Hi, I'm Historywiki11. Pohncl, thanks for creating Deadly (Rapper)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more sources, all of which you have added are from one source.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Historywiki11 ( talk) 19:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Pohncl,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Deadly (Rapper) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Historywiki11 ( talk) 05:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Deadly (Rapper)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Deadly (Rapper), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
- It appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted, or is eligible for deletion itself. (See section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Historywiki11 ( talk) 05:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello there, sorry but i couldn't find any references on the web concerning "Deadly rapper" and no YouTube videos. Hence, the relevance of this article wasn't found on Wikipedia. Visit WP:NOTE for notability guidelines on new articles and also WP:RELIABLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historywiki11 ( talk • contribs) 11:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, here are a few sources I put Deadly NODB into google, because of how common Deadly Rapper is not much may come up and also the Birmingham grime scene is not been as recognised as the London scene.
1) http://www.fabriclondon.com/blog/view/deadly-birminghams-big-mic-man 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar-nUr8Z-aw Video with 250k views 3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY_Q6jrRlVk 160k views 4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svL6r8R5qBI 140k views 5) Interview with Mayhem talking about among other things Deadly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSFwqVF_Xlg
Pohncl ( talk) 18:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I deleted your article because
- it did not have independent third party sources as I explained on my talk page, I assume you have read that. The original had two refs, one was a blog interview with him, he is obviously not an independent source, the other was a spam link to Amazon
- I can't see any evidence that he meets the music notability criteria, such as verified sales, awards, chart placings or the like. The fct that he exists isn't enough
- it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
- You had a link to a sales site.
- Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: helped to popularise Grime in Birmingham... one of the most popular being... he primarily views himself as a grime artist
- Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your group is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
- COI editors are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.Regardless, if you have a paid connection with the group, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pohncl. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pohncl|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I would advise to source for more external links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historywiki11 ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Poles in the United Kingdom without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
19:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Dominic Breazeale. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Historywiki11. Pohncl, thanks for creating Deadly (Rapper)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more sources, all of which you have added are from one source.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Historywiki11 ( talk) 19:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Pohncl,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Deadly (Rapper) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Historywiki11 ( talk) 05:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Deadly (Rapper)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Deadly (Rapper), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
- It appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted, or is eligible for deletion itself. (See section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Historywiki11 ( talk) 05:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello there, sorry but i couldn't find any references on the web concerning "Deadly rapper" and no YouTube videos. Hence, the relevance of this article wasn't found on Wikipedia. Visit WP:NOTE for notability guidelines on new articles and also WP:RELIABLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historywiki11 ( talk • contribs) 11:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, here are a few sources I put Deadly NODB into google, because of how common Deadly Rapper is not much may come up and also the Birmingham grime scene is not been as recognised as the London scene.
1) http://www.fabriclondon.com/blog/view/deadly-birminghams-big-mic-man 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar-nUr8Z-aw Video with 250k views 3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY_Q6jrRlVk 160k views 4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svL6r8R5qBI 140k views 5) Interview with Mayhem talking about among other things Deadly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSFwqVF_Xlg
Pohncl ( talk) 18:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I deleted your article because
- it did not have independent third party sources as I explained on my talk page, I assume you have read that. The original had two refs, one was a blog interview with him, he is obviously not an independent source, the other was a spam link to Amazon
- I can't see any evidence that he meets the music notability criteria, such as verified sales, awards, chart placings or the like. The fct that he exists isn't enough
- it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
- You had a link to a sales site.
- Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: helped to popularise Grime in Birmingham... one of the most popular being... he primarily views himself as a grime artist
- Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your group is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
- COI editors are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.Regardless, if you have a paid connection with the group, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pohncl. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pohncl|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I would advise to source for more external links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historywiki11 ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Poles in the United Kingdom without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
19:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Dominic Breazeale. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)