Welcome!
Hello, Petey Parrot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Wernher von Braun. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Wlmg (
talk)
23:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not create attack pages as you did at Lee Munson. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 19:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hard to believe you thought this was an appropriate edit. Whether you were being serious or making a joke you're clearly very bad at this and should stop editing. 96.236.148.103 ( talk) 04:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
2011 Libyan uprising, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.--
Hon-3s-T (
talk)
02:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Arab Spring. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please keep OR, such as the definition you put of a masscre and your own POV out of the article. Please also go to Talk:Arab_Spring#Golan_Heights_Uprising.3F, where your edits are being discussed as well as your own POV. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 00:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, please see Talk:Israel_–_United_States_relations#CNN_polls_2011. Thanks, u n☯ mi 02:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Talk:Arab Spring. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. . If you make any more comments like this relating to an editor's religion you are likely to be blocked. Religious bigotry expressed either in attacks on editors or in edits to articles is not something that should be tolerated.
Dougweller (
talk)
06:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Comcast.
Seaphoto
Talk
07:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Please note that I have placed a WP:1RR limit on this article per an Arbitration Committee decision. Dougweller ( talk) 09:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
A report has been opened at the BLP noticeboard regarding your edit at this article, Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Can_we_call_Carlos_the_Jackal_a_terrorist.3F please comment there your rationale for the change and provide WP:RS to support your change, thank you. Off2riorob ( talk) 09:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Barack Obama. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SMP0328. ( talk) 14:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
01:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Talk:2011 Libyan civil war, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I see you ignored my earlier warning. Given that and other problems with your editing, I am giving you a final warning. Please take this seriously.
Dougweller (
talk)
11:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
WASP-17b, please cite a
reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Donald Albury
10:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to ignore all the negative feedback you have on your user page discussion for now.
While I thank you for your contribution to the timeline, it is best to represent both sides of an issue, whenever possible. Your post was entirely pro-Gaddafi and I have edited it accordingly to represent both sides of the issue, as this content was available in your sources. Also, try to be a bit more concise in timeline postings as it is a lengthy article to begin with. Lastly, please use the {{
cite news}}
tag when citing sources from news media. I have fixed those accordingly too, so you can go look at the code if you are unsure.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my user page. Daniel Musto ( talk) 20:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~~
EBE123~~
talk
Contribs
13:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
03:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Gay Free Zone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs)
17:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. -- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
A recent edit suggestion by you was reverted. Please add things in a historical and respective matter rather then the trivial commercialization of a political. Obama poop doll? Seriously? Phearson ( talk) 05:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Anne Frank tree, you may be
blocked from editing. if you keep on quoting sources as you like, but not as the source says you will find yourself blocked and reverted!
noclador (
talk)
21:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
05:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
[1]. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.
WegianWarrior (
talk)
14:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dougweller (
talk)
20:52, 17 June 2011 (UTC)I have just extended your block to 60 hours, based on your above response. Please take this time to reflect on your behavior. -- Donald Albury 08:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Cowboy diplomacy, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
noclador (
talk)
14:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
A thread has been opened in WP:ANI involving you. Please visit it when you can. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 17:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey Shalom boy, is this why Israel needs everyone else to fight for them, they're just not battlefield ready with their Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndromes, gay bowel syndrome, etc?
Petey Parrot ( talk) 00:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Enough already .. blocked your talk page too, If you decide you honestly want to edit here ,, email the arbs ,,, I'll grab you the link shortly,
The article Stonewall Miner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable company. No significant coverage except noting its bankruptcy, went kaput before first development ever broke ground.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Pais
arepa
02:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Petey Parrot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Wernher von Braun. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Wlmg (
talk)
23:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not create attack pages as you did at Lee Munson. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 19:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hard to believe you thought this was an appropriate edit. Whether you were being serious or making a joke you're clearly very bad at this and should stop editing. 96.236.148.103 ( talk) 04:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
2011 Libyan uprising, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.--
Hon-3s-T (
talk)
02:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Arab Spring. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please keep OR, such as the definition you put of a masscre and your own POV out of the article. Please also go to Talk:Arab_Spring#Golan_Heights_Uprising.3F, where your edits are being discussed as well as your own POV. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 00:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, please see Talk:Israel_–_United_States_relations#CNN_polls_2011. Thanks, u n☯ mi 02:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Talk:Arab Spring. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. . If you make any more comments like this relating to an editor's religion you are likely to be blocked. Religious bigotry expressed either in attacks on editors or in edits to articles is not something that should be tolerated.
Dougweller (
talk)
06:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Comcast.
Seaphoto
Talk
07:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Please note that I have placed a WP:1RR limit on this article per an Arbitration Committee decision. Dougweller ( talk) 09:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
A report has been opened at the BLP noticeboard regarding your edit at this article, Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Can_we_call_Carlos_the_Jackal_a_terrorist.3F please comment there your rationale for the change and provide WP:RS to support your change, thank you. Off2riorob ( talk) 09:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Barack Obama. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SMP0328. ( talk) 14:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
01:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Talk:2011 Libyan civil war, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I see you ignored my earlier warning. Given that and other problems with your editing, I am giving you a final warning. Please take this seriously.
Dougweller (
talk)
11:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
WASP-17b, please cite a
reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Donald Albury
10:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to ignore all the negative feedback you have on your user page discussion for now.
While I thank you for your contribution to the timeline, it is best to represent both sides of an issue, whenever possible. Your post was entirely pro-Gaddafi and I have edited it accordingly to represent both sides of the issue, as this content was available in your sources. Also, try to be a bit more concise in timeline postings as it is a lengthy article to begin with. Lastly, please use the {{
cite news}}
tag when citing sources from news media. I have fixed those accordingly too, so you can go look at the code if you are unsure.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my user page. Daniel Musto ( talk) 20:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~~
EBE123~~
talk
Contribs
13:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
03:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Gay Free Zone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs)
17:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. -- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
A recent edit suggestion by you was reverted. Please add things in a historical and respective matter rather then the trivial commercialization of a political. Obama poop doll? Seriously? Phearson ( talk) 05:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Anne Frank tree, you may be
blocked from editing. if you keep on quoting sources as you like, but not as the source says you will find yourself blocked and reverted!
noclador (
talk)
21:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
05:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
[1]. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.
WegianWarrior (
talk)
14:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dougweller (
talk)
20:52, 17 June 2011 (UTC)I have just extended your block to 60 hours, based on your above response. Please take this time to reflect on your behavior. -- Donald Albury 08:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Cowboy diplomacy, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
noclador (
talk)
14:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
A thread has been opened in WP:ANI involving you. Please visit it when you can. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 17:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey Shalom boy, is this why Israel needs everyone else to fight for them, they're just not battlefield ready with their Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndromes, gay bowel syndrome, etc?
Petey Parrot ( talk) 00:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Enough already .. blocked your talk page too, If you decide you honestly want to edit here ,, email the arbs ,,, I'll grab you the link shortly,
The article Stonewall Miner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable company. No significant coverage except noting its bankruptcy, went kaput before first development ever broke ground.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Pais
arepa
02:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)