This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 85 | ← | Archive 88 | Archive 89 | Archive 90 | Archive 91 | Archive 92 | → | Archive 95 |
Archive 78:May 2021
For the first time in a long while I came across an article that got me confused. This is the
article, the article makes numerous bold assertions of notability, it’s definitely {{
fanpov}}
and an a promotional article. I did a
WP:BEFORE search in reliable sources which do not seem to substantiate any of those bogus notability claims made in the article. I’m not sure about this one, so I thought it wise to ask you. What do you think about this?
Celestina007 (
talk)
22:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I think my Datong, Anhui and Shouchun, Anhui pages should not be in draftspace, because of WP:GEOLAND.
Also, can you delete User talk:Pizza0614/TWA? Pizza0614 ( talk) 00:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi , onel5969 articles named 2016 Tamil Nadu Premier League , 2017 Tamil Nadu Premier League , 2018 Tamil Nadu Premier League & 2019 Tamil Nadu Premier League are redirected to Tamil Nadu Premier League by you with reason ( articles are not notable ) but these articles are useful for users for TNPL stats , like most runs , most wickets , season champions , runner , points table so please I request you to don't redirected these pages because single article Tamil Nadu Premier League can't provide all these information . User:தனீஷ் ( talk)
Hi, I wanted to let you know that I quite shocked to see that the article I started writing on UCL Press was simply deleted without any discussion and without providing myself or others with any opportunity to expand the article. This is highly disappointing and also makes me think Wikipedia is simply not a place which is welcome to new editors. If someone acted in such a high handed and unilateral manner where I work, they would not merely be unpopular but at risk of disciplinary.
The publishing house of the largest university proper in the UK, one of the highest ranked in the world, as well as the first open source university publisher and which has published dozens of books to date, is inherently notable. The onus is on others to disprove this. There are numerous reference to the press in reputable third party sources including in the Bookseller which is the leading trade publication in the UK.
I do not have the time to invest in lengthy battles here so will not bother to pursue this further. It has shown me that Wikipedia editing is not a constructive use of my time. TopkapiMusik ( talk) 16:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for tagging this page! I've added citations. Do you think the tag can be removed? If not, could you point out specific claims that you feel are not sufficiently supported?-- Brett ( talk) 18:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that you recently relegated an article that I had created - Timeline of teletext in the UK - to draftspace without consulting me first, thereby not allowing me the opportunity to address your concerns. I have now added further independent references and there are now 18 references from a variety of independent sources and this is more than adequate for the article to satisfy any issues regarding independent references. I have now clicked on "Submit your draft for review!" and can you please reinstate this article to mainspace. Rillington ( talk) 16:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969, according to a message received on my User talk:Neuralia page on April 14, 2021, you deleted page Tim Gorski which I had created weeks before, "because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic". I wonder if you would care to comment further about the specific parts of the page that in your view gave grounds for that qualification. Since the deleted page is not visible now for further reference, I have retrieved from my own sandbox records the initial content of the page at the time of its creation, which is visible now on my subpage User:Neuralia/sandbox/TG. May I ask if in your view such (initial) content already incurred in advertising or if the content responsible for the disqualification was something else, presumably added after I created the page. Your help with this will be greatly appreciated, as (as a learning editor) one wishes not to make the same type of mistake more than once. Thank you. Neuralia ( talk) 18:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
How are you doing, User talk:Onel5969? Good, I hope. Considering all the time and energy I put into making those articles, I ask what all can I do to make them notable and fully accepted - seeing that they are both now within the Scope of Wikipedia. Thanks to you for reading this.( LonerXL ( talk) 04:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC))
Hello Onel. I need your opinion if possible. I nominated PuffballsUnited for speedy deletion, because I understand that this redirection is unnecessary. The person is a designer of the game Among Us. Particularly, I do not find secondary and reliable sources or evidence of notability of this designer to fit in notability for a single event, which could justify the creation of the redirect, as WP:BLP1E. But an editor, who does not seem to me to be experienced, contested the elimination. What do you think? Is this redirection correct? The creator was creating several similar redirects, because of that, a more experienced editor sent to him a warning. Best regards. ✍A.WagnerC ( talk) 17:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Forgive me, but the sources I have added for the Draft: Society of Sciences in Lund is the Swedish National Encyclopedia www.ne.se and the Swedish State Calendar which is the official calendar of the Swedish state - both surely must be taken as reliable indications of notability and relevance to list this learned society in Wikipedia as is. Apart from the society itself, ne.se and the state calendar, it is hard to find others writing about the society. The learned publications series are of high quality but as little admissible as the society website. But this does not alter the fact that ne.se article should suffice as an indication of notability and relevance. Jonar242 ( talk) 14:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing this article.— TrottieTrue ( talk) 13:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello there, may I ask why you reverted my changes to the Inti-Plasma Farming and NES page? My changes made perfect sense, as also explained in the change message. Thanks, Vormoza ( talk) 13:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, thank you for your review of the Nicholas Simon page. I saw that your reason for proposing the article for deletion is because there is "not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NFILMMAKER." Given that there are three separate in-depth sources on the page's subject (they address the topic directly and in detail, not needing original research; the sources are authoritative - the NYFA is a reputable establishment in the film industry, and Peter Fox and Patrick Brzeski are known film and media journalists/commentators; they are secondary sources; they are independent sources, as interviews aren't press releases) and WP:GNG states that there is no fixed number of sources required, I was wondering what other sources would you consider necessary for the article to meet the guideline?
In regards to the concern about not meeting WP:FILMMAKER, I was wondering if the page's subject must fulfill all four points? While I do believe that Simon is an important figure (as one of the few producers working on international feature films and TV shows), has played a major role in co-creating significant/well-known works (namely Extraction and A Prayer Before Dawn, as these were mostly filmed in Thailand, and scenes in several Avengers movies), and his works have become a significant monument (in that they mark a growth in SEA's developing film industry), I don't think he has (or at least, as far as I'm aware of) originated a new concept/theory/technique. However, I believe he does fulfill these three other points and is an encyclopedia-worthy subject.
I would appreciate any further advice and comments you have, as I want to fix the page before the week is over and prevent it from being deleted.
Many thanks!
Kind regards,
-- Minekovaa ( talk) 02:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hamidabad College, Satsia হানিফ আলী ( talk) 05:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. I just wanted to ask you which particular policy of WP:Split mandated that a standalaone article on Imelda Staunton's acting credits was not necessary, especially considering how vast it is? Will keep that in mind for sure before doing the same in future. Thanks. Jovian Eclipse ( talk) 11:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel, I'm creating articles of former Mexican footballers who are now coaches and I wanted to ask you if you could help me in creating some of them, these are the following: Juan Manuel Rivera, Octavio Becerril, Luis Fernando Soto, Esteve Padilla, Luis Manuel Díaz, Martín Pérez Padrón, Félix Martínez Mendoza and Filadelfo Rangel.
It would be great and I would appreciate if you could help me in creating some of them.
SputnikXX ( talk) 16:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, You keep reverted my edit on Sacad Muuse unilaterally when I am telling you the article at Habr Awal mostly applies to it. I cannot seem to rename it and move it so if you can do this instead of redericting that would be much more helpful. Thanks, Linkjan2014 ( talk)
You suggested deletion as it requires additional external citations - it contains citations from 3 newspapers, various NHS and charity organisations. Without spamming it with citations I’m not sure what change you are actually suggesting here. Imaginarium Monkey ( talk) 13:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my new page and for your comments.
I'm not sure why you've tagged Valerie Ann Mah with issues on notability. There multiple references on her from trusted and independent secondary sources including those from the City of Toronto, Canada's national broadcaster, and others. I plan to remove the tag in the next few days considering the significant coverage on Mah, if you have issues with this, please feel free to respond on my talk. -- Sjschen ( talk) 16:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've looked at WP:VERIFY but am still unsure on how to correct the citation issues. I've provided an additional citation on the page regarding one of it's historical structures if that helps. I've looked around at various Italian governmental websites but I assume due to the obscurity of the town that most documents related to it are likely locally-held or preserved through books and private documents. Is there anything I can do, within reason, to correct the issues? I don't live in the town itself but I do have family that lives there. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:580:C280:2720:6D57:6286:DF93:D21C ( talk) 17:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. I appreciate the speedy reply, have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:580:C280:2720:6D57:6286:DF93:D21C ( talk) 20:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
For reviewing my pages! The Sokks💕 (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
I have added new sources in the Draft:Anastasiia Kotliar. Please review the draft. The Supermind ( talk) 09:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for reviewing my articles! T. E. Meeks ( talk) 12:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm HeinzMaster. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Zdzisław Józef Porosiński, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
HeinzMaster ( talk) 18:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop a note of thanks for your page reviewing on behalf of WP:A&M. You review far more anime and manga articles than any other new page reviewer (you have even reviewed 2 I created Blue Flag (manga) and City (manga), as well as one I helped influence ( A Certain Scientific Railgun: Astral Buddy). Keep up the great work! Link20XX ( talk) 19:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you placed UPE tags on couple of articles I accepted. Can you guide me how do I identify if the article is UPE or not? And in which cases I should put this tag? Would prefer to be more aware on this. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 17:15, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
FYI - See my edit https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mark_Elworth_Jr.&type=revision&diff=1022823536&oldid=1022432133
I think subject needs a fresh AfD, he may fail again, but it looks like he might make it this time. Jeepday ( talk) 18:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but really I don't know how to provide notability, but I can surely provide the sources. But you instead deleted the whole. Please you should have atleast try to talk with me or at least add a "problem with article" template above. Also, this was not a new article created it was a splitted article from another article . Please I think it should be added again. Please follow WP:PRESERVE JaMongKut ( talk) 11:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC) JaMongKut ( talk) 11:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I just wanted to say that I reverted the redirect move you made, as the game comfortably passes WP:GNG. You mentioned "one-line and simple blurbs". Yes, there are few sources like that (from what I checked, Game Informer and Maxim), but the rest are all non trivial coverage. Not to mention decent sized reviews in non-gaming focused media, like The Cincinnati Enquirer and Entertainment Weekly (dead link in the article but available at [1]). Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, was it you who linked all of those common words in "Boundary organization"? If not, I note that you didn't remove them. I've just spent 10 minutes doing so. Tony (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
You have been such a help. Thank you! When you have a chance, could you look at 1 more articles by me: Curtis Williamson. I confess I do feel better when I have your approval. Thanks again, Joan arden murray ( talk) 19:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC) also, can you move articles on the internet? Walter Yarwood, I could hardly find the wikipedia article for all the dealers and it should be first. Someone put it with Painters Eleven, the group he belonged to. Also, I hate how when you put in Canadian Art, the article that comes up is Canadian Art magazine. Ouch! and I worked hard on Canadian Art for wikipedia. And I am sorry about ever touching my own article. I won`t do it again. Joan arden murray ( talk) 10:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
I've reverted your edit on Blackie Dammett. Please explain what is wrong with the article, and why you think it should be (only) a redirect. Kind regards, Saschaporsche ( talk) 18:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 United Wiffleball National Championship, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 United Wiffleball National Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 it seems that when you reviewed the last section (images copyright) you didn't add a new section? -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 15:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to say that I reverted the reversion you made on my Ashley Mizuki Robbins article to it's old revert state, back to the article I wrote, as I feel like with the information and opinions I sourced that it comfortably passes WP:GNG. You mentioned it being "simple blurbs", yet I fail to see how. I admit the article is not worded as heavily as it could be at the moment, but deleting the thing due to that is absurd. And "trivial mentions"? I am not sure how a qualified game journalist considering Ashley one of the greatest females characters in gaming is "trivial", I also don't know how her impact on Japanese gaming culture in helping to cement the adventure genre into the mainstream populous is "trivial" either. Her character being so easily to relate to and surrogate onto was a fairly large part behind the modern resurgence of point-and-click games in Japan, as the article states and cites.
I mean no offence by pointing this out, but I notice that this whole "trivial blurbs and citing" is a problem other users have also had with you in the past. I don't want to make a hassle out of this, but if you honestly want to revert the page back to a redirect, can you go through a legit channel to do it, please? I feel comfortable in the page passing the standards for notability. Thanks. -- 176.250.33.49 ( talk) 17:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
It's what's written and translated from German Wikipedia. I don't maintain it veificability in face of few resources and general Wikia resources of said Fantasy universes. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai ( talk)
Why Did You Redriect 2021-22 NBA season article for
I believe I would vote to delete the article per WP:NMODEL. If you also believe the actor is not notable enough, we could try to delete it once more. Ron Oliver ( talk) 19:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Som time ago, I did an article on Maia-Mari Sutnik and no one checked it. Could you look it over? It`s at /info/en/?search=Maia-Mari_Sutnik. Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 23:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Well, you never let me finish. Next edit, fully updated page. Would you like to retract that AfD? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey talk:Onel5969, thanks for looking at this. I wish I had looked closer: boy it was borderline plagiarism. I wonder if anything should be revdeleted; maybe Diannaa can tell us that. Anyway, please have another look and see if the tag can go. Thank you so much. (I'm a bit embarrassed; no student of mine should have written like this, and I should have caught it.) Dr Aaij ( talk) 03:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey Onel5969. Could you explain this? [2] Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան ( talk) 10:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
What seemed to be wrong with my revision of the page, it was a recreation of the original from scratch. -- Scratchu90 ( talk) 19:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your response, I'll keep that in mind. Scratchu90 ( talk) 21:25, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Could you check /info/en/?search=Ash_K._Prakash when you have time? Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 10:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Oops, I have to make some corrections.Too close to sources. I will tell you when it`s ready. Thanks for your patience. Joan arden murray ( talk) 20:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
You are the subject of an ANI thread. Per ANI rules, I am required to alert you of this thread, which can be found here. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you've moved my article Polish football clubs in European competitions to draftspace. Can you elaborate on what sections need ref improvement. All of them base on the information available on Wikipedia. I added some refs but they seem to be a bit obsolete. Moreover, there are more articles in this category that also could be moved to draftspace, if you would treat them the same way. SandoLorris ( talk) 14:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
I think the article /info/en/?search=Ash_K._Prakash is alright to read now. Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 15:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
When I saw this. Tbh, I think they are correct. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
I know that you reverted edits done by me in Star Vijay Music because of AFD but how can I or anyone recreate the page? How to delete the page from AFD? The page is an important television channel and should not be deleted. Please tell how to delete the page from AFD. Thanks Bhu1147 ( talk) 04:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, are you able to help then, instead of just reverting back to the old revisions. I've been trimming the article and adding lots of new content too, it's just that the title ought to be Strange Tales since that's the more common translation, not sure how to work around the move. Thanks Kingoflettuce ( talk) 13:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
All I did was split it's content from List of Degrassi Junior High and Degrassi High episodes. I did not personally rip anything from imdb and Amazon. Speedy deleting is overkill. You could have just given me a warning to change the article. ToQ100gou ( talk) 23:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hiya - quick one. You tagged Cazzie David for notability, the page creator removed it. I'm minded to AfD as most of the coverage is dependent on her father - what's your view? Had a couple of recent AfD flubs, so not perhaps as confident as I could be! :O) Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
@Onel5969: Given Missvain's recent speedy keep closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin Gupta (academic) I am surprised to see your move of Sachin Gupta (academic) to Draft:Sachin Gupta (academic) for AfC. Can you please explain? Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Happy Vesak, Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy and Blessed Vesak to you and yours! User:JaMongKut ( talk) 18:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC) |
Onel5969, I am confused by your request for speedy deletion of the WORKS San José article. Nevertheless I have tried to address everything that may seem promotional. That is not the intention of the article. WORKS is a historical cultural institution that deserves documentation on WP. Please let me know how the article might be improved further. Thank you Maxmarsh2021 ( talk) 16:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Maxmarsh2021
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on David Litt (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Could you participate in the RM for War in Iraq (2013–2017)? Thanks Ridax2020 ( talk) 09:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Did you just erase an article with more than 15 specific sources in major news magazines and papers about the CEO of a 30 billions dollars company which employs 100 000 people? That looks bold... and not really constructive.
What annoys you on this page? It looks really common to me with no particular issue
Best,
Remi Mathis ( talk) 14:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
How should I do it the way it’s properly done? I did it to BKN as BKN International was a seperately operated company and BKN was just a children’s programming block. Luigitehplumber ( talk) 12:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Should I revert the BKN International page, or wait first? Luigitehplumber ( talk) 12:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
I need some help with a round swap or whatever it's called. Can you move the page to Bohbot Entertainment? I read in the sources that Bohbot Communications only traded under that name until 1994, and it split into two, so I think it's best if it remains as Bohbot Entertainment to avoid any more confusion. Luigitehplumber ( talk) 19:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
You wrote that there's not a single in-depth reference from a secondary, independent source
. Is there a reason that
this (among others) doesn't count as precisely that? {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
00:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page? There was nothing wrong by with it. JuanGLP ( talk) 02:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
When you have time, could you review this article /info/en/?search=L%C3%A9on_Bellefleur? Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 17:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I see you review some of my articles. As if you mind reviewing these articles I made Mel Pape, Korby Siamis, Wilford Lloyd Baumes, Stephen Warbrick, Ben Hartigan, Budd Grossman and Larry Harpel, if it's needs deletion, redirect, some others or if it's fine. I just think it has problems. Thank you. MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk 01:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks for letting me know. MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk 20:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
I appreciate you reviewing my articles, whether it's suitable. As I learned more of Wikipedia of your reviewing. Thanks! MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk) 15:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC) |
Always great to receive props. Great to be wiki ing with you Sucker for All ( talk) 20:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond to explain proper protocol to me. It is much appreciated. I'm happy to hear that you are intrigued by Mr. Archibong's aesthetic. I would hate that the public would not have the opportunity to learn about Mr. Archibong's practice because of my mistake and ignorance about Wikipedia practices. Please find answers to your previous questions below.
1. What is your relationship to User:Electriclamb? I do not know Electriclamb or have any relationship. I only discovered the existence of Mr. Archibong's Wikipedia page a few weeks ago. 2. I'm assuming you're the ip editor who removed the prod tag, correct? Yes, correct. I didn't understand why that tag was placed there and foolishly assumed it was an error. 3. Do you have any relationship with User:LuGgcy? Yes, she is my colleague. As Mr. Archibong is in the Visual Arts field, I asked her to assist in uploading visual content to Wiki Commons thinking this would also offer more context into Mr. Archibong's approach and notable projects Katelovesdesign212 ( talk) 18:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 85 | ← | Archive 88 | Archive 89 | Archive 90 | Archive 91 | Archive 92 | → | Archive 95 |
Archive 78:May 2021
For the first time in a long while I came across an article that got me confused. This is the
article, the article makes numerous bold assertions of notability, it’s definitely {{
fanpov}}
and an a promotional article. I did a
WP:BEFORE search in reliable sources which do not seem to substantiate any of those bogus notability claims made in the article. I’m not sure about this one, so I thought it wise to ask you. What do you think about this?
Celestina007 (
talk)
22:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I think my Datong, Anhui and Shouchun, Anhui pages should not be in draftspace, because of WP:GEOLAND.
Also, can you delete User talk:Pizza0614/TWA? Pizza0614 ( talk) 00:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi , onel5969 articles named 2016 Tamil Nadu Premier League , 2017 Tamil Nadu Premier League , 2018 Tamil Nadu Premier League & 2019 Tamil Nadu Premier League are redirected to Tamil Nadu Premier League by you with reason ( articles are not notable ) but these articles are useful for users for TNPL stats , like most runs , most wickets , season champions , runner , points table so please I request you to don't redirected these pages because single article Tamil Nadu Premier League can't provide all these information . User:தனீஷ் ( talk)
Hi, I wanted to let you know that I quite shocked to see that the article I started writing on UCL Press was simply deleted without any discussion and without providing myself or others with any opportunity to expand the article. This is highly disappointing and also makes me think Wikipedia is simply not a place which is welcome to new editors. If someone acted in such a high handed and unilateral manner where I work, they would not merely be unpopular but at risk of disciplinary.
The publishing house of the largest university proper in the UK, one of the highest ranked in the world, as well as the first open source university publisher and which has published dozens of books to date, is inherently notable. The onus is on others to disprove this. There are numerous reference to the press in reputable third party sources including in the Bookseller which is the leading trade publication in the UK.
I do not have the time to invest in lengthy battles here so will not bother to pursue this further. It has shown me that Wikipedia editing is not a constructive use of my time. TopkapiMusik ( talk) 16:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for tagging this page! I've added citations. Do you think the tag can be removed? If not, could you point out specific claims that you feel are not sufficiently supported?-- Brett ( talk) 18:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that you recently relegated an article that I had created - Timeline of teletext in the UK - to draftspace without consulting me first, thereby not allowing me the opportunity to address your concerns. I have now added further independent references and there are now 18 references from a variety of independent sources and this is more than adequate for the article to satisfy any issues regarding independent references. I have now clicked on "Submit your draft for review!" and can you please reinstate this article to mainspace. Rillington ( talk) 16:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969, according to a message received on my User talk:Neuralia page on April 14, 2021, you deleted page Tim Gorski which I had created weeks before, "because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic". I wonder if you would care to comment further about the specific parts of the page that in your view gave grounds for that qualification. Since the deleted page is not visible now for further reference, I have retrieved from my own sandbox records the initial content of the page at the time of its creation, which is visible now on my subpage User:Neuralia/sandbox/TG. May I ask if in your view such (initial) content already incurred in advertising or if the content responsible for the disqualification was something else, presumably added after I created the page. Your help with this will be greatly appreciated, as (as a learning editor) one wishes not to make the same type of mistake more than once. Thank you. Neuralia ( talk) 18:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
How are you doing, User talk:Onel5969? Good, I hope. Considering all the time and energy I put into making those articles, I ask what all can I do to make them notable and fully accepted - seeing that they are both now within the Scope of Wikipedia. Thanks to you for reading this.( LonerXL ( talk) 04:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC))
Hello Onel. I need your opinion if possible. I nominated PuffballsUnited for speedy deletion, because I understand that this redirection is unnecessary. The person is a designer of the game Among Us. Particularly, I do not find secondary and reliable sources or evidence of notability of this designer to fit in notability for a single event, which could justify the creation of the redirect, as WP:BLP1E. But an editor, who does not seem to me to be experienced, contested the elimination. What do you think? Is this redirection correct? The creator was creating several similar redirects, because of that, a more experienced editor sent to him a warning. Best regards. ✍A.WagnerC ( talk) 17:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Forgive me, but the sources I have added for the Draft: Society of Sciences in Lund is the Swedish National Encyclopedia www.ne.se and the Swedish State Calendar which is the official calendar of the Swedish state - both surely must be taken as reliable indications of notability and relevance to list this learned society in Wikipedia as is. Apart from the society itself, ne.se and the state calendar, it is hard to find others writing about the society. The learned publications series are of high quality but as little admissible as the society website. But this does not alter the fact that ne.se article should suffice as an indication of notability and relevance. Jonar242 ( talk) 14:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing this article.— TrottieTrue ( talk) 13:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello there, may I ask why you reverted my changes to the Inti-Plasma Farming and NES page? My changes made perfect sense, as also explained in the change message. Thanks, Vormoza ( talk) 13:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, thank you for your review of the Nicholas Simon page. I saw that your reason for proposing the article for deletion is because there is "not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NFILMMAKER." Given that there are three separate in-depth sources on the page's subject (they address the topic directly and in detail, not needing original research; the sources are authoritative - the NYFA is a reputable establishment in the film industry, and Peter Fox and Patrick Brzeski are known film and media journalists/commentators; they are secondary sources; they are independent sources, as interviews aren't press releases) and WP:GNG states that there is no fixed number of sources required, I was wondering what other sources would you consider necessary for the article to meet the guideline?
In regards to the concern about not meeting WP:FILMMAKER, I was wondering if the page's subject must fulfill all four points? While I do believe that Simon is an important figure (as one of the few producers working on international feature films and TV shows), has played a major role in co-creating significant/well-known works (namely Extraction and A Prayer Before Dawn, as these were mostly filmed in Thailand, and scenes in several Avengers movies), and his works have become a significant monument (in that they mark a growth in SEA's developing film industry), I don't think he has (or at least, as far as I'm aware of) originated a new concept/theory/technique. However, I believe he does fulfill these three other points and is an encyclopedia-worthy subject.
I would appreciate any further advice and comments you have, as I want to fix the page before the week is over and prevent it from being deleted.
Many thanks!
Kind regards,
-- Minekovaa ( talk) 02:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hamidabad College, Satsia হানিফ আলী ( talk) 05:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. I just wanted to ask you which particular policy of WP:Split mandated that a standalaone article on Imelda Staunton's acting credits was not necessary, especially considering how vast it is? Will keep that in mind for sure before doing the same in future. Thanks. Jovian Eclipse ( talk) 11:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel, I'm creating articles of former Mexican footballers who are now coaches and I wanted to ask you if you could help me in creating some of them, these are the following: Juan Manuel Rivera, Octavio Becerril, Luis Fernando Soto, Esteve Padilla, Luis Manuel Díaz, Martín Pérez Padrón, Félix Martínez Mendoza and Filadelfo Rangel.
It would be great and I would appreciate if you could help me in creating some of them.
SputnikXX ( talk) 16:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, You keep reverted my edit on Sacad Muuse unilaterally when I am telling you the article at Habr Awal mostly applies to it. I cannot seem to rename it and move it so if you can do this instead of redericting that would be much more helpful. Thanks, Linkjan2014 ( talk)
You suggested deletion as it requires additional external citations - it contains citations from 3 newspapers, various NHS and charity organisations. Without spamming it with citations I’m not sure what change you are actually suggesting here. Imaginarium Monkey ( talk) 13:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my new page and for your comments.
I'm not sure why you've tagged Valerie Ann Mah with issues on notability. There multiple references on her from trusted and independent secondary sources including those from the City of Toronto, Canada's national broadcaster, and others. I plan to remove the tag in the next few days considering the significant coverage on Mah, if you have issues with this, please feel free to respond on my talk. -- Sjschen ( talk) 16:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I've looked at WP:VERIFY but am still unsure on how to correct the citation issues. I've provided an additional citation on the page regarding one of it's historical structures if that helps. I've looked around at various Italian governmental websites but I assume due to the obscurity of the town that most documents related to it are likely locally-held or preserved through books and private documents. Is there anything I can do, within reason, to correct the issues? I don't live in the town itself but I do have family that lives there. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:580:C280:2720:6D57:6286:DF93:D21C ( talk) 17:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. I appreciate the speedy reply, have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:580:C280:2720:6D57:6286:DF93:D21C ( talk) 20:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
For reviewing my pages! The Sokks💕 (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
I have added new sources in the Draft:Anastasiia Kotliar. Please review the draft. The Supermind ( talk) 09:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for reviewing my articles! T. E. Meeks ( talk) 12:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm HeinzMaster. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Zdzisław Józef Porosiński, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
HeinzMaster ( talk) 18:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop a note of thanks for your page reviewing on behalf of WP:A&M. You review far more anime and manga articles than any other new page reviewer (you have even reviewed 2 I created Blue Flag (manga) and City (manga), as well as one I helped influence ( A Certain Scientific Railgun: Astral Buddy). Keep up the great work! Link20XX ( talk) 19:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you placed UPE tags on couple of articles I accepted. Can you guide me how do I identify if the article is UPE or not? And in which cases I should put this tag? Would prefer to be more aware on this. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 17:15, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
FYI - See my edit https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mark_Elworth_Jr.&type=revision&diff=1022823536&oldid=1022432133
I think subject needs a fresh AfD, he may fail again, but it looks like he might make it this time. Jeepday ( talk) 18:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but really I don't know how to provide notability, but I can surely provide the sources. But you instead deleted the whole. Please you should have atleast try to talk with me or at least add a "problem with article" template above. Also, this was not a new article created it was a splitted article from another article . Please I think it should be added again. Please follow WP:PRESERVE JaMongKut ( talk) 11:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC) JaMongKut ( talk) 11:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I just wanted to say that I reverted the redirect move you made, as the game comfortably passes WP:GNG. You mentioned "one-line and simple blurbs". Yes, there are few sources like that (from what I checked, Game Informer and Maxim), but the rest are all non trivial coverage. Not to mention decent sized reviews in non-gaming focused media, like The Cincinnati Enquirer and Entertainment Weekly (dead link in the article but available at [1]). Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, was it you who linked all of those common words in "Boundary organization"? If not, I note that you didn't remove them. I've just spent 10 minutes doing so. Tony (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
You have been such a help. Thank you! When you have a chance, could you look at 1 more articles by me: Curtis Williamson. I confess I do feel better when I have your approval. Thanks again, Joan arden murray ( talk) 19:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC) also, can you move articles on the internet? Walter Yarwood, I could hardly find the wikipedia article for all the dealers and it should be first. Someone put it with Painters Eleven, the group he belonged to. Also, I hate how when you put in Canadian Art, the article that comes up is Canadian Art magazine. Ouch! and I worked hard on Canadian Art for wikipedia. And I am sorry about ever touching my own article. I won`t do it again. Joan arden murray ( talk) 10:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
I've reverted your edit on Blackie Dammett. Please explain what is wrong with the article, and why you think it should be (only) a redirect. Kind regards, Saschaporsche ( talk) 18:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 United Wiffleball National Championship, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 United Wiffleball National Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 it seems that when you reviewed the last section (images copyright) you didn't add a new section? -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 15:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to say that I reverted the reversion you made on my Ashley Mizuki Robbins article to it's old revert state, back to the article I wrote, as I feel like with the information and opinions I sourced that it comfortably passes WP:GNG. You mentioned it being "simple blurbs", yet I fail to see how. I admit the article is not worded as heavily as it could be at the moment, but deleting the thing due to that is absurd. And "trivial mentions"? I am not sure how a qualified game journalist considering Ashley one of the greatest females characters in gaming is "trivial", I also don't know how her impact on Japanese gaming culture in helping to cement the adventure genre into the mainstream populous is "trivial" either. Her character being so easily to relate to and surrogate onto was a fairly large part behind the modern resurgence of point-and-click games in Japan, as the article states and cites.
I mean no offence by pointing this out, but I notice that this whole "trivial blurbs and citing" is a problem other users have also had with you in the past. I don't want to make a hassle out of this, but if you honestly want to revert the page back to a redirect, can you go through a legit channel to do it, please? I feel comfortable in the page passing the standards for notability. Thanks. -- 176.250.33.49 ( talk) 17:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
It's what's written and translated from German Wikipedia. I don't maintain it veificability in face of few resources and general Wikia resources of said Fantasy universes. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai ( talk)
Why Did You Redriect 2021-22 NBA season article for
I believe I would vote to delete the article per WP:NMODEL. If you also believe the actor is not notable enough, we could try to delete it once more. Ron Oliver ( talk) 19:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Som time ago, I did an article on Maia-Mari Sutnik and no one checked it. Could you look it over? It`s at /info/en/?search=Maia-Mari_Sutnik. Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 23:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Well, you never let me finish. Next edit, fully updated page. Would you like to retract that AfD? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey talk:Onel5969, thanks for looking at this. I wish I had looked closer: boy it was borderline plagiarism. I wonder if anything should be revdeleted; maybe Diannaa can tell us that. Anyway, please have another look and see if the tag can go. Thank you so much. (I'm a bit embarrassed; no student of mine should have written like this, and I should have caught it.) Dr Aaij ( talk) 03:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey Onel5969. Could you explain this? [2] Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան ( talk) 10:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
What seemed to be wrong with my revision of the page, it was a recreation of the original from scratch. -- Scratchu90 ( talk) 19:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your response, I'll keep that in mind. Scratchu90 ( talk) 21:25, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Could you check /info/en/?search=Ash_K._Prakash when you have time? Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 10:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Oops, I have to make some corrections.Too close to sources. I will tell you when it`s ready. Thanks for your patience. Joan arden murray ( talk) 20:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
You are the subject of an ANI thread. Per ANI rules, I am required to alert you of this thread, which can be found here. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you've moved my article Polish football clubs in European competitions to draftspace. Can you elaborate on what sections need ref improvement. All of them base on the information available on Wikipedia. I added some refs but they seem to be a bit obsolete. Moreover, there are more articles in this category that also could be moved to draftspace, if you would treat them the same way. SandoLorris ( talk) 14:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
I think the article /info/en/?search=Ash_K._Prakash is alright to read now. Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 15:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
When I saw this. Tbh, I think they are correct. Celestina007 ( talk) 12:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
I know that you reverted edits done by me in Star Vijay Music because of AFD but how can I or anyone recreate the page? How to delete the page from AFD? The page is an important television channel and should not be deleted. Please tell how to delete the page from AFD. Thanks Bhu1147 ( talk) 04:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, are you able to help then, instead of just reverting back to the old revisions. I've been trimming the article and adding lots of new content too, it's just that the title ought to be Strange Tales since that's the more common translation, not sure how to work around the move. Thanks Kingoflettuce ( talk) 13:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
All I did was split it's content from List of Degrassi Junior High and Degrassi High episodes. I did not personally rip anything from imdb and Amazon. Speedy deleting is overkill. You could have just given me a warning to change the article. ToQ100gou ( talk) 23:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hiya - quick one. You tagged Cazzie David for notability, the page creator removed it. I'm minded to AfD as most of the coverage is dependent on her father - what's your view? Had a couple of recent AfD flubs, so not perhaps as confident as I could be! :O) Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
@Onel5969: Given Missvain's recent speedy keep closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin Gupta (academic) I am surprised to see your move of Sachin Gupta (academic) to Draft:Sachin Gupta (academic) for AfC. Can you please explain? Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Happy Vesak, Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy and Blessed Vesak to you and yours! User:JaMongKut ( talk) 18:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC) |
Onel5969, I am confused by your request for speedy deletion of the WORKS San José article. Nevertheless I have tried to address everything that may seem promotional. That is not the intention of the article. WORKS is a historical cultural institution that deserves documentation on WP. Please let me know how the article might be improved further. Thank you Maxmarsh2021 ( talk) 16:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Maxmarsh2021
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on David Litt (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Could you participate in the RM for War in Iraq (2013–2017)? Thanks Ridax2020 ( talk) 09:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Did you just erase an article with more than 15 specific sources in major news magazines and papers about the CEO of a 30 billions dollars company which employs 100 000 people? That looks bold... and not really constructive.
What annoys you on this page? It looks really common to me with no particular issue
Best,
Remi Mathis ( talk) 14:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
How should I do it the way it’s properly done? I did it to BKN as BKN International was a seperately operated company and BKN was just a children’s programming block. Luigitehplumber ( talk) 12:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Should I revert the BKN International page, or wait first? Luigitehplumber ( talk) 12:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
I need some help with a round swap or whatever it's called. Can you move the page to Bohbot Entertainment? I read in the sources that Bohbot Communications only traded under that name until 1994, and it split into two, so I think it's best if it remains as Bohbot Entertainment to avoid any more confusion. Luigitehplumber ( talk) 19:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
You wrote that there's not a single in-depth reference from a secondary, independent source
. Is there a reason that
this (among others) doesn't count as precisely that? {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
00:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page? There was nothing wrong by with it. JuanGLP ( talk) 02:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
When you have time, could you review this article /info/en/?search=L%C3%A9on_Bellefleur? Thank you, Joan arden murray ( talk) 17:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I see you review some of my articles. As if you mind reviewing these articles I made Mel Pape, Korby Siamis, Wilford Lloyd Baumes, Stephen Warbrick, Ben Hartigan, Budd Grossman and Larry Harpel, if it's needs deletion, redirect, some others or if it's fine. I just think it has problems. Thank you. MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk 01:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks for letting me know. MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk 20:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
I appreciate you reviewing my articles, whether it's suitable. As I learned more of Wikipedia of your reviewing. Thanks! MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk) 15:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC) |
Always great to receive props. Great to be wiki ing with you Sucker for All ( talk) 20:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond to explain proper protocol to me. It is much appreciated. I'm happy to hear that you are intrigued by Mr. Archibong's aesthetic. I would hate that the public would not have the opportunity to learn about Mr. Archibong's practice because of my mistake and ignorance about Wikipedia practices. Please find answers to your previous questions below.
1. What is your relationship to User:Electriclamb? I do not know Electriclamb or have any relationship. I only discovered the existence of Mr. Archibong's Wikipedia page a few weeks ago. 2. I'm assuming you're the ip editor who removed the prod tag, correct? Yes, correct. I didn't understand why that tag was placed there and foolishly assumed it was an error. 3. Do you have any relationship with User:LuGgcy? Yes, she is my colleague. As Mr. Archibong is in the Visual Arts field, I asked her to assist in uploading visual content to Wiki Commons thinking this would also offer more context into Mr. Archibong's approach and notable projects Katelovesdesign212 ( talk) 18:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)