Hello, Proudly Indian09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== {{Reflist}}
Hi. I request you to share your thoughts at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium/archive1, which I nominated for featured list. If you find no issues in the article from your point of view, then please consider giving a Support. Thank you. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 06:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Sabyasachi Chakrabarty, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
08:53, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Raka (film director), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
PRAXIDICAE🌈
16:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
RoySmith
(talk)
17:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Proudly Indian09 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear User:RoySmith I do not own multiple accounts nor I am associated with User:Musicfaneditor. You have mistakenly blocked me. Hence I request you to unblock me, or I have to raise complain against you for blocking me for sockpuppetry based on your assumption. Proudly Indian09 ( talk) 09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's not an assumption. It's based on evidence, which this request does not address. Every sock puppet says they aren't one, so that is insufficient. Even if you personally only have this account, that would make this meat puppetry. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 10:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Proudly Indian09 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
331dot & User:RoySmith I am reiterating that, I do not have any other accounts, nor I am associated with the abovementioned blocked user. If there is any similarities of contribution history between me and the blocked user, it is purely coincidence. Based on assumption I have been blocked. If you have proof that I am involved with the mentioned account, show me the evidence. Unless, I will raise complain against all those users who will decline my unblock request.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. I've also reblocked one of your other accounts that I unblocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are already free to review the SPI. You will have to do better than "it's not me" and "it's a coincidence" as all socks say that. 331dot ( talk) 15:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Proudly Indian09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Raka (film director), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Proudly Indian09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Raka".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Proudly Indian09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== {{Reflist}}
Hi. I request you to share your thoughts at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium/archive1, which I nominated for featured list. If you find no issues in the article from your point of view, then please consider giving a Support. Thank you. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 06:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Sabyasachi Chakrabarty, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
08:53, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Raka (film director), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
PRAXIDICAE🌈
16:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
RoySmith
(talk)
17:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Proudly Indian09 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear User:RoySmith I do not own multiple accounts nor I am associated with User:Musicfaneditor. You have mistakenly blocked me. Hence I request you to unblock me, or I have to raise complain against you for blocking me for sockpuppetry based on your assumption. Proudly Indian09 ( talk) 09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's not an assumption. It's based on evidence, which this request does not address. Every sock puppet says they aren't one, so that is insufficient. Even if you personally only have this account, that would make this meat puppetry. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 10:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Proudly Indian09 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
331dot & User:RoySmith I am reiterating that, I do not have any other accounts, nor I am associated with the abovementioned blocked user. If there is any similarities of contribution history between me and the blocked user, it is purely coincidence. Based on assumption I have been blocked. If you have proof that I am involved with the mentioned account, show me the evidence. Unless, I will raise complain against all those users who will decline my unblock request.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. I've also reblocked one of your other accounts that I unblocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are already free to review the SPI. You will have to do better than "it's not me" and "it's a coincidence" as all socks say that. 331dot ( talk) 15:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Proudly Indian09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Raka (film director), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Proudly Indian09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Raka".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)