![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Phoenix79/Archive_3. |
The article looks good. I just don't know why these "Bose-bashers" want to have a piece of the article. While I liked the way you refined the article a lot, there are only two minor things I want to discuss about:
Otherwise, I really liked the new collapse coding you did on the article. However, the QuietComfort 3 Headphones is still my recommended Bose Headphones. I tried out the Bose IE "Earbuds" and they sound OK, but they don't cancel out sound—you won't be able to demo out the IE due to sanitary reasons.
I'm just recommending what to do right now, but as of this time, I'm not going to make any radical edits. — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 15:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi UKPhoenix79, (any relation with Dumbledore's Phoenix by the way?) Thanks for your support on amg and for your subtle changes that still make it visible when existing in infoboxes. I hope some more support will turn up soon or we'll have to forget it. Hoverfish 10:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
There was already a discussion, that was a lot like a straw poll. Since AMG did not win, it is no longer in the infobox. It was a way of coming to a conlusion. It technically stands because as I saw in the these discussions, it was added without discssion. Therefore, we were voting whether or not to include it, not whether or not to remove it (for the first time). I will revert it back if you do not comment by 3 November 2006 0:00. Please help me understand why you removed it. (not that I don't expect you to, I'm just in the mood to set deadlines) Cbrown1023 00:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I thought that I'd point out a few things about polls to help clarify any confusion [I hope you guys dont mind :) ]
I hope these help -- UKPhoenix79 00:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Regarding your edit [1] to the V for Vendetta (film) article, please see the no original research policy for our policy on adding your own original ideas to articles. -- The Anome 23:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
This edit summary seems totally wrong. It could be a botched revert (eg, too far back into the revision history), except that the previous edit was left unmarred, and the only visible change was reintroducing the disputed paragraph. I have no opinion on the matter itself, but I would like some clarification of your intended meaning in the edit summary. NB - this is a dynamic IP, so replying on that talkpage will likely be a waste of time; here or on Talk:V for Vendetta would probably be best. -- 88.111.156.100 00:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Phoenix. (Just read your message on my talk now.) Thanks for the welcome back, though I won't be here for long though, just for Bonfire Night and maybe a week after. I'll be available to resolve the V5 issue though. It's a legitimate theme, and I don't think we have to reference every single statement there. Talk to you later.-- P-Chan 03:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the
edit summary or on the article's
talk page. Take a look at our
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please take my changes seriously. See the discussion on Talk:V for Vendetta. Please assume good faith. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.235.250.66 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok, that: "please work with us" was funny. I'm trying to improve the article here, you (collectively) are reverting while destorying data. Assume good faith and contribute to the fracking discussion!—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
217.235.250.66 (
talk •
contribs)
23:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles. It is considered
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Also, this is not a joke. You deleted my contributions, all the while demanding constructive work form me. How does that make sense?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.235.250.66 ( talk • contribs) 23:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to bring the issue up again, but I feel bad; just look at his talk page... it seems like we are all attacking him... :( (this is of course not implying that he is a man, it is just that it is easier to type in the masculine pronoun...) Cbrown1023 02:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
:¦:- -:¦:- []_____ -:¦:- ¸...¸ __/ \/\____ ,·´º o `·,/__/ _/\_ //____/\ ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | || |l±±±±,,,, ,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸.´
Around the house
I like it... :-) Cbrown1023 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Please don't make edits like this -- I personally don't care, but the altering of other editor's signed comments upsets many people. If you want someone to strike an objection during an FA discussion, ask them to do it themselves. Jkelly 20:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I've reinstated the nom to WP:FAR pending consensus, and left a note for Joelr31 ( talk · contribs) here, so that the nom can be closed properly with a record of concerns addressed and consensus. Regards, Sandy ( Talk) 14:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry Christmas to you too! Thank you. Ian¹³ /t 12:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I wished your Christmas went well, and I also wish you a Happy New Year! — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 14:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the message! Happy holidays to you too. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HoneyBee ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC).
From the E-Mails I've received from you, it appears that PtkFgs is becoming incivil of sorts. He apparently isn't assuming good faith to what I know. I'm not sure if this is becoming heated. I have to work from 8:30am-5pm CST but I'll look into Wikipedia accordingly.
Did you leave any comments on Ptkfgs's user page? I'm going to have to declare Ptkfgs's recent aggression towards you as an act of incivility if it's so. You might want to leave out a notice at WP:ANI if ptkfgs's incivility persists. — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 12:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Tila Tequila#Introduction NPOV dispute. -- wL< speak· check· chill> 19:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about not using the preview function - I'll be more careful from now on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASH1977LAW ( talk • contribs) 11:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
hi, how are you? i was wondering whether you can help me expand Quentin MacLeod article to be a better article? Thanks! HoneyBee 16:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
And yet you continued to call anybody a vandal that reverted your content. Look I don't know why these had to become so escalated as wikipedia try's to encourage bold edits, but once you had other editors stating that they disagreed with your edits and would want you to let them know why you thought that way you let them know and not be aggressive about it. Removing good faith warnings on your talk page also shows your unwillingness to work with other editors especially when you threaten them. Look just show some verifiable sources stating what you say that it is not conical that is all anybody has said. -- UKPhoenix79 22:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not post any further invalid warnings to my talk page, or I will report you. Also, please sign your posts. Joe Dick 21:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do get an admin involved. Joe Dick 21:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thanks for your help. *sigh* i dunno how you do it everytime. i can't keep up with wikipedia all the time. again, thank you for always giving a hand when others need it :) HoneyBee 19:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I believe you are mistaken about the definition on the happy number page, and I have reverted your changes again. Please discuss this on the talk page before makng changes again. The issue seems to be that the phrase "or produces an infinite loop" is part of the definition of the process, not the definition of a happy number. The definition, as stated in the first part of the sentence, requires that the process result in 1 in order for a given number to be happy. With the changes you've made, it is unclear how the process terminates if the number is not happy (and so the process is ill-defined (or, read another way, you suggest that the process always ends in 1)). Cheers, Doctormatt 23:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
On your day, I wish for you I wish you fine and simple pleasures. Happy birthday, dear Phoenix! |
![]() |
I hope you enjoy your birthday and may your wishes come true. |
Cheers and best wishes from Canada! ;-) -- Rob NS 00:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Have a great day! (lemonflash) talk 00:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- BigBrotherIsWatchingYou 09:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Look's like we are going to have to keep an eye on this user who keeps replacing the HL movie posters which one's that have false copyright licences, and sometimes none at all. Stormin' Foreman 08:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Taken from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Image
if you follow the link provided you will see that this is indeed the original
US style-A version
[2]. What you are putting up is the incorrect Italian Style A version. This is an American movie that was first released in the states. If you were to look at other foreign films like the original Japanese
Godzilla you will see that it is the Japanese poster not he US poster that was released years later.
Life Is Beautiful got many academy awards in the US and they use the Italian poster,
The Triplets of Belleville was a French animated feature that had no French spoken throughout the film, only a few songs like the title song was in French, also released in the US, a French poster is used.
I hope that I have made my point :-) I know that you mean well but I am keeping with the policy in using the poster that was used first in the country of origin. So I hope you don't mind but I'm going to revert the image again to the American original version. If there is an issue with this, even though I believe that the wikipedia policies back me up on this one we should take this to the WikiProject Films talk pages either
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films or
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines. It seams that this user
User:SkierRMH helps people with image disputes also. Please don't take offense at my actions as none is intended, but please if there is an issue we should either keep the US original version up or remove both images until this is resolved :-) --
UKPhoenix79
07:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
While I can appreciate the reasoning behind removing both images in contention until the matter is resolved, we need to keep in mind that the article is still 'live.' With that in mind, i've placed a placeholder image (one you recommended) that I've uploaded with an appropriate summary, etc. Frankly, I could live with this image - at least its in English, and its authenticity is not in question. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 11:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Let's sidestep the issue and go with the DVD image currently serving as a placeholder image. Le tme know if this is an acceptable alternative. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 23:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
The Immortal Edition DVD cover is more indicative of the whole highlander mythos. As I said earlier it shows: MacLeod, his katana, Glenfinnin, "Quickening" Lightning, New York City. The current has MacLeod on a hill top (Big Deal). It's also a Resion 2 DVD cover which most U.S. users would't recognize. I also think [User:Arcayne]] has srious ownership issues; he actually suggested I should ask for permission before making an edit and then flatly changed the image back to his liking when he didn't like it. The only rationale that he gave was that it was "too crowded"; (mere opinion). My rationale is not opionion it is fact; the cover shows many more elements of "Highlander". Rather then get in an edit war I am making very logical arguments of why the new image should replace the other. FrankWilliams 21:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
No there is not a disagreement about which one is the original. The one that is there now is the one that was always there. I'm proposing changing it to the new one which is better for the purposes of the article for reasons stated above. FrankWilliams 18:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't blowng you off. UKP. Panzer-Davis were swallowed up by a large studio, and it took me some time to track them down. They are sending me a few images that were used as original posters for the film. Indeed, the b&w was in fact used, but only after they had run out of the original, 4-color image (the one I recall). The image they are sending is the poster in question, with the English titling. I certainly hope that will do for you, bc I did spend a bit of money in long distance charges to get in contact with them, playing phone tag and follow-up. As soon as I get it, I'll pop you a message —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcayne ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm thinking about starting a WikiProject dedicated to everything Highlander, I was wondering if you were interested... If so please see here Stormin' Foreman 12:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC) UPDATE: I'm about to start the project in the next couple of days; What do you think about this being our userbox?
![]() | This user is a member of WikiProject Highlander |
Absolutely! Thanks for inviting me. Although I hardly created/edited any articles nowadays (fatigue/fighting/arguing), but definitely yes. I've been busy editing some stuff for Indonesia Wikiproject too, we just been featured a week ago :) I am also in holiday, dunno when I'm going back to full editing in wikipedia. Have a nice summer! HoneyBee 02:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Hi HoneyBee. I just though that you should know that someone has started up a Highlander WikiProject and since you created most of the Highlander pages I think that you might want to join :-) But anyway enjoy your vacation!
What right have YOU got to remove a technical review of Bose speakers from an entry about Bose?
Does the truth hurt too much?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.206.242.200 ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
UKPhoenix, if it were a GOOD review, you wouldn't remove it, would you? You're removing it because you personally disagree with it. You should leave the link so that other people can make up their own minds. Don't be such a f***ing "school prefect". Why do you care so much about Bose anyway? Seems to me like you probably work for them or have some other connection with the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.206.242.200 ( talk) 21:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi UKPhoenix79, regarding the success or failure of Bose's attempt to sue Consumer Reports, if you have a source that shows that they eventually prevailed in another court, then I'm all for having that in there. Exactly which "higher" court were you referring to that later sided with Bose? Given what's already documented on the case, I'm a little surprised by your insistence that Bose was successful, given the citations. I read the NY Times report on the Supreme Court decision - it's extremely clear that the matter was settled in favour of Consumer Reports on 1st amendment grounds. What exactly is your concern with clarification word, "unsuccessfully", in the first sentence of that section? Regards Mattnad 11:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Pretty funny - that other editor. Goes to show there are as many opinions as topics out there. Have a good one. Mattnad 15:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
As someone who took part in the editing of List of largest empires, you might be interested in trying to help in this case. Thank you. PocketMoon 11:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I think you are misleading people by listing secondary video and audio as mandatory for blu-ray players. First off **NO** players even have this feature yet. Furthermore even if some players have this feature, its not mandatory for all players, its just mandatory for Bonus View players, and the note makes it clear that bonus view will be mandatory on future players. Thus it would be best to leave it as "Optional (Bonus View players only)" -- Ray andrew 02:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Phoenix79/Archive_3. |
The article looks good. I just don't know why these "Bose-bashers" want to have a piece of the article. While I liked the way you refined the article a lot, there are only two minor things I want to discuss about:
Otherwise, I really liked the new collapse coding you did on the article. However, the QuietComfort 3 Headphones is still my recommended Bose Headphones. I tried out the Bose IE "Earbuds" and they sound OK, but they don't cancel out sound—you won't be able to demo out the IE due to sanitary reasons.
I'm just recommending what to do right now, but as of this time, I'm not going to make any radical edits. — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 15:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi UKPhoenix79, (any relation with Dumbledore's Phoenix by the way?) Thanks for your support on amg and for your subtle changes that still make it visible when existing in infoboxes. I hope some more support will turn up soon or we'll have to forget it. Hoverfish 10:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
There was already a discussion, that was a lot like a straw poll. Since AMG did not win, it is no longer in the infobox. It was a way of coming to a conlusion. It technically stands because as I saw in the these discussions, it was added without discssion. Therefore, we were voting whether or not to include it, not whether or not to remove it (for the first time). I will revert it back if you do not comment by 3 November 2006 0:00. Please help me understand why you removed it. (not that I don't expect you to, I'm just in the mood to set deadlines) Cbrown1023 00:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I thought that I'd point out a few things about polls to help clarify any confusion [I hope you guys dont mind :) ]
I hope these help -- UKPhoenix79 00:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Regarding your edit [1] to the V for Vendetta (film) article, please see the no original research policy for our policy on adding your own original ideas to articles. -- The Anome 23:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
This edit summary seems totally wrong. It could be a botched revert (eg, too far back into the revision history), except that the previous edit was left unmarred, and the only visible change was reintroducing the disputed paragraph. I have no opinion on the matter itself, but I would like some clarification of your intended meaning in the edit summary. NB - this is a dynamic IP, so replying on that talkpage will likely be a waste of time; here or on Talk:V for Vendetta would probably be best. -- 88.111.156.100 00:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Phoenix. (Just read your message on my talk now.) Thanks for the welcome back, though I won't be here for long though, just for Bonfire Night and maybe a week after. I'll be available to resolve the V5 issue though. It's a legitimate theme, and I don't think we have to reference every single statement there. Talk to you later.-- P-Chan 03:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the
edit summary or on the article's
talk page. Take a look at our
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please take my changes seriously. See the discussion on Talk:V for Vendetta. Please assume good faith. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.235.250.66 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok, that: "please work with us" was funny. I'm trying to improve the article here, you (collectively) are reverting while destorying data. Assume good faith and contribute to the fracking discussion!—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
217.235.250.66 (
talk •
contribs)
23:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles. It is considered
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Also, this is not a joke. You deleted my contributions, all the while demanding constructive work form me. How does that make sense?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.235.250.66 ( talk • contribs) 23:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to bring the issue up again, but I feel bad; just look at his talk page... it seems like we are all attacking him... :( (this is of course not implying that he is a man, it is just that it is easier to type in the masculine pronoun...) Cbrown1023 02:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
:¦:- -:¦:- []_____ -:¦:- ¸...¸ __/ \/\____ ,·´º o `·,/__/ _/\_ //____/\ ```)¨(´´´ | | | | | | | || |l±±±±,,,, ,.-·²°´ ¸,.-·~·~·-.,¸.´
Around the house
I like it... :-) Cbrown1023 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Please don't make edits like this -- I personally don't care, but the altering of other editor's signed comments upsets many people. If you want someone to strike an objection during an FA discussion, ask them to do it themselves. Jkelly 20:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I've reinstated the nom to WP:FAR pending consensus, and left a note for Joelr31 ( talk · contribs) here, so that the nom can be closed properly with a record of concerns addressed and consensus. Regards, Sandy ( Talk) 14:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Merry Christmas to you too! Thank you. Ian¹³ /t 12:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I wished your Christmas went well, and I also wish you a Happy New Year! — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 14:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the message! Happy holidays to you too. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HoneyBee ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC).
From the E-Mails I've received from you, it appears that PtkFgs is becoming incivil of sorts. He apparently isn't assuming good faith to what I know. I'm not sure if this is becoming heated. I have to work from 8:30am-5pm CST but I'll look into Wikipedia accordingly.
Did you leave any comments on Ptkfgs's user page? I'm going to have to declare Ptkfgs's recent aggression towards you as an act of incivility if it's so. You might want to leave out a notice at WP:ANI if ptkfgs's incivility persists. — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 12:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Tila Tequila#Introduction NPOV dispute. -- wL< speak· check· chill> 19:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about not using the preview function - I'll be more careful from now on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASH1977LAW ( talk • contribs) 11:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
hi, how are you? i was wondering whether you can help me expand Quentin MacLeod article to be a better article? Thanks! HoneyBee 16:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
And yet you continued to call anybody a vandal that reverted your content. Look I don't know why these had to become so escalated as wikipedia try's to encourage bold edits, but once you had other editors stating that they disagreed with your edits and would want you to let them know why you thought that way you let them know and not be aggressive about it. Removing good faith warnings on your talk page also shows your unwillingness to work with other editors especially when you threaten them. Look just show some verifiable sources stating what you say that it is not conical that is all anybody has said. -- UKPhoenix79 22:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not post any further invalid warnings to my talk page, or I will report you. Also, please sign your posts. Joe Dick 21:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do get an admin involved. Joe Dick 21:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thanks for your help. *sigh* i dunno how you do it everytime. i can't keep up with wikipedia all the time. again, thank you for always giving a hand when others need it :) HoneyBee 19:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I believe you are mistaken about the definition on the happy number page, and I have reverted your changes again. Please discuss this on the talk page before makng changes again. The issue seems to be that the phrase "or produces an infinite loop" is part of the definition of the process, not the definition of a happy number. The definition, as stated in the first part of the sentence, requires that the process result in 1 in order for a given number to be happy. With the changes you've made, it is unclear how the process terminates if the number is not happy (and so the process is ill-defined (or, read another way, you suggest that the process always ends in 1)). Cheers, Doctormatt 23:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
On your day, I wish for you I wish you fine and simple pleasures. Happy birthday, dear Phoenix! |
![]() |
I hope you enjoy your birthday and may your wishes come true. |
Cheers and best wishes from Canada! ;-) -- Rob NS 00:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Have a great day! (lemonflash) talk 00:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- BigBrotherIsWatchingYou 09:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Look's like we are going to have to keep an eye on this user who keeps replacing the HL movie posters which one's that have false copyright licences, and sometimes none at all. Stormin' Foreman 08:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Taken from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Image
if you follow the link provided you will see that this is indeed the original
US style-A version
[2]. What you are putting up is the incorrect Italian Style A version. This is an American movie that was first released in the states. If you were to look at other foreign films like the original Japanese
Godzilla you will see that it is the Japanese poster not he US poster that was released years later.
Life Is Beautiful got many academy awards in the US and they use the Italian poster,
The Triplets of Belleville was a French animated feature that had no French spoken throughout the film, only a few songs like the title song was in French, also released in the US, a French poster is used.
I hope that I have made my point :-) I know that you mean well but I am keeping with the policy in using the poster that was used first in the country of origin. So I hope you don't mind but I'm going to revert the image again to the American original version. If there is an issue with this, even though I believe that the wikipedia policies back me up on this one we should take this to the WikiProject Films talk pages either
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films or
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines. It seams that this user
User:SkierRMH helps people with image disputes also. Please don't take offense at my actions as none is intended, but please if there is an issue we should either keep the US original version up or remove both images until this is resolved :-) --
UKPhoenix79
07:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
While I can appreciate the reasoning behind removing both images in contention until the matter is resolved, we need to keep in mind that the article is still 'live.' With that in mind, i've placed a placeholder image (one you recommended) that I've uploaded with an appropriate summary, etc. Frankly, I could live with this image - at least its in English, and its authenticity is not in question. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 11:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Let's sidestep the issue and go with the DVD image currently serving as a placeholder image. Le tme know if this is an acceptable alternative. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 23:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
The Immortal Edition DVD cover is more indicative of the whole highlander mythos. As I said earlier it shows: MacLeod, his katana, Glenfinnin, "Quickening" Lightning, New York City. The current has MacLeod on a hill top (Big Deal). It's also a Resion 2 DVD cover which most U.S. users would't recognize. I also think [User:Arcayne]] has srious ownership issues; he actually suggested I should ask for permission before making an edit and then flatly changed the image back to his liking when he didn't like it. The only rationale that he gave was that it was "too crowded"; (mere opinion). My rationale is not opionion it is fact; the cover shows many more elements of "Highlander". Rather then get in an edit war I am making very logical arguments of why the new image should replace the other. FrankWilliams 21:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
No there is not a disagreement about which one is the original. The one that is there now is the one that was always there. I'm proposing changing it to the new one which is better for the purposes of the article for reasons stated above. FrankWilliams 18:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't blowng you off. UKP. Panzer-Davis were swallowed up by a large studio, and it took me some time to track them down. They are sending me a few images that were used as original posters for the film. Indeed, the b&w was in fact used, but only after they had run out of the original, 4-color image (the one I recall). The image they are sending is the poster in question, with the English titling. I certainly hope that will do for you, bc I did spend a bit of money in long distance charges to get in contact with them, playing phone tag and follow-up. As soon as I get it, I'll pop you a message —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcayne ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm thinking about starting a WikiProject dedicated to everything Highlander, I was wondering if you were interested... If so please see here Stormin' Foreman 12:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC) UPDATE: I'm about to start the project in the next couple of days; What do you think about this being our userbox?
![]() | This user is a member of WikiProject Highlander |
Absolutely! Thanks for inviting me. Although I hardly created/edited any articles nowadays (fatigue/fighting/arguing), but definitely yes. I've been busy editing some stuff for Indonesia Wikiproject too, we just been featured a week ago :) I am also in holiday, dunno when I'm going back to full editing in wikipedia. Have a nice summer! HoneyBee 02:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC) Hi HoneyBee. I just though that you should know that someone has started up a Highlander WikiProject and since you created most of the Highlander pages I think that you might want to join :-) But anyway enjoy your vacation!
What right have YOU got to remove a technical review of Bose speakers from an entry about Bose?
Does the truth hurt too much?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.206.242.200 ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
UKPhoenix, if it were a GOOD review, you wouldn't remove it, would you? You're removing it because you personally disagree with it. You should leave the link so that other people can make up their own minds. Don't be such a f***ing "school prefect". Why do you care so much about Bose anyway? Seems to me like you probably work for them or have some other connection with the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.206.242.200 ( talk) 21:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi UKPhoenix79, regarding the success or failure of Bose's attempt to sue Consumer Reports, if you have a source that shows that they eventually prevailed in another court, then I'm all for having that in there. Exactly which "higher" court were you referring to that later sided with Bose? Given what's already documented on the case, I'm a little surprised by your insistence that Bose was successful, given the citations. I read the NY Times report on the Supreme Court decision - it's extremely clear that the matter was settled in favour of Consumer Reports on 1st amendment grounds. What exactly is your concern with clarification word, "unsuccessfully", in the first sentence of that section? Regards Mattnad 11:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Pretty funny - that other editor. Goes to show there are as many opinions as topics out there. Have a good one. Mattnad 15:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
As someone who took part in the editing of List of largest empires, you might be interested in trying to help in this case. Thank you. PocketMoon 11:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I think you are misleading people by listing secondary video and audio as mandatory for blu-ray players. First off **NO** players even have this feature yet. Furthermore even if some players have this feature, its not mandatory for all players, its just mandatory for Bonus View players, and the note makes it clear that bonus view will be mandatory on future players. Thus it would be best to leave it as "Optional (Bonus View players only)" -- Ray andrew 02:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)