Hello Penbat. Regarding the discussion at Talk:Structuration#Requested move. How would you feel about Structuration (social theory)? This would address at least some of your concerns, and it lets people know the domain from which the word comes. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 19:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Employment discrimination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neoclassical ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 03:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I wanted to discuss the issue of Cluster B personality disorders - borderline PD, narcissistic PD, and antisocial PD and how they correlate with psychopathy. Researchers have proposed "subtypes" of psychopathy (borderline, narcissistic, antisocial, and sadistic) and the primary-secondary distinction is well known about and has quite a bit of backing to support the findings. Borderlines, narcissists, and antisocials frequently score quite high on the PCL-R relative to people without personality disorders, or even people with Cluster A & C PD's. Aggression, sexual promiscuoity, perversions, violence, manipulativeness, attention-seeking behavior, narcissism, lack of empathy, and the use of primitive defense mechanisms (projection, splitting, denial, etc) are common to all three of these Cluster B PD's - especially borderline personality disorder. Jeffrey Dahmer was a diagnosed BPD, as was Dennis Nilsen. Many psychoanaylsts and psychiatrists believe Adolf Hitler was a BPD. Angelina Jolie is classic textbook case of BPD. Aileen Wuornos, and even Andrei Chikatilo were both diagnosed with BPD. Psychopathy and BPD, NPD, and AsPD are related in a very intimate way. I believe that a substantial borderlines, narcissists, and sociopaths are psychopats - or the three seem to represent different "breeds" of psychopaths. -- Dendro†Naja Talk to me! 22:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bullying and emotional intelligence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isolation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
I undid your revision to the article on "peer"—- only because no one searching on "peer" is likely to be searching for "peer victimization". Please don't take personally, just a matter of clarification. KDS4444 Talk 12:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Penbat,
I've seen you do a lot of good edits on articles that are on my watchlist, so I thought I would say hello. I see from your user page that you have a deep interest in the psychology articles and have contributed to many of them. Recently, I am setting up multiple user sandbox pages to do deep dives into the references and structure of most of the articles on human intelligence and IQ tests. (In general, anything within the scope of the nascent Outline of human intelligence, which I also hope to revise extensively, might be touched by my project, but I will especially be looking at about two dozen articles, of which a good half are tightly related the current Intelligence quotient article you just edited today.) I'd be delighted to have you check my work in the sandboxes before I commit sections of drafts or whole new article drafts to mainspace. Like you, I'd be delighted to see every Wikipedia article about psychology topics reviewed by experts for accuracy, balance, and good sourcing. Please feel free to let me know at any time how you think I am doing. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 00:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, LBC, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khairul Islam ( talk • contribs)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Negotiation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First impression ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Please explain why you keep undoing my edits to the Stafford Hospital Scandal page?
I am trying to update the page with factually correct information, rather than the just what the press reported. I suggest your read the Francis report before making unqualified edits.
Mertinuk ( talk) 10:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Mertinuk
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychopathy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stress and Conflict. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Committee on Standards in Public Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selflessness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Self-esteem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perfectionism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
One of my responsibilities at Wiki Ed is going to be doing just what you suggested to Sage - coming up with gaps in coverage that we can encourage instructors to have their classes work on. So I really appreciate your suggestions. If you're interested, I would also be interested in working with you further to identify gaps in our coverage in psychology areas. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 17:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
hi, Hi, can you make a comment about my new project Encyclopine.org?
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 23:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Codependency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
"humour can also be used by bad people such as psychos to deflect criticism - thus trivialising an awkward situation for them." Now that you've grown a little, do you still believe that psychos are bad people? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.148 ( talk) 03:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Epic Systems, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
32.218.35.93 (
talk)
19:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Wanted to see if we can sort out this section on narcissism together. I struggle with this section ( here) and the earlier versions of this article ( here) which disproportionately (length) characterize codependency in terms of narcissism. I suggest that this material is more appropriately suited for the NPD article. I noticed that others have questioned this, too ( here)
I think Cermak ( here) provides the most clinically dependable characterization of the transactional dynamics at play. Enmeshment in relationships extends equally to the chemically dependent, personality disordered, other co ‐ dependent, and/or impulse ‐ disordered individuals. The write up should reflect this balance.
I drafted this (below). Can we work with something brief and to the point similar to this?
192.136.235.164 (
talk)
17:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
192.136.235.164 (
talk)
23:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
192.136.235.164 ( talk) 16:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
In your nomination, you write "Creator of article may have a conflict of interest by being related to subject." Has this supposed COI been raised anywhere? I can't find any evidence of it being raised, and it seems questionable to me to make an assertion like that without even asking the contributor whether it is true. Incidentally, as a matter of policy, creation by someone with a COI isn't of itself grounds for deletion as far as I'm aware. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 08:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hey,
I've done a 95% rewrite of Sitting#Health_effects ( old version) and I've included the two links you'd added to the Talk page. It would be great if you could review the new version and add anything else you know. When you find time. Thanks. Gronky ( talk) 15:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of hospitals in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheadle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Penbat, I saw you removed the link to job control (workplace) (linked as "job control") from the Template:Aspects of workplaces with the reason (IMO Jobs template more apt as word "Job" more prominent than "workplace" and added it instead (linked as "control") to the Template:Aspects of jobs. Yet apart the title (which visibly includes the expression "job"), the article mainly concerns the influence on what happens in the work environment (including the workplace) including the topic of workplace autonomy. These notions also quite close to the concept of Empowerment which is currently already in the template "Aspects of workplaces". Therefore I propose to put it back to the "Aspects of workplaces" template, or – if not – to put there redirect workplace autonomy (as "autonomy") into that template. What do you think? -- Chris Howard ( talk) 19:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Before you hit publish on another article, can I suggest you fix up Eileen Chubb? Vast chunks of it lack inline citations, the tone is highly formal, and a big chunk of it reads like a press release. Ironholds ( talk) 16:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
-- Penbat ( talk) 16:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Psychopathy in the workplace. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Regards Andrew ( talk) 03:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Penbat. That was a reasonable question civilly expressed, not a disgusting smear. Please consider replying to it with a "yes" or "no". Calling a user "hyper in all respects" [1] is a smear, though. Please don't attack users. Bishonen | talk 20:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC).
Hi Penbat. You might like to view a current, rather heated, discussion at [2]. It is a rather tortuous discussion now but I think it will strike some cords with you. All the best.__ DrChrissy ( talk) 21:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't know if you saw it, but I backed off the questions about COI over at my talk page. I am sorry for upsetting you yesterday. I did way too much at once. Jytdog ( talk) 10:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Medicine Barnstar | |
Your edits on a wide variety of medical-related articles are noticed and greatly appreciated. Bfpage | leave a message 11:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hello Penbat. Regarding the discussion at Talk:Structuration#Requested move. How would you feel about Structuration (social theory)? This would address at least some of your concerns, and it lets people know the domain from which the word comes. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 19:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Employment discrimination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neoclassical ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 03:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I wanted to discuss the issue of Cluster B personality disorders - borderline PD, narcissistic PD, and antisocial PD and how they correlate with psychopathy. Researchers have proposed "subtypes" of psychopathy (borderline, narcissistic, antisocial, and sadistic) and the primary-secondary distinction is well known about and has quite a bit of backing to support the findings. Borderlines, narcissists, and antisocials frequently score quite high on the PCL-R relative to people without personality disorders, or even people with Cluster A & C PD's. Aggression, sexual promiscuoity, perversions, violence, manipulativeness, attention-seeking behavior, narcissism, lack of empathy, and the use of primitive defense mechanisms (projection, splitting, denial, etc) are common to all three of these Cluster B PD's - especially borderline personality disorder. Jeffrey Dahmer was a diagnosed BPD, as was Dennis Nilsen. Many psychoanaylsts and psychiatrists believe Adolf Hitler was a BPD. Angelina Jolie is classic textbook case of BPD. Aileen Wuornos, and even Andrei Chikatilo were both diagnosed with BPD. Psychopathy and BPD, NPD, and AsPD are related in a very intimate way. I believe that a substantial borderlines, narcissists, and sociopaths are psychopats - or the three seem to represent different "breeds" of psychopaths. -- Dendro†Naja Talk to me! 22:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bullying and emotional intelligence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isolation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
I undid your revision to the article on "peer"—- only because no one searching on "peer" is likely to be searching for "peer victimization". Please don't take personally, just a matter of clarification. KDS4444 Talk 12:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Penbat,
I've seen you do a lot of good edits on articles that are on my watchlist, so I thought I would say hello. I see from your user page that you have a deep interest in the psychology articles and have contributed to many of them. Recently, I am setting up multiple user sandbox pages to do deep dives into the references and structure of most of the articles on human intelligence and IQ tests. (In general, anything within the scope of the nascent Outline of human intelligence, which I also hope to revise extensively, might be touched by my project, but I will especially be looking at about two dozen articles, of which a good half are tightly related the current Intelligence quotient article you just edited today.) I'd be delighted to have you check my work in the sandboxes before I commit sections of drafts or whole new article drafts to mainspace. Like you, I'd be delighted to see every Wikipedia article about psychology topics reviewed by experts for accuracy, balance, and good sourcing. Please feel free to let me know at any time how you think I am doing. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 00:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, LBC, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khairul Islam ( talk • contribs)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Negotiation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First impression ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Please explain why you keep undoing my edits to the Stafford Hospital Scandal page?
I am trying to update the page with factually correct information, rather than the just what the press reported. I suggest your read the Francis report before making unqualified edits.
Mertinuk ( talk) 10:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Mertinuk
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychopathy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stress and Conflict. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Committee on Standards in Public Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selflessness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Self-esteem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perfectionism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
One of my responsibilities at Wiki Ed is going to be doing just what you suggested to Sage - coming up with gaps in coverage that we can encourage instructors to have their classes work on. So I really appreciate your suggestions. If you're interested, I would also be interested in working with you further to identify gaps in our coverage in psychology areas. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 17:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
hi, Hi, can you make a comment about my new project Encyclopine.org?
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 23:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Codependency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
"humour can also be used by bad people such as psychos to deflect criticism - thus trivialising an awkward situation for them." Now that you've grown a little, do you still believe that psychos are bad people? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.148 ( talk) 03:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Epic Systems, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
32.218.35.93 (
talk)
19:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Wanted to see if we can sort out this section on narcissism together. I struggle with this section ( here) and the earlier versions of this article ( here) which disproportionately (length) characterize codependency in terms of narcissism. I suggest that this material is more appropriately suited for the NPD article. I noticed that others have questioned this, too ( here)
I think Cermak ( here) provides the most clinically dependable characterization of the transactional dynamics at play. Enmeshment in relationships extends equally to the chemically dependent, personality disordered, other co ‐ dependent, and/or impulse ‐ disordered individuals. The write up should reflect this balance.
I drafted this (below). Can we work with something brief and to the point similar to this?
192.136.235.164 (
talk)
17:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
192.136.235.164 (
talk)
23:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
192.136.235.164 ( talk) 16:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
In your nomination, you write "Creator of article may have a conflict of interest by being related to subject." Has this supposed COI been raised anywhere? I can't find any evidence of it being raised, and it seems questionable to me to make an assertion like that without even asking the contributor whether it is true. Incidentally, as a matter of policy, creation by someone with a COI isn't of itself grounds for deletion as far as I'm aware. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 08:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hey,
I've done a 95% rewrite of Sitting#Health_effects ( old version) and I've included the two links you'd added to the Talk page. It would be great if you could review the new version and add anything else you know. When you find time. Thanks. Gronky ( talk) 15:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of hospitals in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheadle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Penbat, I saw you removed the link to job control (workplace) (linked as "job control") from the Template:Aspects of workplaces with the reason (IMO Jobs template more apt as word "Job" more prominent than "workplace" and added it instead (linked as "control") to the Template:Aspects of jobs. Yet apart the title (which visibly includes the expression "job"), the article mainly concerns the influence on what happens in the work environment (including the workplace) including the topic of workplace autonomy. These notions also quite close to the concept of Empowerment which is currently already in the template "Aspects of workplaces". Therefore I propose to put it back to the "Aspects of workplaces" template, or – if not – to put there redirect workplace autonomy (as "autonomy") into that template. What do you think? -- Chris Howard ( talk) 19:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Before you hit publish on another article, can I suggest you fix up Eileen Chubb? Vast chunks of it lack inline citations, the tone is highly formal, and a big chunk of it reads like a press release. Ironholds ( talk) 16:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
-- Penbat ( talk) 16:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Psychopathy in the workplace. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Regards Andrew ( talk) 03:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Penbat. That was a reasonable question civilly expressed, not a disgusting smear. Please consider replying to it with a "yes" or "no". Calling a user "hyper in all respects" [1] is a smear, though. Please don't attack users. Bishonen | talk 20:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC).
Hi Penbat. You might like to view a current, rather heated, discussion at [2]. It is a rather tortuous discussion now but I think it will strike some cords with you. All the best.__ DrChrissy ( talk) 21:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't know if you saw it, but I backed off the questions about COI over at my talk page. I am sorry for upsetting you yesterday. I did way too much at once. Jytdog ( talk) 10:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Medicine Barnstar | |
Your edits on a wide variety of medical-related articles are noticed and greatly appreciated. Bfpage | leave a message 11:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |