Hello Southampton man and a Southampton fan! More to follow...
![]() |
Hi PellèLong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:David Attenborough Portrait by Rocket01 Sheffield.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
How exactly do I go about updating the TIMESTAMP for the Wilfried Bony article on Wikipedia EN?
|club-update=
or sometimes still by the old name of |pcupdate=
, to a date or date/time unambiguously after the end of the match. The easy way is to replace the contents of the parameter with five
tildes, so the row reads|club-update = ~~~~~
|
PellèLong ( talk) 18:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did on
Federico Serraiocco. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Edit summaries like
this is not acceptable.
QED237
(talk)
17:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Actually no, after seeing this from 2 days ago and then your behaviour today, I believe a block is warranted now. I suggest you use your time away to research what it actually means to be part of Wikipedia, and get ready to come back and edit collaboratively as part of a community. If you cannot do that then your block will soon become indefinite. Giant Snowman 18:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes but my point is that if I'd not contacted you today after logging in to find I was blocked I would have been none the wiser ... and when I did eventually discover the block notice it could have been another 4 days away. P.S. if I am blocked, could you at least extend it for a day or two? Pellè Long 14:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, you have been indefinitely blocked for being a sockpuppet of PabloOsvaldo17 ( talk · contribs) - if you want to challenge the block I suggest you log back into your original account and use {{ unblock}}. Giant Snowman 19:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I am not a sock puppet! Log back into my original account, this is my original account! Oh I just love this bit - User talk:GiantSnowman[edit source]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Archives
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Contents
[hide]
1 I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice
I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice[edit source]
but this editor is obviously this indefblocked editor. Apart from similarity of interests, their edit summary is unmistakable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 8:02 pm, Today (UTC+1)
Well very observant of you User:Struway - you're unbelievable! Okay so there are similar interests shared between myself and User Pablo is that a crime, does that automatically give you an incentive to go ahead and immediately block my account no! Right so one user isn't allowed to share interests of another user ... you are way in over your head because what happens if there are some twins that register an account on here ... if they share similarities between each other (music), writing style etc. and one becomes a problem user but the other is the complete opposite you are then telling me that you will block the GOOD twin (from a Wikipedia point of view to spite the vandal twin) - now you have done that you have alienated this user from Wikipedia, and the better twin not only resents Wikipedia but they have also lost all faith in the encyclopedia and will NOT be recommending its services to his / her friends! Another scenario could be that a friend or relative has seen how the account user writes and has decided to hack into their account and perform some very inappropriate edits under that person's username ... meanwhile the owner of the account is completely oblivious to this and only when they log in or just take a look at their user talk page find that they have been either issued a warning (s) or have been BLOCKED for something they did NOT do as a result of the nastiness caused by the vandal (hacker), the person that has USED their account to create problems with other users and to ultimately get them in a lot of trouble with the Wikipedia Community.
Oh and by the way that Lukeno guy who was naive enough to believe Portsmouth had won the Premier League (some editor they are)! had posted an abusive comment in which they either told another user to f-off or said you f*doing idiot something along those lines! That's why it was no surprise to see that NOTHING had been done about this whatsoever! Why don't you search through their revision history ... I really could not care about your oh this person swears a lot on here, better get rid of them post haste ... but Lukeno can get away with it because we're sticking to ONE RULE FOR ONE AND ONE FOR THE OTHER as we'll let Lukeno off and probably won't even flag it up because it's a one time thing in their situation. Meanwhile the Wikipedia rules and regulations specifically state that you should not be abusive towards another user is a rule that has completed been shoved aside and has gone straight out the door! I'll await your apology and unblocking even though you'll reply with a bunch of rubbish about how I am not ready to edit or that I don't have the right mindset for Wiki acting like a hypocrite! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.179.111 ( talk) 22:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you know what really gets me? The Wikipedia is a FREE encyclopedia... Ahem no it's not it is a censored encyclopedia and a place where corruption is rife! Don't see why I have a life ban from Wikipedia?
SUPPOSING I WANT TO CLEAN UP MY ACT AND VOW TO NEVER SWEAR NO MATTER HOW IDIOTIC THE SITUATION IS EVER AGAIN, CAN'T CAN I ACCOUNT CREATION BLOCKED ... WHY DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN A CHANGE OF FORTUNE!? GIVE PEACE A CHANCE!
Why'd you block me? I try so hard to repair all the damaged articles, that were either created by User:Matthew hk or have been co-edited by this user. So much for caring about the quality of articles on Wikipedia. It just goes right over your head otherwise you would make it known to Matthew hk that their editing style is jeopardising football articles on Wikipedia. You would first investigate the user in question as you have done with yours truly and if like me you actually realised the extent of the damage done to these articles by Matthew hk you would go along the process of blocking their access to the encyclopedia altogether. I don't care about what you think of my grammar, as I'd never once claimed to be a scholar I just wish that you would actually give a damn about the state of these articles, associated with Matthew hk. Anyway at least you can understand my English. You're kidding yourself if you truly believe that branding a user as being illiterate is launching a personal attack against an individual, because you can't hide from the facts and the fact is User:Matthew hk contributes with a very poor standard of English, which is not helped by the fact they're not a natural speaker of English. I am not editing Wikipedia articles for the sole purpose of WP:BLOCK EVASION, I am however continuing to edit articles which I have deemed to be unfit for submission as a result of individual actions by users like Matthew hk. User:PellèLong 12:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Southampton man and a Southampton fan! More to follow...
![]() |
Hi PellèLong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:David Attenborough Portrait by Rocket01 Sheffield.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
How exactly do I go about updating the TIMESTAMP for the Wilfried Bony article on Wikipedia EN?
|club-update=
or sometimes still by the old name of |pcupdate=
, to a date or date/time unambiguously after the end of the match. The easy way is to replace the contents of the parameter with five
tildes, so the row reads|club-update = ~~~~~
|
PellèLong ( talk) 18:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did on
Federico Serraiocco. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Edit summaries like
this is not acceptable.
QED237
(talk)
17:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Actually no, after seeing this from 2 days ago and then your behaviour today, I believe a block is warranted now. I suggest you use your time away to research what it actually means to be part of Wikipedia, and get ready to come back and edit collaboratively as part of a community. If you cannot do that then your block will soon become indefinite. Giant Snowman 18:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes but my point is that if I'd not contacted you today after logging in to find I was blocked I would have been none the wiser ... and when I did eventually discover the block notice it could have been another 4 days away. P.S. if I am blocked, could you at least extend it for a day or two? Pellè Long 14:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, you have been indefinitely blocked for being a sockpuppet of PabloOsvaldo17 ( talk · contribs) - if you want to challenge the block I suggest you log back into your original account and use {{ unblock}}. Giant Snowman 19:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I am not a sock puppet! Log back into my original account, this is my original account! Oh I just love this bit - User talk:GiantSnowman[edit source]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Archives
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Contents
[hide]
1 I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice
I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice[edit source]
but this editor is obviously this indefblocked editor. Apart from similarity of interests, their edit summary is unmistakable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 8:02 pm, Today (UTC+1)
Well very observant of you User:Struway - you're unbelievable! Okay so there are similar interests shared between myself and User Pablo is that a crime, does that automatically give you an incentive to go ahead and immediately block my account no! Right so one user isn't allowed to share interests of another user ... you are way in over your head because what happens if there are some twins that register an account on here ... if they share similarities between each other (music), writing style etc. and one becomes a problem user but the other is the complete opposite you are then telling me that you will block the GOOD twin (from a Wikipedia point of view to spite the vandal twin) - now you have done that you have alienated this user from Wikipedia, and the better twin not only resents Wikipedia but they have also lost all faith in the encyclopedia and will NOT be recommending its services to his / her friends! Another scenario could be that a friend or relative has seen how the account user writes and has decided to hack into their account and perform some very inappropriate edits under that person's username ... meanwhile the owner of the account is completely oblivious to this and only when they log in or just take a look at their user talk page find that they have been either issued a warning (s) or have been BLOCKED for something they did NOT do as a result of the nastiness caused by the vandal (hacker), the person that has USED their account to create problems with other users and to ultimately get them in a lot of trouble with the Wikipedia Community.
Oh and by the way that Lukeno guy who was naive enough to believe Portsmouth had won the Premier League (some editor they are)! had posted an abusive comment in which they either told another user to f-off or said you f*doing idiot something along those lines! That's why it was no surprise to see that NOTHING had been done about this whatsoever! Why don't you search through their revision history ... I really could not care about your oh this person swears a lot on here, better get rid of them post haste ... but Lukeno can get away with it because we're sticking to ONE RULE FOR ONE AND ONE FOR THE OTHER as we'll let Lukeno off and probably won't even flag it up because it's a one time thing in their situation. Meanwhile the Wikipedia rules and regulations specifically state that you should not be abusive towards another user is a rule that has completed been shoved aside and has gone straight out the door! I'll await your apology and unblocking even though you'll reply with a bunch of rubbish about how I am not ready to edit or that I don't have the right mindset for Wiki acting like a hypocrite! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.179.111 ( talk) 22:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you know what really gets me? The Wikipedia is a FREE encyclopedia... Ahem no it's not it is a censored encyclopedia and a place where corruption is rife! Don't see why I have a life ban from Wikipedia?
SUPPOSING I WANT TO CLEAN UP MY ACT AND VOW TO NEVER SWEAR NO MATTER HOW IDIOTIC THE SITUATION IS EVER AGAIN, CAN'T CAN I ACCOUNT CREATION BLOCKED ... WHY DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN A CHANGE OF FORTUNE!? GIVE PEACE A CHANCE!
Why'd you block me? I try so hard to repair all the damaged articles, that were either created by User:Matthew hk or have been co-edited by this user. So much for caring about the quality of articles on Wikipedia. It just goes right over your head otherwise you would make it known to Matthew hk that their editing style is jeopardising football articles on Wikipedia. You would first investigate the user in question as you have done with yours truly and if like me you actually realised the extent of the damage done to these articles by Matthew hk you would go along the process of blocking their access to the encyclopedia altogether. I don't care about what you think of my grammar, as I'd never once claimed to be a scholar I just wish that you would actually give a damn about the state of these articles, associated with Matthew hk. Anyway at least you can understand my English. You're kidding yourself if you truly believe that branding a user as being illiterate is launching a personal attack against an individual, because you can't hide from the facts and the fact is User:Matthew hk contributes with a very poor standard of English, which is not helped by the fact they're not a natural speaker of English. I am not editing Wikipedia articles for the sole purpose of WP:BLOCK EVASION, I am however continuing to edit articles which I have deemed to be unfit for submission as a result of individual actions by users like Matthew hk. User:PellèLong 12:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)