Hello - I believe your G3 of this page was in error, as it was only the most recent revisions that were vandalistic. I've taken the liberty of restoring the non-vandalistic ones. If this is not an acceptable solution to you, please go ahead and re-delete and we can go to WP:DRV. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 07:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
The site is known to be the only resource online for people looking for a comprehensive directory of wedding related television shows . Many wedding TV fans do not know that more than 3 or 4 wedding TV shows even exist and are broadcast in the United States. Would like a reconsideration on deletion of BridesTelevision.com .
Stormfly ( talk) 07:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Go ahead and place it in a sandbox for me to edit. I will make revisions to it. I would like to ask how TV.com has done what you have said?
Stormfly ( talk) 07:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Here is a source for you http://goldplanning.blogspot.com/ just do a search for bridestelevision.com . Samantha Goldberg is one of the top wedding planners in the United States and has been featured many times on "Whose Wedding is it Anyway?" If you could help me "usify" the article I would very much appreciate your contribution.
Stormfly ( talk) 08:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I am looking to follow the guidelines buy need some direction here. Let me know your input as to my last comment.
Stormfly ( talk) 08:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Ta for putting in that redirect when I requested the speedy on "Spenelli". I missed spotting that one. -- Chzz ► 12:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
You can thank my watchlist and the refresh button! You actually edit-conflicted me when I was giving a {{ uw-vand4}} but it was probably better to nip it in the bud anyway. Regards, EJF ( talk) 14:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey buddy, glad to have you back. Would you mind dropping in your opinion here? I'd especially like you to lend a voice because of what just happened to you. Thanks. Glass Cobra 01:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
At the risk of being behind the times: welcome back. I was worried the community was about to take another hit for a bit there. -- Bfigura ( talk) 03:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
For the fix on my talk page, and for the block. If they react with insults when I ask him to read policy it's unlikely to go well... Ha hum. -- Nate1481( t/ c) 10:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Question: Why does it say "Logging you out from Wikimedia's other projects" when I log out? RC-0722 361.0/ 1 15:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me for butting in, but non-administrators who want SUL have to merge their accounts. Once you've done that, you'll what Pedro sees. Well, within reason anyway. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 23:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
The following edits made me smile. :) Acalamari 17:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I meant to reply to something you said over at Wikipedia:Requests_for_bureaucratship/EVula_3 and I apparently forgot. Sure, "anyone can edit" is mentioned as part of one of the five pillars. Anyone can edit, sure, but this is really short for "Anyone can edit. And, anyone who can't collaborate reasonably with others can be shown the door." And, yes, we welcome everyone. Those who can't behave like reasonable adults use up that welcome very quickly. I don't think it's remotely contrary to the five pillars to admit that sometimes we have to show disruptive editors the door. Getting rid of those who are causing trouble helps make the environment welcoming for those who are here to do useful work. They're the ones who count. Friday (talk) 20:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you -- I'm wondering if you can guide me to the Wikipedia policy that says, in a nutshell, "Thou shalt not be paid for work on Wikipedia". I'm not sure that WP:COI covers that precise situation. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I *may* be mistaken but I thought that was another young aspirant and not Giggy? (There may well be two separate incidents involving separate characters) Orderinchaos 13:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Pedro. I added another Gwynand situation to the mentoring page for comment. Not sure where that page stands... will it be an ongoing project? Not really getting any traffic.
I've saw recent comments re:DHMO's RfA. Not sure what to say. If that can't be properly refuted... although I am already in the boat that in the vote-war that this RfA has become, I'm not sure how it can be argued that any real consensus was formed at the end to promote. Crats have a tough job, indeed. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 13:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Just indef blocked another one that turned up. What was that guy? Peter something? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight ( talk) 22:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Is there some reason not to say that the candidate blanked the RFA? I can't see why not. I can't see why "courtesy blanked" was correct - that would only be true if someone else had blanked it. In fact I can't see why it was blanked at all - it doesn't usually happen with failed or withdrawn RFAs. I assume that its because there is stuff there that DHMO doesn't want people to see, which is odd, because the history exists William M. Connolley ( talk) 07:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
That article was a G10 because it was attacking the person the article was about therefore qualified for the attack page tag. Chemistrygeek ( talk) 12:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Whittard of Chelsea, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Whittard of Chelsea seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Whittard of Chelsea, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
16:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I've namechecked you at our favourite sock's talk page. Precis: P & I know who you are, could block you right now but are giving you one final chance, screw up on this one and any future socks will be blocked on sight. nancy (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for rollback. I hope that this is not too unusual, I see other users doing the same. Cenarium (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Pedro
I have been pointed in your direction from another editor, and I am asking if you would consider Admin Coaching me? I would be very gratful. Many thanks, yours. Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 14:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks alot. Appreciated. Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 14:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2008 (UTC)
Thank you =] Also I did do that check box in the preferences about me being reminded to do an edit summary.
I would like to be an admin because I have been heavily involved in editing the English Wiki on subjects I am interested in, but also with this I would like to be a wider part of the community and even help it best I can. Helping Wikipedia is an ambition for me because when I edit/search pages I come across a fair amount of vandalism, I would like to play my part in helping cease the bad things such as that. Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 14:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
My first bout at the latest RfA. I see nothing wrong with my neutral stance. Wisdom89 ( T / C) 07:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
In case you don't see it on the rollback request page, thanks for giving me access :-) CultureDrone ( talk) 09:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
You said:
I'm not Mr Connolley. You don't own pages you've protected. If you're going to protect them in a misleading state, you can expect them to be corrected. I find it somewhat odd that you deleted this thread without leaving me time to read it. If thats because you find this all distateful, then feel free to delete this again William M. Connolley ( talk) 18:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Your defenition of "misleading" is yours, but I actually made efforts to make the statement neutral and not misleading. I hope you can see this. Pedro : Chat 20:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, i understand that you reverted the changes I made to BiteFight. I understand the part about the links, but you also reverted much valuable information about hunting, stats, and shadow-lord(member/premmy etc...). I have much experience in this game, and i think that you should let these important edits stay... THEDEFLEDONE ( talk) 22:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks! THEDEFLEDONE ( talk) 22:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I don't know if you noticed. But Alt Gr and B-Wing are sockpuppets by the same user. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 22:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I just edit conflicted with your advice on edit conflicts but as your text was almost word for word identical to mine I didn't need to follow the instructions. nancy (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the possibly newbish question but is there an easy way to watch a user? xenocidic ( talk) 13:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Wasn't quite sure what to do about this user, some constructive edits in the past, but pretty much vandalism only these days. I dropped a 24 hour, as they've not been blocked in the past. xenocidic ( talk) 14:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pedro - I've seen you around a lot, and you've commented at things like my RfA (thanks for the support, etc.!) and I actually value you opinion. I am convinced that you could assess a discussion for consensus impartially and let me know what the response is. Unless you've managed to miss it, a discussion has boiled over on the topic of FritzpollBot. The discussion appears to now be winding down, but there is no formal mechanism by which I can determine consensus. As the bot's operator, and holding particular views on the matter, I should not be allowed to, and thus will not judge what should happen.
I wondered if you, possibly, as someone who has not commented on it, could possibly assess the discussion for me at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/FritzpollBot? If you feel that you can't, no problem - and sorry for the dry tone of this message, I've attempted to eradicate all bias from it! Fritzpoll ( talk) 13:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Nancy#Reviewing edits one has made - I'm concerned that someone is trying to derail our efforts. nancy (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
this edit was made by this user, and CG "warned" him. CG never edited teh Shell article directly, or reverted. (And the diff doesn't have spelling errors anyway). I'm willing to bet that this user (about 50 edits since January, so consistent), is the IP. Still baffling why CG would "warn" him, but not actually change the article. Hmm. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Revision as of 12:04, June 5, 2008 (edit)
Wikiuser100 (Talk | contribs)
m (→Diversification)
← Older edit
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company was a
Dutch company founded in 1890 by
Jean Baptiste August Kessler, along with
Henri Deterding and
Hugo Loudon, when a Royal charter was granted by Dutch king
Willem III to a small oil exploration company known as "Royal Dutch Company for the Exploration of Petroleum Wells in the Dutch Indies" (now Indonesia).
Thanks for revising that article, it took me a while to realize what it was all about. I still think it needs work but at least it's readable now! Thanks, Shoombooly ( talk) 20:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Checking in for my every-so-often evaluation. RC-0722 361.0/ 1 21:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi - can't help but smile when you go from impartial to supportive just reading the proposal. Thanks for the help though - I'm sure we'll meet on Keeper's talk page! Fritzpoll ( talk) 08:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
|
Hi again ! Well, you did say ask if I had any questions..... Can you have a quick look at my recent contributions - you'll see I've changed a lot of US school articles to redirects per WP:SCHOOL - i.e. the schools have failed to establish any notability per the guidelines given, and are basically just articles with an address and infobox. Having done so many, my nerve is failing, and I'd like an opinion as to whether I'm following guidelines, in case I have to justify my actions to the author. Thanks. :-) CultureDrone ( talk) 10:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey there. I was told I need to ask an admin for Account Creator privledgesSince you gave me rollback I thought I'd ask you. I was already approved for SQL's tool and signed up to the mailing list as well. Thanks! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 19:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments you left me on my RFA. Adminship is definitely something one wouldn't want to dive into. I used the expression, "What does this button do?" on someone elses talk page and I wholeheartedly agree with it. Whether it's a red button that destroys the world or a white button that blocks a user, they both can have consequences :). <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 21:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
The record shows you recently deleted the redirect Tina M. Foster, because it did not point at an existing article. Could you please tell me where it redirected to?
Thanks! Geo Swan ( talk) 22:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Please let me see the deleted version of this article. A quick Google search has convinced me that the deletion was premature. I discovered that the user that created it seems to create articles in good faith and with knowledge of Japanese culture but doesn't understand the aggressive, overeager patrolling and tagging that is done too often. Also, are you able to see the list of articles that this user created that were deleted? If so, I'd like to see it. -- C S ( talk) 02:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pedro, i saw your name on the list of Wikipedia administrators willing to grant rollback requests, and was wondering if i would be able to obtain Rollback rights from you. I love Wikipedia, the community, and the articles. I find them helpful and informative. I try to patrol the recent changes as best as i can, but it is tiresome and difficult to undo vandalism when there are a large amounts of edits as the undo feature is only useful for the newest. I also have recently discovered Huggle, however without rollback this program does not work. I realise i have a relatively small amount of edits, however i believe i am an experienced editor here and have familiarised myself with all policies and rules. I do know that rollback rights are a huge responsibility, and misuse could disrupt wikipedia severly, but i believe i am up for the challenge and only wish to help and contribute to Wikipedia, as i believe it is a fantastic resource that needs to be maintained. As far as i know, there are no set requirements for requesting rollback rights, but if you have any standards you wish me to meet before you feel comfortable enough to consider me, please let me know and i will do my best to achieve them. Thank you in advance for any decision you make, and thank you for taking the time to read my request. Once again, contact me on my talk page if you have any concerns. Best wishes and happy editing, Metagraph comment 09:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
First off, thank you for your support. In my current RfA, you said "My cautiousness is that Q1 seems a little bland". I'm not particullarly sure what you mean, could you clarify so I can fix it to be more to your liking? ff m 12:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Hiya. Just a courtesy note to say I've named you as one of the editors that I would accept a request for recall from. There's nothing onerous about it, and you don't have to do anything. It's simply to let you know that as I have added myself to CAT:AOR I needed some unfussed criteria for recall, and I believe your judgement fits that criteria neatly. Thanks! Pedro : Chat 10:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Pedro, you should have a WP:RFPR page where people request, RfA style, the right to be on this list. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 14:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Don't forget to add yourself to Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria. Anyone who's anyone is listed there; it's a pretty happin' place. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm currently on the prowl at RCP and found this diff. It almost seems like a POV statement to me, with some facts included, but there isn't any referencing. What do you think? Dusti complain/compliment 12:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Pedro, I feel kind of honored to be on the list : ) But seriously, one question. I see that you've chosen some pretty astringent criteria - Three or more editors and you'll ask to be desysoped no questions asked. While admirable, I'm confused though. The chosen criteria is up to the administrator in said category, but I was under the impression that it was to stand for a reconfirmation RfA. Or am I mistaken? Wisdom89 ( T / C) 20:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments in my RFB. Since it was only at 64%, it was a shoo-in to be unsuccessful, so I withdrew. I didn't want it to run until its scheduled close time because my intent in standing for RFB was to help the bureaucrats with their workload, not give them one more RfX to close. Through the course of my RFB, I received some very valuable feedback, some of it was contradictary, but other points were well agreed upon. I have ceased my admin coaching for now to give me time to revamp my method. I don't want to give up coaching completely, but I'm going to find a different angle from which to approach it. As for my RFA Standards, I am going to do some deep intraspection. I wrote those standards six months ago and I will slowly retool them. This will take some time for me to really dig down and express what I want in an admin candidate. If, after some serious time of deep thought, I don't find anything to change in them, I'll leave them the way they are. I'm not going to change them just because of some community disagreement as to what they should be. Will I stand for RFB again in the future? I don't know. Perhaps some time down the road, when my tenure as an administrator is greater than one year, if there is a pressing need for more active bureaucrats, maybe. If there no pressing need, then maybe not. Useight ( talk) 03:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
-
Diligent
Terrier
(and friends) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for deleting the MfD nomination page, also. I've reverted the archive (again) to include the removed comments. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 22:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[I hope this is the correct way to leave a comment - I haven't done this before!] Earlier today you deleted a page I posted, Nottingham Laser Clinic, for blatant advertising. I accept this decision fully, but was wondering if you could help me with what overstepped the mark in terms of advertising? My aim was to produce an informative article about the company, and I patterned it after an existing article - Surgicare - in the hope that I would strike the correct balance. I've read a few other articles on companies and can't see a particularly discernable difference in the article I submitted. Obviously there was a difference, so I'd like to find out what that is, as this is my first article so I'd obviously rather not repeat the mistake... Any tips / comments would be very helpful!
Many thanks.
RentaCenta ( talk) 13:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm showing my newness here!
I just visited my talk page for the first time and noticed that you had moved the page when I was working on it to my userpage from user:USERNAME. I didn't spot my error there, nor did I spot your help, but thanks for that!
RentaCenta ( talk) 14:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I look forward to hearing from you.
RentaCenta ( talk) 15:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't tell anymore whether I am just trying to give someone a fair chance or turning in to a over-protective clucky mother hen who can't recognise a lost cause. Pedro objectivity required. Cheers. nancy (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for the pointers. I understand what you mean. I'll try to come up with a more objective version and let you know - if you could check that for me (before I submit it, obviously) that would be great. Thanks again for your help!
