This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi, This is just to inform you that Daniel R. Gernatt, Jr. has been nominated by another editor for deletion. Daniellagreen (talk) (cont) 17:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piguy101, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Amir Segal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of notability, although the assertion(s) made may not be sufficient to pass the relevant notability guidelines (such a thing needs to be decided at WP:AFD). You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 12:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piguy101. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Healthy for Life to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 02:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
Please help me delete "Israel occupation forces," because the page is a slanderous and derogatory parody of the "Israel Defense forces" (the former page redirects to the latter). The Israel Occupation forces is a nonexistent entity and thus the page is inaccurate and does not belong on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.134.133 ( talk) 19:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I have added some articles that u have removed..... plz will u tell the story of birth of lord shiva......
Was the story I have added was wrong.....
I request u to plz correct my knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.185.225.20 ( talk) 13:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
As I m the new user I was not knowing much about editing.Thanks for sharing link about tutorial... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshay B Deokar ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
@Amrgalal: Nobody owns any Wikipedia pages. See WP:OWN. Having an account that seems to solely promote a company is criteria for blocking. See WP:BLOCK, WP:COI, and WP:SPAM. Please do not bring content disputes to the help desk. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Seriously? That's what you go around doing?
Not to mention that the entire section does not have a SINGLE citation. Not a one.
Please, do get a life. It is a very useful endeavor, causing much enjoyment to many people.--
85.92.230.183 (
talk)
19:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
-- 178.215.221.49 ( talk) 19:00, 17 August 2014 (UTC) YouTube Music Awards bay Bold text
This is a black comedy. As I wrote. 79.178.30.38 ( talk) 18:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I love to use Wikipedia to look up everything. I am a Jehovah's Witness & i googled blood transfusions. As I was doing so I came across this subject on Wikipedia. Some of content on that page was not accurate. As a big fan of Wikipedia it was quite disappointing, because it makes me question the accuracy on other subjects I have read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qu3enT93 ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello! A couple hours ago you canceled my edition, linking «good faith». Yesterday I have deleted redirection from Russian Academy of Arts to Imperial Academy of Arts because these are two absolutely separate subjects and more, as a structure complex, Russian Academy is a Head office in relation to Imperial one (though, the Imperial Academy, to put it more correctly, is historical phenomenon, many years ago it was turned to the exclusively educational institution named Repin Art Institute. Next. As «Russian Academy of Arts» is a functional Institution of our time, it has all-Russia concern; so the «Imperial Academy» fulfills today a function of high-quality art Institute and, I'm afraid, its meaning has only regional level. There is in English Wiki only article on SPb Academy, information about last time is reduced there to very small section. At the same time, most significant reformations into Russian Academy of Arts took place for two last decades. May be until the section «Current situation» of «Imperial Academy» become full, unfolded article, it will be difficult to understand the construction of the entire Academic system in Russia now. I had wrote a stub-article «Russian Academy of Arts» and I think you will see it may add some clarity to understanding this theme. And I would be grateful for stylistic improving my text. Thank you Yuracei ( talk) 02:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for helping a new contributor contribute. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Daniellagreen submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
I nominate Piguy101 for Editor of the Week for their insightful, supportive, and helpful comments and actions regarding two articles that I recently created on Wikipedia. Both OccultZone and Piguy101 are obviously familiar with policies and guidelines on Wikipedia, and have reflected their knowledge of them in their communications and actions regarding a particular editor who has been making edits to the articles that I would consider unproductive. My aim is to be a contributor, and to learn about how I can improve, and implement those improvements. OccultZone and Piguy101 have both reflected to me that they are being objective, and that they are doing their best to redirect the other editor in a more positive manner. Therefore, I would like to recognize these editors for their helpful comments; I am definitely learning more about procedures as a result of their input.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Piguy101 |
Piguy's Symbol |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning August 31, 2014 |
Insightful, supportive, and helpful comments to new editors that redirect discussions toward a more positive and constructive place. Over 5000 edits w/ 45% in article space. |
Recognized for |
Help Desk participation |
Notable work(s) |
Green High School (Green, Ohio) |
Nomination page |
Thanks again for your efforts! ``` Buster Seven Talk 17:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! | |
Hello Piguy101, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of {{U| Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for all you do. Faceless Enemy ( talk) 17:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC) |
You are right. In fact, that is the real reason I reverted the edit. Unfortunately, Huggle is missing a few categories of bad edits so I used a category that I hoped would send the message, figuring that if the edit was added again I would leave a specific message. I was a bit lazy. We are agreed that it was a bad edit in any event. Donner60 ( talk) 21:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Brother, It was a mistake. I've removed it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitrajofficial ( talk • contribs) 18:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I was undoing vandalism by that IP!-- QualityEncyclopedia ( talk) 16:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I didn't add "derpyday", I think the IP did it, reverted it, but I accidentally reverted it back in. Thanks for cleaning it up!-- QualityEncyclopedia ( talk) 17:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Thanks for resolving the "derpyday" issue! QualityEncyclopedia ( talk) 17:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC) |
See Sport of athletics and Athletics at the Summer Olympics. If he were in any other sport, he wouldn't be an athlete; he'd be a judoka, baseball player, swimmer, etc., but he wouldn't be an athlete. Nyttend ( talk) 21:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Israel DOES have an occupation force in Palestine. You are not the PC cops, stop acting like it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dead Messiah ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You know why
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
05:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
@ EvergreenFir: Hey thanks, I appreciate it. π♂101 ( talk) 05:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Please-- this is straight-up vandalism, and it's the second time they did that on this article. Please see the WP:BLP. Drmies ( talk) 01:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Piguy101. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi, This is just to inform you that Daniel R. Gernatt, Jr. has been nominated by another editor for deletion. Daniellagreen (talk) (cont) 17:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piguy101, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Amir Segal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of notability, although the assertion(s) made may not be sufficient to pass the relevant notability guidelines (such a thing needs to be decided at WP:AFD). You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 12:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piguy101. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Healthy for Life to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 02:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
Please help me delete "Israel occupation forces," because the page is a slanderous and derogatory parody of the "Israel Defense forces" (the former page redirects to the latter). The Israel Occupation forces is a nonexistent entity and thus the page is inaccurate and does not belong on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.134.133 ( talk) 19:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I have added some articles that u have removed..... plz will u tell the story of birth of lord shiva......
Was the story I have added was wrong.....
I request u to plz correct my knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.185.225.20 ( talk) 13:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
As I m the new user I was not knowing much about editing.Thanks for sharing link about tutorial... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshay B Deokar ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
@Amrgalal: Nobody owns any Wikipedia pages. See WP:OWN. Having an account that seems to solely promote a company is criteria for blocking. See WP:BLOCK, WP:COI, and WP:SPAM. Please do not bring content disputes to the help desk. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Seriously? That's what you go around doing?
Not to mention that the entire section does not have a SINGLE citation. Not a one.
Please, do get a life. It is a very useful endeavor, causing much enjoyment to many people.--
85.92.230.183 (
talk)
19:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
-- 178.215.221.49 ( talk) 19:00, 17 August 2014 (UTC) YouTube Music Awards bay Bold text
This is a black comedy. As I wrote. 79.178.30.38 ( talk) 18:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I love to use Wikipedia to look up everything. I am a Jehovah's Witness & i googled blood transfusions. As I was doing so I came across this subject on Wikipedia. Some of content on that page was not accurate. As a big fan of Wikipedia it was quite disappointing, because it makes me question the accuracy on other subjects I have read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qu3enT93 ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello! A couple hours ago you canceled my edition, linking «good faith». Yesterday I have deleted redirection from Russian Academy of Arts to Imperial Academy of Arts because these are two absolutely separate subjects and more, as a structure complex, Russian Academy is a Head office in relation to Imperial one (though, the Imperial Academy, to put it more correctly, is historical phenomenon, many years ago it was turned to the exclusively educational institution named Repin Art Institute. Next. As «Russian Academy of Arts» is a functional Institution of our time, it has all-Russia concern; so the «Imperial Academy» fulfills today a function of high-quality art Institute and, I'm afraid, its meaning has only regional level. There is in English Wiki only article on SPb Academy, information about last time is reduced there to very small section. At the same time, most significant reformations into Russian Academy of Arts took place for two last decades. May be until the section «Current situation» of «Imperial Academy» become full, unfolded article, it will be difficult to understand the construction of the entire Academic system in Russia now. I had wrote a stub-article «Russian Academy of Arts» and I think you will see it may add some clarity to understanding this theme. And I would be grateful for stylistic improving my text. Thank you Yuracei ( talk) 02:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for helping a new contributor contribute. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Daniellagreen submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
I nominate Piguy101 for Editor of the Week for their insightful, supportive, and helpful comments and actions regarding two articles that I recently created on Wikipedia. Both OccultZone and Piguy101 are obviously familiar with policies and guidelines on Wikipedia, and have reflected their knowledge of them in their communications and actions regarding a particular editor who has been making edits to the articles that I would consider unproductive. My aim is to be a contributor, and to learn about how I can improve, and implement those improvements. OccultZone and Piguy101 have both reflected to me that they are being objective, and that they are doing their best to redirect the other editor in a more positive manner. Therefore, I would like to recognize these editors for their helpful comments; I am definitely learning more about procedures as a result of their input.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Piguy101 |
Piguy's Symbol |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning August 31, 2014 |
Insightful, supportive, and helpful comments to new editors that redirect discussions toward a more positive and constructive place. Over 5000 edits w/ 45% in article space. |
Recognized for |
Help Desk participation |
Notable work(s) |
Green High School (Green, Ohio) |
Nomination page |
Thanks again for your efforts! ``` Buster Seven Talk 17:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! | |
Hello Piguy101, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of {{U| Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for all you do. Faceless Enemy ( talk) 17:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC) |
You are right. In fact, that is the real reason I reverted the edit. Unfortunately, Huggle is missing a few categories of bad edits so I used a category that I hoped would send the message, figuring that if the edit was added again I would leave a specific message. I was a bit lazy. We are agreed that it was a bad edit in any event. Donner60 ( talk) 21:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Brother, It was a mistake. I've removed it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitrajofficial ( talk • contribs) 18:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I was undoing vandalism by that IP!-- QualityEncyclopedia ( talk) 16:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I didn't add "derpyday", I think the IP did it, reverted it, but I accidentally reverted it back in. Thanks for cleaning it up!-- QualityEncyclopedia ( talk) 17:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Thanks for resolving the "derpyday" issue! QualityEncyclopedia ( talk) 17:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC) |
See Sport of athletics and Athletics at the Summer Olympics. If he were in any other sport, he wouldn't be an athlete; he'd be a judoka, baseball player, swimmer, etc., but he wouldn't be an athlete. Nyttend ( talk) 21:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Israel DOES have an occupation force in Palestine. You are not the PC cops, stop acting like it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dead Messiah ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You know why
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
05:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
@ EvergreenFir: Hey thanks, I appreciate it. π♂101 ( talk) 05:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Please-- this is straight-up vandalism, and it's the second time they did that on this article. Please see the WP:BLP. Drmies ( talk) 01:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Piguy101. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |