![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 |
Thank you for quickly reverting User:2601:180:8200:63D0:5D31:D5D7:CBCF:6164 vandalism on my talk page and then blocking them. D Eaketts ( talk) 16:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, Trust you are well in these uncertain times, we are on lock-down and have not seen our family, except for video phone calls. Could I please draw your attention to the activities of LoganRich ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who keeps adding unsourced information to various BBC articles. I have asked on their Talk page several times for them to supply reliable, secondary sources, but they have ignored all requests - and seem to be doing the same with others editors comments. Can I please leave this with you. Thank you and best regards, David, David J Johnson ( talk) 18:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
You're here on a weekend. Also, do you have any particular experience with our dear friend Kingshowman. Pretty sure he's back and using proxies/is the same person as the SPI troll we've been dealing with off and on for a few years. I normally pestered DoRD about him, but, alas, DoRD has left for greener pastures. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I've just blocked 30 socks from a sock drawer. I see you've tagged some of the previous ones and blocked a few ranges, so I'm letting you know they came back. I don't know if it makes sense to tag all of these. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
You blocked User:103.127.30.249 in March of this year, it appears that the editor is evading their block by using other account User:73.1.41.245. For example, the block IP created the article Whole Lotta Red without adding sources [1], the IP just recently recreated the article without adding sources also [2]. I don't know what who this editor is but the edits looks similar. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 03:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your kindness...;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NikoPAR ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I got locked out of FeiGao2020 and created another account (AprilAnon2020). That other account is inactive and as far as I'm aware hasn't been banned from anything so I'm not trying to avoid a ban or any form of sock puppetry — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnonApril2020 ( talk • contribs)
This probably won't happen because of the whole issue with User:Banana Mutant but would you have a problem with lowering the protection level for Template:Justice League characters and Template: Avengers characters. Mark Rhodes 12 ( talk) 20:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Not sure if it helps/hurts anything, but I saw your warning on this users page and their last three or four edits have been just more slandering. I gave them a fourth warning and it didn't really make them budge. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 00:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA.-- Cahk ( talk) 08:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi P, sorry to bug you with this, but I just blocked Trusha.daware for undisclosed paid editing based on on-site info and a touch of off-site info. Short story, Prajakta Koli is affiliated with One Digital Entertainment, an article that Trusha.daware created, so it seems like just a marketing team taking ownership of both topic articles. But I also notice Latika2301 seems rather interested in the Koli article as well. Is there any way you could look into the unraveling of whatever sock/meat ring-ery is happening there? If you want me to write up an SPI, I'd be happy to. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi P, could you clarify why you presumably declined the speedy here (even though it wasn't mine)? I have struggled at points to understand why some admins follow through and some remove. There doesn't seem to be a consistent rationale based on past new page reviewing I've done, and I'd like to have a firmer idea so future admins don't think I'm just indiscriminately CSD tagging articles. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 19:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Can you clarify to which master did the 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:0:0:0:0/64 IP range that you blocked belong to? Thanks. Gotitbro ( talk) 00:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Found this IP readily admitting to being a sock, see here. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, was unaware only the blocking admin is authorized to put the template. Won't happen again. Hillelfrei • talk • 20:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi P:
Would you be willing to revdel what I have flagged on Lululemon murder? Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 20:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
... for speaking my mind better than I could, while I slept, and often -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Article TwoSet Violin was hit with a wave of vandalism that meets Criteria #2 "Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material" [3] Last known good version was on 28 April 2020. Thanks in advance. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 14:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
The history of We Think the World of You, with which you've previously been involved. Thanks. Shadikk ( talk) 20:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
What can i do?, can you help me to upload my profile to wikipedia , because i want to get verified on instagram. My instagram id is @__mohitjaat__ Mohit Gulia Jhajjar ( talk) 14:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/Quilliam333 is obviously a Mrwallace05 sock. Same as before [4] [5] [6] with previous socks. [7] [8] [9]. 2402:1980:8249:4FE7:EC37:FA52:676F:E25B ( talk) 03:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
the sock with various evasions created this redirect page ( [10]), but user:Materialscientist who this time reverted all the sock edits, forgot to delete this page...I just wanted to draw both of your attention to this, to perform deletion. Regards( KIENGIR ( talk) 07:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC))
I see we found them at about the same time. There was more on the /48, going back about a month. I think I've reverted all the archive edits. In case you were assuming good faith, as I was at first, see Special:Diff/954269093. Do you think the unsourced article space edits should be rolled back as well, as presumed sneaky vandalism? Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 18:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Mr Bugti is a living person. Any details about him requires reliable sources. You edited false information and facts about him which you're not authorized to do. Remove the protection template so i can add reliable statements about him. He has a image and reputation to keep which you're intruding in. Aloha31 ( talk) 23:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
The information added previous were of trusted sources and reliable. It is not my personal disagreement, nor I feel it is. You're added edits are false and are just accusations which you might not be aware of. Mr. Bugti is a political leader and has human rights affairs, but you listed him as a terrorist which him and I won't appreciate. I'm aware of the our policies regarding illegitimate use of multiple accounts. People similar to your IP address have been editing it falsely since they day we created this page. So I suggest you remove your edits and the protection template Aloha31 ( talk) 10:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Can you please revert the changes made by 72.227.160.141 and Aryeh10 (sockpuppets of the same user as banned Peteski 123, YYY613 and JIJJRG) back to my version (last update May 7 at 15:54)?
I have spent a lot of time providing the most historically accurate, balanced and non-biased version. I need my edits protected and locked from further attack by this user who is dedicated to destroying the reputation of Pat Day. He will not quit until his one-side negative attacks on Pat Day has completed destroyed his reputation. In addition to his attacks on the biography page, he has taken out dozens of big races that Pat Day won off the page. This is vandalism at its worst. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6C3:4081:A10:9861:3D6C:866A:F11C ( talk) 04:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Any way to get link to Michael J. Devlin page removed from Devlin surname page?
Secondly if not, can the name the biography page title be changed to Michael John Devlin?
MikeD2000 ( talk) 07:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for helping me find help on how to do things. JTZegers ( talk) 18:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC) |
![]() |
Here is some bubble tea to go with your brownie P. I've been meaning to stop by and say that I hope you and yours are safe and well in these crazy times. Best regards MarnetteD| Talk 19:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks for noticing this obvious issue. I have reported it at WP:RFPP. Has there been a report filed at WP:SPI? I wouldn't want to be duplicating requests. Cheers, RandomCanadian ( talk | contribs) 23:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Since you blocked the accounts, could you also leave a note or something at SPI report where I reported them. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 16:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey again! A new account for your consideration. It might also be time to semi this particular article too. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 14:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
I figured it was at least meat puppetry. I just hadn't see the whole fake game show thing in a while, I guess I was dumb enough to think they might have gotten the point and moved on... Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Please RevDel this. Thanks. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD balaji ( M•T•A• C) This message was left at 22:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I think admin protection was a little too harsh. I think Extended confirmed protection would be better since the only user that has been disruptively changing the page is not even close to the required edits for extended confirmed rights. OcelotCreeper ( talk) 16:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I saw some of the articles you've created and I was impressed. Do you think you could give me some tips on places to look to get started with writing an article from scratch? It looks like a bit of a daunting task given formatting challenges. If you are too busy feel free to disregard!
Warm regards, BasicsOnly ( talk) 19:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
...see this. Drmies ( talk) 02:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo. Rothschild1234 has been using the 114.5.250.143 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) IP for socking. As you blocked a previous sock, I was wondering if you can keep an eye on this one, and block it if the disruption continues. Regards. -- Urbanoc ( talk) 13:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
You might want to remove this unhelpful edit from an IP who seems to know an awful lot, as I would imagine it's going to be confusing to a newbie. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Could you check this page. It is from TRwiki. Thank you!-- Yiğitcank ( talk) 19:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
But they did not take to the main section :(-- Yiğitcank ( talk) 19:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay Thank you! I need to wait so then...-- Yiğitcank ( talk) 19:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirchindia ( talk • contribs) 03:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Jayasurya_Mayilsamy_(Blogger) i did not created this article may be if you help to develop this article for me please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirchindia ( talk • contribs) 03:52, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the rangeblock. I should spend the time figuring those out. We crossed paths; I removed talk page access while you were rangeblocking. My change didn't mess yours up, did it? -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Ponyo, I made several attempts to delete the userpage of new user MTV Hits, purloined from Legacypac, but I kept getting error messages saying it couldn't be deleted, or failed to be deleted, or similar. Isn't that odd? Did you have the same experience, since you merely blanked it? Bishonen | tålk 20:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC).
Hi Ponyo, maybe another Cloudkitty sock - User:CanIHaveSomeofJESUS (suspecting them because they also went to WT:RFA as one of their first actions to request administratorship - not super firm evidence, I know, but color me suspicious that two people did that in the same day). creffett ( talk) 00:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello P. Thanks for you efforts in talking to G. I was concerned when I saw this request to shut down the SA page. Best regards and enjoy your Sunday. MarnetteD| Talk 03:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I do not fully understand your edit that you made on the Saki Nakajima's page here 1, I have tried to add the Saki Nakajima's birth year, what happens is that the users of Japanese Wikipedia erroneously deleted the date of birth of the seiyu, now that there was no source and guess that, one already exists and well, they add it again. 148.0.96.73 ( talk) 04:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
You have gone too far you. You have reverted my edit yet it is true, what wrong with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.0.87.180 ( talk) 12:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
User:Wikiepedia015/sandbox looks awfully familiar. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 19:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, just wanted to say a quick thank you for your help over at RFPP. Always appreciate the help! -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Firstly thanks for protecting the article. Secondly, I don't believe it necessary for me to be making a case on the article's talk, as I have been purely removing unsourced speculation. Similarly why I continued to revert beyond 3RR, in accordance with the exceptions listed on the policy page. If you review the respective revisions you'll see that comparatively, the other entries (that were accidentally removed by your rv) all had citations to official MSFT documentation. While the other user persisted in introducing information (Along with abusive summaries) with no sourcing other than Reddit/Forum gossip and speculation. It'd be greatly appreciated if you could restore the lost sourced information, and prune the unsourced speculation. Thanks. 92.29.94.171 ( talk) 01:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hey! I just saw your page. Great work. Chandranshu Gupta 02:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC) |
You may wish to revoke TPA.-- Cahk ( talk) 07:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear administrator, Please, increase the security level of the article 'bp mandal' as it the victim of wrong editing and removal and distortion of statement sourced by a reliable source by an unauthorized/ unregistered editor. The sentence is correct and sourced by reliable source, though some unauthorized editors are creating vandalism. Deokalimuskabad ( talk) 11:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Please, increase the expiration date of protection to indefinite or for a year.Same unregistered person edits with different IP address. Deokalimuskabad ( talk) 15:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
The apparent sock Special:Contributions/Ali_Jaberian was a check user block, so I was unsure. But like you say, they have an uphill climb if they wish ti be unblocked. -- Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 16:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking me for a week. You didn't even review the circumstances of the block, and didn't even let me request a unblock appeal because you blocked my talk page. Thumbs up. Sounds like you didn't give a fuck. Matthewishere0 ( talk) 18:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey Ponyo, hope you are well. I saw you fully protected Andrew Garbarino for edit warring. I'm seeing the same editing behavior over at Mike LiPetri. The dispute is between the same two editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the protection and blocks around this Ponyo. The IPs look to be the return of Icewhiz ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (though I should add that it could be someone else) and I was clicking on the SPI page when I found that you had dealt with it. SPIs and 3RRs are such a time sink so I appreciat not having to spend time on this one. Unless you think I should :-) Best regards. MarnetteD| Talk 23:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey Ponyo, Can you take a look at my reply to you in " Ethnicity vs. citizenship". It's been over two weeks since I notified you. Kind Regards - TheseusHeLl ( talk) 00:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I hope you noticed my reply. - TheseusHeLl ( talk) 19:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my page to remove this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EDW88CBo-8
But that video is quite right: the Israeli cause is meet, right and just. Why are you removing the explanation of things that are right from this site? Marplesmustgo ( talk) 22:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking User:2600:8800:8C81:3600:44D6:A906:9414:5126. I seriously didn't know how much longer that was going to go on. JeffSpaceman ( talk) 23:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
Bravo: you are excellent. Drmies ( talk) 17:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Ponyo I see that you brought up again this issue and even made this page protected. I'm here to inform you that the issue COI/UPE has already been resolved. Accounts have already been disclosed and the article has gone through a numerous edits to improve notability. I'm asking for your assistance on this one since I can't "resubmit" the changes nor publish it. I hope you can review it and finally, move it back to the mainspace. Thank you. Kileyco17 ( talk) 00:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
I want to remove Air Canada fleet section content because the content has been transferred to Air Canada fleet need your opinion Ktdk ( talk) 01:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
and leave the summary of the fleet in Air Canada fleet section Ktdk ( talk) 01:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
You blocked Khicks2212 back in September, and I believe at least one other associated account before that. Now there's a new account, Kh122201. Leaves the exact same edit summaries ("fixed content on page", "added accurate content on page", etc.) and makes similar article edits. No doubt in my mind this is the same editor. Please have a look when you have a chance. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 14:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Ponyo: Could you provide some information regarding reliable sources which should be used in the articles. Thanks. C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂)
No explanation needed (electrochoc)/ 49.130.203.118 ( talk) 02:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
108.21.73.223 ( talk) 14:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Heres a cookie for blocking User:46.208.236.218, who was giving me trouble! SuperGoose007 (Honk!) 20:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
You have reverted back information to the page which are wrong and false information. I can prove to you with news links that will provide you with correct sources of information of Brahumdagh Bugti so I suggest you apply those please because I know Brahumdagh Bugti personally and some information added to the page currently are false. Please get back to me soon. Mohammad Jan Bugti ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi my little Ponyo. An IP, 2409:4042:E9F:14B0:0:0:6D08:E613, opened an ANI thread about revoking my admin tools for topic banning ScholarM, with no great success. [14] ScholarM denies having used the IP. I'm not even asking you about that, as I know CU's won't say anything about IPs, nor do I much care, but I was interested to see the suggestion here that the IP was actually used by Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah. So... do you see a connection between ScholarM and Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah? Bishonen | tålk 20:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC).
Hey there, Ponyo. I hope life's been treating you alright during this catastrophic year. I have a question about LTAs - one that has been at the back of my mind for several years. Way back when, the better part of a decade ago, somebody added a note on Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dragon2016, pertaining to a comment I made, in which I postured that Dragon2016 may have been impaired in some way. Now, I've always found it dubious to include such a notation attributed to me, as it was in passing and was naturally made in good faith, due to the odd and incomprehensible edits Dragon2016 was making. This raised another question that I haven't broached yet; is including notes about legitimate mental disorders appropriate on LTA pages? I ask, because the troll Zhoban - fifteen years and counting - claimed on another wiki that he has been diagnosed with Pervasive Personality Disorder, which is the root of his crude habits. Should notes about psychiatric diagnoses be stricken from pages? If so, I'd be happy to remove the note attributed to me. If not, it could add clarification to the Zhoban saga. DÅRTHBØTTØ ( T• C) 17:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Good afternoon Ponyo, I am looking for some advice please. I came across Template:No Sleep 'til Sudbury: Adventures in 80s Hard Rock and Metal Deconstruction in my recent changes patrolling. This seems to be an inapprorpiate use for a template from a new editor (who only seems to be here to promote his/her/their book) and I wondered if they were trying to create an article? Would this be an example of a G2 candidate? Many thanks. Agent00x ( talk) 22:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Oh great. Now he'll go back to UTRS. I just got him to respond on his talk page. (laughs, then weeps) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
He is Not compatible with a collaborative project. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I'm just curious on how to cite sources. Thanks! Tarantino101 ( talk) 22:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Tarantino101 ( talk) 23:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting Cum Town, could you do the same for Dasha Nekrasova? The same troll is posting the same thing over and over again on her page. I think its this guy User talk:Yellow-billed Loon, he's obsessed with her and keeps vandalising her page and Red Scare and nominating them for deletion. Pinchofhope ( talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
There's a brand new editor on my page named Bishonen Kumari [sic], quoting the post by Aadhaar Gupta Columbo that you removed from Talk:Kayastha on 23 June. Anything..? I've asked them whose sock they are. Bishonen | tålk 20:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC).
I am firmly convinced that this editor is here to do nothing but troll us, based on a combination of his previous activity as an IP user, the totality of his rants on his user talk page, and his now current antics in his sandbox. Change my mind. Elizium23 ( talk) 02:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi.
Would you kindly suppress something for me? If you say yes, I will post rev-del'ed diffs here. —usernamekiran
(talk)
19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
hi ponyo thanks for the locking the edit section on the article of zorawar singh kalhuria , due to so much edit wars on the page . iam unable to handle the article again by reverting the edits made by several non wikipedia users from several i.p. addresses. this message is regarding the issue of some non referenced content and misleading type of texts in current version of article . i also made a edit request regarding that but no use of that till now. so matter is regarding onlt the first line of the article where it says "Zorawar Singh Kahluria (1784-1841) was a general of the Sikh Empire in the Indian subcontinent. He was subordinate to the Dogra ruler Gulab Singh, who was a vassal of the Sikh emperor Ranjit Singh.[4][5] In reference to his legacy of conquests in the Himalaya Mountains including Ladakh, Tibet, Baltistan and Iskardu as General and Vizier, he has been referred to as the "Napoleon of India",[6] and "Conqueror of Ladakh".[7][8]" according to the references and citations present in this article .it makes clear that zorawar singh kalhuria is the dogra general of the army of dogra maharaja gulab singh the maharaja gulab singh is the vassal of the sikh empire . so mentioning term he was general of sikh empire is quite misleading .it may be a previous edit by somebody ,so kindly don't associate sikh empire with zorawar singh term if you need more realible references by 19th century british historians books i can provide you here is references Frederick Drew, The Jummoo & Kashmir territories Alexander Cunningham, Ladak A. H. Francke, Antiquities of Indian Tibet Fisher, Rose, and Huttenback, The Himalayan Battle-ground
i raised this issue due to the fact the i found people got mislead by reading the first line and talking him as a sikh by the reading the first line of article ,i have seen multiple people twitter which got mislead by thinking that he is sikh by his identity although article mentions the his religion in early life and career section but most people don't go further upto that section by reading whole article beacause people nowdays just google the name and it shows the first line on google only ,thats why this is misleading in this way, for further info check talk page of zorawar singh kalhuria where the dispute of his religion is already solved in 2017-2018. so as a wikipedia community member i thought its my duty to raise this issue to respected admins . thanks waiting for your response -- Loneltrussia ( talk) 09:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 |
Thank you for quickly reverting User:2601:180:8200:63D0:5D31:D5D7:CBCF:6164 vandalism on my talk page and then blocking them. D Eaketts ( talk) 16:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, Trust you are well in these uncertain times, we are on lock-down and have not seen our family, except for video phone calls. Could I please draw your attention to the activities of LoganRich ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who keeps adding unsourced information to various BBC articles. I have asked on their Talk page several times for them to supply reliable, secondary sources, but they have ignored all requests - and seem to be doing the same with others editors comments. Can I please leave this with you. Thank you and best regards, David, David J Johnson ( talk) 18:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
You're here on a weekend. Also, do you have any particular experience with our dear friend Kingshowman. Pretty sure he's back and using proxies/is the same person as the SPI troll we've been dealing with off and on for a few years. I normally pestered DoRD about him, but, alas, DoRD has left for greener pastures. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I've just blocked 30 socks from a sock drawer. I see you've tagged some of the previous ones and blocked a few ranges, so I'm letting you know they came back. I don't know if it makes sense to tag all of these. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
You blocked User:103.127.30.249 in March of this year, it appears that the editor is evading their block by using other account User:73.1.41.245. For example, the block IP created the article Whole Lotta Red without adding sources [1], the IP just recently recreated the article without adding sources also [2]. I don't know what who this editor is but the edits looks similar. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 03:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your kindness...;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NikoPAR ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I got locked out of FeiGao2020 and created another account (AprilAnon2020). That other account is inactive and as far as I'm aware hasn't been banned from anything so I'm not trying to avoid a ban or any form of sock puppetry — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnonApril2020 ( talk • contribs)
This probably won't happen because of the whole issue with User:Banana Mutant but would you have a problem with lowering the protection level for Template:Justice League characters and Template: Avengers characters. Mark Rhodes 12 ( talk) 20:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Not sure if it helps/hurts anything, but I saw your warning on this users page and their last three or four edits have been just more slandering. I gave them a fourth warning and it didn't really make them budge. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 00:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA.-- Cahk ( talk) 08:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi P, sorry to bug you with this, but I just blocked Trusha.daware for undisclosed paid editing based on on-site info and a touch of off-site info. Short story, Prajakta Koli is affiliated with One Digital Entertainment, an article that Trusha.daware created, so it seems like just a marketing team taking ownership of both topic articles. But I also notice Latika2301 seems rather interested in the Koli article as well. Is there any way you could look into the unraveling of whatever sock/meat ring-ery is happening there? If you want me to write up an SPI, I'd be happy to. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi P, could you clarify why you presumably declined the speedy here (even though it wasn't mine)? I have struggled at points to understand why some admins follow through and some remove. There doesn't seem to be a consistent rationale based on past new page reviewing I've done, and I'd like to have a firmer idea so future admins don't think I'm just indiscriminately CSD tagging articles. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 19:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Can you clarify to which master did the 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:0:0:0:0/64 IP range that you blocked belong to? Thanks. Gotitbro ( talk) 00:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Found this IP readily admitting to being a sock, see here. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 02:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, was unaware only the blocking admin is authorized to put the template. Won't happen again. Hillelfrei • talk • 20:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi P:
Would you be willing to revdel what I have flagged on Lululemon murder? Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 20:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
... for speaking my mind better than I could, while I slept, and often -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Article TwoSet Violin was hit with a wave of vandalism that meets Criteria #2 "Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material" [3] Last known good version was on 28 April 2020. Thanks in advance. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 14:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
The history of We Think the World of You, with which you've previously been involved. Thanks. Shadikk ( talk) 20:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
What can i do?, can you help me to upload my profile to wikipedia , because i want to get verified on instagram. My instagram id is @__mohitjaat__ Mohit Gulia Jhajjar ( talk) 14:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/Quilliam333 is obviously a Mrwallace05 sock. Same as before [4] [5] [6] with previous socks. [7] [8] [9]. 2402:1980:8249:4FE7:EC37:FA52:676F:E25B ( talk) 03:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
the sock with various evasions created this redirect page ( [10]), but user:Materialscientist who this time reverted all the sock edits, forgot to delete this page...I just wanted to draw both of your attention to this, to perform deletion. Regards( KIENGIR ( talk) 07:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC))
I see we found them at about the same time. There was more on the /48, going back about a month. I think I've reverted all the archive edits. In case you were assuming good faith, as I was at first, see Special:Diff/954269093. Do you think the unsourced article space edits should be rolled back as well, as presumed sneaky vandalism? Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 18:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Mr Bugti is a living person. Any details about him requires reliable sources. You edited false information and facts about him which you're not authorized to do. Remove the protection template so i can add reliable statements about him. He has a image and reputation to keep which you're intruding in. Aloha31 ( talk) 23:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
The information added previous were of trusted sources and reliable. It is not my personal disagreement, nor I feel it is. You're added edits are false and are just accusations which you might not be aware of. Mr. Bugti is a political leader and has human rights affairs, but you listed him as a terrorist which him and I won't appreciate. I'm aware of the our policies regarding illegitimate use of multiple accounts. People similar to your IP address have been editing it falsely since they day we created this page. So I suggest you remove your edits and the protection template Aloha31 ( talk) 10:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
Can you please revert the changes made by 72.227.160.141 and Aryeh10 (sockpuppets of the same user as banned Peteski 123, YYY613 and JIJJRG) back to my version (last update May 7 at 15:54)?
I have spent a lot of time providing the most historically accurate, balanced and non-biased version. I need my edits protected and locked from further attack by this user who is dedicated to destroying the reputation of Pat Day. He will not quit until his one-side negative attacks on Pat Day has completed destroyed his reputation. In addition to his attacks on the biography page, he has taken out dozens of big races that Pat Day won off the page. This is vandalism at its worst. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6C3:4081:A10:9861:3D6C:866A:F11C ( talk) 04:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Any way to get link to Michael J. Devlin page removed from Devlin surname page?
Secondly if not, can the name the biography page title be changed to Michael John Devlin?
MikeD2000 ( talk) 07:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for helping me find help on how to do things. JTZegers ( talk) 18:01, 13 May 2020 (UTC) |
![]() |
Here is some bubble tea to go with your brownie P. I've been meaning to stop by and say that I hope you and yours are safe and well in these crazy times. Best regards MarnetteD| Talk 19:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks for noticing this obvious issue. I have reported it at WP:RFPP. Has there been a report filed at WP:SPI? I wouldn't want to be duplicating requests. Cheers, RandomCanadian ( talk | contribs) 23:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Since you blocked the accounts, could you also leave a note or something at SPI report where I reported them. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 16:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey again! A new account for your consideration. It might also be time to semi this particular article too. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 14:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
I figured it was at least meat puppetry. I just hadn't see the whole fake game show thing in a while, I guess I was dumb enough to think they might have gotten the point and moved on... Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Please RevDel this. Thanks. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD balaji ( M•T•A• C) This message was left at 22:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I think admin protection was a little too harsh. I think Extended confirmed protection would be better since the only user that has been disruptively changing the page is not even close to the required edits for extended confirmed rights. OcelotCreeper ( talk) 16:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I saw some of the articles you've created and I was impressed. Do you think you could give me some tips on places to look to get started with writing an article from scratch? It looks like a bit of a daunting task given formatting challenges. If you are too busy feel free to disregard!
Warm regards, BasicsOnly ( talk) 19:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
...see this. Drmies ( talk) 02:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo. Rothschild1234 has been using the 114.5.250.143 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) IP for socking. As you blocked a previous sock, I was wondering if you can keep an eye on this one, and block it if the disruption continues. Regards. -- Urbanoc ( talk) 13:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
You might want to remove this unhelpful edit from an IP who seems to know an awful lot, as I would imagine it's going to be confusing to a newbie. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Could you check this page. It is from TRwiki. Thank you!-- Yiğitcank ( talk) 19:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
But they did not take to the main section :(-- Yiğitcank ( talk) 19:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay Thank you! I need to wait so then...-- Yiğitcank ( talk) 19:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirchindia ( talk • contribs) 03:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Jayasurya_Mayilsamy_(Blogger) i did not created this article may be if you help to develop this article for me please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirchindia ( talk • contribs) 03:52, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the rangeblock. I should spend the time figuring those out. We crossed paths; I removed talk page access while you were rangeblocking. My change didn't mess yours up, did it? -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Ponyo, I made several attempts to delete the userpage of new user MTV Hits, purloined from Legacypac, but I kept getting error messages saying it couldn't be deleted, or failed to be deleted, or similar. Isn't that odd? Did you have the same experience, since you merely blanked it? Bishonen | tålk 20:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC).
Hi Ponyo, maybe another Cloudkitty sock - User:CanIHaveSomeofJESUS (suspecting them because they also went to WT:RFA as one of their first actions to request administratorship - not super firm evidence, I know, but color me suspicious that two people did that in the same day). creffett ( talk) 00:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello P. Thanks for you efforts in talking to G. I was concerned when I saw this request to shut down the SA page. Best regards and enjoy your Sunday. MarnetteD| Talk 03:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I do not fully understand your edit that you made on the Saki Nakajima's page here 1, I have tried to add the Saki Nakajima's birth year, what happens is that the users of Japanese Wikipedia erroneously deleted the date of birth of the seiyu, now that there was no source and guess that, one already exists and well, they add it again. 148.0.96.73 ( talk) 04:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
You have gone too far you. You have reverted my edit yet it is true, what wrong with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.0.87.180 ( talk) 12:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
User:Wikiepedia015/sandbox looks awfully familiar. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 19:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, just wanted to say a quick thank you for your help over at RFPP. Always appreciate the help! -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Firstly thanks for protecting the article. Secondly, I don't believe it necessary for me to be making a case on the article's talk, as I have been purely removing unsourced speculation. Similarly why I continued to revert beyond 3RR, in accordance with the exceptions listed on the policy page. If you review the respective revisions you'll see that comparatively, the other entries (that were accidentally removed by your rv) all had citations to official MSFT documentation. While the other user persisted in introducing information (Along with abusive summaries) with no sourcing other than Reddit/Forum gossip and speculation. It'd be greatly appreciated if you could restore the lost sourced information, and prune the unsourced speculation. Thanks. 92.29.94.171 ( talk) 01:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hey! I just saw your page. Great work. Chandranshu Gupta 02:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC) |
You may wish to revoke TPA.-- Cahk ( talk) 07:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear administrator, Please, increase the security level of the article 'bp mandal' as it the victim of wrong editing and removal and distortion of statement sourced by a reliable source by an unauthorized/ unregistered editor. The sentence is correct and sourced by reliable source, though some unauthorized editors are creating vandalism. Deokalimuskabad ( talk) 11:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Please, increase the expiration date of protection to indefinite or for a year.Same unregistered person edits with different IP address. Deokalimuskabad ( talk) 15:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
The apparent sock Special:Contributions/Ali_Jaberian was a check user block, so I was unsure. But like you say, they have an uphill climb if they wish ti be unblocked. -- Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 16:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking me for a week. You didn't even review the circumstances of the block, and didn't even let me request a unblock appeal because you blocked my talk page. Thumbs up. Sounds like you didn't give a fuck. Matthewishere0 ( talk) 18:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey Ponyo, hope you are well. I saw you fully protected Andrew Garbarino for edit warring. I'm seeing the same editing behavior over at Mike LiPetri. The dispute is between the same two editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the protection and blocks around this Ponyo. The IPs look to be the return of Icewhiz ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (though I should add that it could be someone else) and I was clicking on the SPI page when I found that you had dealt with it. SPIs and 3RRs are such a time sink so I appreciat not having to spend time on this one. Unless you think I should :-) Best regards. MarnetteD| Talk 23:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey Ponyo, Can you take a look at my reply to you in " Ethnicity vs. citizenship". It's been over two weeks since I notified you. Kind Regards - TheseusHeLl ( talk) 00:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I hope you noticed my reply. - TheseusHeLl ( talk) 19:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my page to remove this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EDW88CBo-8
But that video is quite right: the Israeli cause is meet, right and just. Why are you removing the explanation of things that are right from this site? Marplesmustgo ( talk) 22:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking User:2600:8800:8C81:3600:44D6:A906:9414:5126. I seriously didn't know how much longer that was going to go on. JeffSpaceman ( talk) 23:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
Bravo: you are excellent. Drmies ( talk) 17:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Ponyo I see that you brought up again this issue and even made this page protected. I'm here to inform you that the issue COI/UPE has already been resolved. Accounts have already been disclosed and the article has gone through a numerous edits to improve notability. I'm asking for your assistance on this one since I can't "resubmit" the changes nor publish it. I hope you can review it and finally, move it back to the mainspace. Thank you. Kileyco17 ( talk) 00:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
I want to remove Air Canada fleet section content because the content has been transferred to Air Canada fleet need your opinion Ktdk ( talk) 01:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
and leave the summary of the fleet in Air Canada fleet section Ktdk ( talk) 01:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
You blocked Khicks2212 back in September, and I believe at least one other associated account before that. Now there's a new account, Kh122201. Leaves the exact same edit summaries ("fixed content on page", "added accurate content on page", etc.) and makes similar article edits. No doubt in my mind this is the same editor. Please have a look when you have a chance. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 14:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Ponyo: Could you provide some information regarding reliable sources which should be used in the articles. Thanks. C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂)
No explanation needed (electrochoc)/ 49.130.203.118 ( talk) 02:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
108.21.73.223 ( talk) 14:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Heres a cookie for blocking User:46.208.236.218, who was giving me trouble! SuperGoose007 (Honk!) 20:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
You have reverted back information to the page which are wrong and false information. I can prove to you with news links that will provide you with correct sources of information of Brahumdagh Bugti so I suggest you apply those please because I know Brahumdagh Bugti personally and some information added to the page currently are false. Please get back to me soon. Mohammad Jan Bugti ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi my little Ponyo. An IP, 2409:4042:E9F:14B0:0:0:6D08:E613, opened an ANI thread about revoking my admin tools for topic banning ScholarM, with no great success. [14] ScholarM denies having used the IP. I'm not even asking you about that, as I know CU's won't say anything about IPs, nor do I much care, but I was interested to see the suggestion here that the IP was actually used by Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah. So... do you see a connection between ScholarM and Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah? Bishonen | tålk 20:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC).
Hey there, Ponyo. I hope life's been treating you alright during this catastrophic year. I have a question about LTAs - one that has been at the back of my mind for several years. Way back when, the better part of a decade ago, somebody added a note on Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dragon2016, pertaining to a comment I made, in which I postured that Dragon2016 may have been impaired in some way. Now, I've always found it dubious to include such a notation attributed to me, as it was in passing and was naturally made in good faith, due to the odd and incomprehensible edits Dragon2016 was making. This raised another question that I haven't broached yet; is including notes about legitimate mental disorders appropriate on LTA pages? I ask, because the troll Zhoban - fifteen years and counting - claimed on another wiki that he has been diagnosed with Pervasive Personality Disorder, which is the root of his crude habits. Should notes about psychiatric diagnoses be stricken from pages? If so, I'd be happy to remove the note attributed to me. If not, it could add clarification to the Zhoban saga. DÅRTHBØTTØ ( T• C) 17:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Good afternoon Ponyo, I am looking for some advice please. I came across Template:No Sleep 'til Sudbury: Adventures in 80s Hard Rock and Metal Deconstruction in my recent changes patrolling. This seems to be an inapprorpiate use for a template from a new editor (who only seems to be here to promote his/her/their book) and I wondered if they were trying to create an article? Would this be an example of a G2 candidate? Many thanks. Agent00x ( talk) 22:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Oh great. Now he'll go back to UTRS. I just got him to respond on his talk page. (laughs, then weeps) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
He is Not compatible with a collaborative project. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I'm just curious on how to cite sources. Thanks! Tarantino101 ( talk) 22:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Tarantino101 ( talk) 23:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting Cum Town, could you do the same for Dasha Nekrasova? The same troll is posting the same thing over and over again on her page. I think its this guy User talk:Yellow-billed Loon, he's obsessed with her and keeps vandalising her page and Red Scare and nominating them for deletion. Pinchofhope ( talk) 00:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
There's a brand new editor on my page named Bishonen Kumari [sic], quoting the post by Aadhaar Gupta Columbo that you removed from Talk:Kayastha on 23 June. Anything..? I've asked them whose sock they are. Bishonen | tålk 20:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC).
I am firmly convinced that this editor is here to do nothing but troll us, based on a combination of his previous activity as an IP user, the totality of his rants on his user talk page, and his now current antics in his sandbox. Change my mind. Elizium23 ( talk) 02:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi.
Would you kindly suppress something for me? If you say yes, I will post rev-del'ed diffs here. —usernamekiran
(talk)
19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
hi ponyo thanks for the locking the edit section on the article of zorawar singh kalhuria , due to so much edit wars on the page . iam unable to handle the article again by reverting the edits made by several non wikipedia users from several i.p. addresses. this message is regarding the issue of some non referenced content and misleading type of texts in current version of article . i also made a edit request regarding that but no use of that till now. so matter is regarding onlt the first line of the article where it says "Zorawar Singh Kahluria (1784-1841) was a general of the Sikh Empire in the Indian subcontinent. He was subordinate to the Dogra ruler Gulab Singh, who was a vassal of the Sikh emperor Ranjit Singh.[4][5] In reference to his legacy of conquests in the Himalaya Mountains including Ladakh, Tibet, Baltistan and Iskardu as General and Vizier, he has been referred to as the "Napoleon of India",[6] and "Conqueror of Ladakh".[7][8]" according to the references and citations present in this article .it makes clear that zorawar singh kalhuria is the dogra general of the army of dogra maharaja gulab singh the maharaja gulab singh is the vassal of the sikh empire . so mentioning term he was general of sikh empire is quite misleading .it may be a previous edit by somebody ,so kindly don't associate sikh empire with zorawar singh term if you need more realible references by 19th century british historians books i can provide you here is references Frederick Drew, The Jummoo & Kashmir territories Alexander Cunningham, Ladak A. H. Francke, Antiquities of Indian Tibet Fisher, Rose, and Huttenback, The Himalayan Battle-ground
i raised this issue due to the fact the i found people got mislead by reading the first line and talking him as a sikh by the reading the first line of article ,i have seen multiple people twitter which got mislead by thinking that he is sikh by his identity although article mentions the his religion in early life and career section but most people don't go further upto that section by reading whole article beacause people nowdays just google the name and it shows the first line on google only ,thats why this is misleading in this way, for further info check talk page of zorawar singh kalhuria where the dispute of his religion is already solved in 2017-2018. so as a wikipedia community member i thought its my duty to raise this issue to respected admins . thanks waiting for your response -- Loneltrussia ( talk) 09:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |