Copyright problems with File:Ano in ocean.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ano in ocean.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from Google Earth. As a copyright violation, File:Ano in ocean.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ano in ocean.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Ano in ocean.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Ano in ocean.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Ano in ocean.jpg]].
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. dave pape ( talk) 19:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Howdy, the image you uploaded, image:penelope_and_pup.jpg appears to have come from a website which claims a copyright over it. Unfortunately, Wikipedia can not accept material under copyright unless the owner has released it under a compatible license, or a fair use claim can be made. Since neither seemed evident, I have deleted the file. I am a fan of marine mammals myself (having studied sea lions for my master's degree), so I can especially appreciate your interest in expanding Wikipedia's coverage of these animals. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best wishes, -- TeaDrinker ( talk) 04:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This file as the fiel mentioned above is sourced from the TOPP website which does not have a content license that is compatible with Wikipedia and has consequenly been nominated for speedy deletion. For the images to be uploaded onto Wikipedia they will need to be either a) uploaded by the copyright holder/photographer as an own work and released under a compatible license or b) uploaded by you but specifically released by TOPP under a suitable permissive and compatible license, details of which permission need to be submitted via OTRS and attached to the upload. Any further questions please ask. Mfield ( talk) 07:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, please don't forget to include an edit summary with all your edits, it makes it much easier to track changes to articles (and to avoid your edits being scrutinized for vandalism as non use of the edit summary is a red flag to vandal patrollers). Mfield ( talk) 17:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Suggested move of Penelope seal to Tagging Of Pacific Predators (TOPP)
Hi, I have suggested moving this article into an article that covers the entire program as I feel it is unlikely to survive in its current format and that would be a shame. The program does not have its own article which does not help with assertions of notability of a single animal within the program. Merging this information in would provide readers with more complete context and there would be more independent referencing. Please discuss on article talk. thanks. Mfield ( talk) 18:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, nice work on the TOPP article, I have renamed it inline with our naming conventions, linked it up with the COML article, and removed the move proposal from Penelope seal. The penelope article does need more primary references for notability though still. I am not going to propose it get deleted but if someone were to (as these things happen often with marginal notability) then it could be merged in with TOPP. Some more primary media or scientific references would help with the notabiliy significantly. Mfield ( talk) 06:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Stelephant Colbert, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking ( talk) 02:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Stelephant Colbert, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stelephant Colbert. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mhking ( talk) 03:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TagsgettinggluedonP.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro (talk) 20:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Penelope-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains ( talk) 05:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Penelope at camera.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains ( talk) 05:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problems with File:Ano in ocean.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ano in ocean.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from Google Earth. As a copyright violation, File:Ano in ocean.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ano in ocean.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Ano in ocean.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Ano in ocean.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Ano in ocean.jpg]].
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. dave pape ( talk) 19:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Howdy, the image you uploaded, image:penelope_and_pup.jpg appears to have come from a website which claims a copyright over it. Unfortunately, Wikipedia can not accept material under copyright unless the owner has released it under a compatible license, or a fair use claim can be made. Since neither seemed evident, I have deleted the file. I am a fan of marine mammals myself (having studied sea lions for my master's degree), so I can especially appreciate your interest in expanding Wikipedia's coverage of these animals. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best wishes, -- TeaDrinker ( talk) 04:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This file as the fiel mentioned above is sourced from the TOPP website which does not have a content license that is compatible with Wikipedia and has consequenly been nominated for speedy deletion. For the images to be uploaded onto Wikipedia they will need to be either a) uploaded by the copyright holder/photographer as an own work and released under a compatible license or b) uploaded by you but specifically released by TOPP under a suitable permissive and compatible license, details of which permission need to be submitted via OTRS and attached to the upload. Any further questions please ask. Mfield ( talk) 07:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, please don't forget to include an edit summary with all your edits, it makes it much easier to track changes to articles (and to avoid your edits being scrutinized for vandalism as non use of the edit summary is a red flag to vandal patrollers). Mfield ( talk) 17:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Suggested move of Penelope seal to Tagging Of Pacific Predators (TOPP)
Hi, I have suggested moving this article into an article that covers the entire program as I feel it is unlikely to survive in its current format and that would be a shame. The program does not have its own article which does not help with assertions of notability of a single animal within the program. Merging this information in would provide readers with more complete context and there would be more independent referencing. Please discuss on article talk. thanks. Mfield ( talk) 18:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, nice work on the TOPP article, I have renamed it inline with our naming conventions, linked it up with the COML article, and removed the move proposal from Penelope seal. The penelope article does need more primary references for notability though still. I am not going to propose it get deleted but if someone were to (as these things happen often with marginal notability) then it could be merged in with TOPP. Some more primary media or scientific references would help with the notabiliy significantly. Mfield ( talk) 06:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Stelephant Colbert, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking ( talk) 02:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Stelephant Colbert, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stelephant Colbert. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mhking ( talk) 03:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TagsgettinggluedonP.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro (talk) 20:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Penelope-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains ( talk) 05:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Penelope at camera.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains ( talk) 05:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)