Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hartmann and weiss, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hartmann and weiss seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hartmann and weiss, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
20:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
UEFA Euro 2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –
Nurmsook! (
talk)
17:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to the Ernest Emerson page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 13:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Powermugu. I'm leaving you this note to let you know that I have removed the deletion nomination you listed on today's log because it was for the old AfD, which took place four years ago. Given the result of yesterday's deletion review, I'm guessing that you intend to nominate the article again. In that case, what you need to do is to create a new AfD that is suffixed with (2nd nomination), and transclude that instead (i.e. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Emerson (2nd nomination)). Best regards — frankie ( talk) 14:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I see you deleted a couple of paragraphs of cited text with no explanation and with the edit marked as 'minor'. [1] If I understand correctly, you shouldn't cut good text without a good reason, and it's best to give that reason in the edit summary. Is there a good reason? Rezin ( talk) 21:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed your PROD tag from FlightNetwork, because the PROD is never to be used with articles on AfD. They are two different processes, used for different reasons, and shouldn't both be on the same article. Thanks for your contributions. Eaglizard ( talk) 14:10, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Please write the page or it'll be removed. Wikiepdia is an encyclopedia, not a news service. Xx236 ( talk) 10:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm WannaBeEditor. Powermugu, thanks for creating Merkel (firearms manufacturer)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I would like to see more references that establish notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. WannaBeEditor ( talk) 03:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Meg Donnelly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --
Ronz (
talk)
17:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Meg Donnelly. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Made my input in it Powermugu ( talk) 19:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Powermugu! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that this image by Samir Hussein is copyrighted and can only be released under a creative commons license or into the public domain by the rights holder. Thank you. DrKay ( talk) 08:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Powermugu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
DrKay (
talk)
09:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hartmann and weiss, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hartmann and weiss seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hartmann and weiss, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
20:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
UEFA Euro 2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –
Nurmsook! (
talk)
17:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to the Ernest Emerson page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 13:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Powermugu. I'm leaving you this note to let you know that I have removed the deletion nomination you listed on today's log because it was for the old AfD, which took place four years ago. Given the result of yesterday's deletion review, I'm guessing that you intend to nominate the article again. In that case, what you need to do is to create a new AfD that is suffixed with (2nd nomination), and transclude that instead (i.e. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Emerson (2nd nomination)). Best regards — frankie ( talk) 14:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I see you deleted a couple of paragraphs of cited text with no explanation and with the edit marked as 'minor'. [1] If I understand correctly, you shouldn't cut good text without a good reason, and it's best to give that reason in the edit summary. Is there a good reason? Rezin ( talk) 21:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed your PROD tag from FlightNetwork, because the PROD is never to be used with articles on AfD. They are two different processes, used for different reasons, and shouldn't both be on the same article. Thanks for your contributions. Eaglizard ( talk) 14:10, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Please write the page or it'll be removed. Wikiepdia is an encyclopedia, not a news service. Xx236 ( talk) 10:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm WannaBeEditor. Powermugu, thanks for creating Merkel (firearms manufacturer)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I would like to see more references that establish notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. WannaBeEditor ( talk) 03:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Meg Donnelly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --
Ronz (
talk)
17:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Meg Donnelly. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 17:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Made my input in it Powermugu ( talk) 19:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Powermugu! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that this image by Samir Hussein is copyrighted and can only be released under a creative commons license or into the public domain by the rights holder. Thank you. DrKay ( talk) 08:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Powermugu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
DrKay (
talk)
09:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)