![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An article you recently created,
Carlos A. Coello Coello, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page. ...
discospinster
talk
03:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, PK650,
Thank you for creating Scott Kirkpatrick.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your new article on Scott Kirkpatrick, but please see WP:NACADEMIC and WP:EXIST. More evidence is needed that this individual has received proper notice, including a citation to the statement about all his citations. As I can say from some personal experience, Google's number of citations could include appearances in databases, and not just the classic type of "citation" in which another researcher specifically mentioned an earlier work.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 16:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi PK650. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 02:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Overall your reviews were good, but I wanted to draw your attention to a few of the articles you approved:
I'd be interested if you have any additional comments on the first two cases. Otherwise, feel free to reach out if you need any help or advice while reviewing articles. signed, Rosguill talk 02:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An article you recently created,
Carlos A. Coello Coello, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page. ...
discospinster
talk
03:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, PK650,
Thank you for creating Scott Kirkpatrick.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your new article on Scott Kirkpatrick, but please see WP:NACADEMIC and WP:EXIST. More evidence is needed that this individual has received proper notice, including a citation to the statement about all his citations. As I can say from some personal experience, Google's number of citations could include appearances in databases, and not just the classic type of "citation" in which another researcher specifically mentioned an earlier work.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 16:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi PK650. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 02:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Overall your reviews were good, but I wanted to draw your attention to a few of the articles you approved:
I'd be interested if you have any additional comments on the first two cases. Otherwise, feel free to reach out if you need any help or advice while reviewing articles. signed, Rosguill talk 02:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging