Hello, Pranav8574, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Infused Performing Arts, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Jiahimedluke ( talk) 20:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Infused Performing Arts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jiahimedluke ( talk) 20:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm XenonNSMB. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rarandoi Veduka Chudham without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. XenonNSMB ( talk, contribs) 01:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Brahmotsavam (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 08:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mersal (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mersal (film) was changed by Pranav8574 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861507 on 2018-01-08T20:53:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 20:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Thaanaa Serndha Koottam, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [2] Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Same here and here and here. If you want to opine about a film's critical response, start a blog, or use Twitter. If you add this unsourced analysis again, I'll interrupt your editing privileges to prevent damage to the encyclopedia. Additionally, please stop marking your edits as minor. Minor edits are for cosmetic changes like typo fixes and spelling corrections, not for content that could be the subject of debate. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits by introducing your personal analysis and opinions into articles, most recently here, where without justification, you describe a film as "an unofficial remake of French Film, Largo Winch." Though you might notice similarities, and though others might note similarities, you are publishing a conclusion that is not substantiated in any way. Opinions need to be attributed to specific voices and need to be presented as opinions, not as incontrovertible fact. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but if you continue to demonstrate a lack of understanding about what sort of content is appropriate for inclusion at Wikipedia, or if you continue to demonstrate that you don't understand the difference between facts and opinions, you will be blocked again to prevent damage to the encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bharat Ane Nenu. DMacks ( talk) 20:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bharat Ane Nenu. Once again, you CANNOT add material to articles without a source, or at least a link to a reliable source that explicitly makes the claims. If you do this again, you will be reported and a block requested. Ravensfire ( talk) 04:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   DMacks ( talk) 21:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC) reply