 | This account has been confirmed by a
CheckUser as a
sockpuppet of
Tonytonyb (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs), and has been
blocked indefinitely. Please refer to this sockpuppet investigation for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
 |
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Judd Winick. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Geniac (
talk)
03:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Brian Quintana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Tabercil (
talk)
04:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Tabercil, Hairhorn, Geniac and Cameron Scott you are all part of the problem. You four are all heavily involved in editing his rival Judd Winick's page. None of you have added a single constructive addition to Brian Quintana. You only diminish him when he has 10 time as many Google hits as Winick.I suppose Smartse is a sockpuppet too since anyone who doesn't agree with your assessment of Quintana must be a sockpuppet.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Pupster (
talk •
contribs) 08:31, September 17, 2009
"You four are all heavily involved in editing his rival Judd Winick's page." Since I have never edited that page, I'm not sure how you'd come to that conclusion. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 13:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Judd Winick is a comic/educator and you have done lots of work on Comics in Education. You would probably call it a Sockpuppet. If comics is what you know then you should stick to comics and leave Hollywood producers to editors more knowledgeable. You aren't fooling anyone or even pretending to have no bias.-- pupster ( talk) 13:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
I haven't touched that article. I'm sure you can find something better to do with your time. Or at least find the time to get your facts straight. Hairhorn ( talk) 02:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
|
| This account has been confirmed by a
CheckUser as a
sockpuppet of
Tonytonyb (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs), and has been
blocked indefinitely. Please refer to this sockpuppet investigation for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Judd Winick. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Geniac (
talk)
03:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Brian Quintana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Tabercil (
talk)
04:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Tabercil, Hairhorn, Geniac and Cameron Scott you are all part of the problem. You four are all heavily involved in editing his rival Judd Winick's page. None of you have added a single constructive addition to Brian Quintana. You only diminish him when he has 10 time as many Google hits as Winick.I suppose Smartse is a sockpuppet too since anyone who doesn't agree with your assessment of Quintana must be a sockpuppet.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Pupster (
talk •
contribs) 08:31, September 17, 2009
"You four are all heavily involved in editing his rival Judd Winick's page." Since I have never edited that page, I'm not sure how you'd come to that conclusion. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 13:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Judd Winick is a comic/educator and you have done lots of work on Comics in Education. You would probably call it a Sockpuppet. If comics is what you know then you should stick to comics and leave Hollywood producers to editors more knowledgeable. You aren't fooling anyone or even pretending to have no bias.-- pupster ( talk) 13:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
I haven't touched that article. I'm sure you can find something better to do with your time. Or at least find the time to get your facts straight. Hairhorn ( talk) 02:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)