![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | → | Archive 90 |
Archive 71:October 2020
Greetings. The discussion page for your nomination here was not created. -- Finngall talk 23:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, buddy,
I know it was deleted but I opened it years later after the kickboxer fought for the ISKA World Title against Florent Kaouachi. Meci de titlu mondial pentru Cristian Ristea. The article is sourced though. So since then there was this important modification which qualifies it as notable on our site. So it passes WP:NKICK today. .karellian-24 ( talk) 14:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I see that you took the deletion nomination template off of Rubbery Figures with "closed as Keep", but you didn't actually close it on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubbery Figures. The article was only nominated yesterday, so I think it's possible that you closed it by mistake. Would you mind taking a look? — Toughpigs ( talk) 14:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
Thank you for giving me good advice! Cheer VocalIndia ( talk) 19:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC) |
Hello. Regarding the article, Baruch Dov Povarsky, you deleted its contents and turned it into a redirect page, saying that there's "no demonstrated notability." However, the article sourced "Make the Torah Sweet". from Hamodia.com, which clearly demonstrated his notability. Charlie Smith FDTB ( talk) 03:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Iron Age hand bailer of Nydam Mose |
DannyS712 bot III seems be topping the NPR charts these days, but you and a couple of other editors have been nipping at its electronic heels for some time now. Just a few weeks ago we were up at >10,000 articles in the queue - it's been great to see that figure come down, largely due to your amazing contributions. Thanks, and keep it up! GirthSummit (blether) 15:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC) |
Why did you put the wrong redirect back into place ( source)? -- MartinThoma ( talk) 15:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, I have resolved the G12 concerns in COVID-19 pandemic in Solomon Islands by removing the infringing content and deleting the revisions which contained the text. As a result, the article only has two references and is probably in WP:TOOSOON territory. I wouldn't, however, suggest draftifying at this time and it may be appropriate to redirect again until more sourcing is available. cc Vikram maingi -- TheSandDoctor Talk 17:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
When you moved Talk:Pavas District to Talk:Pavas, you did so without leaving a redirect. Which one of the redirect suppression criteria do you believe applied here? I don't see any that seem to, so for now, I've created the redirect. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 00:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, you reverted the removal of the redirect on Crusading and the addition of content with the comment that the info was covered in the target. Understandable, if you weren't involved in the many painful discussions on the Crusades talk page about that article's scope. Consensus is (currently) that the scope of that article is the crusades in the Holy Land c1096-1291. That means there is a requirement for an article to cover the paradigm of Crusading that begins before and continues long after that period as well as spreading across Europe, Africa and Asia. Titles were considered less important than content.
On the back of this some of the wider content needs excising from Crusades.
I hope that makes sense? Thank you. Norfolkbigfish ( talk) 16:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Admittedly both articles require further work to remove the overlap but this is a start. Norfolkbigfish ( talk) 21:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi sir, can i know why you request to delete the articles Piriyadha Varam Vendum (TV series) and other articles. Parkijolli ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, you recently reverted the edit I made on the Premios CEC page, essentially deleting an entire article's worth of work in just one click. Your argument is that there aren't sufficient in-depth citations to support the article. I would contend that there are various online publications which could support each mention of an award win in the article, and instead of deleting the page, you could have tried to improve it by looking up a few of these, or simply added a hatnote stating that the article needed further citations. I understand where you're coming from, presumably, in your attempt to assure that Wikipedia isn't cluttered up with poorly cited articles, and I've done my share of this as well, but the Premios are the oldest film award ceremony in Spain, second in prominence only to the Goya Awards, and as such, I would say they deserve their own page. Perhaps you could also be a little more circumspect about deleting the work of others in such a wholesale way without first trying to make improvements to said work or seeking dialogue with the author of the work. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Please check out my article, I have been waiting for a long time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatowiki725 ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, hope you are doing great! How does Nino Cassanello passes WP:PROF ? TheBirdsShedTears ( talk) 14:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
What I understand from the admins is that wp:toosoon is applied to the proposed arenas, and that category might disappear. The arenas and stadiums UNDER CONSTRUCTION like SC-Stadion are ok. If a building is under construction normally it will be completed. Rostadia2012 ( talk) 19:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
I was quite pleased to be notified that you had reviewed my article Yorkton Film Festival Golden Sheaf Award - Indigenous. Thank you! |
Kind regards, LorriBrown ( talk) 20:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hey, so I've noticed that you keep undoing my actions. I've also seen that you asked for more info and I have provided. It just seems to me that you don't want to keep her page because she hasn't done anything after the series. However, most houseguests with an actual page have done less than she has. Let me know what you want from me so the page can be kept. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryrymitchell ( talk • contribs) 01:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
She does, she wasn't just on Big Brother, she was on The Challenge as well, and on multiple small reality shows as well. Maybe we can give another reviewer a shot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryrymitchell ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you made the page Stephanie Cmar into a redirect to Top Chef: All-Stars L.A. because "no notability outside show". I was wondering why you thought this was the case. The page clearly showed that she was a contestant on two other seasons of Top Chef (ie. not just notable for one event/one season of Top Chef). There are many sources referring to Cmar (albeit, not cited in the previous version of the article) that predate Top Chef: All-Stars L.A. by several years. Boston Magazine 2014 Article/ Other Boston Magazine 2014 Article, 2016 Eater article, 2014 NYT article supporting that Cmar competed in Top Chef season 10, 2017 Mic Article supporting Cmar's notability for Top Chef season 11 calling her "one of the most screwed-over contestants in show history". I could list more, but I don't want to overwhelm you.
I appreciate that your editing is bold, but I think that in light of the existence of such sources it doesn't make sense to have Cmar redirect to Top Chef: All-Stars LA. If you agree that the redirect is possibly inappropriate in light of these sources, I would be more than happy to go back and add the sources and their information to the article Samsmachado ( talk) 15:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I have recently created a page Neeraj Udhwani keeping all the guidelines in mind and doing so. So I think it will take much time to be reviewed by someone, so if you could help review it, I will be very thankful! Adnanjavidkhan1 ( talk) 10:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I went back to revert it from published to sandbox to fix several issues and it was gone. I have spent a couple of hours now and have learned much. I put this site in sandbox over a year ago and came back and pushed publish too quickly. Can I get this back in sandbox? Or do I need to start from scratch? Kanedbender ( talk) 19:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I saw you write somewhere that you're staying away from reviewing college sports bios. IMO the issue there is that the routine level of coverage for top players at the college level is basically indistinguishable from pro coverage for all but the most elite "changed the history of the sport" players. If GNG is supposed to approximate the level of coverage that makes a subject of encyclopedic, historical interest, the bar is set far too low for athletes. signed, Rosguill talk 02:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Onel5969, Thank you very much! for reviewing the
Emerging Filmmaker award page.
LorriBrown (
talk)
Hi Onel5969, Recently you have change the stub content of The Karski Report to a redirect to his author Claude Lanzmann arguing not WP:NFILM. I am not agree with your criteria, bc I think that the article meets the needed attributes for notability : "2. The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following: * Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release." --> There are non-trivial articles in "The Guardian" here, "The New Yorker" here, "Variety" here, "Indiwire" here, etc. The documentary was also projected at the Berlinale (Berlin film festival) , and at The Lincoln center. I know the article is just a stub now, and must grow maybe as the French equivalent fr:Le Rapport Karski (film), but the subject meets the notability criteria to have his own article. Could you please reconsider your decision and restore the stub content ? Thanks for your time to check it. Alexcalamaro ( talk) 08:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for making the recent edit on Ryan-Mark Parsons. There is some confusion, as I didn't want to reopen nomination for deletion discussion, as this has already taken place recently. There is a user who has created an account with the purpose to target and vandalise the page. They inserted the proposal for deletion. Do you have any advice on how to deal with this user who seems intent on targeting and vandalising the page? JPA24 ( talk) 12:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice. I'm trying to improve the article everyday and I can now see the user has made changes that I think are objective and overall improves the quality of the article. If you look at the page history and edit summaries, I'm sure you can agree there seems to be some kind of targeting taking place. Of course, I see many people edit this page, but never with the same fury behind some of the edits this user is making. Plus, you can see they created an account to initially blank the page, as it was protected, it wasn't possible to do this via IP editing. Even the edit history is bizarre, they have just made many changes and now reverted the edits, just seems very suspect. JPA24 ( talk) 13:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, what do you think /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zvi_Sever ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.12.180.134 ( talk) 21:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw that you took away an article about an album by Jett Rebel that I wrote. I don't really understand why this happened, since I followed all the guidelines? I'm always careful to follow the rules, and I'd like to learn how to prevent this from happening again. The image is legal and meets all requirements. Hopefully you can help me? thank you in advance!-- Esther Claassen ( talk) 18:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jett Rebel Live Forever Album cover 2019.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Jett Rebel Live Forever Album cover 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Thevidiya paiyan — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2409:4072:88D:2692:C5F9:76CB:7E56:A8CD (
talk)
12:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry Onel, but I've again found you making bad redirects. NiziU's Make You Happy topped various charts in Japan, Marie Ueda's Heartbreaker reached the top 40 of the charts in Japan and has enough news sources, as does the song " Basquiat" by Pentagon. Please be more careful redirecting sources with a majority of non-English language sources in future. You've done this before, and it really looks like because you don't understand those languages, you believe they must not be notable topics even when there's enough. I could be wrong, but I've said this to you before and this is again what it looks like. There are enough there on both to assert the releases' notability independent of their charting—even if, admittedly, the charting information was absent. The albums Dark Hearts by Annie and Album No. 8 by Katie Melua could have more news sources present on their articles, but each album is definitely notable. Both albums are out tomorrow (August 16), and Melua's album is guaranteed to chart based on her profile and past success, and even if it's not demonstrated on the article, I can see Annie's album has received extensive coverage in Norwegian media. These are definitely cases for Template:Sources exist. I don't wish to have an argument with you over whether you consider each to be notable because I'm not as active as I used to be, and also because I know you don't think they are notable—you redirected them. But if you disagree with my reverting you on each, the next step is AFD, not to re-revert and restore the redirect. I'm just asking you to be a bit more thorough or maybe do some searches for sources for the topics yourself in future. Maybe tag them with Template:Sources exist if you find the sources and don't want to add them yourself, instead of boldly redirecting so much. Thanks. Ss 112 16:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Onel5969:,
I noticed you added a citations needed reference to the top of the page of Homotopy associative algebra. I'm confused where the issue is. I've added plenty of citations in the article, so can you point to a location where you think there's a problem? Wundzer ( talk) 20:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
You don't seem to even understand. Pete Rock said on video that he's dropping PeteStrumentals 3 in December. If you didn't watch that video on youtube, you need to watch again. He gave out latest updates on his new project. So please stop with the reverts. smdfh Ceedub88 02:24, 15 October 2020
/info/en/?search=Teezio Acafix2 ( talk) 08:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
I actually think there is a lot of merit towards a new article, but it kind of needs a native French editor to go through the other cases and link them together. Maybe you can understand where I am coming from regarding that article. Cheers. Govvy ( talk) 15:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Page Title Wakoklon Heelel Thilel salai Amailon Pukok Puya is correct term. The name Wakoklon Heelel Thilen salai Amailon Pukok Puya is not a proper term as there is spelling difference between Thilel and Thilen. Afingba Mangang ( talk) 17:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
I told you before Pete is dropping PeteStrumentals 3 in DECEMBER!!!. i would greatly appreciated if you would PLEASE STOP WITH REVERTS!! Pete already gave out the good news on his upcoming project. OK. thank you!!!! Ceedub88 17:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
(Per WP:DABMENTION) https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Fairview_Drive&oldid=983048076
![]() |
Was perusing edit histories and saw your name again, thrilled to see that you're back! Keep up the good work. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 06:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. I'm not aware of my edits ever being "reviewed" in the past several years, and now it's becoming an almost common occurrence. Still, over a dozen articles at once is very unusual. What does this "reviewing" consist of? I honestly have no idea. Thanks for explaining. Arminden ( talk) 23:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi please review this page Dulhan (Drama) Kaleem Bhatti Talk 14:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. You ask for additional sources. Please tell me, which sentence or part of the article exactly needs additional sources. A general statement like this does not make sense. Thank you, -- Gereon K. ( talk) 15:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
It seems to me that based on the [ [1]] an article shouldn't be moved to the Draft namespace if someone is actively working on it. It seems pretty clear in the edit history that the article was under progress by myself. Why did you decide to move it to Drafts without contacting me? -- ZeiP ( talk) 12:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I would prefer Nanya not being merged under their "parent" company, as they do completely different things and operate in different industries. That would be like merging merill lynch under BofA, or JP morgan under JS morgan & co. Keiichi88 ( talk) 05:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
I dont mean to further increase your burden when youre already busy, so there's no need to hurry on this, but ...
is it really possible that a company worth over $250 million could fail WP:GNG? I am really surprised. I think we are in the age now where brick-and-mortar stores are no longer the best measure of a company's size. After all, an online retailer may well have no physical stores at all. But I trust your judgment.
Best regards,
— Soap — 22:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, this article was reviewed three months ago. If you feel the article warrants speedy deletion or a redirect, please go through the normal procedure and nominate it as such. Thank you. Larry Dunn ( talk) 03:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ruchira Panda, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's a lot more sources this time, making it sufficiently different to need to go back to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 09:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hey! I saw that you reviewed some of my articles, thank you very much. I added sources to Nittany Lion Wrestling Club and everything that appears in the article can now be found in the them. Should I remove the template message? Thanks. PabloLikesToWrestle ( talk) 14:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
I saw you PRODded this; the creator removed it. I have also had some issues with the article. I don't know if I support deletion since I haven't looked at all the sources, but I suppose AfD is the next step. If you go that route, please ping me. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 15:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
hello sir/mdm i am not angry at you, but i felt discouraged. the three articles i created are nominated for deletion, including the nonoi murder and the kovan double murders which you nominated. the third was the death of darren ng wei jie.
i only started out a newcomer this year. i am thinking should i continue as a editor of wikipedia since my articles got nominated for deletion within a short time since creation, having thought of those articles that stayed for a long time but never get nominated for deletion
i felt depressed because the effort i put in in creating a new article seem to amount to nothing the moment it is deleted i really feel i should voice out to you at least, because i want to let you know how i feel. i really feel depressed about it, even feel like despising myself for being incapable. i am sorry. NelsonLee20042020 ( talk) 16:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, One15969. I have read your response. I think what you said was right. Your encouragement and what you said about learning from the negative criticisms, I understand what you mean and felt better thinking about it. Thank you, it is great talking to you. I got to hear helpful advice from you. NelsonLee20042020 ( talk) 02:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969! I've improved Thomas Reynolds (priest) since your last visit. If you want to give it a look... -- Clementeste( Talk) 09:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
You have reviewed and said this page would be deleted. Wendy Bain is a working actress and screen writer in Los Angeles - married to Sam Bain - what more does this page need in order to remain? Could you let me know in layman’s terms please. Noam25 ( talk) 14:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I see you reverted my change of the Solidago lateriflora redirect page. I was trying to change the redirect to a DAG because Solidago lateriflora was first used by Linnaeus in 1753 to define what is now named Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. Later, the name was used by Raf. from non-published material of DC. to describe Solidago caesia. Without the official full taxonomic names that include the authors, Solidago lateriflora is ambiguous. Using Solidago lateriflora to redirect to Solidago caesia is correct but not complete -- it leaves out the also correct basionym of Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. I think a DAG is in order, but perhaps I did this incorrectly. Could you help me out? It is my first DAG and I studied the different instructional pages before making the changes. Thank you in advance. -- Eewilson ( talk) 06:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Slashme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Trend Receiver, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Slashme ( talk) 13:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks for reviewing the new page British Phycological Society. Much appreciated!-- MerielGJones ( talk) 14:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the page of Franklin Cudjoe. Unfortunately there were a few issues related to copyright infringement. Some of the things are names of institutions, companies and titles which can't actually be changed. Furthermore the issues raised on the article has been rechecked and so I suggest you review it again and crosscheck. The article is a needed one for Wikipedia GH and shouldnt be deleted due to the issues raised. Issues relating to the article should be pointed out for furhter correction and review. Thanks. Ampimd ( talk) 22:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. Is there any particular reason why you decided to delete the University of Western Australia Law School page and replace it with a redirect to the main page for the University of Western Australia? Among the Group of Eight universities, the other seven law schools have their own Wikipedia pages, as do countless other law schools worldwide, so I don't see what you found objectionable about this specific page. -- Drevolt ( talk) 23:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my initial work to create a new page for MDA Corporation. Many of the previous MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates assets that were acquired in 2017 through an RTO to become Maxar have been repatriated to the newly formed Canadian firm MDA Corporation. Now both companies exist and they are indeed separate entities with different offerings. I am going to revert your undo and start to build out a proper page for MDA Corporation. Brantzmyers ( talk) 01:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
I was going to ask WP:RM to rename this as an uncontroversial move, but I noticed you have already reverted the editor Cassidd's creation of this article – be aware that they've simply recreated it at They Call Us Au Go-Go Singers (album). There doesn't seem much point asking for it to be renamed without the disambiguator, or to create a double redirect – not sure what the best plan of action here is. I've noticed this editor seems to be creating as many articles related to Stephen Stills as they can, and many of them are of dubious notability. Richard3120 ( talk) 20:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
|
Thank you for your reviews! :) Neopeius ( talk) 00:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you so much for your reviews on my new wikipedia articles! Hope that I am able to contribute more to the Wikipedia in a resourceful manner. :) -- Aleyamma38 ( talk) 10:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
Aleyamma38 - no worries. Welcome to Wikipedia. Onel5969 TT me 21:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC) onel5969 - Thanks a lot Sir/Madam -- Aleyamma38 ( talk) 11:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No problem from me if you want to delete Walter Adam Lawson. Leveni ( talk) 23:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of OroraTech, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it has real encyclopedic value: The described company is the only private endeavor (in Europe, if not worldwide) to approach the issue of wildfire detection from space; which is subject to scientifical discussion since many years, and also objective of several public space programs (ESA, NASA). Relevance is further underlined by funding for the company from such agencies. Granted, phrasing is a bit press release-like, but I should be able to fix this. -- MultiPolitikus ( talk) 20:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, I hope this message finds you well! I saw that you reverted my redirect/move for Piperia elegans (to Platanthera elegans) earlier. I wonder if we could just discuss it a bit? The Wikipedia page for Piperia is already a redirect to Platanthera (because the former is now considered a synonym of the latter), so I thought I would just move Piperia elegans to Platanthera elegans. Looking through the pages for the other former Piperia species, however, it seems that none of them reflect the genus change. If I moved all the former Piperias to their respective Platanthera pages to ensure uniformity, would that address your objection, or is there another issue? I am also working on hopefully expanding the pages for the former Piperias, if that helps. Best regards, JadeSpire ( talk) 22:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | → | Archive 90 |
Archive 71:October 2020
Greetings. The discussion page for your nomination here was not created. -- Finngall talk 23:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, buddy,
I know it was deleted but I opened it years later after the kickboxer fought for the ISKA World Title against Florent Kaouachi. Meci de titlu mondial pentru Cristian Ristea. The article is sourced though. So since then there was this important modification which qualifies it as notable on our site. So it passes WP:NKICK today. .karellian-24 ( talk) 14:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I see that you took the deletion nomination template off of Rubbery Figures with "closed as Keep", but you didn't actually close it on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubbery Figures. The article was only nominated yesterday, so I think it's possible that you closed it by mistake. Would you mind taking a look? — Toughpigs ( talk) 14:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
Thank you for giving me good advice! Cheer VocalIndia ( talk) 19:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC) |
Hello. Regarding the article, Baruch Dov Povarsky, you deleted its contents and turned it into a redirect page, saying that there's "no demonstrated notability." However, the article sourced "Make the Torah Sweet". from Hamodia.com, which clearly demonstrated his notability. Charlie Smith FDTB ( talk) 03:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Iron Age hand bailer of Nydam Mose |
DannyS712 bot III seems be topping the NPR charts these days, but you and a couple of other editors have been nipping at its electronic heels for some time now. Just a few weeks ago we were up at >10,000 articles in the queue - it's been great to see that figure come down, largely due to your amazing contributions. Thanks, and keep it up! GirthSummit (blether) 15:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC) |
Why did you put the wrong redirect back into place ( source)? -- MartinThoma ( talk) 15:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, I have resolved the G12 concerns in COVID-19 pandemic in Solomon Islands by removing the infringing content and deleting the revisions which contained the text. As a result, the article only has two references and is probably in WP:TOOSOON territory. I wouldn't, however, suggest draftifying at this time and it may be appropriate to redirect again until more sourcing is available. cc Vikram maingi -- TheSandDoctor Talk 17:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
When you moved Talk:Pavas District to Talk:Pavas, you did so without leaving a redirect. Which one of the redirect suppression criteria do you believe applied here? I don't see any that seem to, so for now, I've created the redirect. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 00:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, you reverted the removal of the redirect on Crusading and the addition of content with the comment that the info was covered in the target. Understandable, if you weren't involved in the many painful discussions on the Crusades talk page about that article's scope. Consensus is (currently) that the scope of that article is the crusades in the Holy Land c1096-1291. That means there is a requirement for an article to cover the paradigm of Crusading that begins before and continues long after that period as well as spreading across Europe, Africa and Asia. Titles were considered less important than content.
On the back of this some of the wider content needs excising from Crusades.
I hope that makes sense? Thank you. Norfolkbigfish ( talk) 16:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Admittedly both articles require further work to remove the overlap but this is a start. Norfolkbigfish ( talk) 21:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi sir, can i know why you request to delete the articles Piriyadha Varam Vendum (TV series) and other articles. Parkijolli ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, you recently reverted the edit I made on the Premios CEC page, essentially deleting an entire article's worth of work in just one click. Your argument is that there aren't sufficient in-depth citations to support the article. I would contend that there are various online publications which could support each mention of an award win in the article, and instead of deleting the page, you could have tried to improve it by looking up a few of these, or simply added a hatnote stating that the article needed further citations. I understand where you're coming from, presumably, in your attempt to assure that Wikipedia isn't cluttered up with poorly cited articles, and I've done my share of this as well, but the Premios are the oldest film award ceremony in Spain, second in prominence only to the Goya Awards, and as such, I would say they deserve their own page. Perhaps you could also be a little more circumspect about deleting the work of others in such a wholesale way without first trying to make improvements to said work or seeking dialogue with the author of the work. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Please check out my article, I have been waiting for a long time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatowiki725 ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, hope you are doing great! How does Nino Cassanello passes WP:PROF ? TheBirdsShedTears ( talk) 14:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
What I understand from the admins is that wp:toosoon is applied to the proposed arenas, and that category might disappear. The arenas and stadiums UNDER CONSTRUCTION like SC-Stadion are ok. If a building is under construction normally it will be completed. Rostadia2012 ( talk) 19:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
I was quite pleased to be notified that you had reviewed my article Yorkton Film Festival Golden Sheaf Award - Indigenous. Thank you! |
Kind regards, LorriBrown ( talk) 20:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hey, so I've noticed that you keep undoing my actions. I've also seen that you asked for more info and I have provided. It just seems to me that you don't want to keep her page because she hasn't done anything after the series. However, most houseguests with an actual page have done less than she has. Let me know what you want from me so the page can be kept. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryrymitchell ( talk • contribs) 01:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
She does, she wasn't just on Big Brother, she was on The Challenge as well, and on multiple small reality shows as well. Maybe we can give another reviewer a shot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryrymitchell ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you made the page Stephanie Cmar into a redirect to Top Chef: All-Stars L.A. because "no notability outside show". I was wondering why you thought this was the case. The page clearly showed that she was a contestant on two other seasons of Top Chef (ie. not just notable for one event/one season of Top Chef). There are many sources referring to Cmar (albeit, not cited in the previous version of the article) that predate Top Chef: All-Stars L.A. by several years. Boston Magazine 2014 Article/ Other Boston Magazine 2014 Article, 2016 Eater article, 2014 NYT article supporting that Cmar competed in Top Chef season 10, 2017 Mic Article supporting Cmar's notability for Top Chef season 11 calling her "one of the most screwed-over contestants in show history". I could list more, but I don't want to overwhelm you.
I appreciate that your editing is bold, but I think that in light of the existence of such sources it doesn't make sense to have Cmar redirect to Top Chef: All-Stars LA. If you agree that the redirect is possibly inappropriate in light of these sources, I would be more than happy to go back and add the sources and their information to the article Samsmachado ( talk) 15:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I have recently created a page Neeraj Udhwani keeping all the guidelines in mind and doing so. So I think it will take much time to be reviewed by someone, so if you could help review it, I will be very thankful! Adnanjavidkhan1 ( talk) 10:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I went back to revert it from published to sandbox to fix several issues and it was gone. I have spent a couple of hours now and have learned much. I put this site in sandbox over a year ago and came back and pushed publish too quickly. Can I get this back in sandbox? Or do I need to start from scratch? Kanedbender ( talk) 19:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I saw you write somewhere that you're staying away from reviewing college sports bios. IMO the issue there is that the routine level of coverage for top players at the college level is basically indistinguishable from pro coverage for all but the most elite "changed the history of the sport" players. If GNG is supposed to approximate the level of coverage that makes a subject of encyclopedic, historical interest, the bar is set far too low for athletes. signed, Rosguill talk 02:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Onel5969, Thank you very much! for reviewing the
Emerging Filmmaker award page.
LorriBrown (
talk)
Hi Onel5969, Recently you have change the stub content of The Karski Report to a redirect to his author Claude Lanzmann arguing not WP:NFILM. I am not agree with your criteria, bc I think that the article meets the needed attributes for notability : "2. The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following: * Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release." --> There are non-trivial articles in "The Guardian" here, "The New Yorker" here, "Variety" here, "Indiwire" here, etc. The documentary was also projected at the Berlinale (Berlin film festival) , and at The Lincoln center. I know the article is just a stub now, and must grow maybe as the French equivalent fr:Le Rapport Karski (film), but the subject meets the notability criteria to have his own article. Could you please reconsider your decision and restore the stub content ? Thanks for your time to check it. Alexcalamaro ( talk) 08:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for making the recent edit on Ryan-Mark Parsons. There is some confusion, as I didn't want to reopen nomination for deletion discussion, as this has already taken place recently. There is a user who has created an account with the purpose to target and vandalise the page. They inserted the proposal for deletion. Do you have any advice on how to deal with this user who seems intent on targeting and vandalising the page? JPA24 ( talk) 12:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice. I'm trying to improve the article everyday and I can now see the user has made changes that I think are objective and overall improves the quality of the article. If you look at the page history and edit summaries, I'm sure you can agree there seems to be some kind of targeting taking place. Of course, I see many people edit this page, but never with the same fury behind some of the edits this user is making. Plus, you can see they created an account to initially blank the page, as it was protected, it wasn't possible to do this via IP editing. Even the edit history is bizarre, they have just made many changes and now reverted the edits, just seems very suspect. JPA24 ( talk) 13:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, what do you think /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zvi_Sever ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.12.180.134 ( talk) 21:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw that you took away an article about an album by Jett Rebel that I wrote. I don't really understand why this happened, since I followed all the guidelines? I'm always careful to follow the rules, and I'd like to learn how to prevent this from happening again. The image is legal and meets all requirements. Hopefully you can help me? thank you in advance!-- Esther Claassen ( talk) 18:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jett Rebel Live Forever Album cover 2019.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Jett Rebel Live Forever Album cover 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Thevidiya paiyan — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2409:4072:88D:2692:C5F9:76CB:7E56:A8CD (
talk)
12:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry Onel, but I've again found you making bad redirects. NiziU's Make You Happy topped various charts in Japan, Marie Ueda's Heartbreaker reached the top 40 of the charts in Japan and has enough news sources, as does the song " Basquiat" by Pentagon. Please be more careful redirecting sources with a majority of non-English language sources in future. You've done this before, and it really looks like because you don't understand those languages, you believe they must not be notable topics even when there's enough. I could be wrong, but I've said this to you before and this is again what it looks like. There are enough there on both to assert the releases' notability independent of their charting—even if, admittedly, the charting information was absent. The albums Dark Hearts by Annie and Album No. 8 by Katie Melua could have more news sources present on their articles, but each album is definitely notable. Both albums are out tomorrow (August 16), and Melua's album is guaranteed to chart based on her profile and past success, and even if it's not demonstrated on the article, I can see Annie's album has received extensive coverage in Norwegian media. These are definitely cases for Template:Sources exist. I don't wish to have an argument with you over whether you consider each to be notable because I'm not as active as I used to be, and also because I know you don't think they are notable—you redirected them. But if you disagree with my reverting you on each, the next step is AFD, not to re-revert and restore the redirect. I'm just asking you to be a bit more thorough or maybe do some searches for sources for the topics yourself in future. Maybe tag them with Template:Sources exist if you find the sources and don't want to add them yourself, instead of boldly redirecting so much. Thanks. Ss 112 16:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Onel5969:,
I noticed you added a citations needed reference to the top of the page of Homotopy associative algebra. I'm confused where the issue is. I've added plenty of citations in the article, so can you point to a location where you think there's a problem? Wundzer ( talk) 20:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
You don't seem to even understand. Pete Rock said on video that he's dropping PeteStrumentals 3 in December. If you didn't watch that video on youtube, you need to watch again. He gave out latest updates on his new project. So please stop with the reverts. smdfh Ceedub88 02:24, 15 October 2020
/info/en/?search=Teezio Acafix2 ( talk) 08:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
I actually think there is a lot of merit towards a new article, but it kind of needs a native French editor to go through the other cases and link them together. Maybe you can understand where I am coming from regarding that article. Cheers. Govvy ( talk) 15:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Page Title Wakoklon Heelel Thilel salai Amailon Pukok Puya is correct term. The name Wakoklon Heelel Thilen salai Amailon Pukok Puya is not a proper term as there is spelling difference between Thilel and Thilen. Afingba Mangang ( talk) 17:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
I told you before Pete is dropping PeteStrumentals 3 in DECEMBER!!!. i would greatly appreciated if you would PLEASE STOP WITH REVERTS!! Pete already gave out the good news on his upcoming project. OK. thank you!!!! Ceedub88 17:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
(Per WP:DABMENTION) https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Fairview_Drive&oldid=983048076
![]() |
Was perusing edit histories and saw your name again, thrilled to see that you're back! Keep up the good work. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 06:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. I'm not aware of my edits ever being "reviewed" in the past several years, and now it's becoming an almost common occurrence. Still, over a dozen articles at once is very unusual. What does this "reviewing" consist of? I honestly have no idea. Thanks for explaining. Arminden ( talk) 23:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi please review this page Dulhan (Drama) Kaleem Bhatti Talk 14:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. You ask for additional sources. Please tell me, which sentence or part of the article exactly needs additional sources. A general statement like this does not make sense. Thank you, -- Gereon K. ( talk) 15:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
It seems to me that based on the [ [1]] an article shouldn't be moved to the Draft namespace if someone is actively working on it. It seems pretty clear in the edit history that the article was under progress by myself. Why did you decide to move it to Drafts without contacting me? -- ZeiP ( talk) 12:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I would prefer Nanya not being merged under their "parent" company, as they do completely different things and operate in different industries. That would be like merging merill lynch under BofA, or JP morgan under JS morgan & co. Keiichi88 ( talk) 05:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
I dont mean to further increase your burden when youre already busy, so there's no need to hurry on this, but ...
is it really possible that a company worth over $250 million could fail WP:GNG? I am really surprised. I think we are in the age now where brick-and-mortar stores are no longer the best measure of a company's size. After all, an online retailer may well have no physical stores at all. But I trust your judgment.
Best regards,
— Soap — 22:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, this article was reviewed three months ago. If you feel the article warrants speedy deletion or a redirect, please go through the normal procedure and nominate it as such. Thank you. Larry Dunn ( talk) 03:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ruchira Panda, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's a lot more sources this time, making it sufficiently different to need to go back to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 09:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hey! I saw that you reviewed some of my articles, thank you very much. I added sources to Nittany Lion Wrestling Club and everything that appears in the article can now be found in the them. Should I remove the template message? Thanks. PabloLikesToWrestle ( talk) 14:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
I saw you PRODded this; the creator removed it. I have also had some issues with the article. I don't know if I support deletion since I haven't looked at all the sources, but I suppose AfD is the next step. If you go that route, please ping me. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 15:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
hello sir/mdm i am not angry at you, but i felt discouraged. the three articles i created are nominated for deletion, including the nonoi murder and the kovan double murders which you nominated. the third was the death of darren ng wei jie.
i only started out a newcomer this year. i am thinking should i continue as a editor of wikipedia since my articles got nominated for deletion within a short time since creation, having thought of those articles that stayed for a long time but never get nominated for deletion
i felt depressed because the effort i put in in creating a new article seem to amount to nothing the moment it is deleted i really feel i should voice out to you at least, because i want to let you know how i feel. i really feel depressed about it, even feel like despising myself for being incapable. i am sorry. NelsonLee20042020 ( talk) 16:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, One15969. I have read your response. I think what you said was right. Your encouragement and what you said about learning from the negative criticisms, I understand what you mean and felt better thinking about it. Thank you, it is great talking to you. I got to hear helpful advice from you. NelsonLee20042020 ( talk) 02:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969! I've improved Thomas Reynolds (priest) since your last visit. If you want to give it a look... -- Clementeste( Talk) 09:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
You have reviewed and said this page would be deleted. Wendy Bain is a working actress and screen writer in Los Angeles - married to Sam Bain - what more does this page need in order to remain? Could you let me know in layman’s terms please. Noam25 ( talk) 14:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I see you reverted my change of the Solidago lateriflora redirect page. I was trying to change the redirect to a DAG because Solidago lateriflora was first used by Linnaeus in 1753 to define what is now named Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. Later, the name was used by Raf. from non-published material of DC. to describe Solidago caesia. Without the official full taxonomic names that include the authors, Solidago lateriflora is ambiguous. Using Solidago lateriflora to redirect to Solidago caesia is correct but not complete -- it leaves out the also correct basionym of Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. I think a DAG is in order, but perhaps I did this incorrectly. Could you help me out? It is my first DAG and I studied the different instructional pages before making the changes. Thank you in advance. -- Eewilson ( talk) 06:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Slashme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Trend Receiver, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Slashme ( talk) 13:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks for reviewing the new page British Phycological Society. Much appreciated!-- MerielGJones ( talk) 14:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the page of Franklin Cudjoe. Unfortunately there were a few issues related to copyright infringement. Some of the things are names of institutions, companies and titles which can't actually be changed. Furthermore the issues raised on the article has been rechecked and so I suggest you review it again and crosscheck. The article is a needed one for Wikipedia GH and shouldnt be deleted due to the issues raised. Issues relating to the article should be pointed out for furhter correction and review. Thanks. Ampimd ( talk) 22:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. Is there any particular reason why you decided to delete the University of Western Australia Law School page and replace it with a redirect to the main page for the University of Western Australia? Among the Group of Eight universities, the other seven law schools have their own Wikipedia pages, as do countless other law schools worldwide, so I don't see what you found objectionable about this specific page. -- Drevolt ( talk) 23:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my initial work to create a new page for MDA Corporation. Many of the previous MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates assets that were acquired in 2017 through an RTO to become Maxar have been repatriated to the newly formed Canadian firm MDA Corporation. Now both companies exist and they are indeed separate entities with different offerings. I am going to revert your undo and start to build out a proper page for MDA Corporation. Brantzmyers ( talk) 01:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
I was going to ask WP:RM to rename this as an uncontroversial move, but I noticed you have already reverted the editor Cassidd's creation of this article – be aware that they've simply recreated it at They Call Us Au Go-Go Singers (album). There doesn't seem much point asking for it to be renamed without the disambiguator, or to create a double redirect – not sure what the best plan of action here is. I've noticed this editor seems to be creating as many articles related to Stephen Stills as they can, and many of them are of dubious notability. Richard3120 ( talk) 20:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
|
Thank you for your reviews! :) Neopeius ( talk) 00:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you so much for your reviews on my new wikipedia articles! Hope that I am able to contribute more to the Wikipedia in a resourceful manner. :) -- Aleyamma38 ( talk) 10:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
Aleyamma38 - no worries. Welcome to Wikipedia. Onel5969 TT me 21:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC) onel5969 - Thanks a lot Sir/Madam -- Aleyamma38 ( talk) 11:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
No problem from me if you want to delete Walter Adam Lawson. Leveni ( talk) 23:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of OroraTech, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it has real encyclopedic value: The described company is the only private endeavor (in Europe, if not worldwide) to approach the issue of wildfire detection from space; which is subject to scientifical discussion since many years, and also objective of several public space programs (ESA, NASA). Relevance is further underlined by funding for the company from such agencies. Granted, phrasing is a bit press release-like, but I should be able to fix this. -- MultiPolitikus ( talk) 20:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, I hope this message finds you well! I saw that you reverted my redirect/move for Piperia elegans (to Platanthera elegans) earlier. I wonder if we could just discuss it a bit? The Wikipedia page for Piperia is already a redirect to Platanthera (because the former is now considered a synonym of the latter), so I thought I would just move Piperia elegans to Platanthera elegans. Looking through the pages for the other former Piperia species, however, it seems that none of them reflect the genus change. If I moved all the former Piperias to their respective Platanthera pages to ensure uniformity, would that address your objection, or is there another issue? I am also working on hopefully expanding the pages for the former Piperias, if that helps. Best regards, JadeSpire ( talk) 22:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)