This is Oompaloompa1971's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Oompaloompa1971!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DoubleGrazing (
talk) 07:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jeopardy! contestants, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 00:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant), you may be blocked from editing. CycloneYoris talk! 00:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
It looks like you've been going through the articles on Timothée Chalamet and Denzel Washington and substituting instances of "he" or "him" etc. with the actor's name (and sometimes the other way around). What is the purpose of these edits? --- Sluzzelin talk 00:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — Gor1995 𝄞 18:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Please add an edit summary with your edits, to explain why you are making changes. Your edits have been reverted because it was not clear to other editors that they were an improvement. signed, Willondon ( talk) 14:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
In your edit to Cam Newton [1], why have you changed a number of 'access-date' parameters to a seemingly arbitrary date further back in time? That parameter is supposed to record the most recent date the source was checked. Because there were so many of them, I reverted the edit again. Your edit summary says "Added content because it is important [...]" Maybe redo just the adding content and its source part. Other unexplained parts of the edit will likely get the whole thing reverted again. signed, Willondon ( talk) 17:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you have been changing possessive nouns that end in an "s" by removing the apostrophe-s. Please note that possessive nouns that end in an "s" do indeed receive the apostrophe-s. The only time the apostrophe-s is inappropriate is when the possessive noun is a plural noun.
As well, per MOS:LQ, the logical quotation style of punctuation should always be used in Wikipedia articles. milladrive ( talk) 15:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brad Stevens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notre Dame Fighting Irish basketball. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I notice you have been changing age lead-ins from "age ##" to "at the age of ##". Those extra words are superfluous and thoroughly unnecessary, and are known as "weasel words".
For instance, "so-and-so did something at age 20" is correct. However, "so-and-so did something at the age of 20" is incorrect.
You also continue to incorrectly move commas and periods, disregarding Wikipedia's rules of punctuation and causing other editors extra work. I ask again that you stop doing it. Thank you. milladrive ( talk) 19:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This is Oompaloompa1971's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Oompaloompa1971!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DoubleGrazing (
talk) 07:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jeopardy! contestants, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 00:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant), you may be blocked from editing. CycloneYoris talk! 00:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
It looks like you've been going through the articles on Timothée Chalamet and Denzel Washington and substituting instances of "he" or "him" etc. with the actor's name (and sometimes the other way around). What is the purpose of these edits? --- Sluzzelin talk 00:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — Gor1995 𝄞 18:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Please add an edit summary with your edits, to explain why you are making changes. Your edits have been reverted because it was not clear to other editors that they were an improvement. signed, Willondon ( talk) 14:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
In your edit to Cam Newton [1], why have you changed a number of 'access-date' parameters to a seemingly arbitrary date further back in time? That parameter is supposed to record the most recent date the source was checked. Because there were so many of them, I reverted the edit again. Your edit summary says "Added content because it is important [...]" Maybe redo just the adding content and its source part. Other unexplained parts of the edit will likely get the whole thing reverted again. signed, Willondon ( talk) 17:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you have been changing possessive nouns that end in an "s" by removing the apostrophe-s. Please note that possessive nouns that end in an "s" do indeed receive the apostrophe-s. The only time the apostrophe-s is inappropriate is when the possessive noun is a plural noun.
As well, per MOS:LQ, the logical quotation style of punctuation should always be used in Wikipedia articles. milladrive ( talk) 15:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brad Stevens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notre Dame Fighting Irish basketball. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I notice you have been changing age lead-ins from "age ##" to "at the age of ##". Those extra words are superfluous and thoroughly unnecessary, and are known as "weasel words".
For instance, "so-and-so did something at age 20" is correct. However, "so-and-so did something at the age of 20" is incorrect.
You also continue to incorrectly move commas and periods, disregarding Wikipedia's rules of punctuation and causing other editors extra work. I ask again that you stop doing it. Thank you. milladrive ( talk) 19:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)