Welcome!
Hello, Platinumshore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Wipsenade (
talk) 11:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Not warring, just the television announcement went live, and I was merely correcting the phrase that was used. FACT. Big difference between INTEND and WILL.
Please stop edit-warring at
Egypt - everyone is aware of the situation but in Wikipedia we need to reference material properly and spend time ensuring that the text is to an encyclopedic standard. Note that the main article is already running on the political situation and
Egypt is not the right place to do quick updates. Thanks.
Jamesinderbyshire (
talk) 23:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Please review wp:RS and wp:BRD. Thank you. 173.10.73.233 ( talk) 20:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 206.188.60.1 ( talk) 21:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
This is to let you know that there is a discussion going on here at WP:ANI which concerns you. Fainites barley scribs 21:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Noted comments there, and thank you for bringing it to to my attention. My section on the effect of price of oil demand, although none conventional to base it on feedback effects (of which price is but one feedback mechanism) is totally valid, and been accessed by such international bodies as the International Monetary Fund (IMF). I therefore do not give it to 'mob rule' group think that there is a simple one to one relationship between price and demand at least at a regional level, however politically appealing it maybe in some political quarters. Note: I am obviously willing to accept editing, criticism, and any additions to my brief paragraph on the subject by other people, but totally deleting it or vandalism by a none registered user using a dynamic ip address ( 206.188.**.** ) coming from Washington state area I do not accept.
If 'the mob' succeed via group think in either banning my name or even ip address it will make no difference - the paragraph will remain on there one way or another. I do not give it to the group think of the mob lightly.
Agreed, no battle ground but why does someone keep reverting the article to a version with no citations, and then claims citations are necessary. reverting back again to one with the correct citations.
Welcome!
Hello, Platinumshore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Wipsenade (
talk) 11:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Not warring, just the television announcement went live, and I was merely correcting the phrase that was used. FACT. Big difference between INTEND and WILL.
Please stop edit-warring at
Egypt - everyone is aware of the situation but in Wikipedia we need to reference material properly and spend time ensuring that the text is to an encyclopedic standard. Note that the main article is already running on the political situation and
Egypt is not the right place to do quick updates. Thanks.
Jamesinderbyshire (
talk) 23:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Please review wp:RS and wp:BRD. Thank you. 173.10.73.233 ( talk) 20:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 206.188.60.1 ( talk) 21:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
This is to let you know that there is a discussion going on here at WP:ANI which concerns you. Fainites barley scribs 21:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Noted comments there, and thank you for bringing it to to my attention. My section on the effect of price of oil demand, although none conventional to base it on feedback effects (of which price is but one feedback mechanism) is totally valid, and been accessed by such international bodies as the International Monetary Fund (IMF). I therefore do not give it to 'mob rule' group think that there is a simple one to one relationship between price and demand at least at a regional level, however politically appealing it maybe in some political quarters. Note: I am obviously willing to accept editing, criticism, and any additions to my brief paragraph on the subject by other people, but totally deleting it or vandalism by a none registered user using a dynamic ip address ( 206.188.**.** ) coming from Washington state area I do not accept.
If 'the mob' succeed via group think in either banning my name or even ip address it will make no difference - the paragraph will remain on there one way or another. I do not give it to the group think of the mob lightly.
Agreed, no battle ground but why does someone keep reverting the article to a version with no citations, and then claims citations are necessary. reverting back again to one with the correct citations.