/Archive 1 Penelope1114 ( talk) 16:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Here please find a list of articles I am currently being paid to propose changes to that are factual and referenced by high quality sources:
Here is a list of articles I was previously paid to improve:
Here is a list of articles I was paid to improve before disclosure for such work was mandated in the terms of use. This section is all about disclosure, isn't it?
{{paid|client=Who paid for your edits|employer=Who pays you}}
on your user page for each client/employer and place {{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Youruser name|U1-employer=Who pays you|U1-client= Who paid for the edits|U1-otherlinks= Any additional information}}
on the article talk page. You must also disclose your paid editor status in the edit summary of any edits relating to your paid status, such as on the article, its talk page and deletion or noticeboard discussions by including Paid edit
as part of the edit summary. Thank you for your understanding. Client=
and Employer=
to be the same and the template script will take care of things.
Jbh
Talk
14:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:57, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Other editors who are perhaps not so involved as Justlettersandnumbers in articles concerning Benjamin Genocchio should review my edits to his BLP and decide for themselves. Thank you Penelope1114 ( talk) 06:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Penelope, do please respond at WP:COIN to the concerns raised there. It's not a good idea to spread the issue over several noticeboards (indeed, that's known as forumshopping, or "asking the other parent", and is frowned on). As you can see, your complaint at WP:ANI isn't in any case gaining any traction, and at the same time we miss your input at WP:COIN. I realize the proliferation of noticeboards can be confusing, but WP:COIN is the right place for this. Bishonen | talk 14:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC).
Bishonen thank you for your clarification. I appreciate it and will respond further on WP:COIN. Penelope1114 ( talk) 14:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
For all interested parties, I wanted to say that I understand now why paid editing is a conflict of interest. I was previously declaring no conflict of interest because my primary goal is to improve Wikipedia with every edit I make. I now understand the two are not mutually exclusive.
I will suggest and only make edits that will improve Wikipedia. Other editors are welcome to contact me on my talk page if I appear to be doing otherwise. Thanks! Penelope1114 ( talk) 01:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Here [1] you disclosed a COI, but your userpage User:Penelope1114 does not disclose it at all, or any previous COI. Please see WP:PAID. Ignorance, or failure to understand or comply within a reasonable timeframe is no excuse. Any flaunting the letter and spirit of your legal obligations of your job just reflects badly. Widefox; talk 16:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
connected contributor (paid)}}
template to the recent articles talk pages to disclose my relationship there. Additionally,
Widefox, all articles I have been paid in reference to are mentioned on
my talk page. It seems like you prefer that info live on my user page, is that correct?
Penelope1114 (
talk)
01:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles I am working on:
Make suggestions here:
Jbhunley, I had to feed and put my kids to bed and at least wanted to respond to one of your requests so added the first name to the COI mention for Benjamin Genocchio. I will do my best to address other concerns shared by you, Widefox and Bishonen. Thanks Penelope1114 ( talk) 01:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Penelope1114. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Tad Martin (entrepreneur) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Calton |
Talk
03:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
/Archive 1 Penelope1114 ( talk) 16:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Here please find a list of articles I am currently being paid to propose changes to that are factual and referenced by high quality sources:
Here is a list of articles I was previously paid to improve:
Here is a list of articles I was paid to improve before disclosure for such work was mandated in the terms of use. This section is all about disclosure, isn't it?
{{paid|client=Who paid for your edits|employer=Who pays you}}
on your user page for each client/employer and place {{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Youruser name|U1-employer=Who pays you|U1-client= Who paid for the edits|U1-otherlinks= Any additional information}}
on the article talk page. You must also disclose your paid editor status in the edit summary of any edits relating to your paid status, such as on the article, its talk page and deletion or noticeboard discussions by including Paid edit
as part of the edit summary. Thank you for your understanding. Client=
and Employer=
to be the same and the template script will take care of things.
Jbh
Talk
14:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:57, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Other editors who are perhaps not so involved as Justlettersandnumbers in articles concerning Benjamin Genocchio should review my edits to his BLP and decide for themselves. Thank you Penelope1114 ( talk) 06:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Penelope, do please respond at WP:COIN to the concerns raised there. It's not a good idea to spread the issue over several noticeboards (indeed, that's known as forumshopping, or "asking the other parent", and is frowned on). As you can see, your complaint at WP:ANI isn't in any case gaining any traction, and at the same time we miss your input at WP:COIN. I realize the proliferation of noticeboards can be confusing, but WP:COIN is the right place for this. Bishonen | talk 14:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC).
Bishonen thank you for your clarification. I appreciate it and will respond further on WP:COIN. Penelope1114 ( talk) 14:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
For all interested parties, I wanted to say that I understand now why paid editing is a conflict of interest. I was previously declaring no conflict of interest because my primary goal is to improve Wikipedia with every edit I make. I now understand the two are not mutually exclusive.
I will suggest and only make edits that will improve Wikipedia. Other editors are welcome to contact me on my talk page if I appear to be doing otherwise. Thanks! Penelope1114 ( talk) 01:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Here [1] you disclosed a COI, but your userpage User:Penelope1114 does not disclose it at all, or any previous COI. Please see WP:PAID. Ignorance, or failure to understand or comply within a reasonable timeframe is no excuse. Any flaunting the letter and spirit of your legal obligations of your job just reflects badly. Widefox; talk 16:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
connected contributor (paid)}}
template to the recent articles talk pages to disclose my relationship there. Additionally,
Widefox, all articles I have been paid in reference to are mentioned on
my talk page. It seems like you prefer that info live on my user page, is that correct?
Penelope1114 (
talk)
01:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles I am working on:
Make suggestions here:
Jbhunley, I had to feed and put my kids to bed and at least wanted to respond to one of your requests so added the first name to the COI mention for Benjamin Genocchio. I will do my best to address other concerns shared by you, Widefox and Bishonen. Thanks Penelope1114 ( talk) 01:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Penelope1114. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Tad Martin (entrepreneur) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Calton |
Talk
03:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)