RentaCenta ( talk) 09:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Did you see the events that started this? I left the user a note, but now I'm running away before I get sucked into the drama. I feel like this needs to be addressed at WP:AN/I, but my emotions are engaged and I would not be rational. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 23:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for granting me the Rollback tool. ĤéĺĺвοЎ ( talk) 09:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
What's up? Just checking in for my every-so-often evaluation. RC-0722 361.0/ 1 15:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, Yes, in general Wikipedia is still fun. I enjoy doing general cleanup, fixing headers, rewording sentences, stuff like that. Um, what do you mean when you say, "What are you hoping to work on next?" RC-0722 361.0/ 1 14:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pedro :)
Would you mind replying to my question when you get a chance? Thanks. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 17:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! Yeah, Xenocidic said this morning that RfRBot was "in limbo" (whatever that means...) and that archiving should be done manually until it's fixed ( see this edit summary). Hence the manual archiving. :) But it's good that not done's can be deleted without archiving, that saves some work! Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
May I have rollback please? Thanks. Naerii ( complain) 00:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Well done for reverting vandalism at Hand of God goal, but when you revert, be careful to repair the whole of the damage done: not just removing any offensive comment that they might have made, but also restoring any deletion. Thanks, and keep up the good work. Kevin McE ( talk) 19:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
You commented in this ANI thread, so I figured you may be interested in the RfCU I've filed about myself. If you can find the time, your input would be highly appreciated. Everyme (was Dorftrottel) ( talk) 10:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't involve in any dispute, I was just trying to save this article from miscreants and I requested to protect this article and its been protected now. I hope it clarifies the situation. Kindly retrospect your decision. -- Falconkhe ( talk) 04:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've tidied up the Nottingham Laser Clinic page, User:RentaCenta/NLC, and was wondering if you could have another look at it for me please? I understand that the Mail and Express articles are not dedicated to Nottingham Laser Clinic, but they definitely mention the clinic, and I was trying to use them as evidence of media attention / reputation... Not sure if this is correct?
Any pointers would be great! Thanks for your continuing help.
RentaCenta ( talk) 09:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I know that you might not grant it but was wondering if you could grant the IP block exemption because my college network is always being blocked for vandalism and is really annoying. Thatcher set out some guidelines on the colleges talkpage. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:212.219.59.241 It is continually happening and I keep getting caught up in this block. I will understand if you dont want to grant it but would be an advantage for me. Chemistrygeek ( talk) 09:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for looking at that for me! I actually referenced that appointment later in the main body but I've moved the reference to the lead now, User:RentaCenta/NLC,. So you think it'd be ok to submit it now?
RentaCenta ( talk) 10:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Think I should be able to move it. Many thanks for your help, I really appreciate it. If I need help in the future would I be alright coming back to you?
RentaCenta ( talk) 10:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I put it up but didn't fully capitalise the title - i.e. it's currently 'Nottingham laser clinic' - how would I correct this please?
RentaCenta ( talk) 10:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I'm just trying to fix that. Do you know what copyright tag I should use? I'm finding it difficult to work out... Thanks for correcting the title.
RentaCenta ( talk) 11:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm just reading through the fair use stuff now. I'll carry on reading for my own education on the subject, but if you think it's unlikely to fall under that category then I'll probably just leave it off. Many thanks again!
RentaCenta ( talk) 11:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I uploaded the image again by mistake with incorrect copyright info (it's not showing on the NLC article page though). Could you remove it for me please? Sorry for the error! I was trying to get the hang of the copyright tag and fair use rationale, but I didn't realise I couldn't edit it once it was uploaded. I'm not sure that the logo doesn't fall under fair use by my reading of the guidelines, but I'm gonna leave it alone for now anyway as I have stuff to do!
Many thanks again for all of your help with this - it's good to know that the Wikipedia community is helpful and collaborative!
RentaCenta ( talk) 11:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again. I'll leave it off if you think that's best.
RentaCenta ( talk) 12:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
An adoptee of mine ( User:Udonknome), brough a diff to my attention. Now, I can't explain this diff, so could you shed some light on this situation? Thanks. RC-0722 361.0/ 1 20:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Pedro. I've noticed that you have a completed set of responses to the RfA Review question phase at User:Pedro/RFA Review , but they don't seem to be included on the list of responses here. If you've completed your responses, please can you head to Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question/Responses and add a link to them at the bottom of the list so that they get included in the research. We have a closing date of midnight UTC on 1st July, so please add your link before this date. Once again, thank you for taking the time to participate in the Question Phase of RfA Review. Gazimoff Write Read 15:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Vacay? (sorry, Holiday?) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 23:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear Pedro,
Thank you for your kind words which have given me strength at this terrible time. You've always been a good friend to me, and have shown it once again. Your genorisity of spirit will never be forgotten. Love, Jeffpw ( talk) 16:44, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello - I believe your G3 of this page was in error, as it was only the most recent revisions that were vandalistic. I've taken the liberty of restoring the non-vandalistic ones. If this is not an acceptable solution to you, please go ahead and re-delete and we can go to WP:DRV. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 07:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
The site is known to be the only resource online for people looking for a comprehensive directory of wedding related television shows . Many wedding TV fans do not know that more than 3 or 4 wedding TV shows even exist and are broadcast in the United States. Would like a reconsideration on deletion of BridesTelevision.com .
Stormfly ( talk) 07:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Go ahead and place it in a sandbox for me to edit. I will make revisions to it. I would like to ask how TV.com has done what you have said?
Stormfly ( talk) 07:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Here is a source for you http://goldplanning.blogspot.com/ just do a search for bridestelevision.com . Samantha Goldberg is one of the top wedding planners in the United States and has been featured many times on "Whose Wedding is it Anyway?" If you could help me "usify" the article I would very much appreciate your contribution.
Stormfly ( talk) 08:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I am looking to follow the guidelines buy need some direction here. Let me know your input as to my last comment.
Stormfly ( talk) 08:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Ta for putting in that redirect when I requested the speedy on "Spenelli". I missed spotting that one. -- Chzz ► 12:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
You can thank my watchlist and the refresh button! You actually edit-conflicted me when I was giving a {{ uw-vand4}} but it was probably better to nip it in the bud anyway. Regards, EJF ( talk) 14:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey buddy, glad to have you back. Would you mind dropping in your opinion here? I'd especially like you to lend a voice because of what just happened to you. Thanks. Glass Cobra 01:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
At the risk of being behind the times: welcome back. I was worried the community was about to take another hit for a bit there. -- Bfigura ( talk) 03:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
For the fix on my talk page, and for the block. If they react with insults when I ask him to read policy it's unlikely to go well... Ha hum. -- Nate1481( t/ c) 10:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Question: Why does it say "Logging you out from Wikimedia's other projects" when I log out? RC-0722 361.0/ 1 15:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me for butting in, but non-administrators who want SUL have to merge their accounts. Once you've done that, you'll what Pedro sees. Well, within reason anyway. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 23:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
The following edits made me smile. :) Acalamari 17:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I meant to reply to something you said over at Wikipedia:Requests_for_bureaucratship/EVula_3 and I apparently forgot. Sure, "anyone can edit" is mentioned as part of one of the five pillars. Anyone can edit, sure, but this is really short for "Anyone can edit. And, anyone who can't collaborate reasonably with others can be shown the door." And, yes, we welcome everyone. Those who can't behave like reasonable adults use up that welcome very quickly. I don't think it's remotely contrary to the five pillars to admit that sometimes we have to show disruptive editors the door. Getting rid of those who are causing trouble helps make the environment welcoming for those who are here to do useful work. They're the ones who count. Friday (talk) 20:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you -- I'm wondering if you can guide me to the Wikipedia policy that says, in a nutshell, "Thou shalt not be paid for work on Wikipedia". I'm not sure that WP:COI covers that precise situation. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I *may* be mistaken but I thought that was another young aspirant and not Giggy? (There may well be two separate incidents involving separate characters) Orderinchaos 13:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Pedro. I added another Gwynand situation to the mentoring page for comment. Not sure where that page stands... will it be an ongoing project? Not really getting any traffic.
I've saw recent comments re:DHMO's RfA. Not sure what to say. If that can't be properly refuted... although I am already in the boat that in the vote-war that this RfA has become, I'm not sure how it can be argued that any real consensus was formed at the end to promote. Crats have a tough job, indeed. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 13:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Just indef blocked another one that turned up. What was that guy? Peter something? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight ( talk) 22:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Is there some reason not to say that the candidate blanked the RFA? I can't see why not. I can't see why "courtesy blanked" was correct - that would only be true if someone else had blanked it. In fact I can't see why it was blanked at all - it doesn't usually happen with failed or withdrawn RFAs. I assume that its because there is stuff there that DHMO doesn't want people to see, which is odd, because the history exists William M. Connolley ( talk) 07:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
That article was a G10 because it was attacking the person the article was about therefore qualified for the attack page tag. Chemistrygeek ( talk) 12:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Whittard of Chelsea, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Whittard of Chelsea seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Whittard of Chelsea, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
16:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I've namechecked you at our favourite sock's talk page. Precis: P & I know who you are, could block you right now but are giving you one final chance, screw up on this one and any future socks will be blocked on sight. nancy (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for rollback. I hope that this is not too unusual, I see other users doing the same. Cenarium (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Pedro
I have been pointed in your direction from another editor, and I am asking if you would consider Admin Coaching me? I would be very gratful. Many thanks, yours. Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 14:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks alot. Appreciated. Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 14:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
2008 (UTC)
Thank you =] Also I did do that check box in the preferences about me being reminded to do an edit summary.
I would like to be an admin because I have been heavily involved in editing the English Wiki on subjects I am interested in, but also with this I would like to be a wider part of the community and even help it best I can. Helping Wikipedia is an ambition for me because when I edit/search pages I come across a fair amount of vandalism, I would like to play my part in helping cease the bad things such as that. Police,Mad,Jack ( talk · contribs)☺ 14:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
My first bout at the latest RfA. I see nothing wrong with my neutral stance. Wisdom89 ( T / C) 07:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
In case you don't see it on the rollback request page, thanks for giving me access :-) CultureDrone ( talk) 09:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
You said:
I'm not Mr Connolley. You don't own pages you've protected. If you're going to protect them in a misleading state, you can expect them to be corrected. I find it somewhat odd that you deleted this thread without leaving me time to read it. If thats because you find this all distateful, then feel free to delete this again William M. Connolley ( talk) 18:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Your defenition of "misleading" is yours, but I actually made efforts to make the statement neutral and not misleading. I hope you can see this. Pedro : Chat 20:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, i understand that you reverted the changes I made to BiteFight. I understand the part about the links, but you also reverted much valuable information about hunting, stats, and shadow-lord(member/premmy etc...). I have much experience in this game, and i think that you should let these important edits stay... THEDEFLEDONE ( talk) 22:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks! THEDEFLEDONE ( talk) 22:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I don't know if you noticed. But Alt Gr and B-Wing are sockpuppets by the same user. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 22:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I just edit conflicted with your advice on edit conflicts but as your text was almost word for word identical to mine I didn't need to follow the instructions. nancy (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the possibly newbish question but is there an easy way to watch a user? xenocidic ( talk) 13:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Wasn't quite sure what to do about this user, some constructive edits in the past, but pretty much vandalism only these days. I dropped a 24 hour, as they've not been blocked in the past. xenocidic ( talk) 14:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pedro - I've seen you around a lot, and you've commented at things like my RfA (thanks for the support, etc.!) and I actually value you opinion. I am convinced that you could assess a discussion for consensus impartially and let me know what the response is. Unless you've managed to miss it, a discussion has boiled over on the topic of FritzpollBot. The discussion appears to now be winding down, but there is no formal mechanism by which I can determine consensus. As the bot's operator, and holding particular views on the matter, I should not be allowed to, and thus will not judge what should happen.
I wondered if you, possibly, as someone who has not commented on it, could possibly assess the discussion for me at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/FritzpollBot? If you feel that you can't, no problem - and sorry for the dry tone of this message, I've attempted to eradicate all bias from it! Fritzpoll ( talk) 13:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Nancy#Reviewing edits one has made - I'm concerned that someone is trying to derail our efforts. nancy (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
this edit was made by this user, and CG "warned" him. CG never edited teh Shell article directly, or reverted. (And the diff doesn't have spelling errors anyway). I'm willing to bet that this user (about 50 edits since January, so consistent), is the IP. Still baffling why CG would "warn" him, but not actually change the article. Hmm. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Revision as of 12:04, June 5, 2008 (edit)
Wikiuser100 (Talk | contribs)
m (→Diversification)
← Older edit
Royal Dutch Petroleum Company was a
Dutch company founded in 1890 by
Jean Baptiste August Kessler, along with
Henri Deterding and
Hugo Loudon, when a Royal charter was granted by Dutch king
Willem III to a small oil exploration company known as "Royal Dutch Company for the Exploration of Petroleum Wells in the Dutch Indies" (now Indonesia).
Thanks for revising that article, it took me a while to realize what it was all about. I still think it needs work but at least it's readable now! Thanks, Shoombooly ( talk) 20:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Checking in for my every-so-often evaluation. RC-0722 361.0/ 1 21:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi - can't help but smile when you go from impartial to supportive just reading the proposal. Thanks for the help though - I'm sure we'll meet on Keeper's talk page! Fritzpoll ( talk) 08:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
|
Hi again ! Well, you did say ask if I had any questions..... Can you have a quick look at my recent contributions - you'll see I've changed a lot of US school articles to redirects per WP:SCHOOL - i.e. the schools have failed to establish any notability per the guidelines given, and are basically just articles with an address and infobox. Having done so many, my nerve is failing, and I'd like an opinion as to whether I'm following guidelines, in case I have to justify my actions to the author. Thanks. :-) CultureDrone ( talk) 10:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey there. I was told I need to ask an admin for Account Creator privledgesSince you gave me rollback I thought I'd ask you. I was already approved for SQL's tool and signed up to the mailing list as well. Thanks! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 19:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments you left me on my RFA. Adminship is definitely something one wouldn't want to dive into. I used the expression, "What does this button do?" on someone elses talk page and I wholeheartedly agree with it. Whether it's a red button that destroys the world or a white button that blocks a user, they both can have consequences :). <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 21:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
The record shows you recently deleted the redirect Tina M. Foster, because it did not point at an existing article. Could you please tell me where it redirected to?
Thanks! Geo Swan ( talk) 22:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Please let me see the deleted version of this article. A quick Google search has convinced me that the deletion was premature. I discovered that the user that created it seems to create articles in good faith and with knowledge of Japanese culture but doesn't understand the aggressive, overeager patrolling and tagging that is done too often. Also, are you able to see the list of articles that this user created that were deleted? If so, I'd like to see it. -- C S ( talk) 02:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pedro, i saw your name on the list of Wikipedia administrators willing to grant rollback requests, and was wondering if i would be able to obtain Rollback rights from you. I love Wikipedia, the community, and the articles. I find them helpful and informative. I try to patrol the recent changes as best as i can, but it is tiresome and difficult to undo vandalism when there are a large amounts of edits as the undo feature is only useful for the newest. I also have recently discovered Huggle, however without rollback this program does not work. I realise i have a relatively small amount of edits, however i believe i am an experienced editor here and have familiarised myself with all policies and rules. I do know that rollback rights are a huge responsibility, and misuse could disrupt wikipedia severly, but i believe i am up for the challenge and only wish to help and contribute to Wikipedia, as i believe it is a fantastic resource that needs to be maintained. As far as i know, there are no set requirements for requesting rollback rights, but if you have any standards you wish me to meet before you feel comfortable enough to consider me, please let me know and i will do my best to achieve them. Thank you in advance for any decision you make, and thank you for taking the time to read my request. Once again, contact me on my talk page if you have any concerns. Best wishes and happy editing, Metagraph comment 09:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
First off, thank you for your support. In my current RfA, you said "My cautiousness is that Q1 seems a little bland". I'm not particullarly sure what you mean, could you clarify so I can fix it to be more to your liking? ff m 12:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Hiya. Just a courtesy note to say I've named you as one of the editors that I would accept a request for recall from. There's nothing onerous about it, and you don't have to do anything. It's simply to let you know that as I have added myself to CAT:AOR I needed some unfussed criteria for recall, and I believe your judgement fits that criteria neatly. Thanks! Pedro : Chat 10:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Pedro, you should have a WP:RFPR page where people request, RfA style, the right to be on this list. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 14:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Don't forget to add yourself to Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria. Anyone who's anyone is listed there; it's a pretty happin' place. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm currently on the prowl at RCP and found this diff. It almost seems like a POV statement to me, with some facts included, but there isn't any referencing. What do you think? Dusti complain/compliment 12:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Pedro, I feel kind of honored to be on the list : ) But seriously, one question. I see that you've chosen some pretty astringent criteria - Three or more editors and you'll ask to be desysoped no questions asked. While admirable, I'm confused though. The chosen criteria is up to the administrator in said category, but I was under the impression that it was to stand for a reconfirmation RfA. Or am I mistaken? Wisdom89 ( T / C) 20:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments in my RFB. Since it was only at 64%, it was a shoo-in to be unsuccessful, so I withdrew. I didn't want it to run until its scheduled close time because my intent in standing for RFB was to help the bureaucrats with their workload, not give them one more RfX to close. Through the course of my RFB, I received some very valuable feedback, some of it was contradictary, but other points were well agreed upon. I have ceased my admin coaching for now to give me time to revamp my method. I don't want to give up coaching completely, but I'm going to find a different angle from which to approach it. As for my RFA Standards, I am going to do some deep intraspection. I wrote those standards six months ago and I will slowly retool them. This will take some time for me to really dig down and express what I want in an admin candidate. If, after some serious time of deep thought, I don't find anything to change in them, I'll leave them the way they are. I'm not going to change them just because of some community disagreement as to what they should be. Will I stand for RFB again in the future? I don't know. Perhaps some time down the road, when my tenure as an administrator is greater than one year, if there is a pressing need for more active bureaucrats, maybe. If there no pressing need, then maybe not. Useight ( talk) 03:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
-
Diligent
Terrier
(and friends) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for deleting the MfD nomination page, also. I've reverted the archive (again) to include the removed comments. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 22:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[I hope this is the correct way to leave a comment - I haven't done this before!] Earlier today you deleted a page I posted, Nottingham Laser Clinic, for blatant advertising. I accept this decision fully, but was wondering if you could help me with what overstepped the mark in terms of advertising? My aim was to produce an informative article about the company, and I patterned it after an existing article - Surgicare - in the hope that I would strike the correct balance. I've read a few other articles on companies and can't see a particularly discernable difference in the article I submitted. Obviously there was a difference, so I'd like to find out what that is, as this is my first article so I'd obviously rather not repeat the mistake... Any tips / comments would be very helpful!
Many thanks.
RentaCenta ( talk) 13:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm showing my newness here!
I just visited my talk page for the first time and noticed that you had moved the page when I was working on it to my userpage from user:USERNAME. I didn't spot my error there, nor did I spot your help, but thanks for that!
RentaCenta ( talk) 14:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I look forward to hearing from you.
RentaCenta ( talk) 15:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't tell anymore whether I am just trying to give someone a fair chance or turning in to a over-protective clucky mother hen who can't recognise a lost cause. Pedro objectivity required. Cheers. nancy (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for the pointers. I understand what you mean. I'll try to come up with a more objective version and let you know - if you could check that for me (before I submit it, obviously) that would be great. Thanks again for your help!
RentaCenta ( talk) 09:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Did you see the events that started this? I left the user a note, but now I'm running away before I get sucked into the drama. I feel like this needs to be addressed at WP:AN/I, but my emotions are engaged and I would not be rational. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 23:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for granting me the Rollback tool. ĤéĺĺвοЎ ( talk) 09:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
What's up? Just checking in for my every-so-often evaluation. RC-0722 361.0/ 1 15:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, Yes, in general Wikipedia is still fun. I enjoy doing general cleanup, fixing headers, rewording sentences, stuff like that. Um, what do you mean when you say, "What are you hoping to work on next?" RC-0722 361.0/ 1 14:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Pedro :)
Would you mind replying to my question when you get a chance? Thanks. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 17:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! Yeah, Xenocidic said this morning that RfRBot was "in limbo" (whatever that means...) and that archiving should be done manually until it's fixed ( see this edit summary). Hence the manual archiving. :) But it's good that not done's can be deleted without archiving, that saves some work! Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
May I have rollback please? Thanks. Naerii ( complain) 00:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Well done for reverting vandalism at Hand of God goal, but when you revert, be careful to repair the whole of the damage done: not just removing any offensive comment that they might have made, but also restoring any deletion. Thanks, and keep up the good work. Kevin McE ( talk) 19:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
You commented in this ANI thread, so I figured you may be interested in the RfCU I've filed about myself. If you can find the time, your input would be highly appreciated. Everyme (was Dorftrottel) ( talk) 10:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't involve in any dispute, I was just trying to save this article from miscreants and I requested to protect this article and its been protected now. I hope it clarifies the situation. Kindly retrospect your decision. -- Falconkhe ( talk) 04:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've tidied up the Nottingham Laser Clinic page, User:RentaCenta/NLC, and was wondering if you could have another look at it for me please? I understand that the Mail and Express articles are not dedicated to Nottingham Laser Clinic, but they definitely mention the clinic, and I was trying to use them as evidence of media attention / reputation... Not sure if this is correct?
Any pointers would be great! Thanks for your continuing help.
RentaCenta ( talk) 09:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I know that you might not grant it but was wondering if you could grant the IP block exemption because my college network is always being blocked for vandalism and is really annoying. Thatcher set out some guidelines on the colleges talkpage. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:212.219.59.241 It is continually happening and I keep getting caught up in this block. I will understand if you dont want to grant it but would be an advantage for me. Chemistrygeek ( talk) 09:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for looking at that for me! I actually referenced that appointment later in the main body but I've moved the reference to the lead now, User:RentaCenta/NLC,. So you think it'd be ok to submit it now?
RentaCenta ( talk) 10:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Think I should be able to move it. Many thanks for your help, I really appreciate it. If I need help in the future would I be alright coming back to you?
RentaCenta ( talk) 10:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I put it up but didn't fully capitalise the title - i.e. it's currently 'Nottingham laser clinic' - how would I correct this please?
RentaCenta ( talk) 10:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I'm just trying to fix that. Do you know what copyright tag I should use? I'm finding it difficult to work out... Thanks for correcting the title.
RentaCenta ( talk) 11:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm just reading through the fair use stuff now. I'll carry on reading for my own education on the subject, but if you think it's unlikely to fall under that category then I'll probably just leave it off. Many thanks again!
RentaCenta ( talk) 11:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I uploaded the image again by mistake with incorrect copyright info (it's not showing on the NLC article page though). Could you remove it for me please? Sorry for the error! I was trying to get the hang of the copyright tag and fair use rationale, but I didn't realise I couldn't edit it once it was uploaded. I'm not sure that the logo doesn't fall under fair use by my reading of the guidelines, but I'm gonna leave it alone for now anyway as I have stuff to do!
Many thanks again for all of your help with this - it's good to know that the Wikipedia community is helpful and collaborative!
RentaCenta ( talk) 11:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again. I'll leave it off if you think that's best.
RentaCenta ( talk) 12:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
An adoptee of mine ( User:Udonknome), brough a diff to my attention. Now, I can't explain this diff, so could you shed some light on this situation? Thanks. RC-0722 361.0/ 1 20:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Pedro. I've noticed that you have a completed set of responses to the RfA Review question phase at User:Pedro/RFA Review , but they don't seem to be included on the list of responses here. If you've completed your responses, please can you head to Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question/Responses and add a link to them at the bottom of the list so that they get included in the research. We have a closing date of midnight UTC on 1st July, so please add your link before this date. Once again, thank you for taking the time to participate in the Question Phase of RfA Review. Gazimoff Write Read 15:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Vacay? (sorry, Holiday?) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 23:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear Pedro,
Thank you for your kind words which have given me strength at this terrible time. You've always been a good friend to me, and have shown it once again. Your genorisity of spirit will never be forgotten. Love, Jeffpw ( talk) 16:44, 1 July 2008 (UTC)