Izno ( talk) 07:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My IPBE has been to expire, request renewal. Block ID is 12542404.
Accept reason:
Extended for another year. Please avoid any further blocks, though. IPBE should have been revoked at that time. Still, it looks like you are constructive and I expect no problems at all here, and lots more valuable edits. Yamla ( talk) 10:53, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Talkback/preload. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. – radar 33 19:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Q28,
Maybe you could focus your patrolling efforts on main space articles and edits rather than Draft space. Editors are allowed a lot of leeway in Draft space to work on their pages over time so we don't judge them by the same standards that we judge content in the main space. A draft could be a blank page and it isn't deleted while that would be unaccepted in the main space of the project. The only content in Draft space that needs to be deleted is advertising, vandalism, hoaxes, copyright& BLP violations and attack pages. Thank you for your work though. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
China at the 2008 Summer Olympics is not eligible to score points in the WikiCup at the moment, but will be eligible if it is passed as a GA by a reviewer. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 19:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, you're receiving this note because you're currently signed up for the 2022 WikiCup and don't yet have any points in the competition. As you may know, scoring any points in the first round is traditionally sufficient to advance to the second, and a fast way to get 5 points is to complete a good article review. Given that the January 2022 Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive is active for another 10 days, you might be interested in pitching in. Complete one review, and you'll be on to the next round in WikiCup; complete two or three, and you'll also be eligible to win some barnstars. As always, quality reviews with attention to detail are expected. Cheers, -- Usernameunique ( talk) 19:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
I have warned you once before. Please ensure you are tagging sanitized CSS pages for deletion correctly.
Thanks. Izno ( talk) 15:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Just a note that this should be requested at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for edits to a protected page. Happy editing! ― Qwerfjkl talk 16:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
GET STICK BUGGED LOL and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 29#GET STICK BUGGED LOL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
17:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Recommend user name, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Recommend user name and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:Recommend user name during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Tiger (
Talk)
13:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
So When You Go Solo, You Hold Your Own Hand and Remember That Depth Is the Greatest of Heights and If You Know Where You Stand, Then You Know Where to Land and If You Fall It Won't Matter, Cuz You'll Know That You're Right and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8#So When You Go Solo, You Hold Your Own Hand and Remember That Depth Is the Greatest of Heights and If You Know Where You Stand, Then You Know Where to Land and If You Fall It Won't Matter, Cuz You'll Know That You're Right until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Q28,
I just deleted a redirect that you created that directed editors from a Wikipedia project page to a User talk page for a bot! I can't think of a reason why you thought this redirect was a good idea or even could foresee it being helpful. I see on your talk page that some of your redirects are raising questions. Please do not create questionable or unnecessary redirect pages. Make sure they make logical sense and cross-namespace redirects aren't generally useful.
Thank you for all of your contributions! Liz Read! Talk! 23:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
0rz and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#0rz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
192.76.8.77 (
talk)
17:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Set out and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Set out until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Fram (
talk)
08:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of acronyms: Q, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page QX. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Q28. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Accept reason:
Granted for one year. SQL Query me! 16:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. SQL Query me! 16:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I just came across your successful request for rename and just wanted to share the joy. That would be really really easier and faster to refer in many languages, I bet. Best wishes. Alfa80 ( talk) 17:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Genuinely curious, but why create over 150 sandboxes for templates that probably don't even need them (for example, {{ 25}}, which has not been edited since 2015)? Seems like pointless busywork. Primefac ( talk) 13:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Please stop mass create the template's sandbox. These edits are not constructive contribution and violate Gaming the system guideline. If you still still doing this behavior, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. (警告內容與中維的警告相近) -- SCP -20 00 16:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
User:IN/twinkleoptions.js, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:IN/twinkleoptions.js and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:IN/twinkleoptions.js during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Security
XP
🔒
13:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My IPBE is about to expire, request renewal.
Accept reason:
Extended for 12 months from now. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 11:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
You don't need to add tags like {{ unreferenced}} to articles such as List of listed buildings in the Scottish Borders as these are simply disambiguation pages that do not contain information. Nthep ( talk) 14:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
It seems that the other party has not responded to me for more than a month, so I can assume that this topic has ended, so after I leave this message, I can archive it at any time.-- Alcremie ( talk) 07:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi!
I saw your comment about the Monkbot's edit:
and I got curious about the edits numbering. They really appear to grow in time, so the natural guess is the oldid=1
would give the first revision of the first page ever. Alas, that turned out to be false:
is an edit made to the revision 294750:
As a result, the Monkbot's edit id=999999999
is not necessarily the 999,999,999th one.
Anyway, well spotted!
Keep safe! And happy editing! :) -- CiaPan ( talk) 10:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification message, no reply.--Did you know? Alcremie's 1000th edit was made very close to the 20th anniversary day of Wikipedia. 05:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, IN!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Sulfurboy (
talk)
15:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi, I noticed your signature on
Wikipedia talk:Twinkle and it's really difficult to tell that it's a signature: By the way, did you know?
Alcremie's 1000th edit was made very close to the
20th anniversary day of Wikipedia.
It reads as a continuation of whatever comment you're making, but doesn't make sense as part of that comment. Perhaps you might add that information about your 1000th edit to your user page, and return to a recognizable signature for talk pages? Happy editing!
Schazjmd
(talk)
17:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
据 Special:Diff/1004567715得知。 现在应该可以了。-- AnYiLin Talk 07:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure there was a consensus there. Please could you just close it rather than relist? Thanks, Number 5 7 12:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
It's time for the discussion to come to an end. The template has been deleted, so after I left this message, I can archive it on any time. -- Alcremie ( talk) 11:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:X9 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
I suggest that you don't relist at RfD as you don't understand the rules. Relisting a discussion you have taken part in is a violation of WP:INVOLVED. So until you get more experienced at RfD, don't relist or close those discussions. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 00:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this was just a mistake, an attempt at a joke, or something else – it's no big deal if you just did it this once, but please don't use odd random capital letters, or replace letters with digits (in some kind of Leet spelling), in discussions on Wikipedia. Please also stop using nonsensical edit summaries like the one you used in that edit, or here, or here, and in several other places. Edit summaries are used to give your fellow editors some idea of what you did in your edit, and meaningless combinations of letters don't do that. Thanks. -- bonadea contributions talk 20:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi IN, see WP:IAN#Missing nowiki tags in user scripts lead to strange template creations and protection requests, thanks ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi IN,
if I understand the situation correctly, you are currently blocked on the Chinese Wikipedia, and at least part of the reason is that you have created unnecessary redirects.
Now you have created unnecessary redirects on the English Wikipedia, too, and your recent contributions seem to show an interest in continuing to create redirects.
Please do not continue to create redirects for now.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
17:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
The other party has not responded to the topic for more than a month, so I think this discussion is over, This discussion will be archive on evey time without further notice.-- Alcremie ( talk) 10:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, IN!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Fiddle
Faddle
13:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Hi IN! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, The archival was done by
Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Hi, please don't change other people's comments as you did here. I have undone the addition of that URL. Also, I'm not sure what an edit summary of "Hrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?" is supposed to denote; edit summaries should be concise summaries of the changes that you're making. Thanks. DanCherek ( talk) 18:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
How is editing a sandbox so bad that you needed to place an only warning? Sure, the category is supposed to be for adding to pages, not for editing but this is a sandbox... I'm not sure if even a level 1 warning was needed, let alone a level 4im. Please can you be more careful with your warning? -- Belwine ( talk) 20:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Fiddle
Faddle
10:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I see you have been in trouble before for disruption concerning redirects. Now what is this all about? It makes no sense at all. The redirect does not go to that article and never has done. Nor does the target article discuss or use that abbreviation for anything. Spinning Spark 13:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Spinning
Spark
17:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have understood that change link to en.wikipedia.org is not allowed and I promise that I must not modify the link to en.wikpedia.org again.-- q28 ( talk) 04:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address the reason you were blocked. Yamla ( talk) 10:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Spinningspark: What do I have to do to unblock me? I'll do as you say.-- q28 ( talk) 15:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:P.S. has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Primefac (
talk)
21:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:666. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 22#Wikipedia:666 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Primefac (
talk)
21:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
The page Minecraft (game) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 03:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:GQ. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:GQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:KI. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:KI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:MZ. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:MZ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:Q28. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:Q28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia:FH. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Wikipedia:FH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Q28. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
User:Q28/draft, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 08:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
I've noticed an uptick of your nominations within the past few days. If you're interested you can add yourself as a member of the Unused Templates Task Force that I created. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Q28! Following up from here, your current signature is quite confusing, and it took me a minute at TfD to figure out what was happening. For the convenience of others, I'd suggest changing it to something that doesn't begin with plain unlinked text and/or adding some formatting to set it apart. Regards, {{u| Sdkb}} talk 19:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Just so you know if you find something that's useless and more or less single authored often the easiest way to get it deleted is just requesting a WP:G7 on the creator's page assuming they're currently active. It doesn't always work, but when it does it can save community time in xfds. Anyway, it's an option to consider if the circumstances allow. Due to the app I'm using my IP is currently hopping all over the place every couple of hours, eventually I hope get back on a static IP; in the meantime if I don't follow up on any replies it's not because I don't like you. Regards, 79.126.122.14 ( talk) 03:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Basically, it doesn't have much to do with me.--Did Q28 make a mess today? 07:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Since all of your Hebrew template nominations (at TfD) are with the same logic, could you please group them up? Gonnym ( talk) 15:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
At TfD, please give actual deletion rationales in plain English, not round-about or meaningless phrasing. The entries Unfortunately, that's out of date
, Okay, I still don't understand what this template is for
, I don't know if I need to delete it
at
TfD/2021-11-22 are utterly meaningless so others have to guess at your intent. I know that Pppery has also
raised this with you. There are extensive notes on what makes a good or bad rationale at
WP:AADD.
User:GKFX
talk
19:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Q28,
Any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), you have to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator. It is part of the deletion process. I see you are using Twinkle, which is great, so please check your Twinkle Preferences, make sure that "Notify page creator" is checked and that every criteria of speedy deletion is also checked. I think the default is that only a few of the more popular options are selected but they all need to be. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Q28 - just a note that your signature is confusing at the moment. I saw it at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 22 and other similar entries, and thought at first that it was a comment by some other user, asking if you'd "made a mess". Per WP:SIG, although you can customise your signature up to a point, it still needs to be recognisable as a signature, not look like part of a comment, and it looks like other editors have said the same thing at User_talk:Q28/0#Signature_legibility and User_talk:Q28/0#Your_signature. This may seem like a minor issue, but it's a distraction for other editors so I'd request you to please amend it. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 12:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Now that I'm using my default signature, there should be no problem.-- Q28 ( talk) 01:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Bonadea,
Primefac: I changed my signature.--
Q28 (
talk)
03:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
When you tag a TemplateStyles page for TFD, please ensure that you use the expanded form. Review the last instruction in item I: Tag the Template in the TFD instructions. Thanks! Izno ( talk) 07:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Q28 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My IPBE has been to expire, request renewal. Block ID is 12542404.
Accept reason:
Extended for another year. Please avoid any further blocks, though. IPBE should have been revoked at that time. Still, it looks like you are constructive and I expect no problems at all here, and lots more valuable edits. Yamla ( talk) 10:53, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Talkback/preload. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. – radar 33 19:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Q28,
Maybe you could focus your patrolling efforts on main space articles and edits rather than Draft space. Editors are allowed a lot of leeway in Draft space to work on their pages over time so we don't judge them by the same standards that we judge content in the main space. A draft could be a blank page and it isn't deleted while that would be unaccepted in the main space of the project. The only content in Draft space that needs to be deleted is advertising, vandalism, hoaxes, copyright& BLP violations and attack pages. Thank you for your work though. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
China at the 2008 Summer Olympics is not eligible to score points in the WikiCup at the moment, but will be eligible if it is passed as a GA by a reviewer. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 19:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, you're receiving this note because you're currently signed up for the 2022 WikiCup and don't yet have any points in the competition. As you may know, scoring any points in the first round is traditionally sufficient to advance to the second, and a fast way to get 5 points is to complete a good article review. Given that the January 2022 Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive is active for another 10 days, you might be interested in pitching in. Complete one review, and you'll be on to the next round in WikiCup; complete two or three, and you'll also be eligible to win some barnstars. As always, quality reviews with attention to detail are expected. Cheers, -- Usernameunique ( talk) 19:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
I have warned you once before. Please ensure you are tagging sanitized CSS pages for deletion correctly.
Thanks. Izno ( talk) 15:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Just a note that this should be requested at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for edits to a protected page. Happy editing! ― Qwerfjkl talk 16:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
GET STICK BUGGED LOL and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 29#GET STICK BUGGED LOL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
17:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Recommend user name, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Recommend user name and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:Recommend user name during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Tiger (
Talk)
13:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
So When You Go Solo, You Hold Your Own Hand and Remember That Depth Is the Greatest of Heights and If You Know Where You Stand, Then You Know Where to Land and If You Fall It Won't Matter, Cuz You'll Know That You're Right and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8#So When You Go Solo, You Hold Your Own Hand and Remember That Depth Is the Greatest of Heights and If You Know Where You Stand, Then You Know Where to Land and If You Fall It Won't Matter, Cuz You'll Know That You're Right until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Q28,
I just deleted a redirect that you created that directed editors from a Wikipedia project page to a User talk page for a bot! I can't think of a reason why you thought this redirect was a good idea or even could foresee it being helpful. I see on your talk page that some of your redirects are raising questions. Please do not create questionable or unnecessary redirect pages. Make sure they make logical sense and cross-namespace redirects aren't generally useful.
Thank you for all of your contributions! Liz Read! Talk! 23:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
0rz and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#0rz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
192.76.8.77 (
talk)
17:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Set out and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Set out until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Fram (
talk)
08:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of acronyms: Q, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page QX. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)