Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
William C. Rader has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Leuqarte (
talk)
03:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
It looks like you may have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia, at
William C. Rader. Please do not add such material without permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. —
C.Fred (
talk)
03:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Your edit summary questioning the accuracy of our article on William C. Rader
Hello Oldy2. If there is material in this article that you believe is incorrect, please explain. Everything in the article appears to be referenced to what Wikipedia considers to be reliable sources. For example, do you disagree with what the Los Angeles Times has reported about this doctor? We welcome your comments here to reduce as much as possible the chance that we will make errors in articles about living persons. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
William C. Rader has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Leuqarte (
talk)
03:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
It looks like you may have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia, at
William C. Rader. Please do not add such material without permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. —
C.Fred (
talk)
03:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Your edit summary questioning the accuracy of our article on William C. Rader
Hello Oldy2. If there is material in this article that you believe is incorrect, please explain. Everything in the article appears to be referenced to what Wikipedia considers to be reliable sources. For example, do you disagree with what the Los Angeles Times has reported about this doctor? We welcome your comments here to reduce as much as possible the chance that we will make errors in articles about living persons. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)